The Common Rule and VHA 1200'5: One and the Same PowerPoint PPT Presentation

presentation player overlay
1 / 48
About This Presentation
Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The Common Rule and VHA 1200'5: One and the Same


1
The Common Rule and VHA 1200.5 One and the Same?
Presented by John C. Hudson Research
Compliance Officer Wm. S. Middleton Memorial
Veterans Hospital Madison, WI
2
Objectives
  • Evaluate applicability of the Common Rule
  • Define the scope of regulations described in VHA
    Handbook 1200.5
  • Describe the areas of overlap between the Common
    Rule and VHA 1200.5

3
What are the Common Rule and VHA 1200.5?
  • The Common Rule
  • Federal Policy for the Protection of Human
    Subjects
  • Originally issued in 1974 as Part 46 of Title 45
    of the Code of Federal Regulations (Subpart A) by
    DHEW now DHHS
  • Adopted in 1991 by 17 agencies

4
17 Federal Agencies that Signed the Common Rule
  • National Science Foundation
  • NASA
  • AID
  • Social Security Administration
  • CIA
  • Consumer Product Safety
  • EPA
  • Dept of Veterans Affairs
  • Dept of Agriculture
  • Dept of Energy
  • Dept of Commerce
  • Dept of Justice
  • Dept of Defense
  • Dept of Education
  • Dept of Transportation
  • Dept of HHS
  • HUD

5
Code of Federal Regulations or the Common
Rule
  • 45 CFR 46 refers to DHHS
  • 38 CFR 16 refers to the VA
  • Also FDA adds 21 CFR 56 (IRB)
  • 21 CFR 50 (informed consent)
  • Big VA difference
  • Subparts B, C, D not included

6
What is VHA Handbook 1200.5?
  • Handbook describing procedures for the protection
    of human subjects
  • VHA 1200.5 issued July 15, 2003
  • Handbook vs. Federal Regulations
  • Same regulatory weight (not optional)
  • Applicability

7
(No Transcript)
8
Common Rule and VHA 1200.5
  • Common Rule
  • Describes Types of Research subject to regulation
  • Defines Key Terms research, human subject,
  • minimal risk
  • Requires Written Assurance of compliance with
    Common Rule
  • Describes Requirements for IRB membership,
    authority, review procedures, records, and
    approval criteria
  • Lists basic Requirements for Informed Consent

9
Common Rule and VHA 1200.5
  • VHA Handbook 1200.5
  • Issued July 2003 same regulatory weight as Fed.
    Regs
  • Describes VA procedures for protection of Human
    Subjects
  • ? interprets Common Rule for every-day
    field use in
  • VA facilities engaged in research
  • SO THEN COMBINING COMMON RULE 1200.5 IS ALL
    YOU NEED TO RUN YOUR HRPP EFFECTIVELY AND MEET
    THE REGS?
  • NO!
  • Together act as major guide, but also need
  • Common Rule subparts, HIPAA, 1200.1, FDA Regs,
  • plus various and sundry other VA, federal,
    state, local regulations, directives, guidance,
    etc., etc.

10
Common Rule and VHA 1200.5
  • VHA Handbook 1200.5
  • Describes Roles/Responsibilities
  • Medical Center Director
  • IRB
  • Investigators
  • Details Duties of IRB
  • Membership, functions, research review, record
    keeping
  • Addresses Special VA Issues
  • Surrogate consent, subject payment, use of VA
    records, investigational drugs and devices,
    non-vets in VA research

11
IRB Composition Responsibilities
12
IRB Membership (.107)
  • At least 5 members with varying backgrounds
  • Gender balance more than one profession
  • At least 1 scientist at least 1 non-scientist
  • At least 1 member not affiliated
  • May not participate if has a COI
  • Invite consultant if require expertise

13
IRB Composition VHA 1200.5
  • Licensed Physician for FDA regulated products
  • ACOS/AO/RCO
  • As non-voting ex officio members only
  • Members of a VA IRB
  • Appointed by the Medical Center Director
  • Initial appointment 3-years
  • Chair of a VA IRB
  • Initial appointment 1-year
  • Affiliate IRB
  • Two VA IRB voting members per IRB
  • One VA IRB voting member must have scientific
    expertise

14
IRB Functions Operations (.108)
  • Follow written procedures
  • NOTE This implies you HAVE
  • written instructions!
  • Review must take place at a convened meeting with
    a majority present, including a non-scientist.
    Approval must be by majority of those present

15
VHA 1200.5 Written procedures for operation
  • Other stuff
  • Communication with RD Committee
  • Reporting requirements
  • Conducting audits
  • Education requirements
  • Reporting to Privacy Officer
  • Reporting to VHA Information Security Officer
  • Major focus document, document, document!
  • 1200.5 give the hows, whens and whos
  • (sometimes implies a bit of the whys)

