University of Toronto - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 42
About This Presentation
Title:

University of Toronto

Description:

'On a plain reading, this definition (in the Privacy Act) is ... See, Centurion Security Services Letter Finding June 20, 2001. www.mccarthy.ca. Aids in ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:45
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 43
Provided by: mbla4
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: University of Toronto


1
University of Toronto
Privacy Lecture Series IPRP / KMDI
Privacy Lecture Series
Threshold Issues in Privacy What is Personal
Information?
Barry Sookman, Partner, McCarthy Tétrault Chair,
Internet and Electronic Commerce Law Group
(Toronto) bsookman_at_mccarthy.ca (416) 601-7949
2
What is Personal Information
  • Personal information is defined under section
    2(1) of PIPEDA as information about an
    identifiable individual, but does not include the
    name, title or business address or telephone
    number of an employee of an organization.

3
Deliberately Broad
IPRP
  • On a plain reading, this definition (in the
    Privacy Act) is undeniably expansive. 
  • the language of this section is deliberately
    broad and entirely consistent with the great
    pains that have been taken to safeguard
    individual identity.  Its intent seems to be to
    capture any information about a specific person,
    subject only to specific exceptions Such an
    interpretation accords with the plain language of
    the statute, its legislative history and the
    privileged, foundational position of privacy
    interests in our social and legal culture.
  • Dagg v. Canada (Minister of Finance) 1997
    2 S.C.R. 403

4
Scope of Definition
5
What is Protected
  • name, age, weight, height
  • medical records
  • income, purchases and spending habits
  • race, ethnic origin and colour
  • blood type, DNA code, fingerprints
  • marital status and religion
  • education
  • home address and phone number
  • See, Your Privacy Rights, Canadas Personal
    Information Protection and Electronic Documents
    Act

6
What is Protected-the Privacy Commissioners View
  • Personal information includes any factual or
    subjective information, recorded or not, about an
    identifiable individual. This includes
    information in any form, such as
  • age, name, ID numbers, income, ethnic origin, or
    blood type
  • opinions, evaluations, comments, social status,
    or disciplinary actions
  • employee files, credit records, loan records,
    medical records, existence of a dispute between a
    consumer and a merchant, intentions (for example,
    to acquire goods or services, or change jobs)
  • See, Your Privacy Responsibilities, Guide
    for Businesses and Organizations to Canada's
    Personal Information Protection and Electronic
    Documents Act

7
No Need for Recording
  • Had Parliament chosen not to include unrecorded
    information within the legislative framework, it
    would have defined personal information, as it
    did in the Privacy Act, to be information about
    an identifiable individual that is recorded in
    any form.
  • Includes video surveillance of public places.
  • See, Centurion Security Services Letter
    Finding June 20, 2001

8
Aids in Construing Legislation
9
Why Protect Personal Information?
  • "This notion of privacy of information derives
    from the assumption that all information about a
    person is in a fundamental way his own, for him
    to communicate or retain as he sees fit." R v
    Dyment, 1988, 2SCR 417
  • privacy is at the heart of liberty in a
    modern state it is based on the notion of the
    dignity and integrity of the individual. R v
    Dyment, 1988 2SCR 417

10
Why Protect Personal Information?
  • the purpose of the protection accorded to
    privacy is to guarantee a sphere of individual
    autonomy for all decisions relating to choices
    that are of a fundamentally private or inherently
    personal nature. Godbout v. Longueuil (City),
    1997 3 S.C.R. 844
  • anonymity is an essential element of the
    right to privacy. Aubry v. Éditions Vice-Versa
    Inc, 1998 1 SCR 591

11
Why Protect Information Privacy?
  • Finally, there is privacy in relation to
    information.  This too is based on the notion of
    the dignity and integrity of the
    individual.  This notion of privacy derives from
    the assumption that all information about a
    person is in a fundamental way his own, for him
    to communicate or retain for himself as he sees
    fit."  In modern society, especially, retention
    of information about oneself is extremely
    important.  We may, for one reason or another,
    wish or be compelled to reveal such information,
    but situations abound where the reasonable
    expectations of the individual that the
    information shall remain confidential to the
    persons to whom, and restricted to the purposes
    for which it is divulged, must be protected. 
  • R. v. Dyment, 1988 2 S.C.R. 417

12
Legislative History
  • As this Court has recently confirmed, evidence
    of a statute's history, including excerpts from
    Hansard, is admissible as relevant to the
    background and purpose of the legislation,
    provided, of course, that the court remains
    mindful of its limited reliability and weight.
  • See, Dagg v. Canada (Minister of Finance) 1997
    2 S.C.R. 403

13
Stated Purposes
  • The purpose of this Part is to establish, in an
    era in which technology increasingly facilitates
    the circulation and exchange of information,
    rules that govern the collection, use and
    disclosure of personal information in a manner
    that recognizes the right of privacy of
    individuals with respect to their personal
    information and the need of organizations to
    collect, use or disclose personal information for
    the purposes that a reasonable person would
    consider appropriate in the circumstances.
    Section 3
  • Applied in IMS Health Letter Finding October 2,
    2001

