Preference for SameGender or OtherGender Partner in Seating Arrangements - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 13
About This Presentation
Title:

Preference for SameGender or OtherGender Partner in Seating Arrangements

Description:

Preference for Same-Gender or Other-Gender Partner in Seating Arrangements. Dan Love, Beth Tuck, and Dwayne Guenther. Hanover College. Introduction ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:32
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 14
Provided by: psy56
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Preference for SameGender or OtherGender Partner in Seating Arrangements


1
Preference for Same-Gender or Other-Gender
Partner in Seating Arrangements
  • Dan Love, Beth Tuck, and Dwayne Guenther
  • Hanover College

2
Introduction
  • Most previous research would indicate that
    individuals feel more comfortable around members
    of the same gender.
  • Lee (2000) found that this desire for same-gender
    interaction was based on different needs in
    relationships.
  • Carli (1989) found that personality differences
    between males and females influence prevalence of
    same-gender social interactions.

3
Introduction cont.
  • However, it does appear that many factors play a
    role in how comfortable we are interacting with
    individuals from the opposite-gender.
  • Updegraff, McHale, and Crouter (2000) found that
    having an opposite-gender sibling provided
    opportunities for individuals to better relate
    with members of the opposite-gender.
  • Zajoncs Mere Exposure Effect indicates more
    exposure to certain stimuli results in more
    attraction to that stimulus.

4
Hypothesis
  • We expected males and females to choose a seat
    next to someone of the same gender.
  • We also expected that familiarity with
    opposite-gender individuals based on friendships,
    siblings, and romantic involvement might be a
    factor in choosing a seat next to someone of the
    opposite gender.

5
Participants
  • 23 total participants (10 males, 13 females)
  • 2 participants excluded
  • For all analyses N 21
  • 20 participants were Caucasian 1 participant was
    African American
  • Ages ranged from 18 21 years

6
Procedure
  • After receiving description of study,
    participants expected some form of social
    interaction in the study.
  • Led to another lab room individually
  • Participants entered the room and chose a seat
  • Four chairs lined up at table
  • Outside chairs had female and male items,
    respectively
  • Two chairs available between for participants to
    choose

7
Procedure cont.
  • Experimenter recorded seat choice and gave out
    questionnaire
  • 5 demographic questions
  • 5 questions concerning potential variables
    effecting seat choice
  • For example, participants were asked to list the
    gender and age of any siblings
  • After questionnaire was completed, participant
    was debriefed

8
Results
  • Gender and seat choice unrelated
  • 60 of males chose seat next to male objects
  • 36 of females chose seat next to female objects
  • Overall, participants chose seat next to
    same-gender 48 of the time
  • ?2(21) 0.029, p 0.864
  • No significant results found for other variables
  • However, there was an interesting relationship
    between having opposite-gender siblings and
    opposite-gender seat choice

9
Figure 1. Effect of having opposite-gender
siblings on choosing opposite-gender seat
10
Discussion
  • Results were not significant for our hypothesis
  • Previous research on gender differences in social
    interaction have yielded mixed findings
  • Clark (1994) found that preference for
    same-gender interactions are not prevalent after
    early adolescence.
  • Borja-Alvarez, Zarbatany, and Pepper (1991) found
    that same-gender interactions are preferred over
    opposite-gender interactions.

11
Discussion cont.
  • Results for our secondary hypotheses were not
    significant.
  • However, we did find some interesting trends
    namely, the effect of having opposite-gender
    siblings on seat choice.
  • 73 of individuals having opposite-gender
    siblings chose seat next to opposite-gender
    objects

12
Limitations
  • Too few participants to fully examine topic
  • Limited examination of contributing factors
  • Structure of study could have been confusing
  • Use of confederates might have helped clarify
    participants tasks in choosing a seat
  • Nervousness of participants

13
Further Research
  • Further research could look into other possible
    factors influencing social interaction such as
    betrayal, personality type, androgyny, romantic
    attraction, etc.
  • Further research could also more closely examine
    the effects of having opposite-gender siblings on
    comfort levels around members of the
    opposite-gender
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com