Nuclear Imaging: Emission Tomography II - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 40
About This Presentation
Title:

Nuclear Imaging: Emission Tomography II

Description:

X- and Y-magnification factors and multienergy spatial registration ... Camera head may not be exactly centered in the gantry. Misalignment may also be electronic ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:34
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 41
Provided by: michae354
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Nuclear Imaging: Emission Tomography II


1
Nuclear ImagingEmission Tomography II
  • SPECT peformance
  • Positron Emission Tomography (PET)

2
SPECT performance
  • Spatial resolution
  • X- and Y-magnification factors and multienergy
    spatial registration
  • Alignment of projection images to
    axis-of-rotation
  • Uniformity
  • Camera head tilt

3
Spatial resolution
  • Can be measured by acquiring a SPECT study of a
    line source (capillary tube filled with a
    solution of Tc-99m, placed parallel to axis of
    rotation)
  • National Electrical Manufacturers Association
    (NEMA) specifies a cylincrical plastic
    water-filled phantom, 22 cm in diameter,
    containing 3 line sources
  • FWHM of the line sources are determined from the
    reconstructed transverse images (ramp filter)

4
(No Transcript)
5
Spatial resolution (cont.)
  • NEMA spatial resolution measurements are
    primarily determined by the collimator used
  • Tangential resolution for peripheral sources (7
    to 8 mm FWHM for LEHR or LEUHR collimators)
    superior to central resolution (9.5 to 12 mm)
  • Tangential resolution for peripheral sources
    better than radial resolution (9.4 to 12 mm) for
    peripheral sources

6
Spatial resolution (cont.)
  • NEMA measurements not necessarily representative
    of clinical performance
  • Studies can be acquired using longer imaging
    times and closer orbits than would be possible in
    a patient
  • Patient studies may require use of lower
    resolution (higher efficiency) collimators to
    obtain adequate image statistics
  • Filters used for clinical studies have lower
    spatial frequency cutoffs than the ramp filters
    used in NEMA measurements

7
Comparison with conventional planar scintillation
camera imaging
  • In theory, SPECT should produce spatial
    resolution similar to that of planar
    scintillation camera imaging
  • In clinical imaging, its resolution is usually
    slightly worse
  • Camera head is closer to patient in conventional
    planar imaging than in SPECT
  • Short time per view of SPECT may mandate use of
    lower resolution collimator to obtain adequate
    number of counts

8
Comparison (cont.)
  • In planar imaging, radioactivity in tissues in
    front of and behind an organ of interest causes a
    reduction in contrast
  • Main advantage of SPECT is markedly improved
    contrast and reduced structural noise produced by
    eliminating the activity in overlapping
    structures
  • SPECT also offers promise of partial correction
    for effects of attenuation and scattering of
    photons in the patient

9
Magnification factors
  • Magnification factors determined from a digital
    image of two point sources placed against the
    cameras collimator
  • If X- and Y-magnification factors are unequal,
    the projection images will be distorted in shape,
    as will coronal, sagittal, and oblique images
  • Transverse images, however, will not be distorted

10
Multienergy spatial registration
  • A measure of the cameras ability to maintain the
    same image magnification, regardless of the
    energies of the photons forming the image
  • Important when imaging radionuclides such as
    Ga-67 and In-111 which emit useful photons of
    more than one energy
  • Uniformity and axis-of-rotation corrections that
    are determined with one radionuclide will only
    be valid for others if multienergy spatial
    registration is correct

11
COR calibration
  • The axis of rotation (AOR) is an imaginary
    reference line about which the head or heads of a
    SPECT camera rotate
  • If a radioactive line source were placed on the
    AOR, each projection image would depict a
    vertical straight line near the center of the
    image
  • This projection of the AOR into the image is
    called the center of rotation (COR)

12
COR calibration (cont.)
  • Ideally, the COR is aligned with the center, in
    the x-direction, of each projection image
  • Misalignment may be mechanical
  • Camera head may not be exactly centered in the
    gantry
  • Misalignment may also be electronic
  • May be the same amount in all projection images
    from a single camera head, or may vary with angle
    of the projection image

13
(No Transcript)
14
COR calibration (cont.)
  • Misalignment may be corrected by shifting each
    image in the x-direction by the proper number of
    pixels prior to filtered backprojection
  • If COR misalignment varies with camera head
    angle, it can only be corrected if computer
    permits angle-by-angle corrections
  • Separate assessments of COR correction must be
    made for different collimators (and possibly
    different camera zoom factors and image formats)

15
Uniformity
  • Nonuniformities that are not apparent in
    low-count daily uniformity studies can cause
    significant artifacts in SPECT
  • Artifact appears in transverse images as a ring
    centered about the AOR
  • High-count uniformity images used to determine
    pixel correction factors
  • At least 30 million counts for 64 x 64 images
  • At least 120 million counts for 128 x 128 images
  • Collected every 1 or 2 weeks separate images for
    each camera head

