From Kolb, to Computers in Writing, to Differentiated Classrooms - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 57
About This Presentation
Title:

From Kolb, to Computers in Writing, to Differentiated Classrooms

Description:

A Case Study of the Intersections of Technology, Learning Styles, & Pedagogy ... Forges connections (class and lives) Integrates experience with self ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:35
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 58
Provided by: jmkil
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: From Kolb, to Computers in Writing, to Differentiated Classrooms


1
From Kolb, to Computers in Writing, to
Differentiated Classrooms
  • Christie Gordon and Judith Kilborn
  • Computers Writing 2005

2
A Case Study of the Intersections of Technology,
Learning Styles, Pedagogy
  • Description of a primarily online graduate course
    on Computers, English, Pedagogy
  • Research questions
  • Methodology
  • Primary sources of study
  • Analysis of asynchronous and synchronous
    communication
  • Description of Kolbs Learning Styles Inventory
    (LSI)
  • Findings

3
Graduate Course Computers, English, Pedagogy
  • 18 graduate students at a Midwestern,
    comprehensive university
  • The majority of the students were currently
    teaching composition or literature
  • five of the 18 students were teaching first-year
    college composition and two additional students
    were preparing to teach that class
  • one was teaching composition and literature in a
    community college, three in a high school, and
    one in a middle school
  • three were teaching ESL and two were preparing to
    teach ESL
  • one was preparing to teach Information Media.

4
Focus of the Class
  • Theoretical issues concerning computers in
    literature and composition classrooms
  • considered what is meant by electronic literacies
    particularly how the nature of reading and
    writing is changing and how that is affecting the
    way people write and how they teach writing
  • unpacked some of the key issues underlying
    computers and pedagogy issues concerning
    community, power, culture, and so on

5
Focus of the Class contd
  • Pedagogical uses of specific technology in
    composition and literature classrooms
  • explored how people are using the web in
    "web-enhanced courses
  • examined use of asynchronous discussion (blogs,
    email, listserv) and synchronous discussion
    (chat, MOO) in composition and literature
    classrooms

6
Key Premises of Course
  • That technology should not be used for its own
    sake but should be selected
  • to support specific instructional goals
  • to speak to particular pedagogical problems or
    needs
  • to address specific learners in individual
    learning contexts
  • That students should use the class to sort out
    what technology applications they preferred for
    what pedagogical purposes and why

7
Key Premises of Course contd
  • That they, like their own students, have
    individual learning preferences that affect the
    way they use technology and how they feel about
    it
  • That they should consider all learning styles
    when they plan technology applications
  • so that they teach around the clock
  • so that they don't focus on the needs of those
    with their learning styles while ignoring the
    needs of other types of learners in their classes

8
Primarily Online Class
  • During the 15-week semester, students met face to
    face twice
  • The first class met in a computer classroom for
    the class introduction
  • covered the key premises of the course
  • administered and discussed Kolbs Learning Styles
    Inventory (LSI)
  • encouraged students to think about learning
    styles as they explored various technologies they
    might use in their teaching
  • familiarized students with the synchronous
    discussion space (a MOO) that they would use for
    the majority of class meetings

9
Primarily Online Class contd
  • A second face-to-face class occurred midway
    through the semester.
  • introduced Dreamweaver
  • workshopped translating print teaching materials
    to the Web
  • For the other 13 weeks of the course, students
    met in a MOO
  • to discuss readings
  • to focus on various ways in which technology use
    in classrooms can emerge from consideration of
    pedagogical needs

10
Students Work
  • Each student lead two class discussions of
    readings online in the MOO and developed some
    basic web materials for their teaching.
  • Each student completed a semester-long personal
    blog
  • reflecting on and responding to readings
  • connecting readings, class discussion, and
    technology applications to their own classrooms
    and to their own lives
  • keeping notes of outside research and reading
    about technology applications
  • At the end of the semester, this blog served as
    the basis for a MOO presentation concerning the
    student's plans for using technology in a
    specific course.

11
Students Work contd
  • Students participated in asynchronous discussion
    that supplemented the classroom.
  • This asynchronous discussion used various forums
    as the semester progressed
  • For the first five weeks, students posted to a
    class listserv (Cybers).
  • For the next month, students posted to a
    community blog in response to the teacher's
    prompts.
  • For the final six weeks of the term, students
    posted to a team blog
  • They could respond to the prompts of the teacher
    or their colleagues.
  • They could initiate their own threads.

