Title: Fundamental%20Accelerator%20Theory,%20Simulations%20and%20Measurement%20Lab%20
1Lecture No. 12
Superconductivity for Accelerators
Soren Prestemon Lawrence Berkeley National
Laboratory
Fundamental Accelerator Theory, Simulations and
Measurement Lab Michigan State University,
Lansing June 4-15, 2007
2References
Superconductivity for Accelerators S. Prestemon
- Many thanks to my colleagues Paolo Ferracin and
Ezio Todescu, who provided their course notes
from USPAS 2007 - Also
- Padamsee, Knobloch, and Hays, RF
Superconductivity for Accelerators - Padamsee, Topical Review, The science and
technology of superconducting cavities for
accelerators, Super. Sci. and Technol., 14
(2001) - Ernst Helmut Brandt, Electrodynamics of
Superconductors exposed to high frequency
fieldsMartin Wilson, Superconducting Magnets - Alex Gurevich, Lectures on Superconductivity
- Marc Dhallé, IoP Handbook on Superconducting
Materials (preprint) - Arno Godeke, thesis Performance Boundaries in
Nb3Sn Superconductors, and for many beautiful
photographs and fruitful conversations - Feynman Lectures on Physics
- A. Jain, Basic theory of magnets, CERN 98-05
(1998) 1-26 - Classes given by A. Jain at USPAS
- MJB Plus, Inc. Superconducting Accelerator
Magnets, an interactive tutorial. - K.-H. Mess, P. Schmuser, S. Wolff,
Superconducting accelerator magnets, Singapore
World Scientific, 1996. - LHC design report v.1 the main LHC ring,
CERN-2004-003-v-1, 2004. - R. Gupta, et al., React and wind common coil
dipole, talk at Applied Superconductivity
Conference 2006, Seattle, WA, Aug. 27 - Sept. 1,
2006. - L. Rossi, Superconducting Magnets, CERN
Academic Training, 15-18 May 2000. - S. Wolff, Superconducting magnet design, AIP
Conference Proceedings 249, edited by M. Month
and M. Dienes, 1992, p. 1160-1197. - L. Rossi, The LHC from construction to
commisioning, FNAL seminar, 19 April 2007. - P. Schmuser, Superconducting magnets for
particle accelerators, AIP Conference
Proceedings 249, edited by M. Month and M.
Dienes, 1992, p. 1100-1158.
3Outline
Superconductivity for Accelerators S. Prestemon
- Superconductivity for accelerators
- Basics of superconductivity
- Some historical perspectives
- The energy gap and electron-phonon coupling
- Distinguishing perfect conductors and
superconductors the Meissner state - Type I and II superconductors, the flux quantum
- Pinning the flux quantum for useful conductors
- Using superconductivity for accelerators
- Using the Meissner state for RF applications
- Using type II superconductors for magnets
- Review of magnetic multipoles, and the inverse
problem how to create perfect multipole fields - Design and fabrication issues with real
accelerator magnets - Examples of accelerator magnets
4History
Superconductivity for Accelerators S. Prestemon
- 1911 Kamerlingh Onnes discovery of mercury
superconductivity Perfect conductors - A few years earlier he had succeeded in
liquifying Helium, a critical technological feat
needed for the discovery - 1933 Meissner and Ochsenfeld discover perfect
diamagnetic characteristic of superconductivity
Kamerlingh Onnes, Nobel Prize 1913
5History - Theory
Superconductivity for Accelerators S. Prestemon
- A theory of superconductivity took time to
evolve - 1935 London brothers propose two equations for E
and H results in concept of penetration depth ? - 1950Ginzburg and Landau propose a macroscopic
theory (GL) for superconductivity, based on
Landaus theory of second-order phase transitions
Heinz and Fritz London
Abrikosov, With Princess Madeleine
Ginzburg and Landau (circa 1947) Nobel Prize
1962 Landau Nobel Prize 2003 Ginzburg,
Abrikosov, Leggett (the GLAG members)
6History - Theory
Superconductivity for Accelerators S. Prestemon
- 1957 Bardeen, Cooper, and Schrieffer publish
microscopic theory (BCS) of Cooper-pair formation
that continues to be held as the standard
microscopic theory for low-temperature
superconductors - 1957 Abrikosov considered GL theory for case
??????? - Introduced concept of Type II superconductor
- Predicted flux penetrates in fixed quanta, in the
form of a vortex array
