The 2006 Explosion of the Recurrent Nova RS Ophiuchi - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 19
About This Presentation
Title:

The 2006 Explosion of the Recurrent Nova RS Ophiuchi

Description:

Padin et al (1985), Hjellming et al (1986), Porcas et al (1987), Taylor et al (1989) ... Swift X-ray Observations. Two components: ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:189
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 20
Provided by: BODE3
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The 2006 Explosion of the Recurrent Nova RS Ophiuchi


1
The 2006 Explosion of the Recurrent Nova RS
Ophiuchi
  • Tim OBrien
  • Jodrell Bank Observatory, University of Manchester
  • Bode, Harman (Liverpool), Porcas (MPIfR),
  • Muxlow, Beswick, Garrington, Vaytet, Davis
    (Manchester),
  • Eyres, Rushton (Central Lancs), Gawronski, Feiler
    (Torun),
  • Anupama (Bangalore), Kantharia (Pune),
  • Osborne, Page, Beardmore, Goad (Leicester),
  • Evans (Keele), Starrfield, Ness (Arizona State),
  • Burrows (Penn State), Schwarz (West Chester),
  • Krautter (Heidelberg), Drake (Harvard CfA),
  • Gehrels (Goddard)

2
Vital Statistics
  • Recurrent Nova previous outbursts 1898, (1907),
    1933, 1958, 1967, 1985

Brightens from 11th mag to 4th mag in less than
a day.
Before after 2006
3
High-mass white dwarf (1.2-1.4 M?) Red Giant
(M2III), P 455 days
Outbursts due to thermonuclear runaway (TNR) on
WD surface
4
1985 Outburst First multi-wavelength campaign
  • X-rays EXOSAT, 6 epochs from t 55d. Indicative
    of gas at several million degrees. Mason et al
    (1987)
  • Radio Jodrell BBI from t 18d, VLA, EVNPadin
    et al (1985), Hjellming et al (1986), Porcas et
    al (1987), Taylor et al (1989)
  • Models of shock interaction similar to SNR. Bode
    Kahn (1985), OBrien Kahn (1987), OBrien,
    Bode Kahn (1992)
  • Led to estimates of various parametersd 1.6
    0.3 kpc, NH 2.4 0.6 cm-2 , Mej 1.1 x 10-6
    M, MW 2 x 10-7 M yr-1 , E 1.1 x 1043 erg

5
2006 Outburst
  • Discovered Feb 12.83 UT (t 0)
  • Within a few days, ToOs granted on Swift, XMM,
    Chandra, MERLIN, VLA, VLBA, EVN, Liv Tel, UKIRT,
    plus HST, GMRT, OCRA and Spitzer later.
  • Thanks!

6
Radio Observations
  • Monitoring from day 4.5 onwards with MERLIN, VLA,
    GMRT, OCRA, VLBA and EVN.

7
L/C-Band Lightcurve
Eyres et al (2006)
8
L/C-Band Lightcurve
1985
New component
9
VLBI Imaging
EVN
VLBA
VLBA
VLBA
EVN
10
First VLBI image Day 13.8
VLBA image revealsthe shock wave for thefirst
time. Earliest resolution of structure in any
such explosion. Resn 3 mas Peak Tb
5x107K Significant contribution from synchrotron.
6 cm
OBrien et al (2006)
11
Three epochs of VLBI imaging
VLBA
EVN
VLBA
6 cm
Day 13.8
Day 28.7
Day 21.5
18 cm
Day 13.8
Day 20.5
Day 28.7
12
Expansion velocity
  • 0.63 mas day-1
  • 1750 km s-1
  • at 1600 pc.
  • Consistent with
  • Swift X-ray
  • temperatures.

13
Three epochs of VLBI imaging
The second component
6 cm
Day 13.8
Day 28.7
Day 21.5
18 cm
Day 13.8
Day 20.5
Day 28.7
14
MERLIN imaging
  • Second component clearly visible from day 21
    onwards.
  • Third component to west visible around day 50.
  • Source evolves into E-W structure.

15
VLBI Sequence
VLBA 14d
VLBA 63d
VLBA 49d
EVN 22d
6 cm
18 cm
VLBA 29d
6 cm
18 cm
6 cm
16
Swift X-ray Observations
  • Two components
  • Shock providing higher-energy emission visible at
    early and late times.
  • Bright soft component from nuclear burning on
    white dwarf.

Bode et al (2006), Osborne et al (2006)
17
A model
Bipolar shell viewed at the (known) inclination
of the binary orbit and partially obscured by the
overlying red giant wind.
Binary orbit
18
A model
Synthetic images
Early
Late
As the source expands the overlying free-free
absorption is reduced and it becomes symmetrical.
19
Summary
  • Direct imaging of shock wave for first time.
    Properties consistent with X-ray emission.
  • Develops into E-W structure similar to the 1985
    image of Porcas et al despite doubters!
  • Radio monitoring reveals double-peaked light
    curve related to these multiple components.
  • X-rays reveal shock and nuclear burning (BTW
    proving part of my own PhD thesis wrong!).
  • Hydro modelling in progress to determine whether
    ejection in form of jets.
  • Will RS Oph explode as a Type Ia SN?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com