Title: The Common Rule and VHA 1200'5: One and the Same
1The Common Rule and VHA 1200.5 One and the Same?
Presented by John C. Hudson Research
Compliance Officer Wm. S. Middleton Memorial
Veterans Hospital Madison, WI
2Objectives
- Evaluate applicability of the Common Rule
- Define the scope of regulations described in VHA
Handbook 1200.5 - Describe the areas of overlap between the Common
Rule and VHA 1200.5
3What are the Common Rule and VHA 1200.5?
- The Common Rule
- Federal Policy for the Protection of Human
Subjects - Originally issued in 1974 as Part 46 of Title 45
of the Code of Federal Regulations (Subpart A) by
DHEW now DHHS - Adopted in 1991 by 17 agencies
417 Federal Agencies that Signed the Common Rule
- National Science Foundation
- NASA
- AID
- Social Security Administration
- CIA
- Consumer Product Safety
- EPA
- Dept of Veterans Affairs
- Dept of Agriculture
- Dept of Energy
- Dept of Commerce
- Dept of Justice
- Dept of Defense
- Dept of Education
- Dept of Transportation
- Dept of HHS
- HUD
5Code of Federal Regulations or the Common
Rule
- 45 CFR 46 refers to DHHS
- 38 CFR 16 refers to the VA
- Also FDA adds 21 CFR 56 (IRB)
- 21 CFR 50 (informed consent)
-
- Big VA difference
- Subparts B, C, D not included
6What is VHA Handbook 1200.5?
- Handbook describing procedures for the protection
of human subjects - VHA 1200.5 issued July 15, 2003
- Handbook vs. Federal Regulations
- Same regulatory weight (not optional)
- Applicability
-
7(No Transcript)
8Common Rule and VHA 1200.5
- Common Rule
- Describes Types of Research subject to regulation
- Defines Key Terms research, human subject,
- minimal risk
- Requires Written Assurance of compliance with
Common Rule - Describes Requirements for IRB membership,
authority, review procedures, records, and
approval criteria - Lists basic Requirements for Informed Consent
9Common Rule and VHA 1200.5
- VHA Handbook 1200.5
- Issued July 2003 same regulatory weight as Fed.
Regs - Describes VA procedures for protection of Human
Subjects - ? interprets Common Rule for every-day
field use in - VA facilities engaged in research
- SO THEN COMBINING COMMON RULE 1200.5 IS ALL
YOU NEED TO RUN YOUR HRPP EFFECTIVELY AND MEET
THE REGS? - NO!
- Together act as major guide, but also need
- Common Rule subparts, HIPAA, 1200.1, FDA Regs,
- plus various and sundry other VA, federal,
state, local regulations, directives, guidance,
etc., etc.
10Common Rule and VHA 1200.5
- VHA Handbook 1200.5
- Describes Roles/Responsibilities
- Medical Center Director
- IRB
- Investigators
- Details Duties of IRB
- Membership, functions, research review, record
keeping - Addresses Special VA Issues
- Surrogate consent, subject payment, use of VA
records, investigational drugs and devices,
non-vets in VA research
11IRB Composition Responsibilities
12IRB Membership (.107)
- At least 5 members with varying backgrounds
- Gender balance more than one profession
- At least 1 scientist at least 1 non-scientist
- At least 1 member not affiliated
- May not participate if has a COI
- Invite consultant if require expertise
13IRB Composition VHA 1200.5
- Licensed Physician for FDA regulated products
- ACOS/AO/RCO
- As non-voting ex officio members only
- Members of a VA IRB
- Appointed by the Medical Center Director
- Initial appointment 3-years
- Chair of a VA IRB
- Initial appointment 1-year
- Affiliate IRB
- Two VA IRB voting members per IRB
- One VA IRB voting member must have scientific
expertise
14IRB Functions Operations (.108)
- Follow written procedures
- NOTE This implies you HAVE
- written instructions!
- Review must take place at a convened meeting with
a majority present, including a non-scientist.
Approval must be by majority of those present
15VHA 1200.5 Written procedures for operation
- Other stuff
- Communication with RD Committee
- Reporting requirements
- Conducting audits
- Education requirements
- Reporting to Privacy Officer
- Reporting to VHA Information Security Officer
- Major focus document, document, document!
