Exploring the Technological Synergy between Further and Higher Education Vocational Students' - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 13
About This Presentation
Title:

Exploring the Technological Synergy between Further and Higher Education Vocational Students'

Description:

Teaching, Learning and Assessment Strategy incorporate the use of e-Learning. ... Courses mainly around Equine, Horticulture, Conservation, Agriculture, Floristry. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:45
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 14
Provided by: rachelbut
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Exploring the Technological Synergy between Further and Higher Education Vocational Students'


1
Exploring the Technological Synergy between
Further and Higher Education Vocational Students.
  • Supporting Transition into Higher Education
    Comparing Level 3 and Level 4 Vocational
    Students Experiences of Technology Enhanced
    Learning.

Rachel Butterfield and James Wilson Writtle
Agricultural College
2
Project Objective
  • Project is part f the HEA E-Learning Research
    Observatory (ELRO).
  • Lower than planned retention and progression
    levels throughout the College.
  • Teaching, Learning and Assessment Strategy
    incorporate the use of e-Learning. (HEFCE and
    Writtle)

3
Writtle Agricultural College
  • Vocational College Land-based Sector.
  • Courses mainly around Equine, Horticulture,
    Conservation, Agriculture, Floristry. Small
    cohort of Business students.
  • Both FE and HE Students.
  • Majority of the estate is outside, and used for
    practical teaching.
  • Not as technologically advanced as most HE
    institutions.

4
Rationale
  • Writtle College is unique in that it is a
    dual-sector (Garrod MacFarlane, 2007) or
    hybrid (Smith, Bathmaker Parry, 2007)
    land-based institution with some 50 of its total
    provision (2,650 FTEs) in each of the FE and HE
    sectors.
  • Seamless progression is a key institutional
    objective and student transition issues receive
    high priority.
  • Currently, FE level 3 success rates and
    transition are less successful than desired.
  •  
  • Current innovative pedagogies have been employed
    throughout modules but now a need to link this
    into Academic and Professional Development.

5
Project Aims
  • Identify, through a comparative analysis of FE
    (level 3) and HE (level 4) students experiences
    with their studies, the key factors that may
    facilitate transition into HE through the
    application of technology-enhanced developments
  • Shape the institutional pedagogic approach in
    line with student aspirations, experiences and
    satisfaction, so that a seamless transition to
    successful HE study can be effected
  • Create a proactive CPD strategy that supports
    staff to develop appropriate innovative and
    dynamic e-learning spaces.

6
methodology
  • Interpretivist Approach adopted.
  • Questionnaire open to all FE and HE students.
  • Focus group.
  • Card Sort Exercise.
  • E-Portfolio Workshop sessions.
  • Work with FE students developing electronic
    submission.

7
Focus Group / Card Sort
  • Principles Award Students 5.
  • 1 mature student.
  • Top 5 topics raised by the students
  • Students dont feel satisfied with the technology
    offered by the institution.
  • Students overcompensate for lack of technology
    and provide their own.
  • Differing opinions on MOODLE.
  • Lack of Research skills (databases, references,
    and understanding to a specific level)
    therefore overcompensated by the use of
    Wikipedia, and social networking to get a general
    idea.
  • Students seem keen to try new technology in an
    educational context, but out of exploration
    rather than practical advantages.

8
Questionnaire
  • 126 responses wide representation of both HE
    and FE courses across college.
  • Results still in analysis stage.
  • Male and Female divide.
  • Large age range represented.

9
Areas of competency
  • Card sort exercise highlighted that Word and
    Laptop (used for internet)were regarded as the
    most relevant educational tools.
  • Word competency level of 4.6
  • Internet competency level of 4.7
  • HE and FE Comparison.

10
E-Portfolios
  • Take up of sessions was unexpected.
  • Regular attendance as well as independent
    progression with e-portfolios.
  • Varying level of engagement.
  • Met with staff reservations.
  • Started with 20 students.
  • Completed portfolios 7 students.
  • http//johnwinslow.wordpress.com/
  • http//magicram08.wordpress.com/
  • http//hlrichards.wordpress.com/
  • http//rshepherd.wordpress.com/
  • http//jojoyce.wordpress.com/

11
(No Transcript)
12
Challenges and issues we face??
  • Should retention of the vocational subject areas
    be any different from retention in academic
    based subjects?
  • Should we handle the process of this retention
    through different means?
  • What part should technology take in retention of
    vocational based subjects where this is not the
    students main focus?

13
References
  • Department for Education and Skills Report
    (2007). Online at www.dfes.gov.uk (Accessed
    14/05/08)
  • Garrod, N. Macfarlane, B. (2007) Scoping the
    duals the structural challenges of combining
    further and higher education in post-compulsory
    institutions, Higher Education Quarterly, 614,
    pp. 578-596
  • Smith, D., Bathmaker, A.M. Parry, G. (2007) The
    institutionalisation of duality (re)imagining
    culture, community and college in further and
    higher education. Working paper for the ESRC TLRP
    FurtherHigher project, online at
    http//www.shef.ac.uk/furtherhigher/
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com