The National Institutes of Health NIH: Inside and Out Presented by NSUs Office of Grants and Contrac - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 21
About This Presentation
Title:

The National Institutes of Health NIH: Inside and Out Presented by NSUs Office of Grants and Contrac

Description:

Allows researchers an opportunity to become visiting scientists on the NIH campus. ... Researcher Investigations (R01, R03, R21) Research Training (T32, T34, T35) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:41
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 22
Provided by: roxanne62
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The National Institutes of Health NIH: Inside and Out Presented by NSUs Office of Grants and Contrac


1
The National Institutes of Health (NIH) Inside
and OutPresented by NSUs Office of Grants and
Contracts on November 7, 2003
Note This information was received at the NIH
Seminar in Louisville, Kentucky (June 2002),
unless otherwise indicated.
2
A Brief Background
  • NIH is the primary funding source for scientific
    research in the U.S.
  • The NIH campus is located in Bethesda, Maryland
    just outside of Washington, DC.
  • In 1901, NIH had one building called the Lab of
    Hygiene. Today, it is comprised of more than 25
    Institutes and Centers for research, as well as
    the National Library of Medicine.
  • The extramural research program constitutes about
    85 of NIHs annual budget.
  • NIHs mission is to acquire new knowledge to
    help prevent, detect, diagnose, and treat disease
    and disability, from the rarest genetic disorder
    to the common cold.

3
NIHs Research Programs
  • Intramural Program
  • Extramural Program

4
The NIH Intramural Program
  • Allows researchers an opportunity to become
    visiting scientists on the NIH campus.
  • Provides an opportunity for visiting scientists
    to collaborate on projects across Institutes.
  • There are more than 2,000 projects conducted on
    NIHs campus at any given time.
  • The program is open to all from pre-doctoral
    students to the most seasoned researchers.

5
The NIH Extramural Program
  • Perhaps the most well-known of NIHs research
    programs.
  • Provides funding for research and training
    through grants, cooperative agreements, and
    contracts.
  • Founded on investigator-initiated research.
  • Currently funding over 50,000 principal
    investigators.
  • For more information, view the NIH Office of
    Extramural Researchs website at
    http//grants1.nih.gov/grants/oer.htm.

6
Types of NIH Awards
  • Researcher Investigations (R01, R03, R21)
  • Research Training (T32, T34, T35)
  • Student Fellowships (F31, F32, F33)
  • Career Development (K01, K02, K05, K07)
  • Institutional (R15, U24)
  • Conference Support (R13, U13)
  • Small Business (SBIR, STTR)
  • For more information on types of awards
    http//grants1.nih.gov/grants/funding/funding_prog
    ram.htm

7
The PHS 398 Application Packet
  • Forms are now available online in PDF and Word
    formats.
  • Instructions are also available online and should
    be followed to the letter.
  • OGC can provide assistance with institutional
    information as well as budget development and
    justification.
  • Modular vs. Non-modular budget formats.

8
Computer Retrieval of Information on Scientific
Projects (CRISP)
  • CRISP is a database maintained by NIH and
    chronicles past and current federally funded
    research that is being conducted in a variety of
    settings.
  • Projects include those funded by the National
    Institutes of Health (NIH), Substance Abuse and
    Mental Health Services (SAMHSA), Health Resources
    and Services Administration (HRSA), Food and Drug
    Administration (FDA), Centers for Disease Control
    and Prevention (CDCP), Agency for Health Care
    Research and Quality (AHRQ), and Office of the
    Assistant Secretary of Health (OASH).
  • This is a great way to keep up with the latest
    federally-funded scientific research and also
    take note of what types of projects are typically
    getting funded by NIH and other agencies.

9
Peer Review at NIH
  • CSR
  • Study Sections
  • Institute Advisory Councils

10
The Center for Scientific Review
  • Proposals are sent to the CSR and are processed
    upon arrival.
  • Referral officers coordinate which Study Sections
    and Institutes will receive which proposals.
  • Applicants will receive a letter within 4-6 weeks
    stating the assigned Study Section and Institute
    for the proposals review.
  • At this time, applicants can reply and request
    re-assignments for the proposal review.

