Is Religion Reasonable? Faith Seeking Understanding - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 5
About This Presentation
Title:

Is Religion Reasonable? Faith Seeking Understanding

Description:

P2a: A being that exists in one's mind and in reality (outside of one's mind) is ... he exists; but we cannot simply assume his existence based on our meaning of 'God. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:14
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 6
Provided by: SBreaux
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Is Religion Reasonable? Faith Seeking Understanding


1
Is Religion Reasonable?Faith Seeking
Understanding
  • The ontological argument
  • The cosmological argument
  • The teleological argument (from design)

2
The Ontological Argument
St. Anselm (1033-1109)
  • P1 God means the greatest conceivable being
  • P2a A being that exists in ones mind and in
    reality (outside of ones mind) is greater than
    one that exists only in ones mind
  • P2b A necessarily existing being is greater than
    a merely possible being
  • Therefore, God must exist in reality

3
Objections to Anselms Argument
  • Gaunilo imagining anything as perfect does
    not make it exist. Reply the non-existence
    of everything other than God is
    conceivable
  • Aquinas if there is a greatest conceivable
    being, he exists but we cannot simply assume his
    existence based on our meaning of God. Reply
    what else could we mean?
  • Kant A concept of God a concept of his
    existing may be greater than a concept of God
    alone but these are only concepts, not claims
    about existence outside our concepts. Reply why
    cant we discuss such external existence?

4
The Cosmological Argument St. Thomas Aquinas
(1225-74)
  • The universe, like all things in it, is
    contingent (i.e., depends on something else as
    the cause of its existence) otherwise, it is
    unintelligible
  • If there is no essential cause of the universe
    (that is, if the causal sequence is infinite),
    then nothing would be happening or be
    intelligible here and now. But things do exist
    here and now, so God exists here and now

5
Humes Criticisms of the Cosmological Argument
  • No being (including God) exists necessarily
  • If God is eternal, why not the universe too?
  • Fallacy of composition parts ? whole
  • Why should we think that everything has a cause
    or reason for its existence?
  • Besides, the argument does not prove that God is
    anything other than a cause of things who might
    not care at all about his creation
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com