Homework Due March 3, before 3:30 pm - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 10
About This Presentation
Title:

Homework Due March 3, before 3:30 pm

Description:

Each sensor has three 120 degree sectors, numbered 0, 1 or 2 as shown on the previous ... (Hint: At least one node could be pruned). Problem 3: SharedPlans ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:13
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 11
Provided by: Milind8
Learn more at: http://teamcore.usc.edu
Category:
Tags: before | due | homework | march | pruned

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Homework Due March 3, before 3:30 pm


1
HomeworkDue March 3, before 330 pm
  • Based on readings in the syllabus
  • All questions carry equal points

2
Problem 1Learn more about DCSP Representation
3
Sensor DCSP
  • Each sensor has three 120 degree sectors,
    numbered 0, 1 or 2 as shown on the previous slide
  • Each sensor is controlled by one agent
  • The agent decides which of the sensors sectors
    to activate or to go into rotate mode
  • Rotate mode causes the sensor to repeatedly scan
    the three sectors
  • At any point in time, a sensor must have either
    one sector active or be in rotate mode, NOT BOTH
  • Tracking a target requires at least three sectors
    to be active from three different sensors (more
    than three does not hurt the tracking of the
    target)
  • A sensor cannot contribute to tracking by going
    into rotate mode
  • DONT WORRY ABOUT WEIRD GEOMETRY ON THE NEXT
    PROBLEM or STRANGE BOUNDARY CONDITIONS

4
Question 1
  • (a) Represent the problem1 as DCSP
  • Sensor agents as variables
  • Values 3 sectors, rotate-mode
  • What are the binary constraints?
  • (b) What is a solution if Target1 is seen
  • by Agent As sector 0 in Problem1?
  • Represent as assignment of DCSP values for
    variables
  • How many sensors allocated to Target1?

A
B
E
Target2
Target1
G
C
D
Problem 1 Parts a, b
Addition For Part c,d
5
Question 1
  • (c) If Additions extra sensors and target are
    also present
  • Solve the DCSP again (Using the same
    representation you used in Part a, but with
  • Sensors E and G added in)
  • Report on the results
  • Should the problem be solvable in principle?
  • (d) Represent the problem in part c as
  • a DCOP rather than a DCSP
  • Report on the possible optima
  • solutions to this DCOP
  • Is there any difference from the results
  • Obtained via DCSP?

A
B
E
Target2
Target1
G
C
D
Problem 1 Parts a, b
Addition For Part c,d
6
Problem 2 RMTDP
6
The numbers above each node are referring to
RMTDP evaluations of nodes just one level above
the leaf nodes.
7
Node expanded
  • As explained in class, numbers such as 3420 are
    obtained by taking the sum of the max of each
    component
  • 3420 came about from 84330036
  • For how these numbers (84, 3300, 36) are computed
    please refer to the paper

3420
8
Question 2
  • Which nodes can be pruned and why? Please
    explain.
  • (Hint At least one node could be pruned).

9
Problem 3 SharedPlans
  • One criticism of SharedPlans that Prof. Grosz
    agrees with is that it does not take into account
    uncertainties in the environment.
  • Suppose you were to redesign axiom A7 relating to
    intends.that in the sharedplans theory, to enable
    reasoning about uncertainties as well as cost
    (not just cost as presently done)
  • Please write down your new Axiom, A7-new.

10
Problem 4 Game theory
  • Prof. Embat has suggested the following theorem
  • Theorem 1 Suppose (P1, P2) in a stochastic
    game are in Nash equilibrium, then for all other
    policies P1
  • v1(s, P1, P2) v2(s, P1, P2) gt
  • v1(s, P1, P2) v2(s, P1, P2)
  • (a) Prove or disprove Prof. Embats theorem.
  • (b) If you disprove the theorem, please explain
    if there are special classes of stochastic games
    where the theorem holds OR
  • If you prove the theorem, please give an
    example illustrating the concept of the theorem.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com