Four Levels of Clean, Low Cost, Under-utilized Water Technology for Industrial / Commercial / Agricultural Applications(PART 8 OF 11)

1
Four Levels of Clean, Low Cost, Less Known Water
Technology for Industrial / Commercial /
Agricultural Applications
PART 8 OF 11

• Environmentally Friendly, Economical, Effective
  Water Cleantech for The Future

Ben Rusuisiak New nature paradigm TECH analysis
vancouver, BC, CANADA, updated Feb10, 2017
www.linkedin.com/in/newnatureparadigm
2

• 
  
  
  ABSTRACT This presentation
  covers some of low cost, water related
  commercialized cleantech that is under-utilized
  or not commonly known to exist at all, in areas
  of 1-Environmental cleaning, 2-HVAC improvement,
  3- Energy extraction, 4-Industrial
  processes, 5-Drinking water generation,
  6-Geoengineering, 7-Desalination wastewater
  treating, 8-Selective bio-enhancing, rust
  prevention etc. Some of them are convertible for
  a use in field of energy, medical, biology,
  weather modification, material science with
  similar advantages. ?
  
• One of such effects not fully explainable by
  chemistry, yet officially utilized by some
  non-Western ally nations, is prolonged "water
  structure", or/ "activated" electrical charge
  holding capacity of ions in water. There are
  multiple treatment methods that can cause
  sustained unique capability in plain water for at
  least 4-5 days and used without added chemical or
  solutes. e.g. a-As detergent for commercial
  kitchen, butcher or heavy oil removal, b-Non
  fouling industrial cutting or washing fluid,
  c-Hospital operation room, or food industry
  equipment disinfectant, d-Medical
  oxygen/hydrophobic drug delivery, skin
  disease/infection/organ, upto conventionally
  untreatable chronic disease. e-Plant/animal
  growth increase, brackish water feeding,
  Removing animal residence odor, f-Increase
  strength of concrete, ice, paper, g-Enhance
  flavor of pasta, coffee, bakery, h-Low
  emission fuel making from subgrade incombustible
  hydrocarbon, i-Display chemical or mineral effect
  without chemistry present in water. Some
  exceptionally electrical-active water seems to
  even function as "phase catalyst" and used as
  "plain water concentrate" for similar or more
  robust effects by dilution.?
  
  
• Such Scientific Status gap in water tech by
  nations is fairly common and it affects research
  funding market share of effective processes.
  e.g water treatment by Time variant magnetic
  field Rotating/Concentric Electrode, Far
  InfraRed waves, Hydrodynamic Cavitation,
  Sub/SuperCritical water, Non Anthraquinone H2O2,
  Emulsion fuel, Cold fusion, Resonance H2O
  decomposing, Acoustic Pulsed Fire Dewatering,
  Electro-Scavenging effect for rain generation
  Cosmic Ray based climate change idea. One reason
  for discrediting is they might co-display
  scientifically economically disruptive seeming
  thermodynamic over-unity non-local phenomena.
  But low cost effective way to displace chemical
  based system also have been supported in West
  Electrooxidation/coagulation or multiple ways of
  AOP including Ozone was backed by European groups
  they are now supporting Plasma Activated Water,
  Thermal Hydrolysis, Membrane Distillation,
  various Nano Filtration etc. Others are accepted
  but only for certain use ElectroOsmosis/Poration,
  Metal ion, 3chamber electrolysis, Vacuum
  superheated steam, Steam eductor etc. Overall,
  previously science contested low cost clean water
  tech is increasingly rapidly adopted even by
  multinationals, often accompanied by firm back up
  of mainstream media, science, tech awards. And
  unless spread of this new paradigm stalls soon,
  limitation based "closed system" belief of
  society will fundamentally shift to no-limit
  "open system" before 2030.

linkedin.com/in/newnatureparadigm - Ben
Rusuisiak, Vancouver BC, Canada
3

• SELECTED CONTENTS

• p10 Crystallization Template
  sssddAssisted, Fluidized Bed etc
  p21 Ozone UV etc p41
  SuperCritical Water etc
• p45 Ultrasonic, Cavitation effect, . . .
  Pulsed Combustion Drying
  
  p61 Nano/UltraFine Bubble etc p67
  PhotoCatalytic water etc
• p91 Electrolyzed acid water etc p118 Plasma
  Activated Water
  p126
  Electrolytic Venturi etc p141 .Magnetic Water
  treatment
• p157 Phase Catalyst Water
  
  p181 Torsion field/Scalar Wave p190
  Far InfraRed, Bioceramic, .. Minerals treated
  etc

• p221 Pumpable Ice Slurry p228 ElectroSpray
  etc p235 ElectroHydraulic
  effect
• p245 Solar Desalination etc p268 SuperHeated
  Steam etc
• PART 8 p288
  Magnetic Resonance
  . Freezing Thawing
  p291 Ion projection
  p298 Ferrous/Ferrate Ion water
  p310 Vacuum Saturation/DDW, . Steam Jet
  Ejector/eductor
• p338 Plant Polymer Micelle p343 Rain Related
  Weather .. Modification
  p358 Water Technology List

linkedin.com/in/newnatureparadigm - Ben
Rusuisiak Specialty Cleantech Analysis,
Vancouver, Canada
linkedin.com/in/newnatureparadigm - Ben
Rusuisiak, Vancouver BC, Canada
4

• QUALIFICATION OF
  INFORMATION
  
  
• This presentation might not always reflect the
  views of mainstream group, particularly of
  western media, large NGOs, wikipedia hence
  attendants/readers are recommended to re-assess
  the data from independent perspective Listed
  commercialized claims include that are
  contradicting mainstream science law or
  effectiveness acceptance level, while empirically
  deemed to produce effects repeatedly. "Cleantech"
  here includes "clean chemicals" that are non
  residual Ozone, Hydrogen Peroxide, Peracetic
  Acid, Plasma/ElectroChemical reaction etc
• Compared to other industries, water technology
  tends to have wider varied mechanics to achieve
  intended physical effects Labs, schools, even
  conservative mainstream, or mundane looking
  companies often use their own effective unique
  processes not widely known. Many of what is
  covered here are selected technologies known as
  effective in some sectors or by small of
  consumers but not by other sectors.?
  
  Currently more detailed
  reference list is being produced will be
  published separately The research is updated
  based on reviewing academic papers journals,
  books, speeches, presentations, patents,
  lab/commercialized product testimonies/complaints,
  publications public records of
  NGOs/media/research institutes/think
  tanks/military/space gov't agencies/industry
  associations. Due to space constraints,
  referenced individual names are given with max 3
  letters of first name with entire last
  name(except some non-Western names), company
  names are listed in a way that is findable by
  internet search.
• 12 page long Water Technology Effect Comparison
  Grid List is located at the end of presentation.
  