12
Summary of Class
  • Students in this graduate course were immersed in
    technology.
  • Students read about and experimented with various
    technology throughout the term
  • synchronous discussion (chat, MOO)
  • asynchronous discussion (blogs, email, and
    listservs)
  • Web activities for their students as well as Web
    materials for their teaching

13
Summary of Class contd
  • Students reflected on what particular technology
    applications might support their teaching goals.
  • Students considered how specific technologies
    might be preferred by particular types of
    learners.
  • Students decided upon the technology applications
    that matched their course goals, students, and
    instructional contexts.

14
Research Questions
  1. How do learning styles impact the use of and
    attitude toward technology?
  2. Which technologies were selected and modeled in
    class? And which technologies did the graduate
    students select and implement to fit the goals of
    their own classes?
  3. Is a particular technological application
    selected because of a fit with learning style,
    or is it resisted because it did not fit with the
    dominant learning style?
  4. What insights were gained in students
    self-reflections on the intersections of learning
    style, technology, and pedagogy? How did these
    insights link to our perceptions?

15
Primary Sources for Study Students Public
Discourse
  • The synchronous communication was comprised of
    logs of 13 MOO classes (2 1/2 hours each).
  • The asynchronous communication was comprised of
  • 5 weeks of email sent to Cybers (the class
    listserv)
  • 13 weeks of postings on students' personal blogs
  • 10 weeks of postings on a class blog

16
Review of Public Discourse
  • We focused on the public discourse of four
    students from the class.
  • These students represent Kolb's four Learning
    Styles.
  • These students teach in different areas
  • middle school
  • high school
  • first-year college composition
  • English as a Second Language (ESL)

17
Analysis of Asynchronous Communication MOO
  • We analyzed the MOO logs to determine if learning
    style preferences could be identified in the
    students modes of online presentations.
  • the MOO discussions of readings led by these four
    students
  • these students' final MOO presentations about
    their plans for using technology in a class that
    they are currently teaching or plan to teach.

18
Analysis of Synchronous Communication Personal
Blogs
  • We reviewed the four students' personal blogs,
    recorded the number and types of postings, and
    calculated percentages that we could use for
    cross-comparisons.
  • We wished to know the percentages of
  • on-task/off-task postings
  • posts that initiate and respond to threads
  • posts including more than one type of response.

19
Analysis of Synchronous Communication Personal
Blogs contd
  • We were interested in discovering the types of
    postings typical of each student, such as
  • summaries or response to research, reading, or
    class discussion
  • analysis of technology applications and
    connections to their own lives, their own
    classes, or their own use
  • This data was intended to reveal patterns in the
    blogs that might be associated with learning
    styles preferences.

20
Analysis of Synchronous Communication Class
Blogs
  • We reviewed the last month of postings for the
    class as a whole.
  • We recorded the number and types of postings.
  • We calculated percentages that we could use for
    cross-comparisons.
  • We focused on the postings of the four students,
    assessing the types of postings and the posting
    patterns typical of each student.

21
Intersections
  • Technology
  • Learning Styles Pedagogy

22
Kolbs Learning Styles Types
Concrete Experience (CE)
Accommodators Divergers Sensors/
Sensors/ Feelers Feelers
doers watchers
Convergers
Assimilators Thinkers
Thinkers doers
watchers
Reflective Observation (RO)
Active Experimen- tation (AE)
Abstract Conceptualization (AC)
23
Diverger the Innovative Learner
  • Is imaginative
  • Gathers information, then needs reflecting time
  • Creates own structure
  • Seeks personal meaning and values social
    interactions
  • Prefers atmosphere of high involvement
  • Asks why?
  • Creates goals
  • Forges connections (class and lives)
  • Integrates experience with self
  • Connects new knowledge with prior knowledge
  • Prefers to learn through discussion and
    interaction methods

24
Assimilator the Analytic Learner
  • Is theoretical
  • Needs rational, sequential organization
  • Prefers systematic structure and subdued
    emotional climate
  • Values information, facts, and intellect
  • Prefers parts to wholes
  • Learns concepts
  • Asks what?
  • Poses questions
  • Likes direct teaching and prefers to learn
    through informational methods

