The Traumatic Brain Injury Model Systems of Care - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 47
About This Presentation
Title:

The Traumatic Brain Injury Model Systems of Care

Description:

The Traumatic Brain Injury Model Systems of Care – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:59
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 48
Provided by: nas69
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The Traumatic Brain Injury Model Systems of Care


1
The Traumatic Brain Injury Model Systems of Care
  • A project funded by the US Department of
    Education
  • National Institute on Disability and
    Rehabilitation Research

Cindy Harrison-Felix, PhD Craig Hospital
2
Database Objectives
  • Study the clinical course of individuals with TBI
    from time of injury through discharge from acute
    care and rehabilitation care.
  • Evaluate the recovery and long-term outcome of
    individuals with TBI.
  • Establish a basis for comparison with other data
    sources.

3
Definition of TBI
  • The individual has sustained a TBI external
    mechanical force causing damage to brain tissue,
    as evidenced by any of the following
  • loss of consciousness
  • post-traumatic amnesia (PTA)
  • objective neurological findings

4
Database Inclusion Criteria
  • Moderate to severe TBI (PTAgt24 hrs or LOCgt30
    minutes or GCS in EDlt13 or intracranial
    neuroimaging abnormalities)
  • Admitted to systems hospital emergency
    department within 72 hours of injury.
  • 16 years of age or older at the time of injury
  • Receives acute care and comprehensive inpatient
    rehabilitation within the model system hospitals.
  • Informed consent is signed by patient, family or
    guardian.

5
NIDRR TBI National Database
  • Form I - Acute care 214 variables
  • Form II - Follow-up 153 variables
  • Follow-up conducted 1,2,5, and every 5 years
    thereafter
  • Follow-up methods in-person, phone, mail
    questionnaire

6
National Database Syllabuswww.tbindsc.org
7
Research Issues for Variable Selection
  • Premorbid history
  • Demographic characteristics of the population
  • Causes and severity of injury
  • Nature of diagnoses
  • Types of treatment/services
  • Costs of treatment/services
  • Measurement and prediction of outcomes including
    impairment, disability and participation

8
I. Premorbid History
  • History of TBI
  • Drug Use
  • Alcohol use (NHSDA/BRFSS)
  • Conditions and limitations
  • Psychiatric History
  • Arrests/felony incarcerations
  • Learning/behavior problems

9
II. Demographic Characteristics
  • Age
  • Gender
  • Race
  • Marital Status
  • Residence
  • Zip Code
  • Living with
  • Level of education
  • Employment

10
III. Causes of Injury
  • Date of injury
  • ICD-9 external cause of injury codes
  • Blood alcohol level (limited data)

11
III. Severity of Injury
  • Glasgow Coma Scale Score
  • Revised Trauma Score
  • Duration of unconsciousness
  • Duration of Post Traumatic Amnesia

12
IV. Diagnoses
  • Spinal Cord Injury
  • Intracranial CT scan findings
  • Intracranial hypertension
  • Neuropsychological assessment
  • ICD-9 diagnosis codes
  • Cause of death

13
V. Treatments
  • Surgical procedures
  • Rehospitalizations

14
VI. Costs of Treatment
  • Length of stay
  • Charges
  • Payer source

15
VII. Measure and Predict Outcome at Follow-up
  • Impairment
  • Mortality
  • Subsequent TBI

16
VII. Measure and Predict Outcome at Follow-up
  • Disability
  • Disability Rating Scale (DRS)
  • Functional Independence Measure (FIM)
  • Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended (GOS-E)
  • Supervision Rating Scale (SRS)

17
VII. Measure and Predict Outcome at Follow-up
  • Participation
  • Living with
  • Residence (e.g., private home, SNF, AFC,
    hospital)
  • Marital Status
  • Level of education
  • Employment
  • Drug use
  • Alcohol use (NHSDA/BRFSS)

18
VII. Measure and Predict Outcome at Follow-up
  • Participation (cont.)
  • Transportation
  • Income and source
  • Arrests
  • Psychiatric problems
  • Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9)
  • Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS)
  • Participation Assessment (PART)

19
Sources of Data
  • Abstract from medical records
  • Pre-existing databases
  • Specialized data collection forms
  • Patient examination/interview/testing
  • Family interview

20
Guidelines for Follow-up
  • Follow-up contact attempted with every patient
    1st, 2nd, 5th years and then every five year.
  • 4 month window for year 1 follow-up, 6 month
    window for year 2, 1 year window for years 5, 10,
    15, . . .
  • Patient is primary source of follow-up
    information if patient cannot be interviewed,
    follow-up is attempted with a proxy.
  • Methods of follow-up in order of priority phone,
    mail questionnaire.





21
TBIMS National DatabaseDescriptive Data
SummaryIncludes data from 01/01/1989
12/31/2007
22
Age
mean 38.5 n 7899
23
Gender
n 7897
24
Race
n 7896
25
Level of Education At Injury
n 7899
26
Etiology of Injury
n 7872
27
Blood Alcohol Level
At Emergency Department Admission
excludes cases not tested 20
mean 68.8 n 5856
28
History of TBI
n 7790
29
Glasgow Coma Scale Score
At Emergency Department Admission
mean 9.3 n 6048
30
Duration of Unconsciousness
mean 9.5 days n 7545
31
Duration of PTA
(Moderate/Severe)
(Extremely Severe)
(Very Severe)
mean 25.6 days n 5888
32
Mean Length of Stay
33
Mean Charges
  • TOTAL CHARGES
  • Acute 154,969
  • Rehab. 56,901
  • PER DIEM CHARGES
  • Acute 7,779
  • Rehab. 2,085
  • 41 have government sponsored care (Mcaid/Mcare)

34
Marital Status
35
Living Situation
36
Residence
37
Employment Status
38
Disability Rating Scale
Severe Disability
Moderate Disability
Partial Disability
Partial Disability
Partial Disability
Partial Disability
39
Functional Independence Measure
Note The value of n is reflective of Total FIM
measure
40
Functional Independence Measure
Mean Scores converted to 7-point scale
Complete Independence Modified Independence Superv
ision Minimal Assistance Moderate
Assistance Maximal Assistance Total Assistance
41
Supervision Rating Scale
42
Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended
43
Satisfaction With Life Scale
44
How has the TBI Model Systems National Database
been used?
  • Comparative analyses of sub-groups.
  • Descriptive or predictive studies of outcomes.
  • Comparison with other TBI populations.
  • Comparison of TBI measures.

45
How has the TBI Model Systems National Database
been used?
46
How can NASHIA members use the TBI Model Systems
National Database?
  • Benchmark comparisons on outcomes.
  • Long-term outcomes can be used for state planning
    and advocacy.
  • TBIMS database variables, measures, definitions,
    procedures can be used for other studies or
    purposes.
  • Use summary data when need talking points about
    TBI.  
  • Database available for research studies.

47
Thank You!
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com