Chapter 18 Elongation and Termination - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 58
About This Presentation
Title:

Chapter 18 Elongation and Termination

Description:

Frameshift mutation: add or delete base (X) Without code gaps: AUX GCA GCC AAC ... not tightly bound to ribosome, so released soon translation aborted ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:113
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 59
Provided by: sant267
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Chapter 18 Elongation and Termination


1
Chapter 18Elongation and Termination
2
  • Proteins are synthesized
  • amino-terminal ? carboxyl- terminal
  • mRNA is read in the 5 ? 3 direction

3
AUG UUC
  • Codons
  • nonoverlapping AUG UUC
  • overlapping AUG UGU GUU UUC

4
AUG CAG CCA ACG
  • Frameshift mutation add or delete base (X)
  • Without code gaps AUX GCA GCC AAC
  • With code gaps (Z) AUGZCAGZCCAZACGZ
  • AUXG CAG CCA ACG

5
  • Codon consists of three bases

6
  • How do you tell which codon codes for an amino
    acid?

More than one triplet codes for an amino acid
7
How does an organism cope with having multiple
codons for an amino acid?
  • Multiple tRNAs for same amino acid
  • Wobble hypothesis
  • -first two base pairs must pair with anticodon
  • -last base can wobble
  • G in codon can pair with C or U in third
    position of codon
  • inosine (I) can pair with C, U, or A
  • -reduces number of tRNAs needed

8
(No Transcript)
9
  • The genetic code was originally thought to be
    universal across all of lifeits not!
  • Evidence mitochondria, nuclear, and bacterial
    genomes

10
  • Likely only one origin of life
  • Most changes present in mitochondria
  • - dont code for as many proteins
  • - more likely to have changes
  • Standard code does exist
  • - deviant codes likely evolved from standard code

11
  • Not likely code is random
  • Effective at dealing with mutations
  • - single-base changes usually result in shift to
    a chemically similar amino acid
  • - transitions more common than transversions
  • - ribosome more likely to misread first and
    third bases than second

12
Elongation
  • Takes place in three steps
  • Ef-Tu and GTP bind an aminoacyl-tRNA to the
    ribosomal A site
  • Peptidyl transferase forms a peptide bond
    between the peptide in the P site and the new
    aminoacyl-tRNA in the A site
  • Ef-G and GTP translocate the peptidyl-tRNA to the
    P site

13
(No Transcript)
14
  • Proof of A and P sites based off experiments with
    antibiotic puromycin
  • - resembles aminoacyl adenosine at the end of an
    aminoacyl-tRNA
  • - binds to A site of ribosome
  • - forms a peptide bond with P site peptide
    yielding peptidyl puromycin
  • - not tightly bound to ribosome, so released
    soon ? translation aborted

15
(No Transcript)
16
  • Two sites on the ribosome can be defined
  • 1) puromycin reactive
  • 2) puromycin unreactive peptidyl-tRNA in the A
    site
  • fMet-tRNA goes to the P site

17
  • Third site known as the E site (exit site)

18
Step One of Elongation
  • Factor T transfers aminoacyl-tRNAs to the
    ribosome
  • EF-Tu unstable factor T
  • EF-Ts stable factor T
  • Factor G GTPase activity

19
  • EF-T requires GTP to bind aminoacyl-tRNA
  • Polymerization requires even more GTP

20
  • GTP hydrolysis is not required for aminoacyl-tRNA
    binding
  • GTP hydrolysis is required for the formation of
    the peptide bond

21
  • EF-Tu and GTP form a binary complex
  • Aminoacyl-tRNA binds
  • Aminoacyl-tRNA is delivered to the A site
  • EF-Tu and GTP remain bound
  • GTP is hydroloyzed and EF-Tu-GDP complex
    dissociates
  • EF-Ts exchanges GTP for GDP

22
Evidence
  • EF-T and GTP bind to nitrocellulose filter when
    together
  • Adding aminoacyl-tRNA causes complex to be
    released from filter
  • Only aminoacyl-tRNA causes dissociation

23
More Evidence
24
  • EF-Tu binds to GTP
  • EF-Ts converts EF-Tu-GDP to EF-Tu-GTP
  • - disrupts Mg2-binding center of EF-Tu
    resulting in dissociation of GDP
  • - GTP can then bind to EF-Tu

25
Proofreading
  • Ribosome can reject incorrect aminoacyl-tRNA
  • - ternary complex dissociates because it isnt
    held tightly due to mismatches between codon and
    anticondon
  • - aminoacyl-tRNA dissociates for same reason
  • Cell can tolerate 0.01 error rate

26
  • Accuracy and speed are inversely related
  • Rate of hydrolysis is very important
  • - if too high, not enough time for proofreading
  • - if too low, translation would be too slow

27
Elongation Step 2
  • Peptide bond formation-
  • -No elongation factors and soluble factors
    involved
  • -50S ribosome peptidyl transferase activity
    forms peptide bonds

28
Fig. 18.21
Traut and Monro Experiment
29
Traut and Monro Experiment to distinguish the
released peptidyl t-RNA from t-RNA bound to
ribosome
Fig. 18.22
30
Noller and collaborators experiment for peptidyl
transferase catalytic site
Drawback-Could not not determine exactly if its
protein or RNA since could not eliminate the
proteins .
31
  • 23s rRNA and proteins L2 and L3 are needed for in
    vitro peptidyl transferase activity
  • 23s rRNA lies at the peptidyl transferase
    catalytic site as demonstrated by X-ray
    crystallography.

