Local Development Framework Core Strategy Issues and Options PowerPoint PPT Presentation

presentation player overlay
1 / 33
About This Presentation
Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Local Development Framework Core Strategy Issues and Options


1
Local Development Framework Core Strategy -
Issues and Options
June 2008
2
Presentation Structure
How does the LDF process work? Core Strategy
Issues and Options Public and Stakeholder
consultation What is the timeframe? Making a
Submission
3
(No Transcript)
4
Core Strategy - key development document -
overall vision, objectives spatial strategy -
replace Rutland Local Plan LDF Core Strategy
Issues and Options 40 key issues possible
options - subject to Sustainability Appraisal.
Public consultation June October 2008 LDF
Core Strategy Submissions Stage Public
Consultation (6 weeks) in Mid 2009 Concludes
with Public Examination and adopted LDF Core
Strategy in 2010
5
Presentation Structure
How does the LDF review process work? Core
Strategy Issues and Options Public and
Stakeholder consultation What is the
timeframe? Making a Submission
6
Document Format
  • Main characteristics of Rutland and key issues
  • Spatial Vision and Objectives
  • Spatial Strategy
  • Creating Sustainable Communities
  • Building our Economy and infrastructure
  • Sustaining our Environment

7
RUTLAND Where we are now KEY ISSUES
8
(No Transcript)
9
LDF CORE STRATEGY VISION Up to 2026
10
LDF CORE STRATEGY STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES
11
SPATIAL OPTIONS FOR GROWTH
Spatial Strategy
  • Key part of the document looks at
  • Options for Growth How much new development
    should take place in Rutland and where should it
    be located?
  • Development in the Villages How should
    villages be grouped in terms of facilities and
    types of development permitted?
  • Development in the Countryside What scale and
    type of development should take place in the
    countryside?

12
SPATIAL OPTIONS FOR GROWTH
  • Options for Growth
  • Amount of new housing determined by Regional
    Plan
  • Draft Regional Plan proposes average 170
    dwellings per year in Rutland 2001-2026
  • Total 4,250 new dwellings over 25 years 1,900
    already built or with planning permission
  • Government guidance stresses need for Core
    Strategy to provide continuous supply of
    housing should development proceed more quickly
    - 230 dwellings per year current rate.
  • Should the LDF provide for more housing than
    needed to meet the Regional Plan targets?

13
(No Transcript)
14
SPATIAL STRATEGY
Balance between town and villages
How much development should be focused in the
two towns?
15
Balance of Development between the Towns and
Villages
  • Oakham existing
  • 4,700 dwellings
  • Uppingham existing
  • 1,800 dwellings

16
SPATIAL STRATEGY
How much development should be centred in
Oakham and Uppingham?
Balance between Oakham and Uppingham
17
Balance of development between Oakham and
Uppingham
18
SPATIAL STRATEGY
Directions for Growth around Oakham and Uppingham
What are most suitable directions for growth?
19
Oakham Directions for Growth?
20
Uppingham Directions for Growth?
21
SPATIAL STRATEGY
Proposed Settlement hierarchy
Are these the right groupings of villages in the
new settlement hierarchy?
22
Rutland Proposed Settlement Hierarchy
23
SPATIAL STRATEGY
  • Scale and type of development in Villages
  • Local Service Centres Largest villages with
    best range of facilities and access to public
    transport
  • Smaller Service Centres - Limited range of
    facilities
  • Suitable for infill development or small
    developments adjoining the villages?
  • Other Villages - few services and facilities
  • Suitable for very minor development only?

24
SPATIAL STRATEGY
  • Development in the Countryside
  • Current policies restrict development in the
    countryside to that needing a countryside
    location and appropriate to the countryside e.g.
  • development essential for agriculture,
    horticulture, forestry, sport, recreation,
    visitors facilities, small-scale employment etc.
  • Should this approach continue or should there be
    a more restrictive approach limiting development
    to locations readily accessible by public
    transport?
  • Suitable for very minor development only?

25
Key Features
Employment land Town centre and retail The Rural
economy and tourism Public Transport walking
cycling
Transport schemes
26
Key Features
Housing Density Type, size
tenure Affordable housing Access provision of
co-ordinated facilities services Support from
the Development Contribution
27
Key Features
  • Landscape, cultural built heritage
  • Design
  • Climate change and renewable energy
  • Waste Management
  • Recycling

28
Presentation Structure
How does the review process work Core Strategy
Issues and Options Public and stakeholder
consultation What is the timeframe? Making a
Submission
29
PUBLIC STAKEHOLDER CONSULTATION
30
Presentation Structure
How does the LDF review process work Core
Strategy Issues and Options Public and
Stakeholder consultation What is the
timeframe? Making a Submission
31
(No Transcript)
32
Presentation Structure
How does the LDF review process work Core
Strategy Issues and Options Public and
Stakeholder consultation What is the
timeframe? Making a Submission
33
MAKING A SUBMISSION
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com