16
IRB Review of Research (.109)
  • Authority to approve, require modifications, or
    disapprove to observe consent process
  • Informed Consent must follow Common Rule
    requirements (detailed in .116!)
  • Documentation of informed consent
  • (or of waiver of documentation)
  • Notify investigators of decision in writing
  • Continuing review at least annually

17
VHA 1200.5 adds
  • Prior to initiation
  • Research must be reviewed and approved by both
    IRB and RD!
  • Substantive modifications subsequent review must
    be by the convened IRB
  • Specific, minor modifications IRB chair or
    designee may approve on behalf of IRB

18
Continuing Review in VHA 1200.5
  • Requires a written progress report
  • Brief summary
  • Number of subjects (entered/withdrawn)
  • Gender minority status
  • How many from vulnerable populations
  • Proposal approved amendments
  • Current consent document
  • Current HIPAA Authorization document

19
Continuing Review in VHA 1200.5
  • Written Progress Report (cont.)
  • Info that may impact on risk benefit ratio
  • Research findings to date
  • Summary of DSMB/DMC info
  • All SAEs and UAEs reported as required
  • New scientific or other relevant findings

20
Continuing Review in 1200.5 But wait,
theres more!
Automatic suspension if Continuing Review
not Completed w/in IRB-specified time
  • Local research office notifies PI
  • Continue research interventions?
  • ONLY in consultation with COS
  • ?if in best interest of individual
    subjects
  • Inform other agencies as appropriate (e.g., FDA)
  • Re-review/re-approval must occur
  • prior to re-initiation

21
Expedited Review (.110)
  • Must fit list of categories in Fed. Register
  • (see 1200.5, Appendix B, Para 2)
  • No more than minimal risk,
  • or minor change in approved protocol
  • Carried out by IRB Chair or designee
  • (cannot disapprove the research)
  • Have a process to inform the IRB members
  • VHA 1200.5? ? No difference other than
  • Appendix B category descriptions

22
A Tribute to All Our Dedicated Researchers The
Regs are for them, too
23
Criteria for IRB Approval (.111)
  • The Big Kahuna One-Eleven
  • ? Describes what IRB must review in a protocol
  • ? .111 .116 is the meat and potatoes of IRB
    function (or meat substitute, if you prefer)
  • Risks to subjects are minimized
  • Risks reasonable in relation to benefits
  • Selection of subjects equitable

24
.111 continued
  • Prospective consent (i.e., meeting .116)
  • Informed consent appropriately documented
  • Adequate provisions for safety monitoring
  • Adequate provisions to protect privacy and
    confidentiality
  • Also Protections for Vulnerable Subjects
  • Safeguards if children, prisoners, pregnant
    women, mentally disabled, or other vuln. pop.
    subjects included

25
VHA 1200.5 adds a bit more
  • Conflict of interest
  • IRB ensures that the institution has COI
    procedures and policies in place
  • Includes investigators, institution, and
    committees
  • Investigator education
  • IRB assures that investigators meet educational
    requirements
  • As mandated by facility, VA ORD, OHRP, and other
    groups

26
Review by institution (.112)
  • Research approved by an IRB may be subject to
    further review by official of the institution
  • Those officials MAY NOT approve the research if
    it is not approved by the IRB
  • Rule of thumb
  • Disapprovals can override approvals
  • Approvals cannot override disapprovals

27
Suspension/termination (.113) Cooperative
research (.114)
  • IRB has authority to suspend/terminate a project
    not being conducted in accordance with IRB
    requirements or associated with unexpected
    harm to subjects
  • Such actions must be reported
  • An institution participating in a cooperative
    project may (w/ proper approval) enter into a
    joint review arrangement, rely upon the review of
    another qualified IRB, or make similar
    arrangements for avoiding duplication
  • 1200.5 has nothing to add
  • except who to report to

28
IRB records (.115)
  • Proposals reviewed, scientific evaluations,
    consent docs, progress reports, injury reports
  • IRB meeting minutes IRB membership lists
  • Continuing review activities
  • Relevant correspondence
  • Written IRB procedures
  • Statements of significant new findings

29
1200.5 Adjustments Additions
  • Minutes written reviewable in 3 weeks
  • Additional vulnerable subject safeguards
  • Determination of risk level
  • Correspondence with RD Committee
  • Retain records for 5 years (CR 3 years)
  • Records are the property of the VA
  • Also
  • RD Comm. must receive review
  • non-redacted IRB minutes (VA or affiliate)

30
Informed Consent .116 .117
31
General requirements for informed consent (.116)
  • a. Basic Elements of Consent
  • Study involves research
  • Description of risks
  • Description of benefits
  • Alternative procedures
  • Confidentiality identifiably
  • Compensation for injury (MinRisk )
  • Who to contact (subjects rights injury
    questions)
  • Statement participation voluntary

32
General requirements for informed consent (.116)
  • b. Additional elements
  • Unforeseeable risks
  • Anticipated circumstances participation
    terminated
  • Additional costs to subjects
  • Consequences of withdrawal from research
  • Reporting of significant new findings
  • Approximate number of subjects

