Title: Part I' Finescale structure of a cold front, as detected with a Wband radar
1Part I. Fine-scale structure of a cold front,as
detected with a W-band radar
- A cloud radar view of the May 24 Shamrock cold
front - Bart Geerts, Rick Damiani, Sam Haimov, Dave Leon,
and Tim Trudel - University of Wyoming
Toulouse IHOP workshop, June 2004
2Synoptic situation at 18 UTC on 24 May 2002,
based on the ETA initialization. Equivalent
potential temperature (color field) and winds
(blue, a full barb equals 10 kts) at 900 mb, sea
level pressure (yellow contours), and 300 mb
geopotential height (red contours).
321 Z
18 Z
GOES 8 visible satellite image, operational
surface observations, and subjective frontal
analysis Black line shows location of dropsonde
transect
4Dropsonde transect (2022-2057 UTC)
q,q
qe, RH
55/24, 2107 UTC, view towards SE
61942 UTC
AMA
1952
UWKA
N
1943
cold front
cold front
dryline
dryline
WCR up-looking, flight level 165 m
7(No Transcript)
8164
344
flight level 165 m
W
stratus clouds
breaking K-H waves
Cold frontal propagation speed 7 m/s - this
corresponds with
11 aspect ratio
2002_05_24_2029 UTC
9Dual-Doppler synthesis
- Radial data corrected for aircraft motion
- Actual angles used to estimate (u,w) at various
ranges below the aircraft. - (u,w) redistributed on Cartesian grid (30m x 30m)
(not all vectors are shown) - Some data points are eliminated based on
noisepower ratio, not on local velocity
variance vectors are not filtered or smoothened - Vertical velocities are adjusted for insect
motion (Geerts and Miao 2004, JTech) with a
maximum adjustment of /- 1.5 m/s - Streamlines and vorticities are based on filtered
(u,w)
single up
dual down
10(No Transcript)
11q
q
2300 m
stable layer
dryline 1.5 km to the right
2002_05_24_1958 UTC
11 aspect ratio front-relative flow
12Triple point transect
King Air
2012
cold front _at_2009
2007
cold front
Flight level 2300 m AGL
dryline
NNW 344
frontal motion
SSE 164
front dryline
moist air
cold air
132002_05_24_2009 UTC
11 aspect ratio front-relative flow
14vertical velocity
horizontal vorticity
2002_05_24_2009 UTC
11 aspect ratio
15q and q at flight level (1000 m)
q
reflectivity and streamlines
Flight-level updraft max 9.8 m/s, 500 m average
4.6 m/s
vertical velocity
horizontal vorticity
11 aspect ratio front-relative flow
2002_05_24_2024 UTC
162002_05_24_2024 UTC
2002_05_24_2054 UTC
reflectivity and streamlines
17reflectivity and streamlines
horizontal vorticity (colors)
vertical velocity (contours)
2002_05_24_2024 UTC
2002_05_24_2054 UTC
18(No Transcript)
19May 24 findings
- Leading edge of cold front appears as a density
current with nose, head, rear-to-front inflow
current and front-to-rear acceleration over the
front, as observed in lab experiments (e.g.
Simpson) and as numerically simulated (e.g. Xue
et al 1997) - Vertical transects of GC head highly variable in
slope/depth, but consistently associated with a
strong updraft 500 m wide. This frontal updraft
did not light the fire because something else
(dryline? frontogenetic circulation? ) already
had. - Large amounts of vorticity is baroclinically
generated vorticity and quickly breaks up,
resulting in large-amplitude K-H billows that
evolve into lee-type gravity waves.
20Part II vertical structure of the fair-weather
continental convective boundary layer vertical
velocity and insect flight behavior
characteristics of echo plumes (thermals?)