  
  THIS FILE IS PART 8 of 11
  SERIES ENTIRE 11 SERIES CAN BE VIEWED IN ONE
  FILE AT SCRIBDclick here, ISSUUclick
  here, YUMPU click here, or CALAMEO click
  here

linkedin.com/in/newnatureparadigm - Ben
Rusuisiak Specialty Cleantech Analysis,
Vancouver, Canada
5
How to Read Tech Detail Explanation Texts
.

• Technology claims are explained in details in
  each of 66 dedicated section in coming pages.
  Example of Hydrodynamic cavitation below

• Tech effects Code used in tech lists(located at
  end of this presentation) are headed by Boldface
  purple letters as on the right. Code might
  refer to either or both of a-effect of static
  water product, b-process effect itself on water
  rather than water's effect on matter.
• Commercialized tech claims are listed in(Blue
  Letter ), and within bracket means other
  unnamed companies also claim same effect.
  at example D4 indicates
  particularly effective application.

• 11Hydrodynamic cavitation WM Accepted effect
  J(BOD reduction, Advanced Oxidizing Process,
  toxin/oil field waste water/sludge
  decomposing)(WhirlWind.nl), For ballast
  water(Globallast ua), Enhanced oil recovery-
  additional hydrocarbon quality improvement(Arisdyn
  e),
• Sometimes WM Disputed effect, A(Descaling), HVAC
  application(HyCator, VRTX Technologies), Pipe
  cleaning(Group Konstanta ???????), Dairy
  product flow pipe descaling is WM
  rejected(TEKMASH) B(anticorrosion of water
  pipes), C(Algae removal)(CT Systems ua),
  D4(New.

6
56NanoFiltration Effect mix of Accepted,
Disputed, Generally Rejected, Fully rejected by
Western Mainstream(WM)

• 56NanoFiltration(also see 22Nano Material
  Used Filter), In many ways it is completely
  mainstream tech but some other ways it is clearly
  underused. Generally referred as single digit
  nanometer filtration(1-9nm), Similar effect as
  55Nano Material treating. Typically passes
  monovalent ions i.e. by ionic size, also charge
  etc. But can to some extent customizeable -
  selectively pass certain solutes or set
  directionality of flow by size and charge(RO
  rejects all one fixed way only by outside
  force) ie can function like biological ionic
  channels or super low cost desalination if
  designed(nanopore size needs to be property
  arranged with specific material, also at Carbon
  Nanotube case, water permeability is up to 4-5
  orders of magnitude faster than allowed by
  conventional science law sometimes media
  debunked) if designed. And importantly all of
  this disruptive base idea is approved by WM and
  active research continues wold wide. Some of
  advanced use currently are more often for labs
  and pharmaceutical(MetalMembranes)
• Wide range of claims from mainstream academics to
  sidelined engineers/scientists, particularly
  non-west related(China). Often key for
  anomalous effect is by Use of
  ?1 Various types of
  metal/silicon nanowire, ?2 Janus particle(nano
  sized, have duel hydrophilic and hydrophobic
  side) used membrane, also to some extent Charged
  Nanofilter Membrane types, ?3 Nanocarbon/Carbon
  Nanotube/Inorganic Nanotube or electro-conductive
  polymer, ?3 Mixing/doping/coating certain nano
  or fine metal element such as Silver/Copper/Zinc
  etc, ?4 Metal membrane(some advanced tech can
  make pores down to nano or smaller size, with
  through straight even hole with super high flux
  rates, can be made to suit extreme conditions).
  --gtgtcontinued

linkedin.com/in/newnatureparadigm - Ben
Rusuisiak Specialty Cleantech Analysis,
Vancouver, Canada
7
56NanoFiltration continued 2

• Also due to this high electroconductivity, it
  might kill all virus if designed optimally for
  it(electroporation). These electric or charge
  based Nanocarbon mechanics link to
  pseudoscientized bioenhancing effect of water
  activation methods(magnetic, FIR wave, Electric
  pulse, catalyzed water etc) - as they also have
  similar effect light diffraction quality etc.
  This superior quality can be more fully utilized
  in near future in mainstream by hierarchical
  membrane with nanoporous on top layer supported
  by structurally more robust microporous types at
  the base(manufactured by phase inversion). while
  in some cases this seems to be already quietly
  commercialized, including under vacuum filtration
  mechanics - particularly by Chinese companies.
• WM Accepted effect N2(demineralizing effect),
  mainstream use e.g. demineralization/concentratio
  n of whey/lactose at Dairy, filtering dye at
  Textile, or sugar at Beverage industry is
  preferable to EDI, Ion exchange, or RO. Mega
  membrane players involved are also expanding to
  underutilized use(Koch Membrane, GE water, Toray
  Membrane, Dow Chemical), some are specialized
  focus in specific major use industry but also
  aiming for underused area(Reda Spa,
  Lakta-service, Milktech ru, ???????? "KINGS
  FOOD") often enables straight reuse of
  wastewater, e.g. laundry water reuse etc. Many
  offer portable containerized/on skid portable
  units(Lifestream Watersystems, Degrémont
  Technologies, Newterra, Kriva Rochem), Entering
  nanosize as ceramic membrane(Cerahilix)
  --gtgtcont

linkedin.com/in/newnatureparadigm - Ben
Rusuisiak Specialty Cleantech Research,
Vancouver, Canada
8
56NanoFiltration continued 3

• --gtgtWM Accepted effect cont
  
  P2(Waterfilter) can
  displace existing system with low cost, likely
  lead by Europe with China Often water passing
  filter with electro-conductive material is
  treated by self generated electricity/microplasma
  for automatic disinfection by hydroxyl etc, as
  home use(Vontron), counter top device(Origin
  Water ?????????????), When combined with regular
  microfilter, system recycles water to save 90 of
  shower water with sufficient disinfection even at
  residential level(Orbital Systems AB). Use for
  Reverse Osmosis for longer lasting effects(LT
  Technologies, EcoChem International, SnowPure,
  GEA filtration) generally preferred minerals
  remain unlike RO. Chlorine exposure proof
  polymer based filter(Anfiro), State backed
  production to decrease import(Rusnano),
  Fibreglass bonded with electropositive
  nanoparticle/fibre for faster waterflow
  trapping(Argonide NanoCeram)
• Effective enough to make oil exploration water
  drinkable directly after filtering(Vibe inc
  Sandbox Resource), Commercial water cleaning
  e.g. Agricultural or general industrial
  wastewater(Microdyn-Nadir, Inopor, Synder
  Filtration, ?????????? ??????? ??????????,
  Enviropark ru), Pulp paper(Aslan
  technologies), Also various academic researches
  on customizable filter by spraying different
  mineral nano powder onto base membrane intending
  for different purposes(Mor Endo),Nanomanget
  sprayed nanofilter to replace pool's chlorine use
  if regulation permits(Nano-ff.com), airborne
  moisture germ trapping killing(Toshiba
  CAF-D4), Pretreatment of RO desalination(Filtroxr
  us) --gtgtcont

linkedin.com/in/newnatureparadigm - Ben
Rusuisiak, Vancouver BC, Canada
9
56NanoFiltration continued 4