33
General requirements for informed consent (.116)
  • c. Alteration or waiver of elements of consent
    Govt. Study
  • Research conducted by/subject to approval of
    state/local govt. designed to study, evaluate or
    otherwise examine public benefit program, AND
  • Research could not practicably be carried out
    without the waiver or alteration
  • d. Alteration or waiver of elements of consent
    Min. Risk
  • No more than minimal risk
  • Not adversely affect the rights and welfare of
    subjects
  • Could not be practicably done without waiver
  • AND
  • When appropriate subjects provided pertinent
    information

34
Documentation of informed consent (.117)
  • Documenting written consent
  • Approved by the IRB
  • Signed by the subject or LAR
  • Copy given to person signing the form
  • Consent process
  • May be read to subject or LAR
  • Given adequate opportunity to read before it
    is signed OR
  • Given a short form (documenting oral presentation
    of elements of consent)

35
Documentation of informed consent (.117)
  • Waiver of requirements
  • If only record linking subject with research and
    breach of confidentiality would be harmful,
  • OR
  • Research presents no more than minimal risk AND
    involves no procedures for which written consent
    is normally required outside of research

36
VHA 1200.5 Additions to .116 .117 Appendix C
  • VA form 10-1086 must be used
  • Signed, dated by
  • Subject or LAR
  • Person obtaining consent
  • Witness (to signature only)
  • File original ICF in subjects case history
  • Flag medical record
  • Progress note document consent process
  • Consent criteria
  • Entry and termination dates

37
Subparts B-D Vulnerable Pops
38
Subpart B - Protections for Pregnant Women, Human
Fetuses and Neonates
  • ?Definitions ?Duties of the IRB
  • ?Risks and benefits ?Consent process
  • VHA 1200.5? Appendix D, Para 4
  • Forbids research with a fetus, in utero or ex
    utero (including human fetal tissue)
  • Forbids research related to in vitro
    fertilization
  • Allows participation of pregnant women
  • ? rules consistent with Common Rule Sub-part B

39
Subpart C- Additional Protections for Research
Involving Prisoners as Subjects
  • ?Definitions ?Duties of the IRB
  • ?Permitted Research
  • VHA 1200.5? Appendix D, Para 5
  • Prisoner research allowed BUT
  • ? Requires a waiver from the CRADO
  • IF waiver granted
  • ? rules consistent with Common Rule Sub-part C

40
Subpart D-Additional Protections for Children as
Subjects in Research
  • Definitions
  • Duties of the IRB
  • Risks of Research
  • Of special note when research involving children
  • may be greater than minimum risk
  • Requirements for permission by parents or
    guardians and for assent by children

41
1200.5 Research Involving Children
  • Appendix D, Paragraph 7
  • Requires a waiver from the CRADO
  • IF waiver is granted
  • ? rules consistent with Common Rule Sub-part D
  • For details VHA Directive 2001-028
  • Guidance for waiver process
  • Requires IRB to have specific policies and
    procedures regarding children in research
  • IRB must have expertise

42
Research Involving Human Subjects with Surrogate
Consent
  • Common Rule
  • Section 117 subjects legally authorized
    representative
  • VHA Handbook 1200.5
  • Paragraph 11
  • Under appropriate conditions
  • 1. Research subject unique to population
  • 2. Priority of who can give consent
  • 3. How determine decision-making capacity
  • Research must meet conditions in Appendix D

43
Research with Surrogate Consent (cont.)
  • VHA Handbook 1200.5 Appendix D, Para. 6
  • Only persons with impaired decision making
    capacity are suitable as research subjects
  • Research entails no significant risks or if
    possibility of harm, there must be at least a
    greater probability of direct benefit
  • Procedures assure participants representatives
    are well informed about their roles and
    obligations
  • Decision making ability may fluctuate
  • Resistance to participation must be honored!

44
Investigational Drugs Devices
45
Investigational Drugs
  • 1200.5, Para 14
  • Mostly follow FDA regs
  • ? especially 21 CFR 312
  • Also VHA Handbook 1108.04
  • Caution definition of investigational drugs for
    VA not same as for FDA
  • Yields to FDA on investigational drug regulatory
    jurisdiction when there is conflict

46
Investigational Devices
  • 1200.5, Para 15
  • Mostly follow FDA regs
  • ? especially 21 CFR 812
  • Particular note Significant Risk (SR)
  • v. Nonsignificant Risk (NSR)
  • Also facility must have procedures for receipt,
    control, custody, and dispensing of
    investigational devices
  • ? of particular interest to AAHRPP

47
Investigators Responsibilities
  • There is NOTHING regarding investigators in the
  • Common Rule except that they must get consent
  • BUT in VHA 1200.5 Paragraph 10
  • Training and credentialing
  • Research plan
  • Consent process
  • Reporting of SAEs and/or AEs
  • Amendments
  • IRB Review
  • Record retention
  • HIPAA

48
QUESTIONS
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com