- 1200.5 give the hows, whens and whos
- (sometimes implies a bit of the whys)
16IRB Review of Research (.109)
- Authority to approve, require modifications, or
disapprove to observe consent process - Informed Consent must follow Common Rule
requirements (detailed in .116!) - Documentation of informed consent
- (or of waiver of documentation)
- Notify investigators of decision in writing
- Continuing review at least annually
17VHA 1200.5 adds
- Prior to initiation
- Research must be reviewed and approved by both
IRB and RD! - Substantive modifications subsequent review must
be by the convened IRB - Specific, minor modifications IRB chair or
designee may approve on behalf of IRB
18Continuing Review in VHA 1200.5
- Requires a written progress report
- Brief summary
- Number of subjects (entered/withdrawn)
- Gender minority status
- How many from vulnerable populations
- Proposal approved amendments
- Current consent document
- Current HIPAA Authorization document
19Continuing Review in VHA 1200.5
- Written Progress Report (cont.)
- Info that may impact on risk benefit ratio
- Research findings to date
- Summary of DSMB/DMC info
- All SAEs and UAEs reported as required
- New scientific or other relevant findings
20Continuing Review in 1200.5 But wait,
theres more!
Automatic suspension if Continuing Review
not Completed w/in IRB-specified time
- Local research office notifies PI
- Continue research interventions?
- ONLY in consultation with COS
- ?if in best interest of individual
subjects - Inform other agencies as appropriate (e.g., FDA)
- Re-review/re-approval must occur
- prior to re-initiation
21Expedited Review (.110)
- Must fit list of categories in Fed. Register
- (see 1200.5, Appendix B, Para 2)
- No more than minimal risk,
- or minor change in approved protocol
- Carried out by IRB Chair or designee
- (cannot disapprove the research)
- Have a process to inform the IRB members
- VHA 1200.5? ? No difference other than
- Appendix B category descriptions
22A Tribute to All Our Dedicated Researchers The
Regs are for them, too
23Criteria for IRB Approval (.111)
- The Big Kahuna One-Eleven
- ? Describes what IRB must review in a protocol
- ? .111 .116 is the meat and potatoes of IRB
function (or meat substitute, if you prefer)
- Risks to subjects are minimized
- Risks reasonable in relation to benefits
- Selection of subjects equitable
24.111 continued
- Prospective consent (i.e., meeting .116)
- Informed consent appropriately documented
- Adequate provisions for safety monitoring
- Adequate provisions to protect privacy and
confidentiality - Also Protections for Vulnerable Subjects
- Safeguards if children, prisoners, pregnant
women, mentally disabled, or other vuln. pop.
subjects included
25VHA 1200.5 adds a bit more
- Conflict of interest
- IRB ensures that the institution has COI
procedures and policies in place - Includes investigators, institution, and
committees - Investigator education
- IRB assures that investigators meet educational
requirements - As mandated by facility, VA ORD, OHRP, and other
groups
26Review by institution (.112)
- Research approved by an IRB may be subject to
further review by official of the institution - Those officials MAY NOT approve the research if
it is not approved by the IRB - Rule of thumb
- Disapprovals can override approvals
- Approvals cannot override disapprovals
27Suspension/termination (.113) Cooperative
research (.114)
- IRB has authority to suspend/terminate a project
not being conducted in accordance with IRB
requirements or associated with unexpected
harm to subjects - Such actions must be reported
-
- An institution participating in a cooperative
project may (w/ proper approval) enter into a
joint review arrangement, rely upon the review of
another qualified IRB, or make similar
arrangements for avoiding duplication - 1200.5 has nothing to add
- except who to report to
28IRB records (.115)
- Proposals reviewed, scientific evaluations,
consent docs, progress reports, injury reports - IRB meeting minutes IRB membership lists
- Continuing review activities
- Relevant correspondence
- Written IRB procedures
- Statements of significant new findings
291200.5 Adjustments Additions
- Minutes written reviewable in 3 weeks
- Additional vulnerable subject safeguards
- Determination of risk level
- Correspondence with RD Committee
- Retain records for 5 years (CR 3 years)
- Records are the property of the VA
- Also
- RD Comm. must receive review
- non-redacted IRB minutes (VA or affiliate)
30Informed Consent .116 .117
31General requirements for informed consent (.116)
- a. Basic Elements of Consent
- Study involves research
- Description of risks
- Description of benefits
- Alternative procedures
- Confidentiality identifiably
- Compensation for injury (MinRisk )
- Who to contact (subjects rights injury
questions) - Statement participation voluntary
32General requirements for informed consent (.116)
- b. Additional elements
- Unforeseeable risks