• --gtgt cont WM Accepted effect P2(Watefilter)
  
  When
  combined with existing filter system, it further
  augments performance(eg acoustically filtrated
  carbon nanotube filter, permeation is not driven
  by conventional pressure or even gravity). Well
  adopted by space agency or military, also seems
  coagulation component to be capable of recovering
  at filter(eg extra oil recovered while filtered
  water is instantly drinkable).
• Nanofilteration used Forward Osmosis(FO)
  effect(FO is not at all exclusive to Nanofilters,
  neither is below commercialized example) is
  lowest cost in some limited specific situations
  Use of osmotic power, by clean water side of
  membrane having higher solutes content than dirty
  water side of membrane. Hence little to no power
  required while causing far less membrane fouling.
  ?
  
  
  
• Cost competitive set up is made by use of draw
  solutions that are easily recoverable/separable/re
  useable by temperature change etc for cost
  reduction, so even by combining with RO, it
  might still reduce costs, nutrition is kept
  during concentrating process(eg juice) without
  heating(Oasys water, HTI water, Modern Water,
  Forward Water Technologies), use of Carbon
  Nanotube filter for additional significant
  saving(Porifera). Mechanics example of FO NH3
  CO2 bubbling in water produces salts with very
  high osmotic pressure(NH4HCO3 etc) but easily
  separated/recovered when applied low grade heat.
  Also in certain natural situation it might be
  suitable(eg dirty water cleaning to discharge
  into ocean, located next to desalination reject
  water channel, or making heavy sugary beverage
  etc).

linkedin.com/in/newnatureparadigm - Ben
Rusuisiak Specialty Cleantech Analysis,
Vancouver, Canada
10
56NanoFiltration continued 5

• --gtgt cont WM Accepted effect
  
  
• L3(run CDI more efficiently, removing CO2),
  W2(remove oil, salt, deoxidizing cooking,
  elements, preserve nutrients) combo use of
  hydrophobic/oleophobic element use to filter
  various elements (NacoTech), use of nano carbon
  activation process (NanoCarb), hydrophilic type
  for dye removal water softening(MemTech),
  effective due to ion recovery(AMS Membranes),
  Previously stated Hierarchical Nanoengineered
  Membrane can be particularly effective with its
  physical durability backed up by microporous
  membrane combined, to fully deploy its
  hydrophillic/hydrophobic ability in customized
  way.
• Sometimes WM Disputed effect M2(Desalination
  effect) academically it is mainstream but
  probably too abrupt disruptive(much higher
  permeability, far less fouling, far lower energy
  use for filtration etc compared to RO membrane,
  by advanced salt ion management by adding certain
  material in filter) for industry structure to
  bring out in highlighted way for
  commercialization(eg Perforene - Lockheed), So
  less known companies commercialize
  first(EconoPure),
• Good potential for combined low pressure high
  flow low cost desalination with additionally
  electricity generated by removing ions from
  seawater with specialty Molybdenum Disulfide
  (MoS2) nanofilter(Nar Aluru), Even more
  efficient if osmotic pressure is used(Moh
  Heiranian), Various disruptive Nanofiltration
  application topic is widely discussed its
  practicality by WM academia. --gtgt continue

linkedin.com/in/newnatureparadigm - Ben
Rusuisiak Specialty Cleantech Research,
Vancouver, Canada
11
56NanoFiltration continued 6

• --gtgt cont Sometimes WM Disputed effect
  M2(Desalination effect)
  Aquaporin based filter claims to
  use 1/2 of energy cost of RO(Mangrove Membranes
  Inc - Applied Biomimetic, Aquaporin dk)
  actually it should be much less than 1/2 due to
  little to no energy required, maybe due to its
  filter's fragile nature? Facilitated
  diffusion/ion-charge gradient difference based,
  Also other ion channeling biomimicry filters
  under research. Again various nanofilters can do
  this type at lab levels Use of electrical
  Double Layer charging nanopores of filter to
  electromigrate/separate salt ions.
• Unlisted effect(Descaling pipes corrosion
  prevention)(AquaClear LLC, WEHRLE Umwelt, Shivam
  Water Treaters )
  
  
  
• Occasionally claimed Generally media type
  Rejected effect I2(Solubility increase of
  treated water), O2(Hydroxyl radical production),
  Currently clumsy set up as this is basically WM
  approved effect
• WM Fully rejected Same effect claims should be
  made between Nanofilter 55Nano Material
  treated water, but probably due to small number
  of claimant samples(less than 50), claims shown
  on the list are not identical. As for
  effectiveness approval level by WM, finished
  product filter has more severe debunking than
  nanocarbon. (Also See these in reference to
  22Nano Material Used Filter), Q2(food stock
  preservation water), S2(Bioenhancing water),
  T2(metal rust reduction/prevention), V2(Low redox
  potential) it can be other way around(hydroxyl
  production) depends on set up, A3(Deuterium
  Depleted Water production),
• Weak effects J2(emulsion)

linkedin.com/in/newnatureparadigm - Ben
Rusuisiak Specialty Cleantech Analysis,
Vancouver, Canada
12
57Electric Magnetic Resonance
Freezing/Thawing Effect mix of Accepted
Generally Rejected by (WM)

• 57Electric Magnetic Resonance
  Freezing/Thawing
  WM
  Accepted effect as obvious for freezing
  application Q2(food preservation).
• Effect of this technology is in hanging state in
  mainstream. Western ally Japan widely installed
  this while rest of West(including Wikipedia in
  all languages also in Japanese) is still often
  pseudoscientizing it, hence creating a market
  void in other Western nations, yet even some
  mainstream group in rest of west is quietly
  installing.

