DOES MOTIVATIONAL INTERVIEWING HELP DECREASE BMI IN OVERWEIGHT ADOLESCENTS - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 23
About This Presentation
Title:

DOES MOTIVATIONAL INTERVIEWING HELP DECREASE BMI IN OVERWEIGHT ADOLESCENTS

Description:

Background: No primary pediatric care office interventions have ... Steptoe A, Kerry S, Rink E, Hilton S. American Journal of Public Health 2001;91(2):265-269 ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:69
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 24
Provided by: amaliagu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: DOES MOTIVATIONAL INTERVIEWING HELP DECREASE BMI IN OVERWEIGHT ADOLESCENTS


1
DOES MOTIVATIONAL INTERVIEWING HELP DECREASE BMI
IN OVERWEIGHT ADOLESCENTS?
  • Amalia Guardiola, MD
  • Pediatric Joint Primary Care Fellow
  • University of Texas Houston Health Science Center

2
Abstract
  • Background No primary pediatric care office
    interventions have been proven effective to treat
    childhood or adolescent obesity. Motivational
    interviewing (MI) is a brief counseling technique
    that appears promising as an intervention to
    change adolescent behavior its usefulness in
    adolescent obesity has not been reviewed.
  • Objective To systematically review the
    literature on MI and adolescent obesity.
  • Methods PubMed (National Library of Medicine)
    and the Cochrane Library databases were
    systematically searched for relevant articles.
    The following Medical Subject Headings (MeSH)
    were included MI, childhood obesity, obesity,
    motivational counseling, brief intervention, and
    overweight. PubMed searches were limited to
    humans, and English only. Inclusion criteria
    randomized controlled trials (RCT), systematic
    reviews of RCTs of MI in children for any
    behavior and randomized controlled trials,
    systematic reviews of RCTs and observational
    studies of MI in obesity all ages.

3
Abstract
  • Summary of Results A total of 75 articles were
    found, of which 10 met the inclusion criteria.
    There were two Cochrane reviews, one
    observational study, one systematic review, one
    review of literature, one RCT of brief
    intervention and children, one clinical trial in
    adults, and 3 RCT of MI and adult obesity. MI has
    been shown to have a modest effect in changing
    behavior of adolescents about substance use,
    diabetes, dietary adherence, contraceptive use,
    and HIV/AIDS prevention as well as changing
    lifestyle in adults. There were no studies
    addressing the use of MI in adolescent obesity.
  • Conclusions MI has a modest effect in modifying
    behavior in adolescents. It has been shown to be
    effective in adults. It may be promising as an
    intervention to change adolescent lifestyle and
    help decrease BMI in adolescents. Clinical trials
    of MI in adolescent obesity are justified

4
Background
  • No primary pediatric care office interventions
    have been proven effective to treat childhood or
    adolescent obesity. Motivational interviewing
    (MI) is a brief counseling technique that appears
    promising as an intervention to change adolescent
    behavior. MI usefulness in adolescent obesity has
    not been reviewed

5
What is MI?
  • MI is a counseling technique that assists
    individuals in working through their ambivalence
    about behavior change. MI appears effective for
    individuals who are initially less ready to
    change. MI was initially developed to treat
    addictions and has increasingly been used to
    modify diet and physical activity behaviors. MI
    is based on the following concepts
  • individuals are more likely to accept and act
    upon behavior changes that are negotiated and
    not prescribed
  • encourages approach where patients feel
    comfortable expressing both the positive and
    negative aspects of any behavior
  • the patient is expected to do much of the work
    and talking
  • Some of the specific techniques include
    reflective listening, shared decision making,
    agenda setting, rolling with resistance, building
    discrepancy, and eliciting change talk.

6
Focused Question
  • Among obese adolescents 1318 years old, with
    BMI equal to or above the 85 percentile for age
    and gender, does motivational interviewing,
    compared to conventional counseling, decrease or
    stabilize BMI percentile?

