Green School Facilities and Their Effect On Educational Outcomes - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 40
About This Presentation
Title:

Green School Facilities and Their Effect On Educational Outcomes

Description:

City of New York High Performance Building Guidelines. Poudre School District Sustainable Design Guidelines (CO) Consensus based ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:86
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 41
Provided by: sheila52
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Green School Facilities and Their Effect On Educational Outcomes


1
Green School Facilities and Their Effect On
Educational Outcomes
  • Sheila J. Bosch, Ph.D., LEED AP
  • GreenArk Inc.

2
School Challenges
  • Average age of schools is 42 years
  • Many are outdated, uncomfortable and even unsafe
  • Opportunity to improve schools to enhance
    learning and other desired outcomes

Lakeside High, built in 1967
3
School Building Boom
  • 150 billion to be spent on new, retrofit and
    addition construction from 2004 through 2006
    (nationwide)

4
What are Green Schools?
  • Green schools optimize learning environments
    and enhance natural environments

5
Designing/Rating Green Schools
  • LEED
  • National Best Practices Manual for Building High
    Performance Schools
  • Washington Sustainable School Design Protocol
  • Collaborative for High Performance Schools
  • City of New York High Performance Building
    Guidelines
  • Poudre School District Sustainable Design
    Guidelines (CO)

6
  • Consensus based
  • Buildings rated at one of 4 levels Certified,
    Silver, Gold, Platinum
  • Categories include Sustainable Sites, Water
    Efficiency, Energy Atmosphere, Materials
    Resources, Indoor Environmental Quality, and
    Innovation Design Process
  • Rating systems for both new and existing
    buildings
  • See www.usgbc.org for rating system details

7
Perceptions About Green Schools
  • More then 4/5 are familiar with green/high
    performance schools
  • 2/5 familiar with CHPS, 2/3 with LEED
  • Nearly 2/3 believe they cost more, but 7 is
    acceptable
  • 2/3 have incorporated green practices
  • Daylighting, automated lighting controls and
    energy management are most common
  • 3/4 believe green schools can serve as teaching
    tool

Source (2004) Green Building White Paper
Research Schools. Building Design
Construction and Reed Research Group.
8
Benefits of Green Schools?
  • Reduced operating costs
  • Improved behavior
  • Better attendance
  • Higher test scores
  • Reduced teacher turnover
  • Greater student and parent satisfaction

9
The Green Schools Agenda
  • Minimal or no increase in first cost
  • Lower operating costs
  • School building as a teaching tool
  • Healthy indoor air quality
  • Improved acoustics
  • Thermally comfortable
  • Minimal use of natural resources

10
Guess What
  • Green is NOT enough

11
Other Important Facility-Related Issues
  • Changing pedagogy
  • Safety
  • Increasing public access
  • Rapidly increasing student populations
  • Class size reduction
  • Deferred maintenance
  • Historic preservation
  • Technology
  • ADA compliance
  • Facility equity

12
What do we know about how school facilities
affect educational outcomes?
13
The BICE Report
  • The National Research Council appointed the
    Committee to Review and Assess the Health and
    Productivity Benefits of Green Schools.
  • Committee charged with reviewing, assessing, and
    synthesizing available studies on green schools
    and determine the theoretical and methodological
    basis for the effects of green schools on student
    learning and teacher productivity.
  • Final report due out in a few months

14
Limitations of Existing Data
  • No rigorous studies of green schools vs
    traditional re educational outcomes
  • Results scattered
  • Most studies not replicated
  • Measurement of variables not standardized
  • Effect of physical environment appears to be
    small compared to SES and other variables

15
Lighting
  • Visual conditions in most schools are adequate
  • Good daylighting shown to increase math and
    reading scores by 20 and 26 (Heschong Mahone
    Group 1999)
  • Teachers should try to create both well-lit and
    dimly lit areas in the classroom and encourage
    students to sit where they are most comfortable
    (Dunn 1985)

16
Lighting
  • lighting does seem to have some effect on
    childrens behavior, cognitive performance,
    visual fatigue, and possibly health. (Fletcher
    1983)
  • the visual environment affects a learners
    ability to perceive visual stimuli and affects
    his/her mental attitude, and thus, performance
    (Tanner Jago 1999)

17
Thermal Comfort
  • The presence of air conditioning was shown to
    improve test scores in vocabulary on the Iowa
    Test of Basic Skills in a study of eighth grade
    students from 191 public schools in Georgia (Chan
    1980)
  • Teachers believe thermal comfort affects teaching
    quality and student achievement (Lackney 1999)

18
Thermal Comfort
  • Several studies supporting the notion that when
    temperatures and humidity levels are in the
    moderate range (68-74 ?F and 40-70,
    respectively) students are best able to perform
    mental tasks (Schneider 2002)
  • Inconsistent evidence on temperature and
    performance, more findings associating higher
    temperatures above the comfort envelope with
    decreased performance in adults and children
    (Mendell Heath 2003)
  • Temperatures between 68-74 ?F were shown to be
    the best for learning reading and math (Harner
    1974)

19
Acoustics
  • Sufficient evidence exists to conclude that there
    is an association between decreased noise levels
    in schools and improvement in student achievement
  • Higher student achievement is correlated with
    lower noise levels (Earthman Lemasters 1998)
  • Increased outdoor noise associated with student
    dissatisfaction (Earthman Lemasters 1998)
  • Excessive noise causes student stress (Earthman
    Lemasters 1998)

20
Acoustics
  • Studies demonstrate links between acoustical
    conditions and spelling and reading ability,
    behavior, attention, concentration, blood
    pressure, feelings of helplessness, and a lack of
    persistence on tasks (Schneider 2002)
  • Excessive background noise even a problem in new
    schools (U.S.Architectural and Transportation
    Barriers Compliance Board 1999)