linkedin.com/in/newnatureparadigm - Ben
Rusuisiak Specialty Cleantech Research,
Vancouver, Canada
13
57Electric Magnetic Resonance
Freezing/Thawing continued 2

• gtgt cont WM Accepted effect
  
  Magnetic/electric field oscillation(often
  multiples of frequencies are emitted) to prevent
  freezing at below 0C temperature, This
  supercooling state is followed by quick even
  freezing over critical temperature range that
  can otherwise break cell walls of food by water
  expansion, this seems to be due to small
  clustered ice crystals formed from water
  molecules, also some effect in electroporation of
  breaking germ/bacteria cells(thinner-much weaker
  than food cell walls).
• WM Rejected effect P2(disinfection, suppress low
  temp active bacteria) (Marche-machinery,
  Proton-Group net), some combine visible light
  photocatalysis to kill ethylene(C2H4) (Hitachi
  Shinku Chilled ), R2(Able to freeze defrost
  raw fish, meat, or even some salad keep intact
  cell structure) food appear fresh as if freezing
  never took place, U2(consistently show much lower
  energy cost from user feedback) -20C range
  fridge works on par with -60C types (Nice01-
  Akiyama-Denshi), U2(often food lowers redox
  potential)(Daiwa Reiki Kogyo), X2(lower
  freezing point)

linkedin.com/in/newnatureparadigm - Ben
Rusuisiak Specialty Cleantech Analysis,
Vancouver, Canada
14
57Electric Magnetic Resonance
Freezing/Thawing continued 3

• --gtgtcont WM Rejected
  
  Unlisted effects
  i-High grade food conservation duration is
  extended up to 3times compared to conventional
  freezing tech(Abi-net Cell Alive System, Depak
  jp), Same mechanics can be used to create
  ii-Supercooled water fridge for beverages(Boscom
  jp, Mars Company jp),
• As noted prior its iii-Magnetic resonance
  frequency itself can be adjusted to cause
  bioenhancement effect on plants animals via
  electrically activated water exposed to the
  relevant frequency, or enhanced directly by
  projected nearby EM field,(Iyashiro ??)
  iv-Flavor improves as frozen stored some
  duration (Maruko Denshi), v-Not publicized but
  organ transplant type application used?
• Generally all of this sections effects are
  equally claimed by most manufacturers listed
  here. For consumer refrigerator market, key
  players in Japan are selling same above
  supercooling effect device with different
  mechanics

linkedin.com/in/newnatureparadigm - Ben
Rusuisiak Specialty Cleantech Analysis,
Vancouver, Canada
15
58Ionizing projection in air-mist Effect mix of
Accepted, Disputed, Generally Rejected by (WM)

• 58Ionizing projection in air mist or Mist
  ion/electrostatic/electron projection(This is not
  fully water technology Many devices have only
  minor use of airborne water for ion projection in
  air or moisture as target of ion). ?
  
  
  
• Weak power micro electron projection types have
  basically same effect as 25Electro Static
  treatment of air-mist, in clean tech segment it
  competes with UV air treatment,14Photocatalytic
  treatment(or combination of both),
  17Electrolyzed Acid water spray,
  41'ElectroSpray. But mid high power
  accelerated High Current Electron
  Beam(HCEB)(Electron impact ionization)(also
  available on X-ray range) has rapid matter/water
  altering or decomposing effect, mainstream use in
  pharma and polymer/metal dry process but under
  deployed for food or water. Its ionizing
  radiation level is high enough to be bio
  beneficial far below hazardous range. Note HCEB
  effect description is bracketed by marks. For
  radiation benefit explanation go to another
  report Tesla, Other Controversial Energy Tech
  Claims... look up "radioactive material".
  
  
  
• WM Accepted effect I2(solubility increase),
  Q2(food stock preservation), HCEB is used for
  food pasteurization(Tecleor, Comet AG ebeam,
  ????????? ????? ??????????-??????? ?????????,
  ?????), Due to very high initial cost of setting
  up the system, custom processing services are
  offered (Iotron Impela, ebis.jp, SureBeam Middle
  East, Sadex), while some rather recommend their
  high penetration high radiation gamma ray from
  cobalt or x-ray service option(Steris), Some
  offer portable service(Budker Institute of
  Nuclear Physics),), H3(effective paint
  spraying, ion deposition) Painting preparation
  by static adjustment (EXAIR Ion Air Jet).
  
  
• ?Weaker effect J2(emulsion), ?
  
  

linkedin.com/in/newnatureparadigm - Ben
Rusuisiak Specialty Cleantech Research,
Vancouver, Canada
16
58Ionizing projection in air-mist continued 2

• Sometimes WM Disputed effect E3(air cleaner, fog
  reducing, wet electrostatic precipitator) some
  effective industrial wet scrubbers charge only
  water mist etc(Cloud Chamber Scrubber -
  Tri-mer), Contact Electrification applied air
  cleaning from use of new TriboElectric
  Nanogenerators(Beijing Institute of Nanoenergy
  Nanosystems), also deodoring effect, Extremely
  effective construction site etc dust/smoke
  capturing "open air electrostatic wet scrubber
  system"(Kajima Kensetsu ????EC???)
  
  This completely std mainstream industrial
  process effect which is also called
  Electrostatic Air Filter has interesting
  treatment by certain mainstream groups
• -They might selectively interpret effect and
  actually dispute effectiveness eg the process
  is proven to cause harmful effect with regular
  use, or simply calling ineffective" by quoting
  only rare failed test of less effective type
  device used yrs ago etc.
• -Sign of specific mainstream group sponsored
  debunking appeals, often targeting consumer
  market. This type of media led campaign tends to
  create scientific contradiction. Tech is usually
  much lower in electricity cost than alternative
  method and filter is often washable for reuse.

linkedin.com/in/newnatureparadigm - Ben
Rusuisiak Specialty Cleantech Analysis,
Vancouver, Canada
17
58Ionizing projection in air-mist continued 3

• gtgt cont Sometimes WM media Disputed effect std
  mainstream industrial process E3(air cleaning-
  disinfecting)
  
  
  