7History High Temperature Superconductors
Superconductivity for Accelerators S. Prestemon
- 1986 Bednorz and Muller discover
superconductivity at high temperatures in layered
materials comprising copper oxide planes
8General Principals
Superconductivity for Accelerators S. Prestemon
- Superconductivity refers to a material state in
which current can flow with no resistance - Not just little resistance - truly ZERO
resistance - Resistance in a conductor stems from scattering
of electrons off of thermally activated ions - Resistance therefore goes down as temperature
decreases - The decrease in resistance in normal metals
reaches a minimum based on irregularities and
impurities in the lattice, hence concept of RRR
(Residual resistivity ratio) - RRR is a rough measure of cold-work and
impurities in a metal
Copper
Aluminum
M. Wilson
RRR?(273K)/ ?(4K))
9Basics ofSuperconductivity
Superconductivity for Accelerators S. Prestemon
- In a superconductor, when the temperature
descends below the critical temperature,
electrons find it energetically preferable to
form Cooper pairs - The Cooper pairs interact with the positive ions
of the lattice - Lattice vibrations are often termed phonons
hence the coupling between the electron-pair and
the lattice is referred to as electron-phonon
interaction - The balance between electron-phonon interaction
forces and Coulomb (electrostatic) forces
determines if a given material is superconducting
Electron-phonon interaction can occur over long
distances Cooper pairs can be separated by many
lattice spacings
x
10Cooper Pairs
Superconductivity for Accelerators S. Prestemon
- The strength of the electron-phonon coupling
determines the energy gap generated at the Fermi
surface we can determine the spatial dimension
x0 of the Cooper pairs - The Cooper pairs behave like Bosons, i.e. they
condense into a collective wave - Current is carried by the ensemble of Cooper pair
charges, leading to a slow drift velocity and no
scattering from impurities
Alex Guerivich, lecture on superconductivity
(Uncertainty principle)
kBBoltzmann constant 1.38x10-23 ?DDebye
frequency lep electron-phonon coupling geuler
constant0.577
11Diamagnetic Behavior of Superconductors
Superconductivity for Accelerators S. Prestemon
- What differentiates a perfect conductor from a
diamagnetic material?
A perfect conductor apposes any change to the
existing magnetic state
12The LondonEquations
Superconductivity for Accelerators S. Prestemon
- Derive starting from the classical Drude model,
but adapt to account for the Meissner effect - The Drude model applies classical kinetics to
electron motion - Assumes static positively charged nucleus,
electron gas of density n. - Electron motion damped by collisions
- The penetration depth ?L is the characteristic
depth of the supercurrents on the surface of the
material.
Source of resistance in Drude model 0 for
superconductor
First London equation
Second London equation
13ClassifyingSuperconductors
Superconductivity for Accelerators S. Prestemon
- The density of states ns of the Cooper pairs
decreases to zero near a superconducting /normal
interface, with a characteristic length x0
(coherence length, first introduced by Pippard in
1953). The two length scales x and lL define much
of the superconductors behavior. - The coherence length is proportional to the mean
free path of conduction electrons e.g. for pure
metals it is quite large, but for alloys (and
ceramics) it is often very small. Their ratio
determines flux penetration - From GLAG theory, if
Note in reality x and lL are functions of
temperature
x
14Type I and IISuperconductors
Superconductivity for Accelerators S. Prestemon
- Type I superconductors are characterized by the
Meissner effect, i.e. flux is fully expulsed
through the existence of supercurrents over a
distance lL.
- Type II superconductors find it energetically
favorable to allow flux to enter via normal zones
of fixed flux quanta fluxoids or vortices. - The fluxoids or flux lines are vortices of normal
material of size px2 surrounded by
supercurrents shielding the superconducting
material.
