SAMPLE SPS SUMMARY REPORT

1
SAMPLE SPS SUMMARY REPORT SIMULATION
PATENTS APPLICATIONS TECHNOLOGICAL
INFRASTRUCTURE KEY ACTORS (ORGANIZATIONS
INVENTORS) OPPORTUNITES FOR STRATEGIES,
RESOURCE PLANNING, COLLABORATION, SYNERGY, TECH
TRANSFER, RECRUITMENT, PARTNERING, PLUS OTHER
PRESENTED BY THE STRATEGIC PATENT STUDIES
PROGRAM (SPS) OF CWW INC 113 QUEEN
ST ALEXANDRIA, VIRGINIA PHONE [phone]
E-MAIL cwwinc_at_aol.com
CAN BE EXPANDED OR MODIFIED TO FIT CLIENT NEEDS
OR REQUESTS
2
PURPOSE THIS PRESENTATION
SUMMARIZE THE COMPREHENSIVE INTERACTIVE
PACKAGE FOR ALL PATENTS CONTAINING THE TRUNCATED
KEYWORD SIMULAT IN ALL PATENT ABSTRACTS Y2000
Y2006 NOW AVAILABLE FOR PURCHASE
3
WHAT DOES THE PACKAGE DO?

• 1. ANSWERS THESE QUESTIONS IN CONVENIENT SUMMARY
  DATA BASES
• WHAT WAS DONE/INVENTED ?
• WHO OWNS THE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS ?
• WHO WERE THE INVENTORS ?
• WHERE WERE THE INVENTIONS MADE ?
• WHAT TECHNOLOGIES WERE EMPLOYED ?
• 2. PROVIDES INTERACTIVE FULL TEXT DATA BASES
  CLASSIFIED INTO 16 CATEGORIES WITH UNLIMITED
  ABILITY FOR USERS TO SELECTIVELY SEARCH AND
  REVIEW ANY ITEMS OF INTEREST BY CATEGORY OR IN
  FULL TEXT
• 3. PROVIDES AN EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF SELECTED
  TRENDS AND KEY POINTS
• 4. PROVIDES INSTRUCTIONS ON HOW TO USE THE
  CONTENTS