25
Converger the Common Sense Learner
  • Is practical
  • Needs direct, hands-on learning
  • Values sensory stimuli, the concrete, and
    workability
  • Seeks solutions to problems
  • Likes peer dialogue
  • Asks how? or how does it work?
  • Prefers to learn through coaching

26
Accommodator the Dynamic Learner
  • Is intuitive
  • Prefers lack of structure
  • Creates own structure
  • Values intuition and experience
  • Seeks hidden possibilities
  • Asks if? or What can this become?
  • Looks at collaborative possibilities
  • Goes beyond class
  • Takes risks
  • Prefers to learn through self-discovery

27
How Webs Are Viewed by Various Learning Styles
Accommodators see web as information site for handouts place for technology applications like movies/recordings space for developing critical thinking link to other teacher sites place for new ideas especially curriculum ideas a place for feedback on teaching Divergers see web as assignment place (calendars, links, resources) place for activities (web evaluation, etc.) place to establish a feel for class, teacher site parents, students and other teachers can check
Convergers see web as technology to teach and make available to students resource for class materials that they needed to make available for students Assimilators see web as canvas to convey meaning creative space for zines and publishing resource for class materials file cabinet place for links to experts and expert sources
28
Intersections
  • Each of the four Learning Styles identified by
    Kolb and modified by McCarthy Diverger,
    Assimilator, Converger, and Accommodator has
    different characteristics and preferences that
    were addressed in English 652 (Computers,
    English, and Pedagogy). 
  • Our classrooms are populated by students with
    diverse learning styles who need to be taught
    using pedagogy and technology that reach all.
  • By using technological applications that support
    instructional goals and that attend to all four
    Learning Styles, teachers enable students to both
    hover in their comfort zones, but also stretch
    their own learning and teaching.

29
Findings General
  • When we examined the public discourse of the
    students in the course, patterns emerged.
  • Despite a limited sample size and an analysis
    focused on only four graduate students who taught
    in four different situations and had four
    different Learning Styles, we saw connections
    among students learning styles, pedagogy, and
    technology applications.

30
Research Question 1. How do learning styles
impact the use of and attitude toward technology?
  • Assimilators feel a loss of control in the MOO.
  • They are also bothered by what they see as
    messy blogs and listservs because it is hard
    for them to see any structure in these technology
    applications.
  • Assimilators prefer moderated discussions and a
    threaded outline.
  • When teaching their own classes, Assimilators
    prefer to provide prompts for their students.
  • While MOO resistance came mostly from students
    whose dominant learning style favors reflection
    and structure, these students were stretched by
    the MOO experience.
  • Reflective learners (Assimilators and Divergers)
    report a tendency to blurk on blogs and to lurk
    in MOOs.

31
Research Question 2.Which technologies were
selected and modeled in class? And which
technologies did graduate students select and
implement to fit the goals of their classes?
  • Blogs, both community and individual, were
    implemented in English 652.
  • This form of technology often seemed to result in
    stretches as noted in self-reflections.
  • In keeping with the course objectives, blogging
    offered another kind of public accountability. .
    . It helps increase students awareness of genre,
    audience and purpose (Reading, Blogging and
    Rithmetic Flahagan).
  • Following the use of blogs in 652, the four
    students we examined approached and implemented
    blogs in a variety of ways.

32
Comparison of On-Task Blog Postings of Four
Students (32 required)
Diana Diverger Alexis Assimilator Catherine Converger Anna Accommodator
On-task postings done 110 52 52 149
Percentage of required postings done 343.75 162.5 162.5 465.63
33
Comparison of On- and Off-Task Blog Postings of
Four Students
Diana Diverger Alexis Assimilator Catherine Converger Anna Accommodator
On-task postings done 110 52 52 149
Percentage of on-task postings done 93.22 92.31 91.22 94.3
Off-task postings done 8 4 2 9
Percentage of off-task postings done 6.78 7.69 8.77 5.69
34
Dianas On-Task Personal Blog Postings
35
Diana (Diverger) Types of Blog Postings
I do it the same/I agree and why 38.18
Analysis of particular technology application 27.27
Connections of technology to own life/use 34.54
Connecting current practice to new technology 18.18
Personalizing/Community building 53.63
Self-assessment 14.54
On-task blog postings of more than one type 67.27
36
Diana (Diverger)
  • Diana reflects first on why technology fits,
    personally, then asks what she can do with it,
    and later applies the blog to parent/teacher
    communication opportunities in her middle school.
  • She also sees blogs as a place for teacher tasks,
    as a site for students to ask homework questions,
    and as a method for her class responses to
    literature, videos, speakers.
  • Diana, as a Diverger, illustrates how personal
    meaning and social interactions are so important
    to her teaching pedagogy. As shown by the charts,
    Dianas largest type of posting was categorized
    as personalizing/community building, illustrating
    her need for social interaction.

