Research Ethics - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 12
About This Presentation
Title:

Research Ethics

Description:

1. Introduction: research ethics and moral principles. 2. Case 1: group ... The principle of credit: Do not plagiarize the work of other scientists, give ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:112
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 13
Provided by: tompo9
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Research Ethics


1
Research Ethics
Tom Powers Delaware Biotechnology Institute
Department of Philosophy University of Delaware
2
Outline
  • 1. Introduction research ethics and moral
    principles
  • 2. Case 1 group discussion reconvene
  • 3. 10 minute break
  • 4. Case 2 group discussion reconvene
  • 5. Case 3 group discussion reconvene
  • 6. Professional ethical codes

3
What is the focus of research ethics?
Plagiarism Fabrication falsification of
data Conflicts of Interest Authorship Experimental
subjects
4
What contributes to ethical problems in research?
  • Garden-variety vices dishonesty, envy,
    exploitation, lack of collegiality,
    self-promotion, sloth, arrogance, etc., etc.

5
Lets start by consideringCase 1
Grad student Jones begins an analysis on a large
data set in pumpkin genetics--data that she has
generated in a lab run by Prof. Turnip. The
analysis will be the basis of her dissertation.
The work looks promising, and she hopes to
conduct other analyses after the initial one, but
Turnip wants to hand over the data to a lab run
by a company from which Turnip has received
support in the past. The company wants to go to
market with some GM pumpkin seeds, as opposed to
publishing further genetic studies. Turnip
doesnt admit this to Jones, however, pleading
merely that the data set is too large for Jones
to exploit anyway. Jones starts to
mischaracterize her results to Turnip. Is anyone
in the wrong here?
6
Some specialized principles of research ethics
may help.
Philosophical Foundations of Scientific
Ethics By David Resnik http//www.physics.emich.e
du/mthomsen/resn1.htm 1. Scientific Honesty Do
not commit scientific fraud, i.e. do not
fabricate, fudge, trim, cook, destroy, or
misrepresent data. 2. Carefulness Strive to
avoid careless errors or sloppiness in all
aspects of scientific work. 3. Intellectual
Freedom Scientists should be allowed to pursue
new ideas and criticize old ones. They should
be free to conduct research they find
interesting. 4. Openness i.e. share data,
results, methods, theories, equipment, and so on.
Allow people to see your work, be open to
criticism. 5. The principle of credit Do not
plagiarize the work of other scientists, give
credit where credit is due (but not where it is
not due). 6. The principle of public
responsibility Report research in the public
media when a) the research has an important and
direct bearing on human happiness and b) the
research has been sufficiently validated by
scientific peers.
7
Case 2
  • Dr. Charles, a mid-career faculty member, was
    revising and updating a book chapter. During the
    course of her reading, she came upon a chapter in
    a major text by Dr. Long, a department chair in a
    leading psychology department, that contained
    long passages from her previous chapter without
    attribution.
  • Dr. Charles called Dr. Long and confronted
    him with her finding. At first, he vehemently
    denied having used any of Dr. Charles' text
    inappropriately. Dr. Charles then faxed Dr. Long
    copies of the offending passages. After some
    delay, Dr. Long finally responded, acknowledging
    that the language was indeed remarkably similar
    he noted that he had engaged younger members of
    his research team to write portions of the
    chapter because he was very busy at the time that
    the deadline was approaching. Furthermore, to
    defend himself, he pointed out that much of the
    original research on which her chapter was based
    was derived from the work of his team. He
    admitted only to negligence in not adequately
    monitoring the activities of his students and
    subordinates.
  • Dr. Charles replied that the students/other
    team members were not acknowledged in Dr. Long's
    chapter either, and that admission of plagiarism
    required more than an apology. She indicated her
    intention to report the matter to Dr. Long's dean
    and the editor of the text his and hers?.
  • From www.responsibility.research.umich.edu/.
    Case adapted by Shaké Ketefian from Association
    of American Medical Colleges (1994)."Teaching the
    Responsible Conduct of Research Through a Case
    Study Approach."
  • Washington, D.C., AAMC. Case B6, pages 51-52.

8
Some general ethical theories might help
  • Utilitarianism Act so as to maximize total
    social (stakeholder?) happiness
  • Kantianism 1. Act only in ways that are
    universalizable 2. Treat people as ends and
    never merely as means
  • Virtue Ethics Practice those virtues (courage,
    honesty, etc.) that will help you attain the good
    life.

9
Case 3
  • Jerry Vaughn contracted with a federal agency to
    conduct a social impact assessment of proposed
    topographic changes in an aboriginal habitat in a
    far north region of North America. The contract
    contained no stipulations regarding ownership of
    data. In order to determine the potential impacts
    on the culture of peoples living in that region,
    Vaughn engaged in participant observation
    (keeping a detailed field notebook of same)
    conducted in-depth personal interviews and took
    over 1,000 photographs of people working,
    socializing, and enjoying other everyday and
    special activities. This work was carried out
    over a one year period. Vaughn was paid 75 of
    his contracted salary and other expenses before
    the fieldwork.
  • Vaughn then wrote a 150-page report detailing
    the areas of social life that would be adversely
    affected if the plans were implemented. He
    further noted that, if the plans were implemented
    as proposed, there could be no mitigations that
    could prevent the people's culture from being
    totally altered. Because of these severe
    conclusions, the agency director instructed
    Vaughn to turn over his entire research record in
    order that the agency could solicit another
    opinion on the matter. Furthermore, the director
    told Vaughn that unless he would turn over the
    record, no further payment would be made to him.
  • From Handbook on Ethical Issues in Anthropology
    at www.aanet.org/committees/ethics/case2.htm

10
Finally, consider some professional ethics codes
  • IEEE code of ethics
  • American Institute of Chemical Engineers code of
    ethics
  • American Anthropological Association Statements
    on Ethics

11
Other internet resources
  • SEPP Research Integrity Page
  • Ethics Updates
  • ORI at the US Dept. of HHS

12
Contact me!
  • tpowers_at_udel.edu
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com