14
Other Privacy Legislation
  • Federal Privacy Act, Municipal and Provincial
    Privacy Legislation
  • May be useful, but there are significant
    differences.
  • Information must recorded in any form
  • Includes subject matter that may not be included

15
Ontario Freedom of Information and Protection of
Privacy Act
  • means recorded information about an identifiable
    individual, including,
  • (a) information relating to the race, national or
    ethnic origin, colour, religion, age, sex, sexual
    orientation or marital or family status of the
    individual,
  • (b) information relating to the education or the
    medical, psychiatric, psychological, criminal or
    employment history of the individual or
    information relating to financial transactions in
    which the individual has been involved,

16
Ontario Freedom of Information and Protection of
Privacy Act (cont)
  • (c) any identifying number, symbol or other
    particular assigned to the individual,
  • (d) the address, telephone number, fingerprints
    or blood type of the individual,
  • (e) the personal opinions or views of the
    individual except where they relate to another
    individual,
  • (f) correspondence sent to an institution by the
    individual that is implicitly or explicitly of a
    private or confidential nature, and replies to
    that correspondence that would reveal the
    contents of the original correspondence,

17
Ontario Freedom of Information and Protection of
Privacy Act (cont)
  • (g) the views or opinions of another individual
    about the individual, and
  • (h) the individual's name where it appears with
    other personal information relating to the
    individual or where the disclosure of the name
    would reveal other personal information about the
    individual.

18
EU Directive
  • Personal Data means any information relating to
    an identified or identifiable natural person
    ('data subject') an identifiable person is one
    who can be identified, directly or indirectly, in
    particular by reference to an identification
    number or to one or more factors specific to his
    physical, physiological, mental, economic,
    cultural or social identity.

19
Australia Privacy Act
  • Personal information means information or an
    opinion (including information or an opinion
    forming part of a database), whether true or not,
    and whether recorded in a material form or not,
    about an individual whose identity is apparent,
    or can reasonably be ascertained, from the
    information or opinion.

20
Childrens Online Privacy Protection Rule
  • Personal information means individually
    identifiable information about an individual
    collected online including
  • (c) An e-mail address or other online contact
    information, including but not limited to an
    instant messaging user identifier, or a screen
    name that reveals an individuals e-mail address
  • (f) A persistent identifier, such as a customer
    number held in a cookie or a processor serial
    number, where such identifier is associated with
    individually identifiable information or a
    combination of a last name or photograph of the
    individual with other information such that the
    combination permits physical or online contacting

21
Predominant Purpose of Collection
  • The question whether information is "personal
    information" cannot be determined according to
    whether its predominant characteristic is
    personal or professional.   The plain language of
    the act is "personal information" is information
    about an identifiable individual.
  • Dagg v. Canada (Minister of Finance) 1997 2
    S.C.R. 403

22
Reasonable Expectation of Privacy
  • Although it is not strictly necessary for my
    analysis, I believe that employees of the
    respondent would have a reasonable expectation
    that the information in the sign-in logs would
    not be revealed to the general public.  The
    reasonable expectation of privacy principle is
    a tool used in search and seizure jurisprudence
    to determine whether or not a search is
    "reasonable" in constitutional terms...  The
    principle ensures that, at a conceptual level,
    the dignity and autonomy interests at the heart
    of privacy rights are only compromised when there
    is a compelling state interest for doing so.
  • Dagg v. Canada (Minister of Finance) 1997 2
    S.C.R. 403

23
Reasonable Expectation of Privacy
  • In determining whether an individual has a
    reasonable expectation of privacy in a particular
    piece of information, it is important to have
    regard to the purpose for which the information
    was divulged
  • Dagg v. Canada (Minister of Finance) 1997 2
    S.C.R. 403

24
Limiting Principles
25
Express Limitations
  • The Collection, use or disclosure of personal
    information by federal government organizations
    listed in the Privacy Act
  • Provincial or territorial governments and their
    agents
  • An employees name, title, business address or
    telephone number
  • An individuals collection, use or disclosure of
    personal information strictly for personal
    purposes (e.g. personal greeting card list)
  • The collection, use or disclosure of personal
    information solely for journalistic, artistic or
    literary purposes.

26
Regulations Specifying Publicly Available
Information
  • Information in
  • telephone directories
  • professional and business directories
  • public registries
  • court records
  • books and magazines
  • Note limitations associated with particular
    exemptions

27
Freedom of Speech
  • Commercial speech is protected under section 2(b)
    of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.
    The constitutional guarantee protects not only
    the right to speak, but also the right not to
    speak.
  • The requirement to disclose certain types of
    information e.g., opinions, might compromise
    basic constitutional values.