- Anticipated circumstances participation
terminated - Additional costs to subjects
- Consequences of withdrawal from research
- Reporting of significant new findings
- Approximate number of subjects
33General requirements for informed consent (.116)
- c. Alteration or waiver of elements of consent
Govt. Study - Research conducted by/subject to approval of
state/local govt. designed to study, evaluate or
otherwise examine public benefit program, AND - Research could not practicably be carried out
without the waiver or alteration - d. Alteration or waiver of elements of consent
Min. Risk - No more than minimal risk
- Not adversely affect the rights and welfare of
subjects - Could not be practicably done without waiver
- AND
- When appropriate subjects provided pertinent
information
34Documentation of informed consent (.117)
- Documenting written consent
- Approved by the IRB
- Signed by the subject or LAR
- Copy given to person signing the form
- Consent process
- May be read to subject or LAR
- Given adequate opportunity to read before it
is signed OR - Given a short form (documenting oral presentation
of elements of consent)
35Documentation of informed consent (.117)
- Waiver of requirements
- If only record linking subject with research and
breach of confidentiality would be harmful, - OR
- Research presents no more than minimal risk AND
involves no procedures for which written consent
is normally required outside of research
36VHA 1200.5 Additions to .116 .117 Appendix C
- VA form 10-1086 must be used
- Signed, dated by
- Subject or LAR
- Person obtaining consent
- Witness (to signature only)
- File original ICF in subjects case history
- Flag medical record
- Progress note document consent process
- Consent criteria
- Entry and termination dates
37Subparts B-D Vulnerable Pops
38Subpart B - Protections for Pregnant Women, Human
Fetuses and Neonates
- ?Definitions ?Duties of the IRB
- ?Risks and benefits ?Consent process
-
- VHA 1200.5? Appendix D, Para 4
- Forbids research with a fetus, in utero or ex
utero (including human fetal tissue) - Forbids research related to in vitro
fertilization - Allows participation of pregnant women
- ? rules consistent with Common Rule Sub-part B
39Subpart C- Additional Protections for Research
Involving Prisoners as Subjects
- ?Definitions ?Duties of the IRB
- ?Permitted Research
-
- VHA 1200.5? Appendix D, Para 5
- Prisoner research allowed BUT
- ? Requires a waiver from the CRADO
- IF waiver granted
- ? rules consistent with Common Rule Sub-part C
40Subpart D-Additional Protections for Children as
Subjects in Research
- Definitions
- Duties of the IRB
- Risks of Research
- Of special note when research involving children
- may be greater than minimum risk
- Requirements for permission by parents or
guardians and for assent by children
411200.5 Research Involving Children
- Appendix D, Paragraph 7
- Requires a waiver from the CRADO
- IF waiver is granted
- ? rules consistent with Common Rule Sub-part D
- For details VHA Directive 2001-028
- Guidance for waiver process
- Requires IRB to have specific policies and
procedures regarding children in research - IRB must have expertise
42Research Involving Human Subjects with Surrogate
Consent
- Common Rule
- Section 117 subjects legally authorized
representative - VHA Handbook 1200.5
- Paragraph 11
- Under appropriate conditions
- 1. Research subject unique to population
- 2. Priority of who can give consent
- 3. How determine decision-making capacity
- Research must meet conditions in Appendix D
43Research with Surrogate Consent (cont.)
- VHA Handbook 1200.5 Appendix D, Para. 6
- Only persons with impaired decision making
capacity are suitable as research subjects - Research entails no significant risks or if
possibility of harm, there must be at least a
greater probability of direct benefit - Procedures assure participants representatives
are well informed about their roles and
obligations - Decision making ability may fluctuate
- Resistance to participation must be honored!
44Investigational Drugs Devices
45Investigational Drugs
- 1200.5, Para 14
- Mostly follow FDA regs
- ? especially 21 CFR 312
- Also VHA Handbook 1108.04
- Caution definition of investigational drugs for
VA not same as for FDA - Yields to FDA on investigational drug regulatory
jurisdiction when there is conflict
46Investigational Devices
- 1200.5, Para 15
- Mostly follow FDA regs
- ? especially 21 CFR 812
- Particular note Significant Risk (SR)
- v. Nonsignificant Risk (NSR)
- Also facility must have procedures for receipt,
control, custody, and dispensing of
investigational devices - ? of particular interest to AAHRPP
47Investigators Responsibilities
- There is NOTHING regarding investigators in the
- Common Rule except that they must get consent
- BUT in VHA 1200.5 Paragraph 10
- Training and credentialing
- Research plan
- Consent process
- Reporting of SAEs and/or AEs
- Amendments
- IRB Review
- Record retention
- HIPAA
48QUESTIONS