32
Elongation Step-3
  • Translocation-Each translocation event moves the
    mRNA one codons length,3nt,through ribosome.
  • Supporting data- Peter Lengyel and colleagues
    experiment
  • - Pretranslocation complex without EF-G and
    GTP-UUU ,3nt protected at the 3 end (sequencing)
  • - Post translocation (EF-G and GTP)-
  • UUUACU,6nt protected at the 3 end.

33
Role of GTP and EF-G-

34
(No Transcript)
35
Stopped flow kinetic experiments-
Antitranslocation antibiotics-
Viomycin,Thiostrpton GTP analogs- Unhydrolyzable
GTP analog (caged GTP), GDP
36
  • GTP nd EF-G are needed for translocation though
    not needed in vitro.
  • GTP hydrolysis precedes translocation and
    significantly accelerates it.
  • EF-G is released from ribosome for new round of
    elongation which depends upon GTP hydrolysis

37
Fig. 18.26
GTPases and Translation
Generalized G-protein cycle- G-proteins- -GTP
and GDP binding proteins having intrinsic
ATPase activity -Change confirmation based upon
binding to GDP, GTP -G bound to GTP-Active
form -GAP stimulates GTPase activity
converting to GDP (inactive form) -Reactivated
by Guanine nucleotide exchange factor
38
EF-Tu and EF-G structures
-EF-Tu-tRNA-GDPNP ternary complex and EF-G-GDP
binary complex three dimensional shapes have
been determined by X-ray crystallography -Two
complexes are very similar
39
Fig. 18.28
Translation Termination
  • Termination needs stop codons or termination
    codons
  • Discovered in T4 phage
  • Amber Mutation-
  • Mutation that creates a stop codon which
    terminates the translation prematurely.
  • Suppressed in amber suppressor strain
  • Another Evidence-Brenner and colleagues
    experiment on T4
  • phage head protein

40
-Ambre, Ochre and Opal mutations are
termination codons UAG-Amber mutation UAA-Ochre
mutation UGA-Opal Mutation -Ochre mutation-Not
suppressed by amber suppressors but by ochre
suppressors -Cause premature termination of
translation
41
Stop codon Suppression
Suppressor tRNA- have altered anticodons
that Can recognize stop codons and prevent
termination by inserting an amino acid.
42
Mechanism of Suppression
43
Release Factors (Assay)
44
Nirenbergs Assay for release factors
45
(No Transcript)
46
(No Transcript)
47
Fig. 18.34
48
  • RF1,RF2 and RF3 release factors are needed for
    prokaryotic transcription termination
  • RF1-For UAA and UAG
  • RF2-For UAA and UGA
  • RF3-For RF1,RF2 binding to ribosome (GTP-
    binding protein)
  • Eukaryotes-Two release factors
  • eRF1- For all three termination codons
  • eRF3-For release of the finished peptide
    (GTPase)

49
Fig. 18.35
Dealing with Aberrant Termination
Prokaryotes deal with non-stop mRNAs by
tmRNA-mediated ribosome rescue.
Structure of Thermus thermophilus tmRNA
50
Fig. 18.36
51
Eukaryotes- Exosome-mediated degradation of
eukaryotic non-stop mRNA
52
Premature Termination (NAS and NMD models in
Eukaryotes)
53
  • NMD in mammalian cells involves a downstream
    destabilizing element.
  • -If the codon is far enough upstream ,it
    looks like a premature stop codon and activates
    the downstream destabilizing element to degrade
    mRNA.Needs Upf1 and Upf2.
  • NAS model-
  • - NAS machinery senses a stop codon in the
    middle of the reading frame
  • -Splicing pattern is changed to splice out the
    premature stop codon.Needs Upf1.

54
Use of stop codons to insert unusual amino acids
  • Selenocysteine-A special tRNA (which recognizes
    UGA codon) is charged with serine,which is then
    converted to selenocysteine, and the
    selenocysteyl-tRNA is escorted to ribosome by a
    special EF-Tu
  • Pyrrolysine-A special pyrrolysyl-tRNA synthetase
    joins preformed pyrrolysine with a special tRNA
    that has anticodon that recognizes codon UAG.

55
Possttranslation(folding Nascent Proteins)
-Most newly-made polypeptides are not properly
folded and requires molecular chaperones for
proper folding -E. coli cells have a protein
called trigger factor which associates with
ribosome in such a way as to catch the nascent
polypeptide as it emerges from ribosome exit
channel -Hydrophobic regions of nascent
polypeptide are protected from inappropriate
associations until appropriate partner is
available -Archaea and eukaryotes lack trigger
factor hence uses freestanding chaperones
,which are also present in bacteria.
56
Fig. 18.41
57
Fig. 18.42
58
Release of Ribosomes from mRNA
  • Ribosomes are released from the mRNA
    spontaneously after termination
  • Need ribosome cycling factor (RRF) and EF-G
  • RRF resembles to tRNA and can bind to the
    ribosomes A site,but not in position taken by
    tRNA
  • It collaborates with EF-G in releasing either the
    50S ribosomal subunit,or the whole ribosome,by an
    unknown mechanism
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com