• a-Some devices focus to projecting ion only one
  way to kill germs(by hydroxyl) for precision
  required industrial room or residential purpose,
  some less refined type of this model collect
  dusts instead of repelling each other and dust
  occurs on floor. Frequent target for exaggerated
  ozone harm appeal by some WM media, Hybrid type
  with Photocatalysis(Andes Biomicron),
• b-Focus projecting ion to charge air particles
  then such it in to attach-collect by charge
  polarity (Plasma Cluster - Sharp), or
• c-General commercial /industrial types particles
  pass thru ionizer and electrostatically treated
  to carry a charge, then drawn to their opposite
  charge filter-electrode and cleaned up
  Electrostatic Air Cleaner(Five Seasons Electro
  Air, Trion air, Rydair), effective for cigarette
  smoke sucking system by combining activated
  carbon filter vortex(Tornex jp), Dielectric
  Barrier Discharge triggered(30-40knz range)
  micro/cold plasma use prolonged stronger air
  cleaning effects at human breathing environment
  (Novaerus - Plasma Air International - Aerisa,
  Riedel Filtertechnik GmbH ) some of them
  unofficially claim for bioenhancing effects of
  human plants. Food item disinfection with no
  heat applied(Aerox BV)

linkedin.com/in/newnatureparadigm - Ben
Rusuisiak Specialty Cleantech Analysis,
Vancouver, Canada
18
58Ionizing projection in air-mist continued 4

• gtgt cont Sometimes WM media Disputed effect std
  mainstream industrial process E3(air cleaning-
  disinfecting)?
  
  
  d-Heavier cleaning can be
  done(particularly for less than 1µm size
  particulates) by Wet Electrostatic Precipitator
  types(power use less than wet scrubber but more
  expensive to install), often segment specific
  (EnviBat, AH Lundberg, Napco Separation ), Dry
  Electrostatic Precipitator also uses some water
  elements, much larger market than wet types
  (Alstom, GEA),
• Yet some electrospray/ionizing projection water
  type wet scrubber claims lowest overall cost for
  combined installation and operation including sub
  1µm PM 2.5 performance (CleanMarine no,
  Tri-Mer), They are much more widely used than
  usually segment targeted wet types. Experimental
  vortex used increased effect claims(Vorsana) ?
  
  
  
• e-Use breathing process regenerative(no specific
  process needed) ion adsorption media to
  selectively retain moisture and heat indoor while
  ventilate dirty or toxic air(TED ?????),
  
  
  
• f-High Current Electron Beam(HCEB) projection
  has strong flu gas decomposition alteration
  effect eg making fertilizer(Budker Institute of
  Nuclear Physics, ??????? ??????????????? ????????
  ????????????/???????????? ????? ???????
  ??????????????, ???????????? Chinaep net )

linkedin.com/in/newnatureparadigm - Ben
Rusuisiak Specialty Cleantech Research,
Vancouver, Canada
19
58Ionizing projection in air-mist continued 5

• gtgt cont Sometimes WM media Disputed effect std
  mainstream industrial process
• O2(disinfect-decompose toxin/germs in flowing or
  bulk water or wet sludge, AOP) as High Current
  Electron Beam(HCEB) is exceptional case and WM
  Accepted effect(Iwasaki Denki, ScanTech Holdings,
  Etechnoservice.bz, ?? ??????, EB TECH Co Ltd,
  CGN Dasheng Electron Accelerator), Note China
  seems to have a significant of "pilot
  installations" facilitated by state and academics
  that are fully functioning as accelerated
  electron beam water treatment system ?
  
  
  But the
  same effect is WM Rejected when micro power
  electron ionizing projection is used
• O2(disinfect germs primarily by hydroxyl of
  moisture or water spray)(Sharp PlasmaCluster,
  Panasonic NanoE, Microniser), this effect is
  also WM science std accepted idea usually
  unapproved by WM media and industry lobby
  publications. Incidentally, this type of lobbying
  to create scientific reality itself sometimes
  appears to be also standard practise for
  interlocked mainstream "allied" groups.
• S2(bioenhancing) by electron/ion/spark/microplasm
  a/microlightning projection (only marginally
  water mist related), Human preferred
  fermentation quickens(but undesired mold tends to
  decrease), water soaking permeability increase,
  food in area lasts 30 longer, Growth increase
  for Plant(20)-fermentation(2-3times), relation
  to "Orgone" effect(Yusing TBA-HT4, Plasma ?????
  ???????, Greentechno ????), (also see
  65'Precipitation related Weather Modification)
  
  
  
  
• T2(metal rust prevention), U2(increase energy
  effectiveness) electric equipment efficiency
  maintenance, V2(low redox potential), I3(metal
  cleaning) Negative ion blow dryer
  (????) --gtgtcont
  
  

linkedin.com/in/newnatureparadigm - Ben
Rusuisiak, Vancouver BC, Canada
20
58Ionizing projection in air-mist continued 6

• --gtgt cont WM Rejected
• ? Weaker effects R2(freezing raw salad/high
  grade food) doesnt freeze itself but assists
  effective freezing, W2(remove oil/salt,
  deoxidized food), X2(lower freezing point),
  Y2(acidity control), Z2(fast efficient heat
  conducting)
• ? Unlisted effects Electron air curtain
  Electrification Screen System that shuts out
  smell/smoke/oil particle/dust/germs from clean
  odorless room while door or widow is fully opened
  - by projected ion flow in any direction required
  vertical/diagonal/ horizontal(Silkroom jp,
  AirFresh jp, Panasonic aircurtain)
• Unlisted WM Fully rejected Effect occurs in
  same closed space when electron/mist is projected
  from intended type of device listed at bottom
  Manufacturing process improve - not just types of
  electrostatic painting turn over efficiency, but
  regular mechanical friction heat reduce due to
  static drop in same room leading to higher
  product quality, Flavor enhancement all food
  displayed in a room, Kill germs, Reduces
  undesired insects pests occurring, Decreases
  moisture content of closed room. --gtgtcont

linkedin.com/in/newnatureparadigm - Ben
Rusuisiak Specialty Cleantech Analysis,
Vancouver, Canada
21
58Ionizing projection in air-mist continued 7

• ---gtgtcont Unlisted WM Fully rejected
• This seeming electron phenomena also occurs at
  surroundings of torsion field generator(Rotating
  magnetic field other causes), strong
  antioxidant producing mineral(see section
  33Bioceramic Mineral) or active microorganism
  in sealed bottles(30EM). Majority of effects in
  this section 58 is amplified when it takes place
  where hardwood high temperature
  processed(600-1200C) biochar(non glue) is
  strategically buried or mixed in building
  material,(Maruko-Denshi, ShinseiDenshi,
  Iyashiro.com, Electron-Group.com), linked to
  "Orgone" effect(65'Precipitation Related Weather
  Modification).
• Long distance effective WINDLESS electron
  projection static removal by balancing repulsing
  effect by separating anode/cathode electrodes to
  decrease dust related precision product defect by
  90(TRINC jp)

linkedin.com/in/newnatureparadigm - Ben
Rusuisiak Specialty Cleantech Analysis,
Vancouver, Canada
22
59Ferrous Ferric/Ferrate ion, or its oscillation
only Effect mix of Accepted, Generally Rejected
Fully rejected by(WM)