15ThermodynamicCritical Field
Superconductivity for Accelerators S. Prestemon
- The Gibbs free energy of the superconducting
state is lower than the normal state. As the
applied field B increases, the Gibbs free energy
increases by B2/2m0. - The thermodynamic critical field at T0
corresponds to the balancing of the
superconducting and normal Gibbs energies - The BCS theory states that Hc(0) can be
calculated from the electronic specific heat
(Sommerfeld coefficient)
16Fluxoids
Superconductivity for Accelerators S. Prestemon
- Fluxoids, or vortices, are continuous thin tubes
characterized by a normal core and shielding
supercurrents. - The fluxoids in an idealized material subjected
to an applied field and in the absence of
transport current are uniformly distributed in a
triangular lattice so as to minimize the energy
state - Fluxoids in the presence of current flow (e.g.
transport current) are subjected to Lorentz force
- Concept of flux-flow and associated heating
- Solution for real conductors provide mechanism
to pin the fluxoids
From Dhalle
17Critical FieldDefinitions, T0
Superconductivity for Accelerators S. Prestemon
- Hc1 critical field defining the transition from
the Meissner state - Hc Thermodynamic critical field
- Hc2 Critical field defining the transition to
the normal state
M
18Examples ofSuperconductors
Superconductivity for Accelerators S. Prestemon
- Many elements are superconducting at sufficiently
low temperatures - None of the pure elements are useful for
applications involving transport current, i.e.
they do not allow flux penetration - Superconductors for transport applications are
characterized by alloy/composite materials with
kgtgt1
19Aside Uses for Type ISuperconductors
Superconductivity for Accelerators S. Prestemon
- Although type I superconductors cannot serve for
large-scale transport current applications, they
can be used for a variety of applications - Excellent electromagnetic shielding for sensitive
sensors (e.g. lead can shield a sensor from
external EM noise at liquid He temperatures - Niobium can be deposited on a wafer using
lithography techniques to develop ultra-sensitive
sensors, e.g. transition-edge sensors - Using a bias voltage and Joule heating, the
superconducting material is held at its
transition temperature - absorption of a photon changes the circuit
resistance and hence the transport current, which
can then be detected with a SQUID
(superconducting quantum interference device) - See for example research by J. Clarke, UC
Berkeley
Mo/Au bilayer TES detector Courtesy Benford and
Moseley, NASA Goddard
20SuperconductingMaterials Critical Surfaces
Superconductivity for Accelerators S. Prestemon
- The critical surface Jc(B,T,e) defines the
boundary between superconducting state and normal
conducting state in the space defined by magnetic
field, temperature, and current densities.
M.N. Wilson
A. Godeke
21Outline
Superconductivity for Accelerators S. Prestemon
- Superconducting magnets for accelerators
- Basics of superconductivity
- Some historical perspectives
- The energy gap and electron-phonon coupling
- Distinguishing perfect conductors and
superconductors the Meissner state - Type I and II superconductors, the flux quantum
- Pinning the flux quantum for useful conductors
- Using superconductivity for accelerators
- Using the Meissner state for RF applications
- Using type II superconductors for transport
current - magnets - Review of magnetic multipoles, and the inverse
problem how to create perfect multipole fields - Design and fabrication issues with real
accelerator magnets - Examples of accelerator magnets
22Basics of RF FieldsNormal Metals
Superconductivity for Accelerators S. Prestemon
- We have seen the field profiles in RF cavities
- For normal conductors, the equations with jsE
yield
Assume 1D
Skin depth
Hz and Jz follow the same distribution
Note influence of skin depth
23Superconducting RF
Superconductivity for Accelerators S. Prestemon
- In the case of a superconductor, in the vicinity
of the surface the current can be described by a
two-fluid model, with J composed of normal and
Cooper-pair electrons - This model assumes snltltss
- Valid for TltltTc