37
Alexis On-Task Personal Blog Postings
38
Alexis (Assimilator) Types of Blog Postings
I do it the same/I agree and why 19.23
Connections of technology to own life/use 55.77
Frustration 26.92
Personalizing/Community building 38.46
Self-assessment 25
On-task blog postings of more than one type 73.07
39
Alexis (Assimilator)
  • Initially, Alexis tries to be cheerful about blog
    entries, but is frustrated.
  • However, when she becomes more comfortable with
    blogs and wants to set up blog opportunities for
    her high school students, she is again frustrated
    when the high school administration thwarts her
    plans by saying there are security issues for her
    students.
  • Alexis does set up a 7-9th grade assignment on
    web evaluations that students post on a blog.
  • In keeping with her learning preference, Alexis
    took the theory explained in The Classroom Blog
    and constructed book club discussion groups using
    two of her high school classes.
  • Alexis shows an Assimilators preference for
    sequential organization, and she does that by
    establishing blogs that work in her classroom.

40
Catherines On-Task Personal Blog Postings
41
Catherine (Converger) Types of Blog Postings
I do it the same/I agree and why 53.85
Analysis of particular technology application 19.23
Connections of technology to own life/use 34.61
Personalizing/Community building 48.08
Self-assessment 28.85
On-task blog postings of more than one type 53.85
42
Catherine (Converger)
  • Catherine makes her required blogs entries but
    says she wont continue blog use. Is she
    uncomfortable with it?
  • She does give her first-year composition students
    the option for public presentations on a blog.
  • Catherines resistance to the blog is
    demonstrated by the fact that she never adds to
    or initiates community threads.
  • Because workability is important to Convergers,
    she might not have seen workable sides of
    blogging.
  • Was she struggling to find what worked? Unsure of
    her own capabilities with technology?

43
Annas On-Task Personal Blog Postings
44
Anna (Accommodator) Types of Blog Postings
Response to Research 7.4
I do it differently/I disagree and why 9.4
I do it the same/I agree and why 42.96
Analysis of particular technology application 28.18
Connections of technology to own life/use 38.25
Personalizing/Community building 34.22
Self-assessment 11.4
On-task blog postings of more than one type 56.38
45
Anna (Accommodator)
  • Anna, the dynamic learner who needs unstructured
    experimental organization, took the 652 blogging
    experiences and made them her own.
  • In the community blog, she initiated many threads
    and responded to many othersa true community
    builder.
  • She went on to implement a blog in her current
    Intensive English class as a way to encourage
    greater audience awareness in the public
    discourse written by her second language
    students.
  • Anna likes the blog and even sets up a Chinese
    blog as a way to stay in touch with her friends.

