The Prisoners Dilemma or Life With My Brother and Sister - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 17
About This Presentation
Title:

The Prisoners Dilemma or Life With My Brother and Sister

Description:

Say the two last contestants are named Amy and Emma ... is a weak equilibrium, since if Emma votes 'foe' it doesn't matter what Amy does. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:126
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 18
Provided by: Hus49
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The Prisoners Dilemma or Life With My Brother and Sister


1
The Prisoners DilemmaorLife With My Brother
and Sister
  • John Willett
  • Age 9
  • G.H. Robertson
  • Coventry, CT

2
spend time with my loving sister
play with my cool brother, or
3
Prisoners Dilemma
  • last year I did a presentation on blackjack and
    craps
  • these are simple games
  • there is no opponent with a strategy to play
    against
  • poker is a more interesting game
  • adversarial
  • repeated
  • because poker is so complicated, I will look at a
    simple example of an adversarial game
  • the Prisoners Dilemma
  • based on two choices confess or dont confess
  • shows up in many different places

4
An example of the prisoners dilemma
  • The police have arrested two people, Billy and
    Bob, for a crime that they have committed.
  • Both can talk to the police, or stay quiet
  • confess, or dont confess

5
How to Play
  • (Billy confesses) (Bob confesses)
  • both owe 5 years in jail
  • (Billy confesses) (Bob doesnt confess)
  • Bob owes 10 years in jail Billy goes free
  • (Billy doesnt confess) (Bob doesnt confess)
  • both owe 1 year in jail
  • (Billy doesnt confess) (Bob confesses)
  • Billy owes 10 years in jail Bob goes free
  • Billy and Bob don't know what the other person
    did (or will do), and they are not allowed to
    talk to each other.
  • What should they do?

6
Cost Table Normal Form
Bobs penalty, years in jail
Billys penalty, years in jail
7
The Answer
  • the best answer is for neither Bob nor Billy to
    confess
  • both would get only 1 year in jail
  • but this would require cooperation
  • suppose Bob decides not to confess
  • if Billy confesses, Bob is in trouble
  • on the other hand, suppose Bob confesses,
    reasoning that Billy will confess, too
  • then if Billy doesnt confess, Bobs outcome is
    better than he was expecting

8
Nash Equilibrium
  • the both confess strategy pair (or solution
    concept) has the property that neither Billy nor
    Bob can do better by changing his strategy
  • that is, neither can do better without
    coordinating a change in strategy with the other
    player
  • this solution concept is a Nash Equilibrium
  • named after John Forbes Nash, who discovered it
    in his 1950 dissertation
  • the movie A Beautiful Mind was about Nash

9
Pareto Optimality
  • Pareto optimal solution concept any change in
    strategy that causes improvement for one player
    must make it worse for the other player

Vilfredo Pareto 1848-1923
10
Another example Friend or Foe
  • Friend or Foe was a game show aired in the 1990s
  • The contestants answer a series of questions, and
    close to the end of the show, there are two left
  • Say the two last contestants are named Amy and
    Emma
  • (Emma friend) (Amy friend) split
    winnings
  • (Emma foe) (Amy foe) empty handed
  • (Emma foe) (Amy friend) Emma gets all
  • (Emma friend) (Amy foe) Amy gets all
  • The strategy foe/foe is a weak equilibrium,
    since if Emma votes foe it doesnt matter what
    Amy does.

11
The Iterated Prisoners Dilemma
  • the iterated prisoners dilemma can occur when
    both players remember the game or games before
  • under certain conditions they will most likely
    interact to a cooperative strategy
  • even if the agreement is to defect
  • Robert Axelrod wrote a book called The Evolution
    of Cooperation
  • states that greedy strategies dont benefit as
    much as more altruistic strategies

a.k.a. irritated
12
Colonel Blotto Games
  • Joe and John each have 6 rocks and 3 sacks
  • both put at least one rock in each sack, ordered
    least to most
  • Joes most sack is compared to Johns most,
    and so on
  • the object is to win the most match-ups
  • John (2,2,2) vs. Joe (1,1,4)
  • John wins 2, Joe wins 1
  • only 3 possibilities (1,2,3) (2,2,2) (1,1,4)

13
Nash equilibrium
14
Colonel Blotto with 12 armies he has only 12
choices
15
The T
  • T is for tie
  • B means Colonel Blotto wins
  • D means Colonel Dude wins
  • T is the Nash Equilibrium of this game
  • It is the Nash Equilibrium because
  • You are Colonel Blotto, and you pick 246
  • If Colonel Dude does the same you will tie (same
    with some other choices) if he does anything
    else, you win
  • With 13 armies there is no deterministic Nash
  • optimal solution is randomized
  • I dont understand this
  • P.S. Dude goes down, and Blotto goes across

16
Conclusions
  • A Prisoners Dilemma can be found in many areas
  • it uses game theory
  • the stable solution is a Nash Equilibrium
  • It can only be used when all the players know the
    payoffs
  • Prisoners Dilemma is an easy way to beat family
  • Wikipedia is very useful

17
Bibliography
  • www.wikipedia.com type in Prisoners Dilemma
  • www.wikipedia.com type in Nash Equilibrium
  • www.wikipedia.com type in Pareto
  • http//pespmc1.vub.ac.be/PRISDIL.html
  • http//serendip.brynmawr.edu/playground/pd.html
  • http//prisonersdilemma.groenefee.nl/
  • Jonathan Partingtons Colonel Blotto page
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com