21
Indoor Air Quality
  • Poor IAQ associated with increased absenteeism
    (BICE Report Draft 2006)
  • Robust body of evidence indicating that the
    health of children and adults can be affected by
    air quality in a school (BICE Report Draft 2006)
  • The reduction of pollutant loads has been shown
    to reduce the occurrence of building-associated
    symptoms and to improve the health and comfort of
    people occupying the buildings (BICE draft report
    2006)

22
Indoor Air Quality
  • Microbiological and chemical exposures from
    indoor sources, have been related to
    respiratory infections and asthma, which are
    health outcomes documented to increase
    absenteeism and also likely to decrease
    performance (Mendell Heath 2003)
  • Indoor microbiological and chemical pollutants
    as well as a variety of HVAC and building
    characteristics, have been related to a broad
    range of additional health outcomes allergic
    alveolitis, atopy, lung inflammation, for which
    links to decreased performance or attendance are
    possible but have received little assessment
    (Mendell Heath 2003)

23
School As Teaching Tool
  • Henry Ford Museum/Greenfield Village, Dearborn,
    MI
  • 400 student charter school located in a museum
  • Students learn math skills by calculating window,
    wall, and ceiling areas

Source http//www.ed.gov/inits/construction/9scho
ols.html
24
School As Teaching Tool
  • Ohio Foundation for Environmental Education
  • 200 photovoltaic systems are being installed to
    offset energy loads
  • Web-based tools allow students to analyze power
    generation and consumption
  • Other curricula connections in math and science

Source http//www.solarschools.org
25
What Do We Need to Know?
Study Design
PHASE II Identify Important Measures of Success
(MOS) (i.e., Educational Outcomes)
PHASE I Analyze Literature to Identify Physical
Variables and Educational Outcomes
PHASE IV Identify Gaps and Develop Research
Priorities
PHASE III Identify Physical Variables Plausibly
Related to MOS and Develop Hypotheses
26
Literature Review
  • Purpose identify educational outcome and
    physical variables to identify those previously
    studied
  • Sources
  • Primarily correlational and review studies (27)
  • Scope included spatial features (large vs.
    small, open vs. traditional plan), building
    quality maintenance,visual comfort, thermal
    comfort, acoustical comfort, indoor air quality
  • Method review articles to identify variables and
    the relationships between them

27
Literature Review
  • Most studies are correlational and do not
    evaluate how
  • Wide variety in methods used
  • Most focus on the outcome achievement

28
Identifying Important Educational Outcomes
  • Purpose identify educational outcomes that are
    important to educators
  • Participants educators (17)
  • Method concept mapping
  • a type of structured conceptualization which can
    be used by groups to develop a conceptual
    framework which can guide evaluation or planning

29
Identifying Important Educational Outcomes
Support Services
Teacher attitude and behavior
Health
Collaboration
Facilities
School climate
Parental Involvement
Student Behavior
Community
School factors
Student attitude
Post secondary concerns
Final Cluster Rating Map
30
Identifying Important Educational Outcomes
31
Identifying Research Priorities
  • Purpose Identify plausible relationships between
    physical school environment and important
    measures of success to identify research
    priorities.
  • Participants experienced researchers (17)
  • Method Delphi technique using 4 questionnaires

Outdoor learning space
32
Identifying Research Priorities
  • Several of the priority hypotheses can be
    addressed through green design

33
High Priority Hypotheses
  • Quiet, reflective space
  • The provision of quiet, reflective space for
    students and teachers will result in improved
    student and teacher satisfaction, reduced
    off-task behavior, and improved student social
    development and affective performance

Outdoor gazebo
34
High Priority Hypotheses
  • Circulation spaces with niches, seating areas,
    and natural light
  • The provision of circulation spaces with niches,
    seating areas, and natural light provides
    opportunities for informal interaction among
    students and teachers, resulting in an improved
    social climate that will lead to a more
    student-friendly environment, greater sense of
    school connectedness, improved student academic
    growth, student attendance, affective
    performance, and teacher retention

Circulation space with benches
35
High Priority Hypotheses
  • Daylit classrooms
  • The provision of predominantly daylit classrooms
    is correlated with higher student academic
    achievement, lower absentee rates, fewer student
    suspensions, and improved teacher satisfaction
    when compared with predominantly artificially lit
    classrooms

Skylight
36
High Priority Hypotheses
  • Level of maintenance and building quality
  • Students in buildings that are well maintained
    and of good quality will perform higher on
    measures of achievement, create fewer
    disciplinary problems, and have higher attendance
    rates

Maintenance
37
High Priority Hypotheses
  • School integration into local community
  • When a school is well-integrated into the
    community, students will feel more valued by the
    school and will experience greater social
    development, improved job opportunities, reduced
    transience, and greater satisfaction

Students volunteer in local community
38
Literature Reviews
  • Higgins, S. et.al. (2005). The Impact of School
    Environments A Literature Review. For The
    Design Council.
  • Earthman, G. (2004). The Walls Speak.
  • Mendell, M.J. and Heath, G.A. (2003). Do Indoor
    Environments in Schools Influence Student
    Performance? A Review of the Literature. LBNL
    51780.
  • Schneider, M. (2002). Do School Facilities
    Affect Educational Outcomes? NCEF.

39
Best Resources
  • National Clearinghouse for Educational Facilities
    (Impact of School Facilities on Learning page)
  • www.edfacilities.com
  • Council of Educational Facility Planners,
    International www.cefpi.org
  • DesignShare, www.designshare.com
  • School Design Planning Lab, www.uga.edu/sdpl

40
For More Information About Designing Green Schools
  • Contact
  • TFPG
  • 706-614-1338

TFPG 2351 College Station Road Suite 407 Athens,
GA 30605
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com