- PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Description:

Elementary Cycle of Medical Activity. Medical Information Used in Medical Practice ... QUALITATIVE Anamnesis (descriptive) NUMERICAL Laboratory investigations ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:120
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 35
Provided by: gmih
Category:
Tags:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title:


1
Victor BabesUNIVERSITY OF MEDICINE AND
PHARMACY TIMISOARA
  • DEPARTMENT OF
  • MEDICAL INFORMATICS
  • 2005 / 2006

2
  • http//www.medinfo.umft.ro/dim/metodologie.htm

3
  • Medical Scientific Research MethodologyMCS
  • 2nd Module
  • Course 1

4
1. Medical Information Object of the course
5
1.1. MEDICAL INFORMATION
  • Pacient Physician Relation
  • Elementary Cycle of Medical Activity
  • Medical Information Used in Medical Practice
  • DATA individual character facts
  • studied by MEDICAL/HEALTH INFORMATICS
  • KNOWLEDGE general character concepts
  • studied by MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

6
1.2. ELEMENTARY CYCLE OF MEDICAL ACTIVITY
7
1.3. TYPES OF DATA
  • QUALITATIVE Anamnesis (descriptive)
  • NUMERICAL Laboratory investigations
  • GRAPHICAL Biosignals (ECG, EEG)
  • SOUNDS Phonocardiogram
  • STATIC IMAGES X-Ray, NMR
  • DYNAMIC IMAGES movies

8
1.4. TYPES OF KNOWLEDGE
  • a) Explicit knowledge
  • Formalized
  • expressed in words, schemes, formulae
  • Easy transmission (books, lectures)
  • Education
  • b) Tacit knowledge
  • Personal experience
  • skill
  • Difficult transmission
  • Training

9
1.5. Relation between knowledge and
diagnosis/treatment
  • LOGICAL INFERENCE
  • Classical Medicine
  • STATISTICAL INFERENCE
  • Evidence Based Medicine

10
1.6. Object of Medical Scientific Research
Methodology
  • Production of explicit knowledge research
  • Research methods
  • Observational
  • surveys
  • clinical trials
  • Experimental
  • laboratory studies - specific
  • Theoretical modeling/simulation

11
1.7. Research Activity Steps
  • Documentation
  • Study Organizing
  • Clinical Studies
  • Laboratory Studies
  • Theoretical Research formalizing knowledge
  • Data Processing
  • Presentation of results
  • Writing scientific papers

12
1.8. TYPES OF CLINICAL STUDIES
  • Public Health Studies
  • Health Services Studies
  • Evaluation of a Diagnostic Procedure
  • Evaluation of a Therapeutical Approach
  • Risk and/or Prognostic Factors Studies

13
  • 1.9. TYPES OF PAPERS
  • original papers - book reviews
  • case studies - theses
  • reviews editorials
  • Approach Modes
  • Descriptive
  • Analitical

14
I. TYPES OF STUDIESGeneral Characteristics
15
2. DESCRIPTION OF A HEALTH PHENOMENON
16
  • 2.1. STEPS
  • - first step data collection
  • does not explain causes
  • comparation with existing etalons
  • 2.2 THE PROTOCOL
  • Estabilishing target population
  • Pathological state definition
  • Choosing variabiles, scales, standards etc
  • Epidemiological indicators computation
  • Comparing with known indicators

17
2.3. Mandatory Criteria inDescriptive Studies
  • Representativity of
  • general (target) population
  • studied pathology
  • Comparability
  • with results from other studies
  • variables and their measurement
  • Utility
  • Medical and scientific pertinence
  • Priorities
  • Efficiency for patients

18
3. EVALUATION OF A DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE
19
  • 3.1. PHASES
  • 1. Determination of
  • Method validity
  • Fiability influenced by inter and
    intra-observational reproducibility
  • 2. Qualitative Assessment of the Test (Procedure)
  • Sensitivity / Specificity
  • ROC Curve (Receiver Operating Characteristic)
  • Sn f (1 Sp)
  • Youden Index Y Sn Sp 1 (diagn.value)

20
CLASSIFICATION QUALITYASSESSMENT
3.2. Classification table Test
T T-
D N11 N12 R1 D- N21 N22 R2
C1 C2 N
Real
21
3.3. PARAMETERS
  • false negative N12
  • false positive N21
  • sensitivity SN p(T/D) N11 / R1
  • specificity SP p(T-/D-) N22 / R2
  • inverse relationship between SN and SP
  • positive/negative predictive values
  • PPV p(D/T) N11 / C1
  • NPV p(D-/T-) N22 / C2
  • accuracy AC (N11 N22) / N
  • classification error rate ER (N12 N21) / N

