Antenatal - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 64
About This Presentation
Title:

Antenatal

Description:

Screening tests have high sensitivity ... Single Umbilical artery. Nuchal fold 6 mm. Absent nasal bone. Soft Markers. Increased Nuchal Fold: ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:120
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 65
Provided by: david2602
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Antenatal


1
Antenatal
  • David Watson TTH
  • 2009

2
Down Syndrome Screening
  • Rationale
  • Common chromosome abnormality 1/500
  • Moderate degree of intellectual impairment (IQ
    40)
  • Screening tests have high sensitivity
  • Median age of women with trisomy 21 pregnancy
    28-29 years of age
  • Increased individual risk increases with maternal
    not paternal age

3
Maternal Age risk
  • Maternal age Chance of Down syndrome
  • 12 weeks birth
  • 20 1 in 1070 1 in 1530
  • 25 1 in 950 1 in 1350
  • 30 1 in 630 1 in 900
  • 32 1 in 460 1 in 660
  • 34 1 in 310 1 in 450
  • 35 1 in 250 1 in 360
  • 36 1 in 200 1 in 280
  • 38 1 in 120 1 in 170
  • 40 1 in 70 1 in 100
  • 42 1 in 40 1 in 55
  • 44 1 in 20 1 in 30

4
Maternal age-related risk for chromosomal
abnormalities
5
Gestational age-related risk for chromosomal
abnormalities. The lines represent the relative
riskaccording to the risk at 10 weeks of
gestation
6
Down Syndrome ScreeningWhat is recommended
  • Explain difference between screen and diagnostic
    test
  • Sensitivity and specificity
  • Compare different tests
  • Risks of prenatal diagnosis
  • Psychological implications of prenatal screen and
    diagnosis
  • Implications of a child with Down Syndrome
  • Detection of other aneuploidy and implications
  • Timing of results
  • Information about termination

7
Down Syndrome ScreeningWhat is recommended
  • Explain difference between screen and diagnostic
    test
  • Sensitivity and specificity T/T F-, T-/T-
    F
  • Compare different tests
  • Risks of prenatal diagnosis
  • Psychological implications of prenatal screen and
    diagnosis
  • Implications of a child with Down Syndrome
  • Detection of other aneuploidies and implications
  • Timing of results
  • Information about termination

8
History Screening
  • Maternal Age gt35 or 37 or 40 years offer
    amniocentesis or CVS

9
History Screening
  • Maternal Age gt35 years amniocentesis or CVS
  • MA Second Trimester biochemistry Triple test

10
History Screening
  • Maternal Age gt35 years amniocentesis or CVS
  • MA Second Trimester biochemistry Triple test
  • MA First Trimester Nuchal translucency

11
NT alone
  • 200,868 pregnancies, including 871 fetuses with
    trisomy 21, have demonstrated that increased
    nuchal translucency can identify 76.8 of fetuses
    with trisomy 21, which represents a
    false-positive rate of 4.2.

12
History Screening
  • Maternal Age gt35 years amniocentesis or CVS
  • MA Second Trimester biochemistry Triple test
  • MA First Trimester Nuchal translucency
  • MA First trimester NT and first trimester
    biochemistry

13
NT First trimester biochemistry
  • fetal nuchal translucency was combined with
    maternal serum freeß-human chorionic
    gonadotrophin and pregnancy-associated plasma
    protein-A in prospective studies in a total of
    44,613 pregnancies, including 215 fetuses with
    trisomy 21, the detection rate was 87.0 for a
    false-positive rate of 5.0.

14
History Screening
  • Maternal Age gt35 years amniocentesis or CVS
  • MA Second Trimester biochemistry Triple test
  • MA First Trimester Nuchal translucency
  • MA First trimester NT and first trimester
    biochemistry Combined first trimester screen
  • MA First trimester NT and first trimester
    biochemistry and first trimester markers (nasal
    bone, TR, DV a wave, Maxillary angle)

15
Nasal bone alone
  • 15,822 pregnancies, which included 397 fetuses
    with trisomy 21, have demonstrated that the
    absence of the nasal bone can identify 69.0 of
    trisomy 21 fetuses, which represents a
    false-positive rate of 1.4