- Nb T1.9K better than 4.2K
Note it is essential that the superconductor
remain in the Meissner state any flux
penetration will result in unacceptable thermal
loads from flux motion, as well as hysteretic
behavior associated with pinning
We can relate accelerating E-field to surface
magnetic field from equations for TM010 mode Nb
is limited to 57MV/m
24SuperconductingCavity Examples
Superconductivity for Accelerators S. Prestemon
Type SC Normal
Q0 2x109 2x104
P/L W/m, 1MV/m 1.5 56000
Room temp power kW/m, 1MV/m 0.54 112
Room temp power kW/m, 1MV/m 13.5 2800
Data from Padamsee, Knobloch, Hayes
From Proch
25Fabrication Issues
Superconductivity for Accelerators S. Prestemon
- A key issue with any cavity fabrication is
cleanliness - Defects, dirt, etc. can contribute to surface
heating or field emission - Typically require semiconductor-class clean-room
From Padamsee, Topical Review
26On to the NextApplication
Superconductivity for Accelerators S. Prestemon
- Superconducting magnets for accelerators
- Basics of superconductivity
- Some historical perspectives
- The energy gap and electron-phonon coupling
- Distinguishing perfect conductors and
superconductors the Meissner state - Type I and II superconductors, the flux quantum
- Pinning the flux quantum for useful conductors
- Using superconductivity for accelerators
- Using the Meissner state for RF applications
- Using type II superconductors for transport
current - magnets - Review of magnetic multipoles, and the inverse
problem how to create perfect multipole fields - Design and fabrication issues with real
accelerator magnets - Examples of accelerator magnets
27Multifilament WiresMotivations
Superconductivity for Accelerators S. Prestemon
- The superconducting materials used in accelerator
magnets are - subdivided in filaments of small diameters
- to reduce magnetic instabilities called flux
jumps - to minimize field distortions due to
superconductor magnetization - twisted together
- to reduce interfilament coupling and AC losses
- embedded in a copper matrix
- to protect the superconductor after a quench
- to reduce magnetic instabilities called flux jumps
NbTi LHC wire (A. Devred)
NbTi SSC wire (A. Devred)
Godeke, Nb3Sn
Nb3Sn bronze-process wire (A. Devred)
Nb3Sn PIT process wire (A. Devred)
28Multifilament Wires Fabricationof NbTi
Multifilament Wires
Superconductivity for Accelerators S. Prestemon
- Monofilament rods are stacked to form a
multifilament billet, which is then extruded and
drawn down. - Heat treatments are applied to produce pinning
centers (?-Ti precipitates). - When the number of filaments is very large,
multifilament rods can be re-stacked (double
stacking process).
A. Devred, 1
29Multifilament Wires Fabricationof Nb3Sn
Multifilament Wires
Superconductivity for Accelerators S. Prestemon
- Internal tin process
- A tin core is surrounded by Nb rods embedded in
Cu (Rod Restack Process, RRP) or by layers of Nb
and Cu (Modify Jelly Roll, MJR). - Each sub-element has a diffusion barrier.
- Advantage no annealing steps and not limited
amount of Sn - Disadvantage small filament spacing results in
large effective filament size (100 ?m) and large
magnetization effect and instability. - Non-Cu JC up to 3000 A/mm2 at 4.2 K and 12 T.
A. Godeke
30Multifilament Wires Fabricationof Nb3Sn
Multifilament Wires
Superconductivity for Accelerators S. Prestemon
- Powder in tube (PIT) process
- Nb2Sn powder is inserted in a Nb tube, put into a
copper tube. - The un-reacted external part of the Nb tube is
the barrier. - Advantage small filament size (30 ?m) and short
heat treatment. - Disadvantage fabrication cost.
- Non-Cu JC up to 2300 A/mm2 at 4.2 K and 12 T.
A. Godeke
31Multifilament Wires Fabricationof Nb3Sn
Multifilament Wires
Superconductivity for Accelerators S. Prestemon
A. Godeke
32Superconducting CablesFabrication of Rutherford
Cable
Superconductivity for Accelerators S. Prestemon
- Rutherford cables are fabricated by a cabling
machine. - Strands are wound on spools mounted on a rotating
drum. - Strands are twisted around a conical mandrel into
an assembly of rolls (Turks head). The rolls
compact the cable and provide the final shape.
