Tile and fibre measurements (Tile HCAL) J. Cvach, S. Nemecek Institute of Physics AS CR, Prague (Calice Coll.) - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Tile and fibre measurements (Tile HCAL) J. Cvach, S. Nemecek Institute of Physics AS CR, Prague (Calice Coll.)

Description:

Institute of Physics AS CR, Prague (Calice Coll.) Tile uniformity, current measurements ... light tight box PM Hamamatsu R5505 at 2 kV Keithley 6514 electrometer ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:104
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 19
Provided by: jarosla2
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Tile and fibre measurements (Tile HCAL) J. Cvach, S. Nemecek Institute of Physics AS CR, Prague (Calice Coll.)


1
Tile and fibre measurements (Tile HCAL)J.
Cvach, S. Nemecek Institute of Physics AS CR,
Prague (Calice Coll.)
  1. Tile uniformity, current measurements
  2. Cosmics monitor
  3. Comparisons
  4. Conclusions

2
(No Transcript)
3
1. Tile uniformity with source measurement
  • Our setup consists of
  • light tight box PM Hamamatsu R5505 at 2 kV
    Keithley 6514 electrometer
  • 90Sr ( 1.5 MBq) radioactive source
  • has a fixed grid for uniformity measurements
  • - multiples of 4 mm in x direction
  • - 10 mm in y direction
  • Uniformity s / ltIgt calculated over area
    smaller by 10 mm than tile size (due to the
    source profile),
  • s STD of one meas.
  • Different tile sizes Bicron bc908 tiles 5x5,
    10x10, 15x15 cm2
  • (read by fiber bc91A mc, 0.8 mm thick)
  • Different grooves, tile size 5x5 cm2, Kuraray
    SCSN81
  • - middle, edge, diagonal groove
  • - 1 and 2 circular grooves (read by fiber bc91A)

Result no dependence of uniformity on tile size
observed
4
Setup for uniformity measurements
5
Example tile with middle groove
6
Summary for tile Kuraray SCSN81 5x5 cm2
Worse Corner
Best Corner
7
Example tiles bc408 - uniformity
fibre on side
Tile (cm2) 5 x 5 10 x 10 15 x 15
Uniformity () 4.0 6.0 5.0 6.5 4.0 5.5
no dependence on size!
8
Tilefiber response to 90Sr source in the tile
centre
9
Tilefibre response to 90Sr cont.
10
2. Cosmics monitor
µ
  • Two plastic scintillator bars, 50 cm long, 52
    cm² ( detector Up, Down)
  • separated vertically by 2.5 cm thick Pb bar
    (larger Eµ for Coinc.) gt Eloss of MIP
  • read by PMTs EMI 9813 (d46mm, 14 dynodes)
  • connected by PMMA (Plexiglas) lightquide 52
    cm² gt p(2.3 cm) ²
  • Sliding Up detector the Test area L5 cm ² is
    prepared
  • Three optically separated Scintillator tiles
    Bicron BC-408, 55 cm²
  • Two optically separated Scintillator tiles
    Bicron BC-408, 1515 cm²
  • Read by PMTs HAMA H3165 (d10mm, 10 dynodes)

11
Cosmics monitor, DAQ
Pulser
100 Hz
300 ns
LRS 645
LRS 645
LRS 2249W
Gate
Down
Delay
1
CAMAC to PC by KK 009
2
Up
Delay
3
Right
4
50 Ohm
Delay
5
Left
Delay
Linear FAN-OUT 428A
  • PULSER from Dual Timer CAEN, N93A

LRS 623A
12
Scintillator Tiles BICRON bc408 spectra

30
µ
29
Left PMT
Right PMT
13
Npe from left and right PM
  • Npe.
  • C lt Q(LR)gt ²
  • s(L-R) ² - s02
  • C up to 1.25
  • to correct for statistical fluctuations in the
    first few dynodes
  • ( C1 used)
  • s0 Noise ( neglected)
  • E.H.Bellamy, ..,S.Tokar,..NIM A339(1994)468

CUT (LR) gt 6
14
Corespondance of LY and cosmics - bc408
  • 3 tiles 5x5, 3 tiles 10x10, 2 tiles 15x15 cm2
    used in cosmic m measurements
  • Light yield measured - Sr source in the middle
    of the tile
  • 2 fibres Kuraray Y11(200), 1 mm with mirror on
    tile side, Tyvek, Alu reflect.
  • Results per tile fibre

Tile a x a (cm2) 5 x 5 10 x 10 15 x 15
LY (nA) 105 - 6 60 - 4 39 - 6
Relative LY 2.4 - 0.4 1.5 - 0.3 1
Photo e- 6.5-0.4 ) 4 - 0.2 2.5 - 0.2
LY / photo e- (nA) 16 - 1.7 15 - 1.4 16 - 2.8
  • approximate scaling 1/a observed in ATLAS
    collaboration
  • our normalization factor 16 nA/ photo e-
  • ) cf. to 6.57 given in S. Reiche, Diploma
    thesis, Hamburg 2001

15
Comparison of LY measurements
  • DESY effort made to have collimated Sr source,
    hand device ( )
  • Prague Sr source with divergence of 45o,
    semiautomatic device, grid 10 mm x 4 mm ( )
  • each data sample normalized to its max value

PRG fibre on side
PRG fibre end
16
LY comparison - comments
  • DESY subtracts correction 6-10 which is x
    dependent, not y dependent
  • PRG no corrections, background dark current lt 2
    and not x, y dependent
  • PRG tile position in coordinate system known to
    - 2 mm for x, y
  • DESY tiles in Tyvek, mirrored fibre end
  • PRG tiles in white paper, fibre end cut and not
    mirrored
  • PRG LY increases toward fibre end
  • DESY measurements smaller decrease towards tile
    edges collimated source
  • DESY meas symmetric in x, understanding of x
    dependent correction?
  • --gt DESY measurement better uniformity
  • PRG try to collimate source or unfold the source
    profile

17
Comparison
  • measurement of attenuation length for bc408
    scintillator (Kuraray Y11 fibre)
  • left S. Reiche, Diploma thesis, bc408 (box),
    Kuraray SCSN (triangle), 5x5cm2
  • right this talk, bc408, 15x15 cm2

Measurements consistent drop 6 at 4 cm
18
4. Conclusions
  • Measurements with radioactive source and cosmic
    muons provide consistent results
  • Cosmic muon measurements confirm assumption from
    TDR about Npe
  • Uniformity of different tile geometries/sizes lt
    7
  • Comparison of measurements from different labs
    important
  • Simulation needed to better understand
    measurements/ improve design
  • Fiber on tile side is a recommended option but
    fiber in circular groove gives 3x larger LY
    (option for larger tiles?)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com