• 59Ferrous Ferric ion dissolved(eg Fe2Fe3Cl5)
  or its oscillation treated water(Ferrous is 2
  oxidation state iron, Ferric is 3,
  Bivalent-Trivalent Ferrates, also see ? Iron
  Sulphate Fertilization in water for later pages
  in this section
• WM Accepted effect Q2(Advanced Oxidation- AOP)
  Ferrous ion related strong oxidation effect of
  various versions of Fenton Reaction(with H2O2 to
  generate Hydroxyl as likely cause for effective
  disinfection, but something also seems to be
  anomalous with Ferrous ion ability) exists and
  extensively studied by academics but low key
  industrial application for water(US Peroxide),
  compared to moisture-water containing ground
  remediation(Vertex Environmental Inc, In-Situ
  Oxidative Technologies - ISOTEC) even upto
  Chelate use high pH version(Kajima Kensetsu
  ??????????),
  or always use Citric acid(IS-solution.com).
  
  
  One of
  most effective commercialized water treatment
  with self H2O2 generating Electro Fenton(Boron
  Dope Diamond electrolysis etc)(Thyssenkrup - Uhde
  - DeNora Permelec - "New Fenton"), Photo Electro
  Fenton(UV/Solar etc), Sono Electro Fenton, or
  rare Hydrodynamic Cavitation Fenton(AG
  Chakinala) etc.
• WM Rejected At WM unacceptable level, some type
  of activation or ion/electron excitation,
  occurs and works in such a way to generate
  various bio enhancement effects Some devices use
  its bioceramic memory, others very slight ion
  dissolves in water as it passes through device to
  trigger electrical activity in water Similar to
  Weaker effect version of 28Catalytic water,
  and sometimes stronger longer lasting effect
  than majority of 26Electric/27Magnetic field
  treated water, Cross over with 33BioCeramic
  mineral combination water or 21Fulvic Acid
  water, Used often combined with other
  vitalization type filters

linkedin.com/in/newnatureparadigm - Ben
Rusuisiak Specialty Cleantech Analysis,
Vancouver, Canada
23
59Ferrous Ferric ion/Ferrate ion dissolved, or
its oscillation only treated water Continued 2

• WM Rejected effect(but generally media level)
  I2(solubility increase), J2(emulsion), T2(rust
  reduction/prevention), V2(low redox potential),
  
• WM Fully rejected effect S2(bioenhancing) can
  place fresh water and ocean fish both together in
  slight salty water, This effect is also regularly
  demonstrated in 13Nanobubble, or 28Catalytic
  water. ?
  
  Comparatively weak effect Q2(food stock
  preservation water), X2(low freezing point),
  Y2(acidity control), Z2(Fast efficient heat
  conducting within sealed space), D3(hydrophobic
  drug solubility/carrier/permeable), F3(efficient
  fast drying/ wood by spraying the water on
  surface) Strong electric activity of water seems
  to affect wood surface to depart moisture from
  cell structure- stronger version seen in some of
  28Catalytic water
• Unlisted effect Medical application
  hydrophobic drug carrier, increased cell
  permeability, Some western medical groups
  continue to use this water without publicizing
  results(to keep reputation, medical license etc),
  For bioenhancing microorganism search(whether it
  grows well in it or stifled)(Ter Higa)

linkedin.com/in/newnatureparadigm - Ben
Rusuisiak Specialty Cleantech Analysis,
Vancouver, Canada
24
59Ferrous Ferric ion/Ferrate ion dissolved, or
its oscillation only treated water Continued 3

• gtgt cont WM Fully rejected effect
  
  
• Commercialized eg Strong effects of Ferrous
  Ferric ion reaction type water is fairy
  consistently claimed by manufactures of
  device/water (pWater - PiWater or its licensees
  Activelements.nl), there are various water
  claimed to be using similar PiWater recipe, or
  first originator (Wonyong Tamara Water), US FDA
  approved pseudoscientific water as dietary
  supplement(Wonyong Vital Organic Water
  V.O.W)(2030950) Diplomatic Immunity?(South
  Korean product). Unique "Ferrous-Ferric
  Chloride" bioceramic water(Akatsuka FFC) this
  tech is partially mainstream academic backed
  Harvard univ etc. Some are ion dissolving
  type(HinomaruSangyo.com, ??????),
  
  
  
• Related strong combitnation effect of
  Coagulation/Oxidention/Disinfection/Bioenhancement
  for lake/drinking water/wastewater/ballast water
  exists by Ferrate ion(FeO4)2? generator as
  initially mainstream highlighted but later
  practically media ignored effect if not
  rejected(Ferrate Treatment Technologies) but
  actually strong industrial and military
  applications

linkedin.com/in/newnatureparadigm - Ben
Rusuisiak Specialty Cleantech Analysis,
Vancouver, Canada
25
59Ferrous Ferric ion/Ferrate ion water
Continued 4 ? Iron
Sulphate Depositing in large body of water

• ? Iron Sulphate Depositing in water/Ocean
  Fertilization(FeSO4, or FeSO4.7H2O) As std
  process FeSO4 is used for Drinking or Waste water
  treatment(coagulant), Hydrometallurgy, or Part of
  aquaculture feed mix. Incidentally even certain
  toxic heavy metal effluent can be now processed
  by unique mainstream approved low cost
  proprietary photochemical hydrometallurgy to
  produce very potent Iron Sulphate type liquid
  fertilizer(GOLDn GRO) and other reuseable silver
  silver glass slag products with zero waste
  zero liquid discharge(Itronics), Note this is
  related to Ferrous Ferric Ion tech but not fully
  combined "Ferrous Ferric" ion(Fe2 Fe3) type,
  
  
• WM Rejected cost effectiveness of below S2 claims
  at media level, At mainstream science it is
  disputed level, at strict specialized science
  undeniable (below1) or at least it clearly works
  majority of the time at large volcano eruption
  ash deposit level(2), cost effectiveness is
  unknown or questionable(3)?
  
