SHIPWRECKED: Dealing With Construction Contract Defaults in the Real World - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 23
About This Presentation
Title:

SHIPWRECKED: Dealing With Construction Contract Defaults in the Real World

Description:

Was the injured party deprived of the benefit it expected? ... Does the breaching party's behavior comport with standards of good faith and fair dealing? ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:67
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 24
Provided by: nx8
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: SHIPWRECKED: Dealing With Construction Contract Defaults in the Real World


1
SHIPWRECKED Dealing With Construction Contract
Defaults in the Real World
American Bar Association Forum on the
Construction Industry
2007 Fall Meeting
  • George J. Bachrach, Esq.
  • Whiteford, Taylor Preston, LLP
  • Baltimore, Maryland
  • Deborah S. Butera, Esq.
  • Shapiro, Fussell, Wedge Martin, LLP
  • Atlanta, Georgia

2
SCENARIO NO. 1 OWNERS THREAT TO TERMINATE
GENERAL CONTRACTOR
  • 1. Default concepts
  • material default
  • waiver
  • Contract provisions
  • Types of default events
  • The suretys investigation
  • The suretys assertion of the principals
    defenses

3
IS THERE A MATERIAL DEFAULT?
  • Restatement (Second) of Contracts 241
  • Was the injured party deprived of the benefit it
    expected?
  • May the injured party be adequately compensated?
  • Will the breaching party suffer forfeitures?
  • Is a cure likely?
  • Does the breaching partys behavior comport with
    standards of good faith and fair dealing?

4
AIA A 201 ARTICLE 14.2 TERMINATION OF THE
CONTRACTOR FOR DEFAULT BY THE OWNER
  • Persistent failure to supply labor or materials
  • Failure to pay subcontractors
  • Persistent disregard of laws
  • Other substantial breach of contract provisions

5
TYPES OF GENERAL CONTRACTOR DEFAULT EVENTS
  • Failure to perform
  • - nonperformance
  • - deficient performance
  • - delayed performance
  • 2. Failure to pay subcontractors
  • 3. Failure to administer the contract
  • 4. Violation of laws

6
THE SURETYS INVESTIGATION
  • Why, when, who, what and how
  • 2. The suretys analysis of its investigation

7
THE SURETYS ASSERTION OF THE PRINCIPALS DEFENSES
  • The obligees failure to pay
  • The obligees design obligations
  • The obligees duty to cooperate
  • The obligees failure to properly administer the
    contract
  • The obligees failure to provide an opportunity
    to cure
  • Waiver and/or release and settlement
  • The principals setoffs or counterclaims

8
SCENARIO NO. 2 OWNER/OBLIGEES DEMAND ON
PERFORMANCE BOND
  • AIA A312 and A311 performance bond claim
    procedures
  • What happens when the performance bond claim
    procedures are not followed
  • The suretys defenses to the performance bond
    claim

9
AIA A312 PERFORMANCE BOND CLAIM
  • Provide notice to contractor and surety that
    owner is considering a declaration of default
  • Request conference to be held within 15 days of
    receipt of notice
  • Declare a contractor default and formally
    terminate not earlier than 20 days from receipt
    of notice
  • Agree to pay contract balance to surety or
    replacement contractor

10
AIA A311 PERFORMANCE BOND CLAIM
  • Contractor in default
  • Owner/obligee declaration of default
  • Owner/obligee has performed its obligations

11
  • Bad things may happen to everyone if the
    performance bond claim procedures are not
    followed
  • and why

12
DRAGON v. PARKWAY BANK,678 N.E.2d 55, 58 (Ill.
Ct. App. 1997)
  • We find the obligees failure to provide
    adequate notice of the contractors termination
    and their hiring of a successor contractor before
    the surety received the late notice stripped
    the surety of its right to limit its liability
    and constituted a material breach of contract
    which rendered the surety bonds null and void.

13
ST. PAUL v. CITY OF GREEN RIVER, 93 F. Supp. 2d
1170, 1179 (D. Wyo. 2000)
  • While the Board did properly notify St. Paul of
    Westgates default, it prohibited St. Paul from
    exercising its contractual right to perform
    itself or to participate in the selection of the
    replacement contractor. Because the Court
    concludes that St. Paul would not have entered
    the performance bond in the absence of its
    performance options under Paragraph 4, the
    Boards action depriving St. Paul of those
    options was a material breach, which discharged
    St. Paul from any further duty of performance
    under the bond.

14
SEABOARD SURETY V. GREENFIELD, 266 F. Supp. 2d
189, 198 (D. Mass. 2003)
  • Because a clear and direct default notice was not
    served pursuant to Paragraph 5, the Court finds
    that Greenfield was in material breach of the
    Bond when it ceased its dealings with Seaboard
    and hired another company to complete the
    Project. . . Greenfields refusal to allow
    Seaboard to complete the Project renders the Bond
    null and void and discharges Seaboard from any
    and all liability under the Bond.

15
THE SURETYS ASSERTION OF THE PRINCIPALS DEFENSES
  • The obligees failure to pay
  • The obligees design obligations
  • The obligees duty to cooperate
  • The obligees failure to properly administer the
    contract
  • The obligees failure to provide an opportunity
    to cure
  • Waiver and/or release and settlement
  • The principals setoffs or counterclaims

16
THE SURETYS ASSERTION OF THE SURETYS OWN
DEFENSES
  • The obligees failure to provide notice to the
    surety and/or comply with the performance bonds
    conditions precedent
  • The obligees actions prejudicial to the surety
  • Material alterations
  • Overpayment
  • Extensions of time
  • Failure to timely terminate principal
  • Failure to mitigate damages

17
THE SURETYS ASSERTION OF THE SURETYS OWN
DEFENSES
  • The obligees release and/or discharge of the
    principal (including the wrongful termination of
    the principal)
  • Contractual and statutory limitations
  • The obligees lack of good faith (concealment,
    non-disclosure and/or misrepresentation of facts)

18
SCENARIO NO. 3 RESPONSES TO THE OWNER/
OBLIGEES PERFORMANCE BOND CLAIM
  • The contractors claim of wrongful termination
  • The suretys options in response to the
    owner/obligees AIA A312 performance bond claim
  • Where the positions of the principal and the
    surety
  • Coincide
  • Differ

19
WRONGFUL TERMINATION BY OWNER/OBLIGEE
  • 1. Discharges contractor and surety from all
    performance obligations
  • 2. Bars owner/obligees recovery of costs of
    completion
  • 3. Exposes owner/obligee to lost profits and
    other damage claims
  • 4. May expose owner/obligee to bad faith claims

20
AIA A312 BOND CLAIM THE SURETYS OPTIONS
  • Arrange for contractor completion
  • Perform through agents or independent contractors
  • Obtain bids and arrange for completion contract
    between owner/obligee and replacement contractor
  • Waive rights to the above and either (1) tender
    payment or (2) deny liability

21
  • Where the positions of the principal and the
    surety
  • Coincide
  • Differ

22
SCENARIO NO. 4 GENERAL CONTRATOR TERMINATION OF
BONDED SUBCONTRACTOR
  • Alternatives to default termination
  • Discussion of issues

23
ALTERNATIVES TO DEFAULT TERMINATION
  • Termination for convenience
  • Correct and back charge
  • Deductive change order
  • Default and allow completion
  • Withhold payment
  • Change of personnel
  • Supplement work force
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com