Dan Dietderich, Hugh Higley, Nate Liggins
33Superconducting CablesFabrication of Rutherford
Cable
Superconductivity for Accelerators S. Prestemon
- The final shape of a Rutherford cable can be
rectangular or trapezoidal. - The cable design parameters are
- Number of wires Nwire
- Wire diameter dwire
- Cable mid-thickness tcable
- Cable width wcable
- Pitch length pcable
- Pitch angle ?cable (tan?cable 2 wcable /
pcable) - Cable compaction (or packing factor) kcable
-
- i.e the ratio of the sum of the cross-sectional
area of the strands (in the direction parallel to
the cable axis) to the cross-sectional area of
the cable. - Typical cable compaction from 88 (Tevatron) to
92.3 (HERA).
34On to the Next Application
Superconductivity for Accelerators S. Prestemon
- Superconducting magnets for accelerators
- Basics of superconductivity
- Some historical perspectives
- The energy gap and electron-phonon coupling
- Distinguishing perfect conductors and
superconductors the Meissner state - Type I and II superconductors, the flux quantum
- Pinning the flux quantum for useful conductors
- Using superconductivity for accelerators
- Using the Meissner state for RF applications
- Using type II superconductors for transport
current - magnets - Review of magnetic multipoles, and the inverse
problem how to create perfect multipole fields - Design and fabrication issues with real
accelerator magnets - Examples of accelerator magnets
35Field Harmonics
Superconductivity for Accelerators S. Prestemon
- We have seen that the field can be expanded as a
power series - It is common to rewrite this as
- We factorize the main component (B1 for dipoles,
B2 for quadrupoles) - We introduce a reference radius Rref to have
dimensionless coefficients - We factorize 10-4 since the deviations from ideal
field are ?0.01 - The coefficients bn, an are called normalized
multipoles - bn are the normal, an are the skew (adimensional)
36Field Harmonicsof a Current Line
Superconductivity for Accelerators S. Prestemon
- Field given by a current line (Biot-Savart law)
-
- using
- !!!
- we get
Félix Savart, French (June 30, 1791-March 16,
1841)
Jean-Baptiste Biot, French (April 21, 1774
February 3, 1862)
37Field Harmonicsof a Current Line
Superconductivity for Accelerators S. Prestemon
- Now we can compute the multipoles of a current
line
38How to Generate a Perfect Field
Superconductivity for Accelerators S. Prestemon
- Perfect dipoles
- Cos theta proof we have a distribution
- The vector potential reads
- and substituting one has
- using the orthogonality of Fourier series
39How to Build a Good Field Sector Coils for
Dipoles
Superconductivity for Accelerators S. Prestemon
- We compute the central field given by a sector
dipole with uniform current density j - Taking into account of current signs
- This simple computation is full of consequences
- B1 ? current density (obvious)
- B1 ? coil width w (less obvious)
- B1 is independent of the aperture r (much less
obvious) - For a cos?,
40How to Build a Good Field Sector Coils for
Dipoles
Superconductivity for Accelerators S. Prestemon
- Multipoles of a sector coil
- for n2 one has
- and for ngt2
- Main features of these equations
- Multipoles n are proportional to sin ( n angle of
the sector) - They can be made equal to zero !
- Proportional to the inverse of sector distance to
power n - High order multipoles are not affected by coil
parts far from the centre
41How to Build a Good Field Sector Coils for
Dipoles
Superconductivity for Accelerators S. Prestemon
- First allowed multipole B3 (sextupole)
- for ??/3 (i.e. a 60 sector coil) one has B30
- Second allowed multipole B5 (decapole)
- for ??/5 (i.e. a 36 sector coil) or for ?2?/5
(i.e. a 72 sector coil) - one has B50
- With one sector one cannot set to zero both
multipoles but it can be done with more sectors!