28
Must be Information
  • Information means Knowledge acquired in any
    manner facts data.
  • Canada (Privacy Commissioner) v Canada (Labour
    Relations Board) 1996 3 F.C. 609

29
Must be Intended to Inform
  • it is doubtful that anything expressed by a
    decision maker in the course of consultations or
    deliberations can be regarded as personal
    information about an individual. This is because
    nothing that is recorded by a decision maker in
    the course of deliberations is intended to
    inform.
  • Canada (Privacy Commissioner) v Canada (Labour
    Relations Board) 1996 3 F.C. 609

30
Opinions
  • Opinion 1. a belief not based on absolute
    certainty or positive knowledge but on what seems
    true, valid, or probable to one's own mind
    judgment 2. an evaluation, impression or
    estimation, etc. 3. the formal judgment of an
    expert.
  • Canada (Privacy Commissioner) v Canada
    (Labour Relations Board) 1996 3 F.C. 609

31
Opinions
  • Not included in definition of personal
    information, although expressly included in
    Federal Privacy Act.
  • Political opinions v an individuals opinion
    about another person
  • Internal credit scores and underwriting
    information?

32
Must be Capable of Collection
  • Must personal information be capable of
    collection?
  • Does it include all information that is created
    by an entity?
  • Does created information belong to an
    individual?
  • Must the information created be capable of being
    accurate, corrected and up to date to be
    personal information?

33
Intention/Capability to Use
  • The scheme of the Privacy Act supports the
    proposition that it is aimed at information that
    is intended to be used as such or that is at
    least capable of being used as such. Recorded
    consultations and deliberations are neither...
  • Accounts of consultations and deliberations do
    not lend themselves to notations and corrections.
    They do not purport to be and cannot reasonably
    be viewed by anyone as "accurate" "up-to-date" or
    "complete" as to what they may reveal.
  • Canada (Privacy Commissioner) v Canada
    (Labour Relations Board) 1996 3 F.C. 609

34
Must identify Individual - anonymous data
  • While I do not rule out the possibility that
    information about small groups may, in some
    cases, constitute personal information, the mere
    fact that one can divide the groups assets by
    the number of its members does not support such a
    finding.
  • Montana Band of Indians v. Canada (Minister of
    Indian and Northern Affairs) 1989 1 F.C. 143

35
Must identify Individual - anonymous data
  • The terms personal data and data subject
    serve to underscore that the Guidelines are
    concerned with physical persons. The precise
    dividing line between personal data in the sense
    of information relating to identified or
    identifiable individuals and anonymous data may
    be difficult to draw and must be left to the
    regulation of each Member country. In principle,
    personal data convey information which by direct
    (e.g. a civil registration number) or indirect
    linkages (e.g. an address) may be connected to a
    particular physical person.
  • OECD Guidelines on the Protection of Privacy and
    Transborder Flows of Personal Data

36
Employee Related Information
  • Does Act apply to employee related information of
    non-federal undertakings?
  • Does Act apply to prevent collection of
    information about activities and behavior of
    employees of other firms?

37
Employee Related Information
  • 4. (1) This Part applies to every organization in
    respect of personal information that
  • (a) the organization collects, uses or discloses
    in the course of commercial activities or
  • (b) is about an employee of the organization and
    that the organization collects, uses or discloses
    in connection with the operation of a federal
    work, undertaking or business.

38
Employee Related Information
  • Considering the specific case of employee data
    exported from the EU to Canada, the Working Party
    notes that this will fall under the Act as from
    1st January 2001, if the data is about an
    employee of a Canadian federally related work or
    if the exchange of information is carried out for
    a commercial purpose. In all other cases, the Act
    will apply as of 1st January 2004.
  • European Commission, Opinion 2/2001 on the
    adequacy of the Canadian Personal Information and
    Electronic Documents Act Adopted on 26th January
    2001

39
Information Must Relate to an Individual
  • The word individual means a natural person, so
    it follows that it does not include legal persons
    such as corporations, partnerships or
    associations. There may be circumstances where
    information relating to an entity such as a sole
    proprietorship is so closely linked to an
    individual person, that the information can be
    said to be about that individual but for the most
    part personal information must be about an
    identifiable individual and not merely associated
    with the individual, by name for example. In my
    view, therefore, the meaning of personal
    information, while broad, is not so broad as to
    encompass all information associated with an
    individual. IMS Health Letter Finding October 2,
    2001

40
Information Must Relate to an Individual
  • In what cases will the activities or behavior of
    an individual within an organization be
    considered personal information about the
    individual rather than the activities or behavior
    of the organization?
  • Implications for CRM projects.

41
Work Products
  • If the prescribing patterns of a physician for
    instance, a tendency to prescribe one medication
    rather than another for a given ailment were
    deemed to be information "about" the physician,
    then the same determination would logically have
    to be made about identifiable patterns with
    regard to the work products arising from a broad
    variety of other activities...
  • I do not believe that such results would be
    consistent with the stated purpose of the Act.
    Rather, it is my view that the balance is
    properly struck by establishing whether the
    information is indeed about the individual, or
    rather about the tangible result of his or her
    work activity, namely the work product.
  • IMS Health Letter Finding October 2, 2001

42
University of Toronto
Privacy Lecture Series IPRP / KMDI
Privacy Lecture Series
Threshold Issues in Privacy What is Personal
Information?
Barry Sookman, Partner, McCarthy Tétrault Chair,
Internet and Electronic Commerce Law Group
(Toronto) bsookman_at_mccarthy.ca (416) 601-7949
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com