7
Methods
  • Systematic review of published literature
  • Databases searched
  • PubMed (National Library of Medicine)- searched
    limited to humans and English only
  • Cochrane Library
  • Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) used
  • MI, childhood obesity, obesity, motivational
    counseling, brief intervention, and overweight
  • Other Methods
  • After relevant articles were identified a hand
    search of the references was performed

8
Methods (Cont.)
  • Inclusion criteria
  • Randomized controlled trial (RCT) and systematic
    reviews of RCTs of MI in children for any
    behavior
  • Randomized controlled trials, systematic reviews
    of RCTs and observational studies of MI in
    obesity in all ages

9
Summary of Results
  • A total of 75 articles were found, of which 10
    met the inclusion criteria
  • MI in Children
  • Cochran Review- Interventions for preventing
    obesity in children (1) Studies of children (
    under 18 years) that focused on combining dietary
    and physical activity approaches did not
    significantly improve BMI, but some studies that
    focused on dietary or physical activity
    approaches showed a small but positive impact on
    BMI status

10
Results (Cont.)
  • MI in Children
  • Randomized Controlled Trial- School-based
    interventions improve heart health in children
    with multiple cardiovascular disease risk factors
    (5) 422 children age 9 0.8 years with at least
    two CVD risk factors were randomly selected to
    receive either a classroom-based intervention in
    the 3rd and 4th grades or physical activity
    classes. Both interventions produced large
    reduction in cholesterol compared with a small
    drop in the controls. Both intervention groups
    had a small reduction in body fat and higher
    health knowledge.

11
Results (Cont.)
  • MI in Children
  • Systematic Review- Measurement of outcomes,
    mediators, and moderators in behavioral obesity
    prevention research (4) A systematic review of 17
    studies that used different measures (weight,
    skinfolds, behavioral scales, health knowledge,
    self-efficacy, etc.) to evaluate target behaviors
    (increase healthier choices in diet and physical
    activity, reduce saturated fat intake, etc.)
    found that the poor quality of measurements may
    be the cause of not detecting changes in the
    target outcome. It included children 6-14 years
    old.

12
Results (Cont.)
  • MI in Children
  • Observational Study- A brief motivational
    intervention to improve dietary adherence in
    adolescents (2) Adolescents aged 13-17 years that
    participated in the Dietary Intervention Study in
    Children (DISC) Research Group (N127) were
    selected to received motivational intervention of
    dietary change. Results showed mild decrease in
    the total of calories consumed by the
    participants as well as decrease in the amounts
    of calories from fat and total cholesterol
    consumed.

13
Results (Cont.)
  • MI in Children
  • Review of Literature- An integrative research
    review effective school-based childhood
    overweight interventions (3) Of the 10 articles
    reviewed, 8 found that social cognitive theory
    was stated or implied as an intervention for
    decreasing BMI or weight in children 4-14 years
    old. All of the studies showed statistically
    significant outcomes.

14
Results (Cont.)
  • MI in Adults
  • Cochran Review- Psychological interventions for
    overweight or obesity (6) Adults (18 years or
    older) who are overweight or obese benefit from
    psychological interventions, particularly
    behavioral and cognitive-behavioral strategies,
    to enhance weight reduction. Predominantly useful
    when combined with dietary and exercise strategies

15
Results (Cont.)
  • MI in Adults
  • Clinical Trial
  • Implementation of a primary care physician
    network obesity management program (7) Among
    adults, a 10 minute intervention delivered by the
    primary care physician was coupled with
    individual dietary counseling sessions delivered
    by a registered dietician via telephone. Patients
    completing 6 months in the program lost an
    average of 19 4 lb for women and 15.5 8.2 lb
    for men.

