The Future of TV: - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 27
About This Presentation
Title:

The Future of TV:

Description:

The influences behind the view. Revolution? Evolution? The impact of change on content ... Meaning that the number and complexity of revenue sources will increase ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:98
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 28
Provided by: Wil49
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The Future of TV:


1
Madrid Spain, October 5 2007
The Future of TV Curators, Aggregators and
Niche Channels
Presented at FORO501 Innovation in Television
Content, platforms and formats Sponsored by
RTVE, UIMP, Abertis Telecom.
2
  • The Future of TV
  • The influences behind the view
  • Revolution?
  • Evolution?
  • The impact of change on content

3
Background
Forrester (UK) Media and Retail sector analyst,
During the dotcom boom then bust.
BBC (UK) Strategy, Factual and Learning The
360 era e.g. Rome on all platforms.
Nordicity (Toronto and London) Consultant
Film, TV, New Media Strategy development for
broadcasters and production industry, in the old
world and the new world
4
  • The Future of TV
  • The influences behind the view
  • Revolution?
  • Evolution?
  • The impact of change on content

5
Jim the new TV viewer?
Jim goes to university
No room or money for a tv doesnt buy cable
package buys broadband for school
Watches tv favourites online CSI, Sopranos, and
Discovery Channel on Joost
  • Jim rarely engages with a Canadian broadcaster .
    online for the Corner Gas and goes to the pub for
    hockey

Graduates from university with student debt not
sure why he should buy a tv subscription package
for 50/month when he gets his favourites for
free . Replaces laptop with big iMac screen and
Apple TV
Jim never watches Traditional TV
6
New technologies drive the Jim possibility
  • Jim could be the norm, as new technologies could
    reduce the bandwidth costs of viewing online
  • With peer-to-peer networks, the greater the
    number of users, the greater the power of the
    network
  • Hence the lower the costs of bandwidth to the
    content distributor for distributing video

Source Jason Roks, PXP
7
Advertising will follow Jim.. possibly away from
TV
  • Internet advertising in Canada is growing by
    18.8 Compound Annual Growth Rate compared to TV
    at 3.8.
  • As more Jims shift to viewing TV online, ad
    dollars also shift to the Web so is the
    traditional television business model under
    threat?

Current and Forecasted Ad Revenue in Canada
(U.S., 2005)
8
  • The Future of TV
  • The influences behind the view
  • Revolution?
  • Evolution?
  • The impact of change on content

9
In actual fact, Jim is a Minority (for now)
  • 90 of Canadians watch tv with a BDU subscription
    and pay 50
  • 10 watch TV free via terrestrial analogue tv
  • 29 between ages 9 and 29 view tv content online

10
In Canada, there is evidence that traditional TV
is still the Main Screen
CBC audiences typically hover around 500-700,000
viewers (4 share) Little Mosque in 2007 hit 2m
HD TV Uptake is Steadily Increasing
of households
Nordicity Estimates for HDTV Set Uptake in Canada

11
In the UK, terrestrial TV still reigns supreme
TV Viewing in the UK by type of platform
12
  • The Future of TV
  • The influences behind the view
  • Revolution?
  • Evolution?
  • The impact of change on content

13
  • The impact of evolutionary change on content
  • New players aggregators, curators and niche
    channels-- will emerge, but only a few will see
    success
  • Producers and Broadcasters will pursue hybrid
    models of revenue generation
  • New and hybrid models will not change forms of
    content over night, but over time development
    will be impacted

14
  • The impact of evolutionary change on content
  • New players aggregators, curators and niche
    channels-- will emerge, but only a few will see
    success
  • Producers and Broadcasters will pursue hybrid
    models of revenue generation
  • New and hybrid models will not change forms of
    content over night, but over time development
    will be impacted

15
New Players Aggregators
Aggregating available content into one portal or
player
16
New Players Curators
Curating or collecting the best content, both
video and interactive content, around a certain
subject or audience.
17
New Players Niche Channels
A site dedicated to a specific program or a
specific stream of programming
  • PRODUCER DRIVEN Têtes à Claques
  • Tetes-a-claques, Quebecois site
  • Animated clips posted daily
  • BROADCASTER DRIVEN - CurlTV
  • Niche broadcaster online only
  • Curling games for die-hard fans
  • Subscription fees charged

18
But the Economics are a challenge with these new
models
  • The dirty truth of the long tail only the
    aggregators make real money from aggregation
  • Revenue shares based on a cut of advertising will
    be slim for each content provider
  • Curating is a tough business, as audiences have
    to be generated before they can be monetized
  • Heavy.com the cost of generating an audience
    via marketing the revenues generated by
    monetizing the audience
  • To succeed, niche channels will struggle to
    command the perfect combination of
  • High CPMs (ad rates) and/or subscription fees
  • High user numbers
  • Low production and distribution costs
  • Low marketing costs

19
  • The impact of evolutionary change on content
  • New players aggregators, curators and niche
    channels-- will emerge, but only a few will see
    success
  • Producers and Broadcasters will pursue hybrid
    models of revenue generation
  • While new and hybrid models will not change forms
    of content over night, over time development will
    be impacted

20
Realistically most Producers and Broadcasters
will Pursue Hybrid Models
  • Because of the difficult economics of the new
    players, broadcasters and producers will pursue
    both traditional and new sources of revenue

13 x 30 eps can be sold to broadcasters,
domestically and internationally
Interactive content and games can provide
alternative revenue streams, e.g. via sponsorship
Media player video content can provide
alternative revenue streams, via sponsorship
which is more heavily regulated in linear world
21
Meaning that the number and complexity of
revenue sources will increase
Current and Projected Sources of Production
Funding - Canada
22
  • The impact of evolutionary change on providers of
    and forms of content
  • New players aggregators, curators and niche
    channels-- will emerge, but only a few will see
    success
  • Producers and Broadcasters will pursue hybrid
    models of revenue generation
  • New and hybrid models will not change forms of
    content over night, but over time development
    will be impacted

23
Implications on Content Production
  • The development process will increasingly
    incorporate consideration of the following
    questions
  • Does the content invite opportunities for
    sponsorship, and/or product placement?
  • Can the content travel internationally to
    maximise value?
  • Is interactive content versionable e.g. be sold
    as components, including for games?
  • Able to produce spin-off products e.g., books,
    and other products

24
Implications on Content Production
  • A complex matrix algorithm will be needed to
    determine the maximum value of each different
    type of rights
  • Who gets to distribute the program online and for
    how long and in which territory? First window
    broadcaster? Second window? How will it be
    geo-blocked?
  • When are rights values exhausted by
    broadcasters before a producer dares distribute
    solo or direct to aggregators, such as Joost?
  • Which aggregator, curator, or broadcaster will
    promise the highest revenue share?

25
Implications on Content Production
  • Content must be found and viewed to make money,
    with both the new and the hybrid business models
  • So, what does content need to include to ensure
    this
  • Metagged with popular key words to be found on an
    aggregator?
  • Shock-factor encouraging viral marketing?
  • Heavy marketing budgets?
  • Attention grabbing titling?

26
Conclusions
  • The future of TV is a brave new world where the
    opportunities are high
  • Viewers can be reached in any number of ways
  • Potential buyers and distributors are numerous
  • Costs of production and distribution decrease
  • But the challenges are equally high
  • The fight for viewers attention becomes harder
  • Despite low distribution and production costs,
    generating enough revenue from each buyer and
    distributor is still difficult.
  • The survivors will be innovators of content as
    well as of business models

27
Thank-you
  • For more information about Nordicity
  • www.nordicity.com
  • Contact
  • Terri Wills
  • twills_at_nordicity.com
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com