Brain Tumours for Psychologists - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 79
About This Presentation
Title:

Brain Tumours for Psychologists

Description:

... required for patients receiving TMZ during the concomitant phase. ... expressed in cells, they can repair TMZ damage, and thus are resistant to chemotherapy ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:86
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 80
Provided by: allan7
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Brain Tumours for Psychologists


1
Brain Tumours for Psychologists
  • Allan James
  • Consultant Clinical Oncologist
  • Beatson Oncology Centre

2
(No Transcript)
3
(No Transcript)
4
(No Transcript)
5
(No Transcript)
6
(No Transcript)
7
(No Transcript)
8
(No Transcript)
9
(No Transcript)
10
(No Transcript)
11
(No Transcript)
12
(No Transcript)
13
(No Transcript)
14
(No Transcript)
15
(No Transcript)
16
(No Transcript)
17
(No Transcript)
18
(No Transcript)
19
(No Transcript)
20
(No Transcript)
21
(No Transcript)
22
Why suspect a Brain Tumour ?
  • Headaches are common, very few caused by tumour
  • Look for acute onset, particular pattern,
    association with other symptoms / signs
  • Although seizures are dramatic, very few are
    caused by brain tumours
  • Scan all with new onset seizures with no adequate
    explanation of cause
  • Personality changes are common in older age
  • Brain tumours are a rare cause
  • VIGILANCE
  • is the key

23
(No Transcript)
24
(No Transcript)
25
(No Transcript)
26
(No Transcript)
27
(No Transcript)
28
(No Transcript)
29
Some imaging is a little more accurate still
30
Baseline
Week 6
Week 24
Week 40
Week 56
31
(No Transcript)
32
LOH 1p 19q is becoming A useful clinical marker
Both for prognosis
And therapeutic decisions
33
There is no more Powerful prognostic Marker in
GBM
Than AGE
34
THUS
35
Introduction to GliomaTreatment
36
Introduction to GliomaTreatment
37
Introduction to GliomaTreatment
38
Introduction to GliomaTreatment
39
Introduction to GliomaTreatment
Frame based Image Guided Brain Biopsy 1980
40
Introduction to GliomaTreatment
Image guidance has simplified the biopsy or ex
cision of supratentorial
lesions
41
Introduction to GliomaTreatment
Awake craniotomy for brain mapping and tumour
excision cortical stimulation and
language testing during craniotomy
42
Introduction to GliomaTreatment
A Biopsy only B Maximal debulking C Various p
ercentage debulking
43
Introduction to GliomaTreatment
44
Introduction to GliomaTreatment
  • Glioma Historical perspective
  • Situation around 2000
  • HGG
  • Age
  • Age 70 PS 0 or 1
  • Young but PS 1
  • Age 70 WHO 1 Supportive care
  • Chemotherapy at relapse
  • Survival 12months (Gd IV) 1-4 years (Gd III
    OOAA)

Highly palliative 6 XRT
45
Introduction to GliomaTreatment
46
Introduction to GliomaTreatment
47
Introduction to GliomaTreatment
48
Introduction to GliomaTreatment
  • Radiotherapy of Primary Brain tumours
  • What do we achieve

49
Chemotherapy for Brain Tumours
50
Chemotherapy for Brain Tumours
  • Can we give chemotherapy with / after XRT to
    improve outcome in High Grade Gliomas?
  • Meta-analysis of several small trials in 1990s
    suggested small survival advantage (6) at 1
    year, halved, barely significant at 2 years, gone
    by 3 years
  • Chemo was 9 months of 3 drug regimen with GI
    side effects, marrow suppression, diet
    restrictions
  • Interpreted differently in UK (Europe), chemo
    witheld until relapse in US, survival advantage,
    therfore adjuvant PCV offered
  • BUT, TIMES HAVE CHANGED