wedge
42On to the Next Issue
Superconductivity for Accelerators S. Prestemon
- Superconducting magnets for accelerators
- Basics of superconductivity
- Some historical perspectives
- The energy gap and electron-phonon coupling
- Distinguishing perfect conductors and
superconductors the Meissner state - Type I and II superconductors, the flux quantum
- Pinning the flux quantum for useful conductors
- Using superconductivity for accelerators
- Using the Meissner state for RF applications
- Using type II superconductors for transport
current - magnets - Review of magnetic multipoles, and the inverse
problem how to create perfect multipole fields - Design and fabrication issues with real
accelerator magnets - Examples of accelerator magnets
43Design Issues
Superconductivity for Accelerators S. Prestemon
- Superconducting magnets store energy in the
magnetic field - Results in significant mechanical stresses via
Lorentz forces acting on the conductors these
forces must be controlled by structures - Conductor stability concerns the ability of a
conductor in a magnet to withstand small thermal
disturbances, e.g. conductor motion or epoxy
cracking, fluxoid motion, etc. - The stored energy can be extracted either in a
controlled manner or through sudden loss of
superconductivity, e.g. via an irreversible
instability a quench - In the case of a quench, the stored energy will
be converted to heat magnet protection concerns
the design of the system to appropriately
distribute the heat to avoid damage to the magnet
44Lorentz ForceDipole Magnets
Superconductivity for Accelerators S. Prestemon
- The Lorentz forces in a dipole magnet tend to
push the coil - Towards the mid plane in the vertical-azimuthal
direction (Fy, F? lt 0) - Outwards in the radial-horizontal direction (Fx,
Fr gt 0)
Tevatron dipole
HD2
45Lorentz ForceQuadrupole Magnets
Superconductivity for Accelerators S. Prestemon
- The Lorentz forces in a quadrupole magnet tend to
push the coil - Towards the mid plane in the vertical-azimuthal
direction (Fy, F? lt 0) - Outwards in the radial-horizontal direction (Fx,
Fr gt 0)
TQ
HQ
46Lorentz ForceSolenoids
Superconductivity for Accelerators S. Prestemon
- The Lorentz forces in a solenoid tend to push the
coil - Outwards in the radial-direction (Fr gt 0)
- Towards the mid plane in the vertical direction
(Fy, lt 0)
47Stress and Strain Mechanical Design Principles
Superconductivity for Accelerators S. Prestemon
- LHC dipole at 0 T LHC dipole at 9 T
- Usually, in a dipole or quadrupole magnet, the
highest stresses are reached at the mid-plane,
where all the azimuthal Lorentz forces accumulate
(over a small area).
Displacement scaling 50
48Overview of Nb3SnCoil Fabrication Stages
Superconductivity for Accelerators S. Prestemon
After impregnation
After winding
After reaction
Cured with matrix Reacted
Epoxy impregnated
49Concept of Stability
Superconductivity for Accelerators S. Prestemon
- The concept of stability concerns the interplay
between the following elements - The addition of a (small) thermal fluctuation
local in time and space - The heat capacities of the neighboring materials,
determining the local temperature rise - The thermal conductivity of the materials,
dictating the effective thermal response of the
system - The critical current dependence on temperature,
impacting the current flow path - The current path taken by the current and any
additional resistive heating sources stemming
from the initial disturbance
50Calculation of the Bifurcation Pointfor
Superconductor Instabilities
Superconductivity for Accelerators S. Prestemon
Thanks to Matteo Allesandrini, Texas Center for
Superconductivity, for these calculations and
slides
Ex. RECOVERY of a potential Quench
51Analysis of SQ02
Superconductivity for Accelerators S. Prestemon
QUENCH with 1 mJ
Linear Scale
Quench
Temperature K
Heat deposition
Length m
Time s
52Analysis of SQ02Quench Propagation
Superconductivity for Accelerators S. Prestemon
QUENCH with 1 mJ
Hot Spot temp. profile
Tcritical
Tsharing
53Overview of AcceleratorDipole Magnets
Superconductivity for Accelerators S. Prestemon
Tevatron
HERA
SSC
RHIC
LHC