4
PACKAGE CONTENTS
SEARCHABLE FULL TEXT TABLE
SERIES OF SPECIAL ANALYTICAL TABLES COMPARING
YEAR TO YEAR
PATNUMBER UNIQUE NUMBER ASSIGNED BY PATENT OFFICE
UPON AWARD
INVENTORS INVENTOR NAMES ADDRESSES/ EMPLOYERS/
TITLES/ PATNUMBERS/ COUNTS OF PATENTS BY YEAR
CATEGORY 16 CUSTOMIZED SUBJECT CATEGORIES
ASSIGNED BY ANALYSIS STAFF
ASSIGNEES ASSIGNEE NAME/ ADDRESS/
PATNUMBER/COUNTS OF PATENTS BY YEAR
TEXT FULL TEXT WITH RECORDS HAVING 1/1 RELATION
TO ORIGINAL TEXT OF THE PATENT OFFICE DOCUMENT
TITLES INTEGRATED FOR ALPHABETICAL OR KEY WORD
SEARCHES REFERENCED TO YEAR/PATNUMBER
TECHNOLOGY INFRASTRUCTURE TABLES ASSIGNED
APPLICATION CATEGORIES/ PATENT CLASSES,
SUB-CLASSES, SUB-SUB CLASSES TO LEVEL 6 OF THE
TECHNICAL HIEARCHIAL STRUCTURES WITH COMPARATIVE
COUNTS AT ALL LEVELS BY YEAR
5
PACKAGE CONTENTS - CONTINUED
INCLUDES ALL PATENTS FOR Y2000 - Y2006
6056 PATENTS IN FULL TEXT 6056 PATENT NUMBERS
THE KEY MEANS OF LINKING ANALYSES 2176 ASSIGNEE
COMPANIES/ORGANIZATIONS 7980 INDIVIDUAL INVENTORS
BY LOCATION 6056 PATENT TITLES ____ TECHNICAL
APPLICATION CATEGORIES 366 TECHNOLOGY
CLASSES 3229TECHNOLOGY SUB-CLASSES TO THE 1ST
HIEARCHIAL LEVEL 14939 TECHNOLOGY SUB-SUB CLASSES
TO THE 2ND HIEARCHIAL LEVEL 20514 TECHNOLOGY
SUB-SUB CLASSES TO THE 6TH HIEARCHIAL LEVEL 4.4
MILLION LINES OF TEXT
6
TRENDS TOTAL AWARDS PATENTS ISSUED BY YEAR
Awards Have Shown Steady Overall Increasing
Trend Large Exception Was Dip In 1992 With Sharp
Rebound In 1993 Overall Outlook Should Expect
Continued Increase Next Several Years
7
TRENDS ASSIGNEES CONCENTRATION BY PERCENTILE
The Number of Assignees Is Highly Dispersed, With
Less Than 10 of Assignees Accounting for the Top
25 of Awards Over 80 of Assignees Account for
50 of Awards Analysis Shows These Assignees to
Be Dispersed Among Many Industries As Well
8
TRENDS ASSIGNEES TOP 25 COMPANIES BY YEAR
This and the Next Page Rank the Top 25 Assignees
for Each Year Based Upon Total Awards Note That
There Is Significant Variation Among the
Companies and Their Rankings From Year to Year
(Comments Continued on Next Page)
9
TRENDS ASSIGNEES TOP 25 COMPANIES BY YEAR -
CONTINUED
Note That the Ratio of Total Awards Accounted for
by the Top 25 Assignees Is Steadily
Increasing Consolidation Among Major Global
Industries May Be the Major Driver of This Trend.
Nevertheless Control of Simulation Estates Is
Likely to Continue Consolidating
10
TRENDS ASSIGNEES TOP 25 LOCATIONS BY YEAR
This table shows the annual ranking of the top 25
states in which awards were given Note the
gradual geographic concentration but with the
exception of California and Japan there are
significant variations from year to year.
11
TRENDS INVENTORS CONCENTRATION BY PERCENT OF
INVENTORS
The 7980 Set of Individual Inventors Has Shown a
Relatively Stable Trend in Terms of the
Percentages by Percentile This Reflects a
Significant Diffusion of the Technologists That
Are Producing the Actual Inventions
12
TRENDS INVENTORS CONCENTRATION BY NUMBER OF
INVENTORS
This Chart Reflects the Same Overall Trend Shown
in the Previous Distribution Providing the
Breakdowns by Numbers of Inventors Vs the Ratio
by Percentile The Key Point Is That in Terms of
Absolute Numbers, the Last 2 Years Show Growing
Dispersion
13
TRENDS INVENTORS CONCENTRATION LOCATION OF
INVENTION
While the Numbers of Inventors Show Such
Dispersion, the Geographic Distributions Are
Highly Concentrated The Implication Is That
Geographic Centers of Technological Capabilities
Are Significant and Relatively Stable.
14
TRENDS INVENTORS TOP 25 INVENTORS BY YEAR
This table summarizes the number of inventors and
the percentage of total patents for which they
accounted on a year to year basis. The table
continues on the next page
15
TRENDS INVENTORS TOP 25 INVENTORS BY YEAR
-CONTINUED
16
TRENDS INVENTORS TOP 25 INVENTORS BY YEAR
-CONTINUED
17
TRENDS TECHNOLOGIES CONCENTRATION TECHNICAL
CLASSES BY PERCENTILE/YEAR
18
TRENDS TECHNOLOGIES TOP 25 CLASSES BY YEAR
NEXT THREE SLIDES
The next three slides show the rankings for the
top 25 technical classes involved in the
technological structure by year. ( two years per
slide) The second column of each year shows the
number of patents for the class for the year
the top two lines show the number and percentage
of patents accounted for by the top 25 classes vs
the number of total patents for the year. The
third column provides the descriptive title of
the class
19
TRENDS TECHNOLOGIES TOP 25 CLASSES BY YEAR
20
TRENDS TECHNOLOGIES TOP 25 CLASSES BY YEAR
21
TRENDS TECHNOLOGIES TOP 25 CLASSES BY YEAR
22
GUIDES FOR USING THE PACKAGE DATA BASES PROVIDED
Microsoft Access