51
Chemotherapy for Brain Tumours
52
Chemotherapy for Brain Tumours
Concomitant TMZ/RT
Adjuvant TMZ
R
0
Weeks
6
10
14
18
22
26
30
RT Alone
Temozolomide 75 mg/m2 po qd for 6 weeks,
then 150200 mg/m2 po qd d15 every 28 days for 6
cycles
Focal RT daily 30 x 200 cGy Total dose 60 Gy
PCP prophylaxis was required for patients
receiving TMZ during the concomitant phase.
53
2001 2003 EORTC 26981Progression Free Survival
54
2001 2003 EORTC 26981Overall Survival

100
RT TMZ/RT Median OS, mo 12.1 14.6 2-yr surviva
l 10 26 HR 95 C.I. 0.63 0.52-0.75 p 0.0001
90
80
70
60

50
40
30
TMZ/RT
20
RT
10
0
0
6
12
18
24
30
36
42
months
RT
TMZ/RT
Stupp et al. N Engl J Med 2005, 352987-996
55
Concomitant Chemoradiotherapy
  • Concomitant Chemoradiotherapy
  • First trial in 25 years to show significant
    survival advantage (Walker, XRT, 1978)
  • Temozolomide developed in UK
  • Expensive - 15-18k per course

56
Concomitant Chemoradiotherapy
  • Concomitant Chemoradiotherapy
  • First trial in 25 years to show significant
    survival advantage (Walker, XRT, 1978)
  • Temozolomide developed in UK
  • Expensive - 15-18k per course

57
Concomitant Chemoradiotherapy
  • Concomitant Chemoradiotherapy
  • First trial in 25 years to show significant
    survival advantage (Walker, XRT, 1978)
  • Temozolomide developed in UK
  • Expensive - 15-18k per course
  • There is a potential target population
  • ie a way of identifying responders, thus
    targetting resources and identifying patients in
    whom we must take a different approach

58
MGMT Promoter Methylation Predicts Benefit from
TMZ Treatment?
Unmethylated MGMT
Randomization RT TMZ/RT Median OS, mo 11.8 12
.7
2-yr survival 1.9 13.8
100
100
90
90
Logrank p 0.062
Logrank p 0.0074
80
80
70
70
TMZ/ RT
60
60
50
50
Overall Survival
TMZ/ RT
40
40
30
30
RT alone
RT alone
20
20
10
10
0
0
0
4
8
12
16
20
24
28
32
36
40
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
months
months
59
Management of (High Grade) Glioma whats new
  • MGMT (methyl guanine methyl transferase)
  • Repairs damage inflicted on DNA by Temozolomide
    (methyl group attached on Guanine)
  • Suicide enzyme
  • If MGMT expressed in cells, they can repair TMZ
    damage, and thus are resistant to chemotherapy
  • If MGMT gene promoter is methylated, it is not
    expressed in those cells, therefore they will not
    be able to repair TMZ damage, and thus will
    respond to chemotherapy

60
Management of (High Grade) Glioma whats new
  • UK / Scottish History of Concomitant Therapy
  • 2001-2003 Randomised Phase 3 study
  • 2004 Results first presented at ASCO
  • Late 2004 First cases treated in Glasgow
  • March 2005 Definitive paper published in NEJM
    with the MGMT paper
  • Feb 2006 NICE fail to recommend use of regime in
    any category. Use stops in Glasgow.
  • April 2006 SMC follow suite but 8 point criticism
    submitted to NICE
  • December 2006 SMC and subsequently NICE finally
    approve use in newly diagnosed GBM of PS 0 or 1

61
(No Transcript)
62
(No Transcript)
63
Gliadel
But 2 year data less convincing
And compare with Stupp trial curve
64
(No Transcript)
65
Thus age remains the strongest prognostic factor
in
HGG survival, despite advances in therapy
66
(No Transcript)
67
Low Grade Glioma
68
(No Transcript)
69
(No Transcript)
70
(No Transcript)
71
(No Transcript)
72
(No Transcript)
73
(No Transcript)
74
(No Transcript)
75
Compare with GBM data already given
76
(No Transcript)
77
(No Transcript)
78
(No Transcript)
79
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com