- Bart Geerts and Qun Miao
- Department of Atmospheric Science
- University of Wyoming
- Acknowledgement Peggy LeMone, NCAR
Toulouse IHOP workshop, June 2004
21mid-level flight, radar looking up down
29 May 02
aspect ratio 21
22Low-level flight, radar looking up
aspect ratio 41
23Thermodaynamic BL depth corresponds well with the
WCR-inferred one
24Note the prevalence of downdrafts
CBL top
aspect ratio 21
25Development of the CBL (14 June BLE flight)
aspect ratio 11
26Echo plumes tend to be associated with updrafts
r 0.39
27WCR velocity spectrum corresponds with the gust
probe spectrum, but high frequencies (lt100 m) are
dominated by noise
- - wa (gust probe) accurately describes
atmospheric turbulence - the average wa may be off (integration error)
- -gt leg-mean wa values are set to zero
28WCR vertical velocities show a clear downward
bias at all levels
29This downward bias is stronger in strong
updrafts
radar
average of first gate above and first gate below
the aircraft
gust probe
30This updraft-dependent bias does not exist in
the ice-filled CBL over warm water
IHOP
Lake Michigan cold-air outbreak
31Analysis method average all WCR velocities in
each wa bin over 1 minute (1500 profiles)
IHOP
Lake Michigan cloud streets
32(No Transcript)
33bias vs vertical air motion on 3 days
Note - average bias 0.45 m/s - bias
increases with updraft strength, almost linearly
- the slope is almost 50 ! - wa
distribution is positively skewed (LeMone 1990)
34This bias appears to be largely independent of
- Height in the CBL
- Echo strength
- Time of day
35Radar should give air vertical motion, thus we
correct for insect opposition
Average regression, for three days
Or
Thus the corrected radar vertical velocity is
uncorrected
36Insect opposition to updrafts
- The cloud radar detects mainly micro-insects in
the continental CBL - Micro-insects are weak flyers (aerial plankton,
Russell and Wilson 1997) - Micro-insect dispersal, necessary to find new
feeding and breeding grounds, occurs during the
daytime - Dispersal is more effective by opposing updrafts
(longer suspension time) - The traditional entomological theory is that
micro-insects slow or stop their wingbeat due to
low temps in the upper CBL, since insects are
poikilotherms - This theory does not fly since none of the temp
thresholds was reached - A simple numerical model shows that the updraft
opposition theory produces high insect
concentrations (strong echoes) in sustained
updrafts. The temperature control theory produces
weaker echoes, and they occur to the side of the
updrafts. - Radar fine-lines and other echo plumes in the CBL
thus are an indication of the sustained nature of
sfc convergence and updrafts
37Adjusted radar vertical velocities
original
corrected
Echo plumes correspond with updrafts The vertical
velocity is skewed
38Stronger plumes correspond with stronger updrafts
(more buoyant thermals ??)
39Conditional sampling echo plumes have a mean
reflectivity gt1dBZ above the background mean
40Height (m)
TIME (UTC)
Reflectivity (dBZ)
41Plume width and spacing
42May 29 western track plume statistics
43Plume thermodynamic properties variation with
height in the CBL
q
w
q
qv
44Plume characteristics (May 29, June 6, June 17)
- Plume width is highly variable, about 500-700 m
- Plume spacing is 2-3 times larger
- About 20-25 of the CBL is considered plume
- In these plumes,
- q is positive and maximum in the upper CBL
(.5-.7 g/kg) - Updrafts occur (wgt0), maximum at mid- to
upper-levels (about 1 m/s) - qv is positive except in the upper CBL, where it
is usually negative. qv 0.2K at low-mid levels
in the CBL.
45Stronger plumes smaller fraction of CBL,
stronger updraft, higher buoyancy
w 0.7 m/s
q 0.25 g/kg
20 of CBL
1
qv 0.3 K
q 0.2 K
May 29, 2002 10 flight legs
46Plume strength and thermodynamic properties, two
other days water vaporpotential
temperaturebuoyancy,vertical velocity
47Conclusions
- The CBL reflectivity field is dominated by
well-defined plumes, most of which penetrate to
the CBL top. These plumes tend to be associated
with updrafts. - The scatterers in the CBL (small insects) tend to
oppose updrafts. This opposition increases with
updraft strength. This explains the existence of
echo plumes and radar fine-lines in an
otherwise well-mixed layer. - Aircraft and radar data confirm that updrafts are
generally stronger but more confined than
downdrafts. - Echo plumes have the characteristics of thermals
- Positive water vapor anomaly, increasing with
height - Positive buoyancy except at upper levels
- Updrafts peaking aloft
48Echoes are passive tracers? simple dispersal
49Dead particle scenarioEchoes fall at a constant
speed
50Temperature control scenario insects fall like
dead particles above 0.7 zi
51Updraft opposition scenario
52Correlation between vertical velocity and insect
concentration
dead particles
passive tracers
temperature threshold
updraft opposition