22
  • 3.4. Test Assessment (practical)
  • PPV, NPV AC, ER
  • Test D (detectability AC2 / AC1)
  • Test V (validity Y2 / Y1)
  • 3.5. Index Evaluation
  • CB Cost Benefit
  • CE Cost - Efficiency

23
4. EVALUATION OF A THERAPEUTIC
PROCEDURECLINICAL TRIALS
24
4.1. Definitions and Terms
  • Def CLINICAL TRIAL clinical research technique
    for estimating the effect of a therapy, within an
    extremely restrictive methodological frame
  • Estimating EFFICIENCY
  • Comparison of the treated group with a
    control group (placebo)
  • Terms
  • Controlled clinical trial with controls
  • Uncontrolled clinical trial without controls

25
4.2. Methodological Principles in clinical
trials
  • A) Exact Scope Definition
  • Unilateral study (refer.), bilateral (2
    treatments)
  • B) Patient Groups Definition
  • Samples selection size, continuity, inclusion /
    exclusion criteria
  • C) Comparison Modes
  • Comparable groups , randomization, stratification
  • Definition of treatment control type (no
    treatment, placebo, std)
  • Mentaining results quality (systematic errors
    elimination)

26
  • Defining the general comparing plan
  • Parallel groups each group a scheme
  • Cross-over automartor order by randomozation
  • Disadv need of a stable pathology, objective
    evaluation criteria, wash-out periods
  • Secquential patients recruited for a longer
    period stop at significant differences.
  • D) Defining assessment criteria
  • Main criterion conforming the objective
  • E) Analysis mode and comparison interpretation
  • Type of analysis, statistical tests, prognostic
    factors

27
  • Comparability (avoid bias)
  • Randomization random numbers
  • Simple / Double Blind Studies
  • simple blind the patient does not know
    his/her treatment, the physician does
  • double blind neither the patient nor the
    physician know the allocation to a certain
    treatment group

28
  • The ideal study
  • (simple, cheap, good results)
  • Controlled
  • Randomized
  • Double blind
  • Parallel groups

29
4.3. Writing the Protocol of a CLINICAL TRIAL
  • It should be detailed its precision is
    determining the quality of the study
  • Introduction basic data describing the medical
    problem and the therapy under study
  • Scope clear definition of the scope and of the
    objectives
  • Method description of the general comparing plan
  • Groups defining subjects/patients (inclusion and
    exclusion criteria), patient acceptance signature
    for each individual in the study

30
  • 5. Sample size details on calculating should be
    included in the protocol
  • 6. Selection randomization method when, how,
    type (even, stratified)
  • 7. Treatments
  • a) Studied treatment procurement method,
    physical-chemical properties, prescribing
  • b) Placebo or reference treatment procurement,
    comparability (look, physical-chemical qualities
    etc)
  • c) Associated treatments list of authorized
    substances, administration conditions, forbidden
    substances list

31
  • 8. Initial balance list of necessary
    investigations for inclusion or prognostic
    factors for rejection, which will be studied in
    the trial
  • 9. Evaluation criteria for the therapeutic
    effect details on data collection, main
    criterion, secondary criteria
  • 10. Surveillance mode all subjects will be
    surveyed in the same manner, at the same
    intervals. The rhythm and content of control
    examinations shall be presented. Following
    features must be observed, and the conduct in
    such cases shall be detailed
  • a) Secondary effects
  • b) Therapy break-up
  • c) Lost during the study

32
  • 11. . Data analysis
  • a) Statistical analysis methodology comprises the
    hazard evaluation, systematic errors and
    confusion factors, with alternate explanation for
    the recorded results
  • b) The attitude on the lost shall be mentioned
    the following postulate is recommended once
    randomized mandatory analyzed. None of the
    subjects included in a study group shall be
    omitted in the analysis
  • 12. Criteria for breaking-up the trial
  • a) Clear benefic results in an intermediary
    phase, due to a highly significance of the tests,
    correlated with the clinical context
  • b) When the treatment may be dangerous for the
    subject(s)

33
  • 13. Attached documentsThe protocol has usually
    the following attached documents
  • List of persons and their responsibilities
  • Activities calendar
  • Observation log
  • Subjects identification data
  • Inclusion data
  • Results of successive balances
  • The informative document given to patients
  • List of acceptance signatures
  • Ethical commission approval, containing details
    on the trial quality control strategy, during the
    study, for subjects / patients protection

34
Pause
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com