11
The Study Section
  • Assigned proposals based on type of funding,
    scientific area, revision versus new application.
  • Each section has a Scientific Research
    Administrator (SRA) and a Grant Technical
    Assistant to oversee the review process and
    support reviewers during the process.
  • The SRA is an important contact.
  • Study Sections members are listed on NIHs
    website http//www.csr.nih.gov/studysec.htm

12
The SRAs Responsibilities
  • Selects reviewers for the Study Sections.
  • Distributes proposals to reviewers.
  • Coordinates reviewers meetings.
  • Oversees and ensures fairness of review process.
  • Drafts summary statements of the review.
  • Considers applicants Study Sections requests.
  • Has overall responsibility of Study Sections
    function.
  • Serves as liaison for applicants if any
    last-minute materials need to be added.

13
The Institute Advisory Council
  • Proposals scoring high enough move on to the
    Councils for review at the Institute-level.
  • Councils ensure that the Study Sections reviews
    were fair and unbiased.
  • Councils review how the proposals fit into the
    Institute's mission and priorities.
  • Councils decide on which proposals to fund and
    the amount of the award.

14
3 Ways Institute Advisory Councils Can Respond
  • The Council agrees with Study Sections review.
  • The Council requests modifications of the Study
    Sections comments, though the score remains
    unchanged.
  • The Council requests a deferral to review the
    same application at a later date.

15
STUDY SECTIONS DO NOT FUND, INSTITUTES FUND!
16
Notes About The Peer Review Process
  • The review process is not a passive process
    getting involved and staying informed are to the
    applicants benefit.
  • Reviewers are an eclectic mix of researchers, not
    just those in your field.
  • While reviewers are accomplished and respected
    scientists, they are also busy people.
  • Ensure proper attention to your proposal by
    following directions and being careful about its
    presentation.

17
First Impressions Last What The Reviewers Notice
  • The proposals aesthetic - Is the proposal easy
    to read and well-organized? Does the project
    title sound interesting?
  • The nuts and bolts of the proposal - Does the
    project seem significant and have a solid
    methodology that is carefully and clearly
    explained? Does the applicant institution have
    the necessary resources to carry out the
    projects goals? Are the budget estimates
    realistic and well-justified?
  • How is the proposal special or unique? Is it
    innovative? Can the results of this study project
    contribute to greater knowledge or further
    inquiry about the field of study?

Based on presentation by David Morrison of Grant
Writers Seminars and Workshops, LLC April 2003.
18
10 Reasons an Application is not Funded by NIH
  • Lack of new or original ideas
  • Absence of acceptable scientific rationale
  • Lack of experience in essential methodology
  • Questionable reasoning in experimental approach
  • Uncritical approach
  • Diffuse, superficial, or unfocused research plan
  • Lack of sufficient experimental detail
  • Lack of knowledge of published relevant work
  • Unrealistically large amount of work
  • Uncertainty concerning future directions

19
NIH Regional Seminars
  • May 6-7, 2004 in Miami and June 24-25, 2004 in
    Seattle, WA
  • For general or program related information on the
    NIH Regional Seminars, please contact Megan
    Columbus at megan.columbus_at_nih.gov or
    301-435-0937.
  • On the web at http//grants2.nih.gov/grants/semina
    rs.htm

20
Useful Websites Regarding NIH Applications
  • www.nih.gov The National Institutes of Health
  • http//crisp.cit.nih.gov/ The CRISP Database
  • http//grants1.nih.gov/grants/forms.htm PHS 398
    among other NIH applications
  • http//deainfo.nci.nih.gov/EXTRA/EXTDOCS/gntapp.ht
    m Quick Guide for Grant Applications courtesy of
    the National Cancer Institute
  • http//www.csr.nih.gov/REVIEW/streamln.htm The
    NIH Streamlining Process

21
NIH links continued
  • http//www.csr.nih.gov/ Center for Scientific
    Review website
  • http//www.csr.nih.gov/review/terms.htm Glossary
    of Terms for Peer Review
  • http//www.csr.nih.gov/REVIEW/policy.asp Peer
    Review Policy and Procedures
  • http//www.csr.nih.gov/REVIEW/Peerrev.htm
    Narrative of Peer Review Process
  • http//www.nigms.nih.gov/funding/tips.html Tips
    for new NIH applicants
  •  
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com