Title: Freiwillige Selbstkontrolle Multimedia FSM principles and evaluation of user complaints
1Freiwillige Selbstkontrolle Multimedia (FSM) -
principles and evaluation ofuser complaints
- Council of Europe
- Hearing on on-line self-regulation, October 17,
2000, Strasbourg - Dr. Arthur Waldenberger, LL.M. - Chairman of FSM
2FSM principles
- - FSM is a self-regulatory body founded in 1997
by internet service providers and content
providers - - FSM fights against illegal and harmful content
on the Internet and gives advice to users on all
issues involving the protection of minors on the
Internet - - FSM supports a strict separation of the tasks
of the state and the tasks of self-regulatory
institutions
3FSM principles (continued)
- - FSM is against any kind of censorship on the
Internet - - FSM rejects, therefore, any kind of
co-regulation between the state and the private
sector - - FSM supports and actively takes part in an open
dialogue with all government institutions dealing
with illegal and harmful content on the Internet
4FSM principles (continued)
- - FSM supports the foundation of private
Internet hotlines in Europe and overseas - - FSM plays an active role in the Internet
Hotlines Providers of Europe Association (INHOPE) - - For further information, see www.fsm.de.
5 FSM complaints office
6FSM complaint procedure
Plaintiff
Commissioner
- checks FSMs competence to deal with
complaint - forwars complaint to the
competent body - sorts out inconsistent, anony-
mous and obviously unreasonable complaints
Defendant
Witnesses
Collects all facts and, if neccesary, writes
summary
Experts
FSM complaints commission
7Possible FSM sanctions
- 1. Hint comprising the advice to
remove a certain content - 2. Disapproval including the request to remove a
certain content - 3. Reprimand
- A reprimand must be published in the
defendants online service for a month it can
also be published by competitors
8... FSM sanctions (continued)
- - Defendants who have not signed the FSM code of
conduct may only be given hints - - If an FSM member repeatedly does not follow an
FSM decision, he will be expelled. Consequences
(a) damage to his reputation (b) legal duty to
appoint a commissioner for the protection of
minors
9FSM sanctions - further possible measures
FSM decision
Defendant (ignores decision)
2. Host service provider
3. Access provider
10 F I N I S H