Computational Methods in Particle Physics: OnShell Methods in Field Theory - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 37
About This Presentation
Title:

Computational Methods in Particle Physics: OnShell Methods in Field Theory

Description:

so all invariants vanish, hence all spinor products vanish ... However A3 only vanishes linearly, so the amplitude is not finite in this limit, ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:25
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 38
Provided by: wwwtheori
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Computational Methods in Particle Physics: OnShell Methods in Field Theory


1
Computational Methods in Particle
PhysicsOn-Shell Methods in Field Theory
  • David A. Kosower
  • University of Zurich, January 31February 14,
    2007
  • Lecture III

2
Review of Lecture II
  • All-n forms for tree-level amplitudes
  • Parke-Taylor equations
  • Mangano, Xu, Parke (1986)

Maximally helicity-violating or MHV
3
  • MHV Rules

4
Factorization Properties of Amplitudes
  • As sums of external momenta approach poles,
  • amplitudes factorize
  • More generally as

5
Factorization in Gauge Theories
  • Tree level
  • As but
  • Sum over helicities of intermediate leg
  • In massless theories beyond tree level, the
    situation is more complicated but at tree level
    it works in a standard way

6
What Happens in the Two-Particle Case?
  • We would get a three-gluon amplitude on the
    left-hand side
  • But
  • so all invariants vanish,
  • hence all spinor products vanish
  • hence the three-point amplitude vanishes

7
  • In gauge theories, it holds (at tree level) for
    n?3 but breaks down for n 2 A3 0 so we get
    0/0
  • However A3 only vanishes linearly, so the
    amplitude is not finite in this limit, but should
    1/k, that is
  • This is a collinear limit
  • Combine amplitude with propagator to get a
    non-vanishing object

8
Two-Particle Case
  • Collinear limit splitting amplitude

9
Universal Factorization
  • Amplitudes have a universal behavior in this
    limit
  • Depend on a collinear momentum fraction z

10
  • In this form, a powerful tool for checking
    calculations
  • As expressed in on-shell recursion relations, a
    powerful tool for computing amplitudes

11
Example Three-Particle Factorization
  • Consider

12
  • As , its finite expected
    because
  • As , pick up the first term with

13
Splitting Amplitudes
  • Compute it from the three-point vertex

14
Explicit Values
15
Collinear Factorization at One Loop
16
Soft Factorization
  • Universal factorization limits correspond to
    infrared-singular limits
  • Recall that in addition to collinear
    singularities, amplitudes are also singular when
    a gluon momentum becomes soft
  • The full amplitude does not have a simple
    factorization property in the soft limit, but
    color-ordered amplitudes do

17
  • The Soft factors are eikonal factors, and depend
    only on the helicity of the soft gluon,
  • There are two singular invariants this
    characterizes soft singularities and
    distinguishes them from collinear ones

18
Combining Factorization Limits
  • In performing real integrations over singular
    regions, we have two different kinds of singular
    regions and their overlap and different
    functions to integrate in each
  • Gets worse at higher loops
  • Desirable to combine the two limits
  • Original method Catani Seymour combine squared
    splitting and eikonal functions to give
    factorization of squared amplitude
  • Also possible at the amplitude level

19
Dipole Factorization
  • Catani Seymour (1996)
  • Unify soft collinear limits of squared matrix
    element
  • Add soft limits to collinear factorization

20
Dipole Factorization
  • Most widely-used subtraction method in numerical
    calculations at NLO

21
Antenna Factorization
  • DAK (1998)
  • Combine soft collinear limits at amplitude
    level
  • Add collinear wings to soft core
  • Use tree-level current J, computed
    recursively Berends Giele (1988),
    Dixon (1995)
  • Remap three momenta to two massless momenta

22
Collinear Wings
  • Merge a ??1, 1 soft, and 1 ??b

23
Antenna Factorization
  • In any singular limit (?(a,1,b)/sab3 ? 0),

24
Reconstruction Functions
  • Map three momenta to two massless momenta
  • Conserve momentum
  • Ensure no subleading terms contribute to singular
    limits
  • Generalizes to m singular emissions m ? 2

25
Limiting Values

26
Derivation
  • Extract all poles in sa1 and s1b
  • Insert complete set of states
  • Put reconstructed momenta on shell, momentum
    flows between currents

27
Gluon Examples
  • A particular helicity
  • Helicity-summed square (factorization of squared
    matrix element)

28
Multicollinear Limits Using CSW
Birthwright, Glover, Khoze, Marquard (2005)
  • Consider limits where
  • so that
  • Different helicity configurations

29
  • Power-counting and phase weight ? any term in
    the splitting amplitude must be of the form
  • Imagine factorizing an amplitude to extract the
    splitting amplitude cannot come from
    vertices (q-dependent ones cancel), must come
    from propagators
  • ? need j nearly on-shell propagators

30
  • In the required diagrams, use the substitutions
    (c collinear leg, x non-collinear, r off-shell
    sum of some collinear momenta, z momentum
    fractions, P sum of all collinear momenta)

31
Anomalous Dimensions Amplitudes
  • In QCD, one-loop anomalous dimensions of twist-2
    operators in the OPE are related to the
    tree-level Altarelli-Parisi function,
  • Relation understood between two-loop anomalous
    dimensions one-loop splitting amplitudes
  • DAK Uwer (2003)

Mellin Transform
Helicity-summed splitting amplitude
Twist-2 Anomalous Dimension
Altarelli-Parisi function
?

32
Recursion Relations
  • Considered color-ordered amplitude with one leg
    off-shell, amputate its polarization vector
  • This is the BerendsGiele current
  • Given by the sum of all (n1)-point color-ordered
    diagrams with legs 1 n on shell
  • Follow the off-shell line into the sum of
    diagrams. It is attached to either a three- or
    four-point vertex.
  • Other lines attaching to that vertex are also
    sums of diagrams with one leg off-shell and other
    on shell, that is currents

33
BerendsGiele Recursion Relations
Berends Giele (1988) DAK (1989) ?
Polynomial complexity per helicity
34
(No Transcript)
35
Properties of the Current
  • Decoupling identity
  • Reflection identity
  • Conservation

36
Explicit Solutions
  • Strategy solve by induction
  • Compute explicitly
  • shorthand
  • Compute five-point explicitly ? ansatz

37
Complex Momenta
  • For real momenta,
  • but we can choose these two spinors independently
    and still have k2 0
  • Recall the polarization vector
  • but
  • Now when two momenta are collinear
  • only one of the spinors has to be collinear

  • but not necessarily both
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com