16
History Screening
  • Maternal Age gt35 years amniocentesis or CVS
  • MA Second Trimester biochemistry Triple test
  • MA First Trimester Nuchal translucency
  • MA First trimester NT and first trimester
    biochemistry
  • MA First trimester NT and first trimester
    biochemistry and first trimester markers (nasal
    bone others)
  • MA First trimester NT and first trimester
    biochemistry and first trimester markers (nasal
    bone) and second trimester biochemistry
    Integrated test

17
History Screening
  • Maternal Age gt36 years amniocentesis or CVS
  • MA Second Trimester biochemistry Triple test
  • MA First Trimester Nuchal translucency
  • MA First trimester NT first trimester
    biochemistry
  • MA First trimester NT first trimester
    biochemistry and first trimester markers (nasal
    bone others)
  • MA First trimester NT first trimester
    biochemistry /- first trimester markers and
    second trimester biochemistry Integrated test
  • MA First trimester NT first trimester
    biochemistry and next test contingent on results
    from earlier testing Contingent test (nasal
    bone)

18
Contingent Testing
  • Combined first trimester result in three groups
  • 1. Low risk lt1/1000 exit testing here
  • 2. High risk gt1/100 Offer invasive testing
  • 3. Intermediate risk 1/100 1/1000 proceed to
    next stage of testing with first trimester
    markers Nasal Bone, TR, DV a wave, Maxillary
    angle
  • Advantage 97 sensitivity with 3 false positive

19
NT Biochem Nasal bone
  • It has been estimated that first-trimester
    screening by a combination of sonography and
    maternal serum testing can identify 97 of
    trisomy 21 fetuses, which represents a
    false-positive rate of 3, or that the detection
    rate can be 91, which represents a
    false-positive rate of 0.5

20
Detection rate Trisomy 21
21
(No Transcript)
22
Calculate Trisomy 21 risk
  • Background maternal age related risk
  • Risk increases with maternal not paternal age
  • Previous aneuploidy?
  • Risk increases if previous affected baby
  • Nuchal translucency
  • increases risk if greater than median NT for CRL
  • Nuchal translucency measure increases with bigger
    CRL
  • First trimester Biochemistry
  • Risk increases with low PAPPA and high BHCG
  • High Risk if Trisomy 21 more likely than 1/300

23
(No Transcript)
24
Nuchal translucency measurement in 326 trisomy 21
fetuses plotted on the normal range
forcrownrump length (95th and 5th centiles)
25
What is a normal NT?
  • Fetal NT increases with crown-rump length
  • 96,127 pregnancies
  • Median and 95th percentile at a crown-rump length
    of
  • 45 mm were 1.2 and 2.1 mm
  • 84 mm were 1.9 and 2.7 mm
  • 99th percentile did not change with crown-rump
    length and was approximately 3.5 mm

26
Maternal age-related risk for trisomy 21 at 12
weeks of gestation and the effect of fetal
nuchal translucency thickness
27
First trimester biochemistry
28
Number of pregnancies withnuchal translucency
(NT) thickness above the 95th centile and an
estimated risk for trisomy 21, based onmaternal
age and fetal nuchal translucency and crown-rump
length, of 1 in 300 or more
29
INCREASED NUCHAL TRANSLUCENCY WITHNORMAL
KARYOTYPE
30
Down Syndrome ScreeningWhat is recommended
  • Explain difference between screen and diagnostic
    test
  • Sensitivity and specificity T/T F-, T-/T-
    F
  • Compare different tests
  • Risks of prenatal diagnosis
  • Psychological implications of prenatal screen and
    diagnosis
  • Implications of a child with Down Syndrome
  • Detection of other aneuploidies and implications
  • Timing of results
  • Information about termination

31
Risks of Prenatal Diagnosis
  • Most high risk results are false positives,
  • 5 screened population will offered invasive
    testing much less than with age based screening
    (15)
  • CVS
  • 11-13 weeks
  • Trans-abdominal not TV (yet)
  • 1 fetal loss rate (1/50 1/100 or 1-2)
  • Possible to have suction TOP if results before
    13-14 weeks

