From trade cumuli to deep moist convection - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 15
About This Presentation
Title:

From trade cumuli to deep moist convection

Description:

Convective overshoot and penetrative entrainment are important in the long-term ... Adiabatic. A plume-ensemble view of entrainment. In-cloud PDF, hours 50-52 ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:45
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 16
Provided by: david1701
Learn more at: http://www.mmm.ucar.edu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: From trade cumuli to deep moist convection


1
From trade cumuli to deep moist convection
  • Chris Bretherton and Zhiming Kuang
  • University of Washington
  • (with inspiration from GCSS WG1)

2
Some features of trade cumulus convection
  • Shallow Cu are always highly entraining.
  • Convective overshoot and penetrative entrainment
    are important in the long-term evolution of the
    Cu layer.
  • Their typical buoyancy excess is much less than
    undilute.
  • Their cloud base properties are connected to the
    statistics of the subcloud layer turbulence the
    Cu are the vertical extensions of the moistest,
    strongest subcloud updrafts.

These points apply to most deep convection, but
are often overlooked in parameterizations.
3
BOMEX LES (Siebesma and Cuijpers 1995)
(dq/dt)adv - 1 g/kg-d Wmin -0.65 cm/s Qr -2
K/d
4
BOMEX GCSS results (Siebesma et al. 2003)
Overshooting Cu
Core lateral entrainment rate 1-2 km-1
Bottom-heavy cloud population
5
Clouds are barely buoyant
2-3s cloud base humidity, w excess
6
Feedbacks in shallow (and deep?) oceanic Cu
Cloudbase CIN is the rapid mass flux valve
-
Weaker CIN
More mass flux
More compensating Cu-layer warming
Penetrative entrainment slowly adjusts Cu buoyancy
-
More Cu buoyancy
Stronger updraft
More penetrative entrainment
Stronger ql stratification
(Bretherton et al. 2004, MWR)
7
Oceanic shallow-to-deep CRM
Setup BOMEX with enhanced SHF, LHF
(inadvertently doubled Qrad) CSU
CRM, Lx Ly 12.8 km, Lz 28 km.
Dx Dy 100 m, Dz 50 m below 12 km.
8
Results
143 hr
48 hr
9
Cloud fields (qcgt0.1 g/kg)
48 hr
143 hr
10
In-cloud buoyancy is remarkably small
Hor avg Cloud Wgt1 m/s Adiabatic
11
A plume-ensemble view of entrainment
In-cloud PDF, hours 50-52
  • All updrafts are diluted.
  • e 0.5-1/km
  • in vigorous updrafts.
  • Most cloud is much more dilute

0.25/km
0.5/km
Mass-flux PDF, hours 50-52
1/km
2/km 4/km
8
1
Wlt0
2
4
12
Later and deeper
Cloud PDF,158-160 hrs
  • Qualitatively similar, but
  • core updraft e 0.5/km.

0.25/km
0.5
1
2
e 4
Mass-flux PDF,158-160 hrs
8
4
2
1
Wlt0
13
Buoyancy and Vertical Velocity
qv, 50-52 hrs
cloud
  • Even a little less dilution makes a very
    strong updraft!

clear
w, 50-52 hrs
14
Conclusions
  • Both for shallow and deep convection, all cumuli
    are substantially entrainment-diluted such that
    their mean buoyancy is nearly zero, even in
    vigorous updrafts.
  • Below the LFC, the Cu mass flux is dominated by
    updrafts with a narrow range of entrainment
    rates, suggesting a single ensemble plume may
    suffice.
  • Penetrative entrainment dominated by stronger,
    less dilute updrafts- requires consideration of
    plume ensemble.
  • Cloud base updraft properties represent moist
    tail of PBL air mass flux is regulated via CIN.
  • Over the long term, penetrative entrainment
    regulates mean sounding to keep typical cloud
    buoyancy small.

15
qv, 158-160 hrs
w, 158-160 hrs
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com