• FIVE SETS OF CUSTOMIZED DATA BASES ARE PROVIDED
• ALL SPECIALIAL ANALYTICAL DBs DERIVED FROM THE
  FULL TEXT DB
• Assignees Set (Owners of the Intellectual
  Property)
• Inventors Set (Individuals Who Actually Developed
  the Technology and Invention)
• Titles ( The Title Assigned by the Inventor(s) to
  Their Patent Application and Descriptions)
• Technologies ( the Technological Disciplines and
  Sub-disciplines in the Hierarchies Assigned by
  the Patent Office Examiners )
• For the Primary Technical Classifications on
  Which the Invention Rests Directly
• For the Referenced Related Classifications
  Employed in Searching for Infringements I.E. The
  Overall Legality of Issuing the Patent
• For the Combined Primary and Referenced
  Classifications Integrated Into a Total
  Technological Infrastructure Defining the
  Technologies Upon Upon Which the Patent Was
  Developed and Which Were Advanced Thereby
• Full Text ( the Full Text of All Patents
  Containing the Truncated Term Simulat in Their
  Abstracts)

23
GUIDES FOR USING THE PACKAGE DATA BASES
PREPROGRAMMED AIDES PROVIDED Microsoft Access

• THERE ARE TWO TYPES OF PRESET AIDES
• QUERIES LOCATED IN THE DATA BASE UNDER QUERIES
• A series of queries related to the data base
  title and number with brief descriptions of what
  each will do. A click on the relevant query
  opens the data base and positions the fields
  considered most relevant
• FORMS.
• Three forms which provide capability to review
  sets of fields that contain too much information
  for intelligible reading field by field . The
  forms place the information into a preset order
  and reflect the total of each field in vertical
  sequence like reading pages of a report.