16
(No Transcript)
17
Camera head tilt
  • Camera head or heads must be exactly parallel to
    the AOR
  • If not, loss of spatial resolution and contrast
    results from out-of-slice activity being
    backprojected into each transverse image slice
  • Loss will be less toward the center of the image
    and greatest toward the edge of the image
  • Can assess using a point source in cameras FOV,
    centered in the axial (y) direction, but near the
    edge in the transverse (x) direction
  • If there is head tilt, position of point source
    will vary in y-direction from image to image

18
(No Transcript)
19
(No Transcript)
20
(No Transcript)
21
Positron emission tomography
  • PET generates images depicting the distributions
    of positron-emitting nuclides in patients
  • In the typical scanner, several rings of
    detectors surround the patient
  • PET scanners use annihilation coincidence
    detection (ACD) instead of collimation to obtain
    projections of the activity distribution in the
    subject

22
(No Transcript)
23
(No Transcript)
24
(No Transcript)
25
(No Transcript)
26
Annihilation coincidence detection
  • Positrons emitted in matter lose most of their
    kinetic energy by causing ionization and
    excitation
  • When a positron has lost most of its kinetic
    energy, it interacts with an electron by
    annihilation
  • The entire mass of the electron-positron pair is
    converted into two 511-keV photons, which are
    emitted in nearly opposite directions

27
(No Transcript)
28
ACD (cont.)
  • If both annihilation photons interact with
    detectors, the annihilation occurred close to the
    line connecting the two interactions
  • Circuitry within the scanner identifies
    interactions occurring at nearly the same time, a
    process called annihilation coincidence detection
  • Circuitry of the scanner then determines the line
    in space connecting the locations of the two
    detector interactions

29
ACD (cont.)
  • ACD establishes the trajectories of the detected
    photons, a function performed by collimation in
    SPECT systems
  • Much less wasteful of photons than collimation
  • Avoids degradation of spatial resolution with
    distance from the detector that occurs when
    collimation is used to form projection images

30
True, random, and scatter coincidences
  • A true coincidence is the simultaneous
    interaction of emissions resulting from a single
    nuclear transformation
  • A random coincidence, which mimics a true
    coincidence, occurs when emissions from different
    nuclear transformations interact simultaneously
    with the detectors
  • A scatter coincidence occurs when one or both of
    the photons from a single annihilation are
    scattered, but both are detected

31
(No Transcript)
32
Design of a PET scanner
  • Scintillation crystals coupled to PMTs are used
    as detectors in PET
  • Signals from PMTs are processed in pulse mode to
    create signals identifying the position,
    deposited energy, and time of each interaction
  • Energy signal is used for energy discrimination
    to reduce mispositioned events due to scatter and
    the time signal is used for coincidence detection

33
Design (cont.)
  • Early PET scanners coupled each scintillation
    crystal to a single PMT
  • Size of individual crystal largely determined
    spatial resolution of the system
  • Modern designs couple larger crystals to more
    than one PMT
  • Relative magnitudes of the signals from the PMTs
    coupled to a single crystal used to determine the
    position of the interaction in the crystal

34
(No Transcript)
35
Scintillation materials
  • Material must emit light very promptly to permit
    true coincident interactions to be distinguished
    from random coincidences and to minimize
    dead-time count losses at high interaction rates
  • Must have high linear attenuation coefficient for
    511-keV photons in order to maximize counting
    efficiency

36
Materials (cont.)
  • Most PET systems use crystals of bismuth
    germanate (Bi4Ge3O12, abbreviated BGO)
  • Light output 12 to 14 that of NaI(Tl), but
    greater density and average atomic number give it
    higher efficiency at detecting 511-keV photons
  • Other inorganic scintillators being investigated
    lutetium oxyorthosilicate and gadolinium
    oxyorthosilicate faster light emission than BGO
    produces better performance at high interaction
    rates

37
(No Transcript)
38
Energy signals
  • Energy signals sent to energy discrimination
    circuits which can reject events in which the
    deposited energy differs significantly from 511
    keV to reduce effect of photon scatter in patient
  • Energy window may be adjusted to include part of
    the Compton continuum, increasing sensitivity but
    also increasing the number of scattered photons
    detected

39
Time signals
  • Time signals of interactions not rejected by the
    energy discrimination circuits are used for
    coincidence detection
  • When a coincidence is detected, the circuitry or
    computer of the scanner determines a line in
    space connecting the two interactions
  • PET system collects data for all projections
    simultaneously
  • Projection data used to produce transverse images
    of the radionuclide distribution as in x-ray CT
    or SPECT

40
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com