  
  S2(bioenhancing increasing population)
• claims1-phytoplankton increase, 2-Fishstock
  increase,
  3-CO2 sequestration due
  to phytoplankton increase
• Mainly Iron(II)/Ferrous Ion (Fe2) to fertilize
  certain selected body of water in ocean/lake
  for(1st claim)Phytoplankton increase(seemingly
  usually at least x2times, very effective to
  distribute at low iron offshore surface area, but
  often lasts only short duration). Phytoplankton
  Increase is significant level in all of dozen
  in-situ mainstream group trial of 0.5-120ton size
  conducted in poor iron surface water area by
  FeSO4 scattering(NIWA, LOFAFEX, EisenEx, CROZEX,
  SERIES, Ironex ).
  --gtgtcont

linkedin.com/in/newnatureparadigm - Ben
Rusuisiak Specialty Cleantech Analysis,
Vancouver, Canada
26
59Ferrous Ferric ion/Ferrate ion water
Continued 5 ? Iron
Sulphate Depositing in water 2

• --gtgtcont WM Rejected claims at media,
  S2(bioenhancing) of 2nd claim
• Based on FeSO4 depositing consistently showing
  explosively increased phytoplanktons in low iron
  surface water region, theoretically it is
  probable correctly-timed increase of fish food
  leads to(food chain reaction takes phytoplankton
  --gtzooplankton --gtfish stock)
  
  (2nd
  claim)Fish stock increase its
  biofunction(probably very effective but not
  enough actual data to firmly back up, also
  variables unknown)
• ? Only one publicly known major trial is made,
  which coincided with abrupt record level 10-20
  fold fish return results then declining as
  expected due to no scattering since(2013/14
  Fraser River etc Canada)(Haida Salmon Restoration
  Corporation, Ocean Pastures Corp ), Some times
  also Iron Oxide is used.
  
  
  
  
• ? Selected test sites had iron deficient surface
  off shore ocean/lake environment with already
  sufficient phosphate Nitrogen level, hence it
  is likely single major condition for explosive
  phytoplankton growth(Jo Martin Ste Fitzwater)
  
  
  ? Limited but also
  lab type data indicates volcano ash(heavy iron)
  triggers explosive growth of phytoplantkon(Sve
  Duggen)

linkedin.com/in/newnatureparadigm - Ben
Rusuisiak Specialty Cleantech Research,
Vancouver, Canada
27
59Ferrous Ferric ion/Ferrate ion water
Continued 6 ? Iron
Sulphate Depositing in water 3

• --gtgtcont WM Rejected claims at media,
  S2(bioenhancing) of 2nd claim Fish stock
  increase
• Volcano ash(heavy iron) falling on
  ocean/lake/river seems to trigger its short term
  explosive plankton growth followed by fish
  population growth, while negative long lasting
  environmental impact of above doesn't seem to be
  major(Rus George, Pet Gross), Examples
• 1912 Katmai USA At least 2 times growth but can
  be much more (GA
  Rounsefell),
  
  
  1956 ?????????? - ?????
  ?????????? ????????/Kamchatka Russia same growth
  level as Katmai(????????? ??, ?????? ??),
  2008
  Kasatochi USA 10-20times(Tim Parsons), also
  numerous tests on fresh volcano ash lab
  environment grows algae, trees, or agricultural
  crops with significantly increase growth for
  1-2yrs after feeding.
  
• There are several other academic anecdotal
  stories related to some of other larger volcano
  eruptions Aleutian islands, Chile, Kamchatka.
  Yet results are not uniform - each volcano
  mineral content is not the same(Cli
  Oppenheimer), --gtgtcont

linkedin.com/in/newnatureparadigm - Ben
Rusuisiak Specialty Cleantech Analysis,
Vancouver, Canada
28
59Ferrous Ferric ion/Ferrate ion water
Continued 7 ? Iron
Sulphate Depositing in water 4

• --gtgtcont WM Rejected claims at media,
  S2(bioenhancing)
• (3rd claim)CO2 sequestration by thriving
  phytoplankton(There is clear effect, but probably
  not cost effective)
• ? Extremely large volcano's intermittent long
  duration ash depositing causes prolonged massive
  phytoplankton bloom with clear CO2 reduction(JL
  Sarmiento),
  
  
  ? When scale is smaller it is lot
  more difficult to measure attribute to CO2
  reduction like dramatic effect of fish
  increase(Rob Hamme),
  
  
  
• ? Volcano eruption cases when significant effect
  is clearly observed (Agung -
  Indonesia, Pinatubo - Philippines, etc),
  indicate
  
  
• A- Unlike fish increase type eruption, its CO2
  reduction seems to need locally catastrophic
  volume of ash/iron dispersion cost being
  prohibitory,
  
  B- Causes fair
  amount of lasting environmental damage due to its
  scale C-
  Effect could be largely to do with land plants'
  very prolonged enhanced growth rather than
  plankton photosyhthesis?

linkedin.com/in/newnatureparadigm - Ben
Rusuisiak Specialty Cleantech Research,
Vancouver, Canada
29
59Ferrous Ferric ion/Ferrate ion water
Continued 8 ? Iron
Sulphate Depositing in water 5 RISK FACTOR

• gtgt cont WM Fully rejected effect
  S2(bioenhancing)
  
  
• RISK VALIDITY ASSESSMENT A-C
  
  
  A- Interlocked Mainstream Group's
  standard process of across the board debunking
  method
• i-Majority of large Western media or most of
  Mainstream funded large environmental groups
  ignore most or all of tested positive tech
  results in official western academic data listed
  in this section for volcanic ash FeSO4, hence
  easily claim "there is no evidence this works at
  all" with quotes of willing debunking scientists,
  then furnishing it with words like "devastating",
  "largest geoengineering experiment" "contravened
  UN convention" to encourage public to not even
  consider possible effectiveness.
• Interlocked environmental groups seem to be
  specialized in this strategy to ultimately
  prevent over-supply of low cost resources of all
  types while ignoring effective alternatives,
  hence often creating shortage and commercial
  benefit to establishment group over all. --gtgtcont

linkedin.com/in/newnatureparadigm - Ben
Rusuisiak Specialty Cleantech Analysis,
Vancouver, Canada
30
59Ferrous Ferric ion/Ferrate ion water
Continued 9 ? Iron
Sulphate Depositing in water 6 RISK FACTOR

• gtgt cont WM Fully rejected effect
  S2(bioenhancing) RISK- A
  
  
• ii-Other mainstream groups partially admit
  academic data and say "unlikely it works, but
  even if it it did..", then list more of possibly
  going wrong exaggerated scenario that are not
  actually seen than workable scenario like
  acidification, irreversible destruction of
  environment etc.
• iii-Incidentally, other western mainstream
  initiated and managed geoengineering projects
  like climate intervention project of different
  types world wide(on public record), are entirely
  ignored by them or call it "there is no such
  thing exists" hence abstain from criticism while
  successfully create a reality, in which much
  larger mainstream led geoengineering becomes mere
  theory for majority of western public who
  exclusively believes in WM media. (For details,
  see other report and look up "Only Man made CO2
  causes catastrophic global warming" Tesla,
  Other Controversial Energy Tech Claims...
  
