Title: Computational Methods in Particle Physics: OnShell Methods in Field Theory
1Computational Methods in Particle
PhysicsOn-Shell Methods in Field Theory
- David A. Kosower
- University of Zurich, January 31February 14,
2007 - Lecture III
2Review of Lecture II
- All-n forms for tree-level amplitudes
- Parke-Taylor equations
- Mangano, Xu, Parke (1986)
Maximally helicity-violating or MHV
3 4Factorization Properties of Amplitudes
- As sums of external momenta approach poles,
- amplitudes factorize
- More generally as
5Factorization in Gauge Theories
- Tree level
- As but
- Sum over helicities of intermediate leg
- In massless theories beyond tree level, the
situation is more complicated but at tree level
it works in a standard way
6What Happens in the Two-Particle Case?
- We would get a three-gluon amplitude on the
left-hand side - But
- so all invariants vanish,
- hence all spinor products vanish
- hence the three-point amplitude vanishes
7- In gauge theories, it holds (at tree level) for
n?3 but breaks down for n 2 A3 0 so we get
0/0 - However A3 only vanishes linearly, so the
amplitude is not finite in this limit, but should
1/k, that is - This is a collinear limit
- Combine amplitude with propagator to get a
non-vanishing object
8Two-Particle Case
- Collinear limit splitting amplitude
9Universal Factorization
- Amplitudes have a universal behavior in this
limit - Depend on a collinear momentum fraction z
10- In this form, a powerful tool for checking
calculations - As expressed in on-shell recursion relations, a
powerful tool for computing amplitudes
11Example Three-Particle Factorization
12- As , its finite expected
because - As , pick up the first term with
13Splitting Amplitudes
- Compute it from the three-point vertex
14Explicit Values
15Collinear Factorization at One Loop
16Soft Factorization
- Universal factorization limits correspond to
infrared-singular limits - Recall that in addition to collinear
singularities, amplitudes are also singular when
a gluon momentum becomes soft - The full amplitude does not have a simple
factorization property in the soft limit, but
color-ordered amplitudes do
17- The Soft factors are eikonal factors, and depend
only on the helicity of the soft gluon, - There are two singular invariants this
characterizes soft singularities and
distinguishes them from collinear ones
18Combining Factorization Limits
- In performing real integrations over singular
regions, we have two different kinds of singular
regions and their overlap and different
functions to integrate in each - Gets worse at higher loops
- Desirable to combine the two limits
- Original method Catani Seymour combine squared
splitting and eikonal functions to give
factorization of squared amplitude - Also possible at the amplitude level
19Dipole Factorization
- Catani Seymour (1996)
- Unify soft collinear limits of squared matrix
element - Add soft limits to collinear factorization
20Dipole Factorization
- Most widely-used subtraction method in numerical
calculations at NLO
21Antenna Factorization
- DAK (1998)
- Combine soft collinear limits at amplitude
level - Add collinear wings to soft core
- Use tree-level current J, computed
recursively Berends Giele (1988),
Dixon (1995) - Remap three momenta to two massless momenta
22Collinear Wings
- Merge a ??1, 1 soft, and 1 ??b
23Antenna Factorization
- In any singular limit (?(a,1,b)/sab3 ? 0),
24Reconstruction Functions
- Map three momenta to two massless momenta
- Conserve momentum
- Ensure no subleading terms contribute to singular
limits - Generalizes to m singular emissions m ? 2
25Limiting Values
26Derivation
- Extract all poles in sa1 and s1b
- Insert complete set of states
- Put reconstructed momenta on shell, momentum
flows between currents
27Gluon Examples
- A particular helicity
- Helicity-summed square (factorization of squared
matrix element)
28Multicollinear Limits Using CSW
Birthwright, Glover, Khoze, Marquard (2005)
- Consider limits where
- so that
- Different helicity configurations
-
29- Power-counting and phase weight ? any term in
the splitting amplitude must be of the form - Imagine factorizing an amplitude to extract the
splitting amplitude cannot come from
vertices (q-dependent ones cancel), must come
from propagators - ? need j nearly on-shell propagators
30- In the required diagrams, use the substitutions
(c collinear leg, x non-collinear, r off-shell
sum of some collinear momenta, z momentum
fractions, P sum of all collinear momenta)
31Anomalous Dimensions Amplitudes
- In QCD, one-loop anomalous dimensions of twist-2
operators in the OPE are related to the
tree-level Altarelli-Parisi function, - Relation understood between two-loop anomalous
dimensions one-loop splitting amplitudes - DAK Uwer (2003)
Mellin Transform
Helicity-summed splitting amplitude
Twist-2 Anomalous Dimension
Altarelli-Parisi function
?
32Recursion Relations
- Considered color-ordered amplitude with one leg
off-shell, amputate its polarization vector - This is the BerendsGiele current
- Given by the sum of all (n1)-point color-ordered
diagrams with legs 1 n on shell - Follow the off-shell line into the sum of
diagrams. It is attached to either a three- or
four-point vertex. - Other lines attaching to that vertex are also
sums of diagrams with one leg off-shell and other
on shell, that is currents
33BerendsGiele Recursion Relations
Berends Giele (1988) DAK (1989) ?
Polynomial complexity per helicity
34(No Transcript)
35Properties of the Current
- Decoupling identity
- Reflection identity
- Conservation
36Explicit Solutions
- Strategy solve by induction
- Compute explicitly
- shorthand
- Compute five-point explicitly ? ansatz
37Complex Momenta
- For real momenta,
- but we can choose these two spinors independently
and still have k2 0 - Recall the polarization vector
- but
- Now when two momenta are collinear
- only one of the spinors has to be collinear
-
but not necessarily both