Title: Economic Decentralization and Political Centralization: Implications for Poverty Alleviation
1Economic Decentralization and Political
Centralization Implications for Poverty
Alleviation
2Background
- Successful development-led approach for poverty
alleviation - However, the speed of poverty reduction has
slowed down - Therefore, calling for a paradigm shift towards
more transfers and targeting.
3Background
- In the eleventh five-year plan, the central
government has committed to significant increase
investment and transfers in the rural and
interior regions - Can the money reach the poor as expected?
4A Brief Walk over the History
- Central planning to the market economy
- Opening up
- Decentralization
- Privatization
- Governance structure has changed little.
5Chinas Fiscal Structure
- Fiscal decentralization
- Expenditures tie more closely to revenue
- Horizontally, inter-judiciary competition.
6Chinas Political Structure
- Organization form.
- replicate, vertical hierarchy structure
- irrelevant of economic size and local needs.
- Strong central mandates.
- Family planning
- Social stability and occupational safety (no
major accidents) - Other central tasks
7Hierarchy Structure
- Central
- Province
- Prefecture
- County 1500
- Township 1000
- Village 200
- ???????
- Source IFPRI Survey at Guizhou and Gansu
5000
8(No Transcript)
9Number of Bureaus in Yingshan County
Source XU Yong, 2004
10Uneven Fiscal Dependent Burden
11Regressive Tax Rate
12Two Spirals
- Tax burdens are extremely high in poor regions
with agriculture as the major means of
production. - Downward spiral small tax base, more extraction
from limited agricultural surplus and nonfarm
activities, worsening investing environment, and
lowering public goods provision. - They are low in developed regions initially with
a large nonfarm sector. - Virtuous cycle light tax burden for each
enterprise, more public inputs, better investing
environment.
13Poor Region Race to the Top
- Big government and predatory investment
environment. - Devote most energy to obtain transfers from the
upper level government. - Keep the poverty county status (these counties
are growing slower). -
14Coastal Region Race to the Bottom
- Less tax on capital
- Small governments and better investment
environment - but often under provision of public goods (such
as crime problem) -
15Industrial Tax Rate, 1994
16Conclusions
- Decentralization has hardened local budget. But
due to differences in initial conditions, the
ability to provide public goods and fulfill the
mandates has become more varied over time. - The differences in the levels of public goods
provision in turn affect the investing
environment for private and foreign capital.
17Conclusions
- As more people migrate from interior regions to
the coast, the actual fiscal burdens to support
the government have become increasingly uneven
across regions. - The problem becomes more acute as China abolished
the agricultural taxes.
18Hierarchy Structure
- Central
- Province
- Prefecture
- County 1500
- Township 1000
- Village 200
- ???????
- Source IFPRI Survey in Gansu Province
5000
19(No Transcript)
20(No Transcript)
21Conclusions
- It is a good news that the government has focused
more on the rural and poor areas. - However, more transfers may not reach to the
poor. There may be a large leakage in the
trickling down process in the poor regions
because officials are hungry and therefore are
more likely extending a grabbing hand.
22Implications
- Cautious note potential problems of soft
budget and aid dependency associated with
transfers when there are many redundant staffs in
local governments. - Increasing transfers alone is not enough!
- How to reduce the government size in the poor
regions deserves more research. ---- Luos talk
on entitlement exchange.
23Entitlement Trading
- Land development right transfer within provinces
- Government staffing quota (borrowing police
officers) - Pollution permit
24Economic Growth and Regional Inequality
Zhang and Kanbur (2005)
25Distribution of Per Capita GDP, 1994 2000
Yao and Zhang (2006)
26Coastal-Inland Inequality
Zhang and Kanbur (2005)
27(No Transcript)