46
Technology Preferences According to Style
Accommodators enjoy all technology (like change) especially enjoy MOO and blogs say the least about listserv Divergers prefer community blogs and listserv to personal blogs have mixed feelings about MOO
Convergers enjoy MOO and blogs have mixed feelings about listserv Assimilators prefer blog to listserv but have mixed feelings about both dislike MOO
47
Divergers Technology Preferences
MOO Mixed like interaction, sense of community, personal reinforcement from others (such as nods or direct response), and the ability to lurk and read dislike the fast flow of ideas and the fact that by the time they compose what they wanted to say, it has often already been said Listserv Like like the personal involvement like the opportunity to read, write, and respond at their own pace like conver-sations that unfold over time Blogs Like prefer personal blog as place to journal when ideas occur or to capture information for later reflection prefer community blog as space for clarifying ideas on subject and for interacting with others prefer community blog over personal blog find reading blogs fun can get to know others can search for interesting titles or quotes owning personal blog brings sense of freedom
48
Assimilators Technology Preferences
MOO Dislike dislike loss of control find discussion hard to follow and messy threading isnt visually apparent dislike social interaction dislike the fast pace, lack of focus, and opinionated nature of MOO Listserv Mixed dislike lack of structure and tangential thoughts find speed too fast and postings hard to manage like defined audience and boundaries of listserv like hearing what experts think and teacher has to say Blog Mixed prefer the more structured feel of blogs to the more random feel of listserv find the more obvious threading easier to follow especially like the community blog when threads managed by teacher dislike the loosey goosey feel of the threading would prefer threaded discussion forums where threads are hierarchically displayed like the ability to blurk
49
Convergers Technology Preferences
MOO Like like the ability to make connections among ideas in MOO can control own learning in MOO its hands-on Listserv Mixed like explanations dislike the fact that ideas arent linked dislike repetition of ideas Blogs Like can gain insights in blog can be creative with color/photos in blog
50
Accommodators Technology Preferences
Accommodators like all technology can adapt to various situations and enjoy change. Accommodators like all technology can adapt to various situations and enjoy change. Accommodators like all technology can adapt to various situations and enjoy change.
MOO Like like diverse perspectives enjoy collaboration opportunities benefit from unstructured and creative environment enjoy the focus on topic, not person Listserv Like like interaction Blogs Like like to explore the hidden possibilities love interaction enjoy reading and various perspectives like to develop knowledge or expertise appreciate choice of topics like running around (blog) rather than running into (listserv) something like open, public audience
51
Research Question 3.Is a particular
technological application selected because of a
fit with learning style, or is it resisted
because it did not fit with the dominant learning
style?
  • Some examples of fit can be seen through the
    four students as they led MOO discussions on
    articles read by the entire class.

52
Diana (Diverger)
  • Diana, in her March 28 discussion, provides a
    slide on an article and asks, In what ways do
    you see technology working with your course
    goals? In what ways does technology not fit? When
    not many peers respond, Diana rephrases the
    questions by asking, Im curious to see where
    you all think technology fits best. And where
    does it does it not fit?
  • Diana often uses this rephrasing discussion
    pattern to engage her peers a fit with her
    preference for an atmosphere of high involvement.

53
Alexis (Assimilator)
  • Alexis, in her March 11 discussion, used many
    slides. These slides might have been her way of
    organizing and accumulating facts to be analyzed.
  • In her presentation, she asked What? questions.
    For example, she often asked, What did you think
    about. . .? What do you think about the
    cross-curricular effects? or she would say, I
    questioned. . . .
  • Alexiss other responses to the group discussion
    seem motivated at involving them in their own
    applications of the creative uses of technology
    and ways to reconsider writing strategies.

54
Catherine (Converger)
  • Catherine, in her February 21 discussion, used a
    few quotes on slides and responded by saying,
  • Thats an interesting question.
  • Yes, that can be a problem.
  • I talk about it in my class.
  • Yes, thats true.
  • While she probably saw these comments as
    affirmations to classmates who participated in
    the discussion, the comments come across as
    perfunctory.
  • She never asks follow-up questions and does not
    encourage the extension of the discussion.
  • She never asks How questions in her discussion.
    This could be seen as a form of resistance to
    MOOing or to the online discussions.

55
Anna (Accommodator)
  • Anna, in her April 4 discussion, tends to ask
    many open-ended questions. She also asks her
    peers,
  • What do you need to do for your own class?
  • What are students attitudes towards. . .?
  • Do you agree/disagree with the author?
  • Give examples to support your reasons.
  • These questions seem to represent a fit with
    her learning preference for applying information
    in new ways, going beyond the class, and
    considering the larger audience, in this case,
    students of her classmates.
  • Anna writes an end-of-the-course evaluation in
    which she talks about the advantages of online
    discussion over traditional class discussion.

56
Research Question 4.What insights were gained in
students self-reflections on the intersections
of learning style, technology, and pedagogy? How
did these insights link to our perceptions?
  • Students in English 652 wrote self reflections on
    all of their technology applications.
  • These reflections provide some insights into the
    intersections of learning style, technology, and
    pedagogy.

57
Summary
  • A variety of asynchronous and synchronous
    discussions were modeled and implemented in the
    graduate course.
  • Patterns emerged in the public discourse
    generated by the graduate students.
  • Students have individual learning preferences
    that affect their use of technology and their
    attitudes about technology.
  • When teaching online, it is important to
    implement technology that supports instructional
    goals, speaks to pedagogical needs, and stretches
    all learning styles.
  • Our case study was small a larger study is
    needed.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com