24
GUIDES FOR USING THE PACKAGE ASSIGNEE DATA BASES
Assignee 2 by patent numbers lists 5144
individual assignees names, address and patent
numbers Review by Query - Assignee 2 Review
Individual Assignees With Patnumber,
Address Assignee 3 summarizes awards by
individual assignees (2360) by the location where
the award was applied for and made I.e. the same
company or organization may have applied from
more than one location. This will show the number
of awards by year by that location Review by
query - Assignee 3 Review Invidiual Assignees By
Location Sum By Years Assignee 4 summarizes
awards at the overall company level (2176
companies) for all awards including those to
multiple locations Review by Query - Assignee 4
Review Assignees Sum By Company By Year
Notes The queries are designed to facilitate
direct reviews of the data. To get to them open
the Data Base Simulation Analyses 2000-2006 and
check the queries box. Place cursor on the
desired query and the data base will be opened
with fields in a suggested order. Any field can
be filtered or sorted as desired (for example
assignees can be organized by name, by location,
or by numbers of awards per year or for all
years. Users may open the data bases directly and
make their own queries or review the data
directly as they wish. These same notes apply to
all subsequent data base references
25
GUIDES FOR USING THE PACKAGE INVENTOR DATA BASES
Inventor 2 List By Name, Address, Patent Number
Query - Inventor 2 Review Individual Inventors
By Address, Patnumber Inventor 3 Unique List
Inventors Sum By Year Number of Patents in
Which Each Inventor Participated Query - Inventor
3 Review Sum Awards By Inventor, Address Sum By
Year Inventor 4 Integrating Inventor,assignee,tit
le, Pat Number, Yr This Table Is the
Integrating Table for All Information About Each
Individual Inventor Except the Technological
Structures Within Which He/she Worked (See
Technological Data Bases for This Additional
Integration) Query - Inventor 4 Review Individual
Inventors By Patnum And Titles Form 4 - Inventor
4 View Inventor, Assignee,title By Patnum And
Year Inventor 5 Main Inventors Listed By Year
These Are the Individual Inventors Who Can Be
Considered As the Leaders of the Team or As Sole
Individual Inventors for a Patent The Number of
Patents in Which Each Person Was the Main
Inventor Are Summed by Year Query - Inventor 5
Review Main Inventors By Name, Sum Of Each
Year Inventor 6 List Main Inventors By Pat
Number, Year Of Patent Details Above Table by
Pat Number and the Year of the Patent Query
Inventor 6 Review Main Inventors With Patnumbers
By Year and Form 6 Inventor 7 Summary Of State
Invention Made Sum By Year This Summarizes the
States in Which the Inventions Were Developed by
Year References Are to the States in Which the
Inventors Registered Themselves, Giving a Clear
Picture of Geographic Areas in Which Actual
Development Work Took Place Query Inventor 7
Review Number Patents Issued In Each State By Year
26
GUIDES FOR USING THE PACKAGE TITLE DATA BASES
Titles 2 List All Titles By Patent Number Review
by Query - Title 2 Review Titles By Patnum
27
GUIDES FOR USING THE PACKAGE TECHNOLOGICAL DATA
BASES
Tech 3c List Class Sum By Year - Sums Number
Patents Within Each Technical Class by
Year Review by Query - Tech 3c All Sum Awards At
Class Level By Year Without Patnumber Tech 3c2
All List Classes Sum By Year With Patnumbers
Use to review the above list with patent numbers
added combined into a single field can filter to
get all classes employed to support a given
patent or set of patents Review by Query - Tech
3c2 All Sum Classes By Year With Patnum Tech 3d
All List Technical Structure Without Patents Sum
By Year Use to review total tech stricture
including subclasses with summary of number
patents employing the classes and each level of
subclass by year Review by Query - Tech 3d All
Review Sum Total Tech Structure Without
Patents Tech 3d2 Structure With
Patnumbers/assignees,inventors,titles The fully
integrated data base defining assignees,
inventors, titles and full technical structure to
subclass levels Review by Form - Tech 3d2
Strucutre With Patnumbers/assignees,inventors,titl
es Tech 3e All Total Class Structures For Active
Classes Review by Query - Tech 3e All Review
Total Struc Active Classes Tech 3x List Total
Strucutes For All Classes Review by Query - Tech
3x Review Total Tech Struc All Classes Noted For
Sim
28
GUIDES FOR USING THE PACKAGE THE FULL TEXT
DATABASE

• The full text data base provides total patent
  information as it appears in the files of the
  U.S. Patent office
• There are five fields
• Rowall simply a numeric field to permit anytime
  return to the original order of the records
  since this is the order in which the patents are
  read
• Patnum the notation of the patent number
  related to each line of text within the patent
  permits filtering by one or a set of patnumbers
  which may be marked for review
• Category a customized coding of each line
  within the patent documentation which permits
  filtered reviews for the various categories I.e.
  Patnumber, Main Inventor, Title, Abstract,
  Inventors, Assignees, Application Number, Date
  Filed, Current U.S. Classes (The Primary
  References), International Classes, Field of
  Search (Referenced Classes having indirect
  relationship to the patent), References to other
  patents to which the current patent is related,
  Primary Patent Office Examiner, Assistant
  Examiner, Claims Made for what the patent does,
  Government Interests (agencies of government have
  interest in the intellectual property,
  Description (all other information placed under
  the non-standard headings used in the application
  usually as designated by the combination of
  patent guidelines and inventors or applicants
  choice.
• Text full line by line narrative as shown in
  the patent document

29
GUIDES FOR USING THE PACKAGE THE FULL TEXT
DATABASE - CONTINUED
Best way to review is to open the data base
(about 4,452,822 lines) and program search by all
categories or within any field ( can be by word
or number or phrase or name or any other
descriptive definition one might wish to review
in toto as they are reading through the full
text Given the size of this Data Base, it will
be more efficeint to seek the information within
the analytical DBs if they will yield what is
desired.