Learning Literacies Project PowerPoint PPT Presentation

presentation player overlay
1 / 10
About This Presentation
Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Learning Literacies Project


1
Learning Literacies Project
  • William Paterson University

2
Learning Literacies Project
  • Objectives and timeline
  • To provide baseline assessment data on student
    performance in areas of lifelong learning
  • To engage the University in dialog and planning
    about means of improving student performance
  • Information Literacy (2007)
  • Critical Thinking (2008)
  • Technology Skills (2009)
  • Quantitative Reasoning (2010)

3
Learning Literacies Project
  • Critical Thinking Skills
  • Critical thinking is active, purposeful, and
    organized. It typically involves reasoning based
    on inquiry, evidence, interpretations and
    implications. A critical thinker considers
    context as well as assumptions and biases in
    making judgments.

4
Learning Literacies Project
  • A critical thinker can
  • Analyze statements, identify and examine
    assumptions, premises, arguments, statements and
    perspectives. Distinguish between belief, opinion
    and empirical truth.
  • Maintain an open disposition, think open-mindedly
    and critically about beliefs.
  • Present and assess the quality of supporting data
    and empirical evidence.
  • Make logical connections and draw conclusions
    based on evidence consider prior knowledge,
    context and perspectives.
  • Create or generate ideas, processes, experiences
    or objects.

5
Learning Literacies Project
  • Results of the fall 2008 Critical Thinking
    Survey
  • 15 Response rate
  • 18 (10.2) Capstone students 159 (89.8) General
    Education students
  • Students assessed as beginning, competent or
    advanced on each dimension
  • Chi Square analysis - to compare the skill levels
    between GE and Capstone students

6
Learning Literacies Project
  • Results, contd.
  • On all 5 critical thinking dimensions, Capstone
    students had significantly higher proportions of
    advanced skills than GE students.
  • For the Chi square Capstone students were
    considered at the two levels Advanced and Not
    Advanced (collapsing the Beginning and Competent
    categories). Results are thus robust.
  • Findings were significant with probability
    levels lt .05

7
Learning Literacies Project
8
Learning Literacies Project
9
Learning Literacies Project
  • Next Steps!
  • Technology skills assessment survey this spring
  • Share findings with the GE Council and open
    dialog with University
  • Develop a quantitative reasoning assessment

10
Learning Literacies Project
  • Members of the Learning Literacies Team
  • Anne Ciliberti (Library)
  • Mark Ellis (Sociology)
  • Pixy Ferris (Communication)
  • Sue Godar (Marketing Management)
  • Ellie Goldstein (Mathematics)
  • Kathy Malanga (Library)
  • Sandie Miller (IRT)
  • Donna Perry (English)
  • Miryam Wahrman (Biology)
  • Linnie Weiland (Elementary Early Childhood
    Education)
  • Nancy Weiner (Library)
  • Hilary Wilder (Educational Leadership)
  • Jane Zeff (IRA)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com