  --gtgtcont

linkedin.com/in/newnatureparadigm - Ben
Rusuisiak Specialty Cleantech Analysis,
Vancouver, Canada
31
59Ferrous Ferric ion/Ferrate ion water
Continued 10 ? Iron
Sulphate Depositing in water 7 RISK FACTOR

• gtgt cont WM Fully rejected effect
  S2(bioenhancing) RISK assessment
• B- Less limited i.e. wider data sourcing than
  WM(western mainstream) its evaluation leads to
  somewhat different risks/evaluation conclusion
• iv-Effect of large volcano eruption on fish
  increase has been "tested" with seemingly no
  major long term negative effect, but artificial
  Ferric ion dispersion has been done only in super
  small level(0.5-120ton), hence large scale impact
  of mono nutrient chemical dispersion is really
  inconclusive (volcano ash has mix of phosphate,
  iron, silica, manganese etc, and even has another
  pseudoscientific idea of seeming very strong
  bioenhancing effect causing ORMUSsection 63').
• v-It is plausible there are variable cases when
  rapid increase of phytoplankton does not lead to
  increased fish stock or even zooplankton(combo
  element with other nutrients in water, location,
  timing duration, sunlight duration, fish
  travelling route vs temperature ocean current
  change etc) highly likely it requires strong
  skill know-how like casting bait net that
  involves hit miss

linkedin.com/in/newnatureparadigm - Ben
Rusuisiak Specialty Cleantech Research,
Vancouver, Canada
32
59Ferrous Ferric ion/Ferrate ion water
Continued 11 ? Iron
Sulphate Depositing in water 8 RISK FACTOR

• gtgt cont WM Fully rejected effect
  S2(bioenhancing) RISK
• C- But biggest risk of this tech seem to be
• vi-Along with some other low cost effective
  technological processes, mainstream endorsed
  success of this tech would bring too much too
  rapid large negative impact on economic system,
  geopolitical balance, and key stake holders that
  are largely inflencing them. There are various
  indication of interlocked/coordinated/teamwork
  effort by western establishment groups to
  increase influence of key resources management by
  creating shortage which economical structure
  follows naturally 1- fresh water, 2-food,
  3-heath medical, 4-energy, 5-banking
  financial policies
• World fish stock supply is 100-120millon ton/yr,
  while all world wide meat stock is 250-300millon
  ton/yr, hence food market would collapse if fish
  increases even just to 130 range with basically
  same base operating cost. If increase amounts to
  200, this largely natural catch protein could
  completely devastate the food market pricing,
  controlled food production(GMO etc) and destroy
  food stock control system shortage idea.
  --gtgtcont

linkedin.com/in/newnatureparadigm - Ben
Rusuisiak Specialty Cleantech Analysis,
Vancouver, Canada
33
59Ferrous Ferric ion water/Ferrate ion
Continued 12 ? Iron
Sulphate Depositing in water 9 RISK FACTOR

• gtgt cont WM Fully rejected effect
  S2(bioenhancing) RISK C- Biggest risk
• Fair portion of increased fish stock by this tech
  would go to current food importing or starved low
  agri tech nations, where various interlocked
  group members with technological financial
  stronghold, IMF/WB lending and compulsory
  economic restructuring contract(to suit western
  establishment's control of those nations)etc
  would have lot to lose abruptly. This research
  finds some portion of mainstream interlocked
  groups are accommodating gradual low cost
  technological propagation but official overt
  endorsement of this particular tech might cause
  the loss too suddenly even for those "white hat
  groups"'s tolerance standard.
• This type of geopolitically risky relative
  low-tech(eg Coal Water Slurry, Various water
  based over-unity energy production, Practically
  free medical effect stronger than mainstream
  methodseg Homeopathic vaccine for majority of
  chronic disease) might be better off to be
  practised quietly without endorsement by
  "credible" people at this time.
• Temporal win-win scenario If allowed
  unofficially, this benefits fish growth operators
  knowledged group of people "who foolishly
  believe it works" while establishment can
  continue to keep food stock etc control world
  wide with little such tech deployment, due to
  most people still only believe in mainstream news
  approved tech.

linkedin.com/in/newnatureparadigm - Ben
Rusuisiak Specialty Cleantech Analysis,
Vancouver, Canada
34
60Vacuum Saturation heating or cooling Effect
mix of Accepted Fully rejected by Western
Mainstream(WM)

• 60Vacuum Saturation heating or cooling
  Related processes Many vacuum related water
  technologies are used as fully standard process
  in some industries while almost forgotten in
  other industries or residential applications.
  
  
  
  WM Accepted effect widely used process due
  to lower temperature(lower energy use) water
  evaporation M2N2(helps desalination process
  dimineralization) by low temperature, lower
  energy use vaporization secondary/tertiary step
  as std process in distillation, B3(soil-sand-oil
  separation from water)-
• Standard process in some industries(Pulp Paper,
  Petro processing, Chemical) but much less often
  used in other areas Z2(fast-efficient heat
  conducting),
• This process can often replace hot/cold water
  based heating/cooling Conventional heating via
  hot water occurs by heat-giving from water
  towards target medium, hence accomplished
  temperature tends to be uneven, but saturated
  steam is same temperature in closed system so
  whole heating is faster in even temperature(saves
  10-30 of energy, same applies for cooling
  process) This usually means higher consistent
  product quality with less rejects in
  manufacturing

linkedin.com/in/newnatureparadigm - Ben
Rusuisiak Specialty Cleantech Research,
Vancouver, Canada
35
60Vacuum Saturation heating or cooling
continued 2 Steam Jet Ejectors/Eductors etc 1

• gtgt continue WM Accepted effect
  
  F3(cooling effect or faster
  even heating-cooling) (TLV, Lalonde
  Systhermique, KCPC jp ), Food industry benefits,
  also nutrition flavor enhanced (Miuraz jp,
  Marutaka50 ), I3(metal cleaning) Applies to all
  washing by flash vapour by sudden change of
  pressure(Aqa-T jp)
• UNLISTED EFFECTS Vacuum generation itself is
  often done by various mechanical process, but
  sometimes can be automatically done by use of
  mini Vacuum creating Venturi Effect pipe which
  has explosive pressure changes in t