32
Risks of Prenatal Diagnosis
  • Amniocentesis
  • 16 -17 weeks
  • 1 fetal loss rate ( 1 0.5 or 1/100 1/200)
  • One randomized trial 1 miscarriage rate
  • If termination of pregnancy induction of labour
  • 20W0D birth and ideal to have done before 20
    weeks

33
Down Syndrome ScreeningWhat is recommended
  • Explain difference between screen and diagnostic
    test
  • Sensitivity and specificity T/T F-, T-/T-
    F
  • Compare different tests
  • Risks of prenatal diagnosis
  • Psychological implications of prenatal screen and
    diagnosis
  • Implications of a child with Down Syndrome
  • Detection of other aneuploidies and implications
  • Timing of results
  • Information about termination

34
Down Syndrome ScreeningWhat is recommended
  • Explain difference between screen and diagnostic
    test
  • Sensitivity and specificity T/T F-, T-/T-
    F
  • Compare different tests
  • Risks of prenatal diagnosis
  • Psychological implications of prenatal screen and
    diagnosis
  • Implications of a child with Down Syndrome
  • Detection of other aneuploidies and implications
  • Timing of results
  • Information about termination

35
Down Syndrome ScreeningWhat is recommended
  • Explain difference between screen and diagnostic
    test
  • Sensitivity and specificity T/T F-, T-/T-
    F
  • Compare different tests
  • Risks of prenatal diagnosis
  • Psychological implications of prenatal screen and
    diagnosis
  • Implications of a child with Down Syndrome
  • Detection of other aneuploidies and implications
  • Timing of results
  • FISH (21,18,13,X and Y 2-3 days)
  • Full Karyotype CVS 2 weeks. Amniocentesis 3
    weeks
  • Culture failure 1/200, Placental mosaicism
    1/200
  • Terminate on FISH?
  • Information about termination

36
Down Syndrome ScreeningWhat is possible?
  • Ask about screen or diagnostic test Queensland
    policy on Down Syndrome Screening 2009, RANZCOG
  • Detection rates (Sensitivity) and stress second
    trimester morphology is not a screening test for
    Down Syndrome (poor detection rate)
  • Compare one or two different tests depending on
    gestation
  • Risks of prenatal diagnosis false positive and
    invasive testing loss rate of 1
  • Psychological implications of prenatal screen and
    diagnosis
  • Implications of a child with Down Syndrome
  • Detection of other aneuploidies and implications
  • Timing of results
  • Information about termination All if required

37
Second Trimester Morphology
  • 19-20 weeks with 20 weeks better if overweight
  • No obvious structural anomalies
  • Soft signs or markers
  • Structural anomalies that may be associated with
    aneuploidy ( or not associated with aneuploidy)

38
Soft Markers
  • Definition Normal variants in anatomy
  • Present in 1-17 of normal fetuses
  • Prevalance may be higher in aneuploid fetus
  • Most fetuses with Down Syndrome dont have
    markers at 20 weeks
  • Increased nuchal fold
  • Absent or small nasal bone
  • Echogenic bowel
  • Pyelectasis
  • Ventriculomegaly
  • Shortened long bones (humerus, femur)
  • Echogenic intracardiac focus
  • Choroid plexus cysts
  • Single Umbilical artery

39
Nuchal fold 6 mm
40
Absent nasal bone
41
Soft Markers
  • Increased Nuchal Fold
  • gt6mm
  • 40 Trisomy 21 and 1-2 normal fetuses
  • LR 9-11
  • Absent or Hypoplastic nasal bone
  • lt3mm 16/40 or lt4.5mm 20/40
  • 60 Trisomy 21, 1.4 normal
  • LR 20-40

42
(No Transcript)
43
Pyelectasis 4 mm
44
Hypoplasia 5th metacarpal
45
Hyperechoic bowel
46
Echogenic intracardiac focus
47
(No Transcript)
48
Likelihood Ratios of Isolated Markers
  • None 0.5-1.0
  • Nuchal fold 9-11
  • Bright bowel 3-5
  • Short humerus 2.5
  • Short femur 2.2
  • EIF 2
  • Pyelectasis 1.5

49
The Scoring Index (USA)
  • Sonographic Finding Score
  • Major anomaly 2
  • Nuchal fold 6 mm 2
  • Short femur 1
  • Short humerus 1
  • Pyelectasis 4 mm 1
  • Hyperechoic bowel 1
  • Echogenic intracardiac focus 1
  • Age gt34 1

