Title: Operational NCEP Global Ocean Data Assimilation System at NCEP: the impact of TOPEXJason1 altimetry
1Operational NCEP Global Ocean Data Assimilation
System at NCEP the impact of TOPEX/Jason-1
altimetry
- D W Behringer NOAA/NCEP
- 4th JCSDA Science Workshop
- Greenbelt Marriott Hotel, Greenbelt, MD
- May 31 - June 1, 2006
2Seasonal to Interannual Prediction at NCEP
Climate Forecast System (CFS)
3Seasonal to Interannual Prediction at NCEP
4 Ocean observations used in GODAS
- Requirements
- A data set that spans 20 years.
- Global coverage with emphasis on the tropics.
- Emphasis on the surface and upper ocean.
- Consequently
- Primary reliance on ocean profiles (XBT, TAO,
Argo) and on SST (Reynolds analysis). - Stability of TAO and growth of Argo mean in situ
profiles retain central importance. - Satellite altimetry, available since 1992,
arrived at a time when ocean models were already
well constrained by in situ data.
5(No Transcript)
6(No Transcript)
7GODAS Experiments
- GODAS - operational version, assimilates
temperature from XBTs (xT), Argo/Argo-like (aT)
and TAO/Triton/PIRATA (tT) and synthetic salinity
(sS) - GODAS-T/J - assimilates xT, aT, tT, sS and
TOPEX/Jason1 (TJ) - RA6 - Previous operational system, Pacific Ocean
only, assimilates xT, aT, and tT, but NOT
salinity - CONTROL - control, model is configured as in
GODAS, but there is no data assimilation
812 / 28 / 1997 - 1 / 07 / 1998
9Guam RMS COR CON 9.62
0.53 GDS 4.42 0.88 GDS-T/J1 3.13
0.93 Majuro RMS COR CON
6.43 0.56 GDS 4.63
0.81 GDS-T/J1 3.22 0.90 Pago Pago
RMS COR CON 4.71 0.80 GDS
3.06 0.92 GDS-T/J1 2.27 0.96
10Nauru RMS COR CON 5.05
0.85 GDS 5.11 0.82 GDS-T/J1 4.38
0.88 Kapingamarangi RMS
COR CON 4.97 0.82 GDS 3.73
0.90 GDS-T/J1 3.14 0.93 Santa Cruz
RMS COR CON 4.39 0.88 GDS
2.54 0.97 GDS-T/J1 2.10 0.97
11(No Transcript)
12(No Transcript)
13Atlantic Ocean - Temperature Analyses vs CTD - A16
14Atlantic Ocean - Salinity Analyses vs CTD - A16
15Concluding Remarks
- A consistent, uninterrupted altimetry data set
(TOPEX/Jason-1) has been available since late
1992, providing a good basis for testing its
impact on GODAS. - In the equatorial Pacific the assimilation of the
TAO mooring data leads to a good representation
of anomalous SSH in the operational GODAS (and
RA6). Assimilation of T/J-1 improves GODAS SSH
beyond the bounds of the TAO array and well into
the subtropics. - In the Atlantic and Indian Oceans the operational
GODAS does a poor job representing the SSH
anomaly field and appears to do no better than
the Control experiment. In these two oceans the
assimilation of T/J1greatly improves GODAS SSH. - Comparison of the Control and GODAS experiments
with an Atlantic CTD section shows that the
assimilation of subsurface data (XBTs, Argo)
largely serves to correct model bias. Comparison
with the GODAS-T/J experiment shows that only
small additional subsurface changes are needed to
improve anomalous SSH.
16Concluding Remarks - continued
- The question remains whether adding new data sets
to the operational GODAS will have an impact on
the NCEP S/I forecasts. An answer to this
question is only possible after a data set is
available for a period of many years (20)
spanning several ENSO events. Any conclusions
drawn from retrospective forecasts over a shorter
period of time would lack statistical
reliability. - In the interim, the most sensible strategy may be
to work to improve both the model and the
assimilation method so as to make the best
possible use of the available data. - Thus, from the perspective of S/I prediction, it
is imperative to support not only the acquisition
of new data, but also the development of improved
techniques to make use of them.
17The End
cfs.ncep.noaa.gov/cfs/godas www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/
products/GODAS