16
Results (Cont.)
  • MI in Adults
  • Randomized Controlled Trials
  • The impact of behavioral counseling on stage of
    change in fat intake, physical activity, and
    cigarette smoking in adults at increased risk of
    coronary heart disease. (8)Twenty general
    practices were randomized to lifestyle counseling
    by behavioral methods or to usual health
    promotion. 883 adult patients participated. Brief
    behavioral counseling based on advice matched to
    stages of change may be valuable in encouraging
    healthy lifestyles among patients in primary care
    at risk of cardiovascular disease.

17
Results (Cont.)
  • MI in Adults
  • Randomized Controlled Trials (Cont.)
  • Improving management of obesity in primary care
    cluster randomized trial (9) 44 general practices
    attending obese adult recruited 843 patients. A
    training package promoting a brief prescriptive
    approach to the treatment of obesity through
    lifestyle modification, intended to be
    incorporated into routine clinical practice, did
    not ultimately affect the weight of the
    participants.

18
Results (Cont.)
  • MI in Adults
  • Randomized Controlled Trials (Cont.)
  • MI to improve adherence to a behavioral
    weight-control program for older obese women with
    NIDDM A pilot study (10)Twenty-two older women
    (55-67 years old) with NIDDM were randomly
    assigned to a standard 16-week group behavioral
    weight-control program or the same group
    behavioral program with three individualized MI
    sessions added. The MI group significantly
    enhanced their adherence to the program
    recommendations and glycemic control. There was
    no difference is weight loss between the groups.

19
Discussion
  • Due to the small number of articles initially
    found during the literature search, the focused
    question was broadened to include MI in obesity
    in all ages.
  • Studies have shown that behavioral interventions
    are effective in changing childrens and
    adolescents behavior toward food and exercise.
  • Motivational interviewing is considered a
    behavioral brief intervention that can be
    performed by primary care physicians but training
    is required to apply this methodology.
  • Training for a physician can take from 18 hours
    to 2 days workshop followed by monthly
    reinforcement.

20
Discussion (Cont.)
  • Once learned, MI has been shown to have a modest
    effect in changing the behavior of adolescents
    about substance use, diabetes, dietary adherence,
    contraceptive use, and HIV/AIDS prevention as
    well as changing lifestyle in adults.
  • There were no studies specifically addressing the
    use of MI in adolescent obesity

21
Conclusions
  • MI has a modest effect in modifying behavior in
    adolescents. It has been shown to be effective in
    adults. It may be promising as an intervention to
    change adolescent lifestyle and help decrease BMI
    in adolescents. Clinical trials of MI in
    adolescent obesity are justified.

22
References
  • Summerbell CD, Waters E., Edmund LD, Kelly S,
    Brown T, Campbell KJ. The Cochrane Database of
    Systematic Reviews.2005, Issue 3
  • Berg-Smith SM, Stevens VJ, Brown KM, et al.
    Health education research 199914 (3)399-410
  • Cole K, Waldrop J, DAuria J, Garner H. Journal
    for specialists in pediatric nursing
    200611(3)166-177
  • Baranowski T, Klesges LM, Cullen KW, Himes JH.
    Preventive medicine 2004 (38)S1-S13
  • Harrell JS, Gansky SA, McMurray RG, et al.
    Pediatrics.1998102(2)371-380
  • Shaw K, ORourke P, Del Mar C, Kenardy J. The
    Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2005,
    Issue 2
  • Bowerman S, Bellman S, Saltsman P, et al. Obesity
    Research. 20019(4)321S-325S.
  • Steptoe A, Kerry S, Rink E, Hilton S. American
    Journal of Public Health 200191(2)265-269
  • Moore H, Summerbell CD, Greenwood DC, et al. BMJ
    2003 327 (8)1085-89
  • Smith DE, Heckemeyer CM, Kratt PP, Mason DA.
    Diabetes Care 199720 (1), 52-54

23
Acknowledgement
  • I would like to acknowledge my mentors Drs.
    Virginia Moyer and Mona Eissa for assistance with
    this project.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com