Bayesian Networks: Review Representation, independence, and inference a few problems for your enjoym - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Bayesian Networks: Review Representation, independence, and inference a few problems for your enjoym

Description:

3/30/2006. Bayesian Networks: Review. 1. Bayesian Networks: Review ... a few problems for your enjoyment) Stanislav Funiak. 10-701 Recitation, 3/30/2006. 3/30/2006 ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:81
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 20
Provided by: scie5
Learn more at: http://www.cs.cmu.edu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Bayesian Networks: Review Representation, independence, and inference a few problems for your enjoym


1
Bayesian Networks ReviewRepresentation,
independence, and inference( a few problems for
your enjoyment)
  • Stanislav Funiak
  • 10-701 Recitation, 3/30/2006

2
Conference Submission Network
Done
Beer
in Time
Quality
Sleep1
Sleep2
Comm- ents1
Comm-ents2
Recom-mended
Accepted
3
Bayesian Network
  • DAG, each node is a variable
  • For each var. X, CPD p(X Pa X)
  • represents the distribution as

A,B,D,T,Q,S1,S2,C1,C2,R
4
Smaller Network
C2t
Qt
C2f
Qf
p(S1f, Qt, C1f, C2t, Rt, At)
5
Independence Relations
  • where the force lies
  • example independencies

6
Factorization gt Independence relations
  • We have seen
  • starting from p factorizes according to G
  • show p satisfies some independence relations
  • Which independence assumptions in G?

p factorizes according to G
p satisfies indep. relations in G
7
Independence relations encoded in G
  • 1. Local Markov Assumptions
  • X indep. NonDescendants(X) Pa X

8
Independence relations encoded in G
  • 2. absence of active trails
  • Variables X indep of variables Ygiven Z if no
    active trail betweenX and Y given Z

9
Active trail Review
  • A path X1 X2 Xk is an active trail
    when variables OµX1,,Xn are observed if for
    each consecutive triplet in the trail
  • Xi-1?Xi?Xi1, and Xi is not observed (Xi?O)
  • Xi-1?Xi?Xi1, and Xi is not observed (Xi?O)
  • Xi-1?Xi?Xi1, and Xi is not observed (Xi?O)
  • Xi-1?Xi?Xi1, and Xi is observed (Xi2O), or one
    of its descendents

10
Independence relations encoded in G
  • 2. absence of active trails
  • Variables X indep of variables Ygiven Z if no
    active trail betweenX and Y given Z

11
Independence relations encoded in G
  • 1. Local Markov Assumptions
  • 2. absence of active trails (d-separation)

12
Independence relations gt Factorization
  • Before
  • How about

p factorizes according to G
p satisfies indep. relations in G
p factorizes according to G
p satisfies indep. relations in G
13
Independence relations gt Factorization
  • Suppose
  • Prove that p factorizes according to G

14
Queries
  • Marginal probability
  • Most probable explanation (MPE)
  • Active data collection

Variable elimination
15
Conditioning on evidence
Q
S1
C1
C2
R
C2t
Qt
A
C2f
Qf
16
Marginal probability query
  • Lets compute

Q
S1
C1
C2
R
A
17
Most probable explanation
  • Now, lets compute

Q
S1
C1
C2
R
A
18
Do we need this algorithm?
  • Couldnt we just take argmax of marginals?

Take
19
What you need to know
  • Representation
  • Independence relations
  • local Markov assumption
  • active trails / d-separation
  • independence relations gt factorization
  • Variable elimination
  • marginal queries
  • argmax queries
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com