Title: The National Institutes of Health NIH: Inside and Out Presented by NSUs Office of Grants and Contrac
1The National Institutes of Health (NIH) Inside
and OutPresented by NSUs Office of Grants and
Contracts on November 7, 2003
Note This information was received at the NIH
Seminar in Louisville, Kentucky (June 2002),
unless otherwise indicated.
2A Brief Background
- NIH is the primary funding source for scientific
research in the U.S. - The NIH campus is located in Bethesda, Maryland
just outside of Washington, DC. - In 1901, NIH had one building called the Lab of
Hygiene. Today, it is comprised of more than 25
Institutes and Centers for research, as well as
the National Library of Medicine. - The extramural research program constitutes about
85 of NIHs annual budget. - NIHs mission is to acquire new knowledge to
help prevent, detect, diagnose, and treat disease
and disability, from the rarest genetic disorder
to the common cold.
3NIHs Research Programs
- Intramural Program
- Extramural Program
4The NIH Intramural Program
- Allows researchers an opportunity to become
visiting scientists on the NIH campus. - Provides an opportunity for visiting scientists
to collaborate on projects across Institutes. - There are more than 2,000 projects conducted on
NIHs campus at any given time. - The program is open to all from pre-doctoral
students to the most seasoned researchers.
5The NIH Extramural Program
- Perhaps the most well-known of NIHs research
programs. - Provides funding for research and training
through grants, cooperative agreements, and
contracts. - Founded on investigator-initiated research.
- Currently funding over 50,000 principal
investigators. - For more information, view the NIH Office of
Extramural Researchs website at
http//grants1.nih.gov/grants/oer.htm.
6Types of NIH Awards
- Researcher Investigations (R01, R03, R21)
- Research Training (T32, T34, T35)
- Student Fellowships (F31, F32, F33)
- Career Development (K01, K02, K05, K07)
- Institutional (R15, U24)
- Conference Support (R13, U13)
- Small Business (SBIR, STTR)
- For more information on types of awards
http//grants1.nih.gov/grants/funding/funding_prog
ram.htm
7The PHS 398 Application Packet
- Forms are now available online in PDF and Word
formats. - Instructions are also available online and should
be followed to the letter. - OGC can provide assistance with institutional
information as well as budget development and
justification. - Modular vs. Non-modular budget formats.
8Computer Retrieval of Information on Scientific
Projects (CRISP)
- CRISP is a database maintained by NIH and
chronicles past and current federally funded
research that is being conducted in a variety of
settings. - Projects include those funded by the National
Institutes of Health (NIH), Substance Abuse and
Mental Health Services (SAMHSA), Health Resources
and Services Administration (HRSA), Food and Drug
Administration (FDA), Centers for Disease Control
and Prevention (CDCP), Agency for Health Care
Research and Quality (AHRQ), and Office of the
Assistant Secretary of Health (OASH). - This is a great way to keep up with the latest
federally-funded scientific research and also
take note of what types of projects are typically
getting funded by NIH and other agencies.
9Peer Review at NIH
- CSR
- Study Sections
- Institute Advisory Councils
10The Center for Scientific Review
- Proposals are sent to the CSR and are processed
upon arrival. - Referral officers coordinate which Study Sections
and Institutes will receive which proposals. - Applicants will receive a letter within 4-6 weeks
stating the assigned Study Section and Institute
for the proposals review. - At this time, applicants can reply and request
re-assignments for the proposal review.
11The Study Section
- Assigned proposals based on type of funding,
scientific area, revision versus new application. - Each section has a Scientific Research
Administrator (SRA) and a Grant Technical
Assistant to oversee the review process and
support reviewers during the process. - The SRA is an important contact.
- Study Sections members are listed on NIHs
website http//www.csr.nih.gov/studysec.htm
12The SRAs Responsibilities
- Selects reviewers for the Study Sections.
- Distributes proposals to reviewers.
- Coordinates reviewers meetings.
- Oversees and ensures fairness of review process.
- Drafts summary statements of the review.
- Considers applicants Study Sections requests.
- Has overall responsibility of Study Sections
function. - Serves as liaison for applicants if any
last-minute materials need to be added.
13The Institute Advisory Council
- Proposals scoring high enough move on to the
Councils for review at the Institute-level. - Councils ensure that the Study Sections reviews
were fair and unbiased. - Councils review how the proposals fit into the
Institute's mission and priorities. - Councils decide on which proposals to fund and
the amount of the award.
143 Ways Institute Advisory Councils Can Respond
- The Council agrees with Study Sections review.
- The Council requests modifications of the Study
Sections comments, though the score remains
unchanged. - The Council requests a deferral to review the
same application at a later date.
15STUDY SECTIONS DO NOT FUND, INSTITUTES FUND!
16Notes About The Peer Review Process
- The review process is not a passive process
getting involved and staying informed are to the
applicants benefit. - Reviewers are an eclectic mix of researchers, not
just those in your field. - While reviewers are accomplished and respected
scientists, they are also busy people. - Ensure proper attention to your proposal by
following directions and being careful about its
presentation.
17First Impressions Last What The Reviewers Notice
- The proposals aesthetic - Is the proposal easy
to read and well-organized? Does the project
title sound interesting? - The nuts and bolts of the proposal - Does the
project seem significant and have a solid
methodology that is carefully and clearly
explained? Does the applicant institution have
the necessary resources to carry out the
projects goals? Are the budget estimates
realistic and well-justified? - How is the proposal special or unique? Is it
innovative? Can the results of this study project
contribute to greater knowledge or further
inquiry about the field of study?
Based on presentation by David Morrison of Grant
Writers Seminars and Workshops, LLC April 2003.
1810 Reasons an Application is not Funded by NIH
- Lack of new or original ideas
- Absence of acceptable scientific rationale
- Lack of experience in essential methodology
- Questionable reasoning in experimental approach
- Uncritical approach
- Diffuse, superficial, or unfocused research plan
- Lack of sufficient experimental detail
- Lack of knowledge of published relevant work
- Unrealistically large amount of work
- Uncertainty concerning future directions
19NIH Regional Seminars
- May 6-7, 2004 in Miami and June 24-25, 2004 in
Seattle, WA - For general or program related information on the
NIH Regional Seminars, please contact Megan
Columbus at megan.columbus_at_nih.gov or
301-435-0937. - On the web at http//grants2.nih.gov/grants/semina
rs.htm
20Useful Websites Regarding NIH Applications
- www.nih.gov The National Institutes of Health
- http//crisp.cit.nih.gov/ The CRISP Database
- http//grants1.nih.gov/grants/forms.htm PHS 398
among other NIH applications - http//deainfo.nci.nih.gov/EXTRA/EXTDOCS/gntapp.ht
m Quick Guide for Grant Applications courtesy of
the National Cancer Institute - http//www.csr.nih.gov/REVIEW/streamln.htm The
NIH Streamlining Process
21NIH links continued
- http//www.csr.nih.gov/ Center for Scientific
Review website - http//www.csr.nih.gov/review/terms.htm Glossary
of Terms for Peer Review - http//www.csr.nih.gov/REVIEW/policy.asp Peer
Review Policy and Procedures - http//www.csr.nih.gov/REVIEW/Peerrev.htm
Narrative of Peer Review Process - http//www.nigms.nih.gov/funding/tips.html Tips
for new NIH applicants -