50
Summary
  • Should all women be offered screening?
  • Definite answer requires invasive testing in
    2009.
  • Fetal cells in pap smear
  • Fetal DNA in maternal circulation
  • How to screen Combined NT and first trimester
    biochemistry gtgt second trimester testing
  • MA NT Biochem Combined first trimester
    Screening good sensitivity (80 90) but false
    positives 5

51
Alcohol
  • Prevalence of drinking
  • Non-pregnant
  • 10 drink daily and 10 never
  • 40 drink weekly (AIHW 2005)
  • 50 drink at or below NHMRC 2001 level for short
    term harm 1/3 drink above harm threshold at
    least once in 12 months
  • 10 above long term harm threshold (AIHW 2008)

52
Pregnancy and Alcohol
  • NHMRC 2001 concept of short and long term harm
  • Short term accidents and injuries
  • Long term alcohol related diseases
  • Short term threshold
  • gt6 standard drinks (10g alcohol)/day men
  • gt 4 standard drinks/day women
  • Long term threshold
  • 4/day XY and 2/day XX

53
(No Transcript)
54
(No Transcript)
55
(No Transcript)
56
Pregnancy and Alcohol
  • 60 drink alcohol at some time in pregnancy
  • 15 gt5 drinks at one occasion in 3/12 before
    pregnancy
  • Most abstain from alcohol in pregnancy
  • T1 T2 58 no alcohol
  • T3 54 no alcohol
  • Colvin 2007 Alcohol Clin Exp Res 31(2)

57
Pregnancy and Alcohol
  • 15 above 2001 NHMRC guidelines in T1
  • 10 above 2001 NHMRC guidelines in T2 T3
  • 34 drank alcohol in last pregnancy
  • 24 would drink in future pregnancy
  • 80 said reducing or no alcohol would benefit
    baby
  • Colvin 2007 Alcohol Clin Exp Res 31(2)
  • Peadon 2007 J Paed Child Health 43(7-8)

58
Alcohol and high risk groups
  • Non English home language
  • Regional or remote location
  • Aboriginal or Torres Straight race if they drink
  • ATSI
  • 50 drink above short term threshold ( 34)
  • 20 drink above long term threshold ( 10)

59
NHMRC 2009
  • Non Pregnant no more than 2 standard
    drinks/day may reduce lifetime risk of harm
  • Pregnancy and breast feeding No alcohol is the
    safest option

60
NHMRC 2009
  • Alcohol is a Teratogen
  • Alcohol X placenta easily
  • Associated with miscarriage, stillbirth, Preterm
    delivery at high doses
  • Fetal anomalies with FASD Fetal Alcohol
    Spectrum Disorder including FAS and structural
    anomalies (agenesis of Corpus Callosum)
  • ARBD (birth defects) and ARND (neurodevelopmental
    disorders) Risk is greatest with heavy or
    frequent drinking
  • No safe threshold with likely risk of 1 or 2
    drinks/week low

61
Alcohol and Pregnancy
  • Hendersen systematic review (2007)
  • 46 studies
  • Low moderate alcohol 12g/week
  • No real evidence of adverse pregnancy outcomes
    miscarriage, SB, PTD, IUGR, Anomalies including
    FAS, BUT quality of evidence poor and cant
    conclude safe dose is one drink/week

62
Alcohol and Pregnancy
  • Hendersen systematic review (2007)
  • 14 studies
  • Binge drinking (6 drinks one one occasion or
    multiple occasions)
  • Poorer neuro-developmental outcomes with dose
    effect learning difficulties, low verbal IQ,
    behavioral problems and poor education
    performance
  • No consistent evidence of adverse pregnancy
    outcomes miscarriage, SB, PTD, IUGR, Anomalies
    including FAS,

63
Alcohol and Pregnancy
  • Approach similar to smoking in pregnancy
  • 5As
  • Ask about alcohol
  • Assess level of risk
  • Advise
  • Assist
  • Arrange further support

64
  • Group B streptococcus
  • Miscarriage management
  • Poor fetal movements
  • Reduced liquor volume
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com