AntiNeutrino Simulations - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 24
About This Presentation
Title:

AntiNeutrino Simulations

Description:

LS only. Used for detecting gammas from prompt and delayed events. Double Chooz. Buffer ... Kamioka Mine in northwestern Japan (main island) Spherical geometry ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:59
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 25
Provided by: phys4
Learn more at: http://www.phys.ksu.edu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: AntiNeutrino Simulations


1
Anti-Neutrino Simulations
  • And Elimination of Background Events
  • Kansas State REU Program
  • Author Jon Graves

2
Topics
  • What are neutrinos?
  • How do we measure them?
  • Double Chooz
  • Fast neutrons
  • Simulations and analysis
  • Results
  • Conclusion
  • KamLAND
  • Final Remarks

3
What Are Neutrinos?
  • Nearly massless
  • Three flavors
  • Mass oscillations
  • Sources
  • Fusion
  • Fission
  • CMBR
  • Super Novae
  • Cosmic Rays

4
What Are Neutrinos?
  • Reactions
  • Neutron Transformation ---
  • Proton Transformation
  • Flavors
  • Electron, Muon, Tau
  • Detection yields 1/3 the value expected

5
What Are Neutrinos?
  • Sources
  • Stars
  • Radioactive Decay
  • Nuclear Reactors
  • Super Novae

View of the sun as seen in neutrinos. (Credit
Institute for Cosmic Ray Research, Tokyo)
Supernova 1987A
6
How do we measure them?
  • Anti-Neutrino - Proton interaction
  • Prompt signal
  • Positron/Electron annihilation
  • -----
  • Delayed signal
  • Thermal neutron capture
  • Gadolinium
  • Hydrogen

7
Double Chooz
  • In northern France
  • Cylindrical geometry
  • Four volumes of interest
  • Target
  • Gamma-Catcher
  • Buffer
  • Inner Veto

8
Double Chooz
  • Target
  • LS and Gd
  • Used for capturing neutrons
  • Gamma-Catcher
  • LS only
  • Used for detecting gammas from prompt and delayed
    events

9
Double Chooz
  • Buffer
  • Mineral oil, a.k.a. Buffer oil
  • Shields inner active volumes from accidental
    backgrounds
  • U Th decay in PMTs
  • PMTs line this volume
  • Inner Veto
  • Steel shield tags muons

10
Fast neutrons
  • My goals
  • How does the detector geometry affect the
    neutrons?
  • How does the surrounding rock affect the
    neutrons?
  • How often do the neutrons correlate to neutrino
    events?

11
Simulations and analysis
  • Macro parameters
  • Rock shell thickness
  • Initial position of generated neutrons
  • Fill of generated neutrons
  • Number of events to simulate
  • Geology

12
Geology
  • Rocks surrounding detector are simulated using
    the following elements
  • Gd, Ti, Ni, Cr, Fe, K, N, Al, Si, C, O
  • The following elements are quite common in
    northern France
  • Mn, Na, Ca, H, P, Mg
  • A report confirms these additions plus Cl.

Dominant Elements in Earths Crust
13
Simulations and analysis
  • My energy deposition program
  • Plot histograms of
  • Energy depositions within the detector
  • Prompt/Delayed energies
  • Time interval for prompt/delayed energies
  • 1 to 100 microseconds
  • Initial/Final positions of neutrons
  • Provide data analysis output in an organized text
    format

14
Results
  • 10,000 events simulated, 4000.0mm rock thickness
  • Target 2 statistical error
  • Gamma-Catcher 6
  • Buffer 17
  • Inner Veto 74
  • Most neutrons are absorbed by the steel shield
    and rocks
  • No correlated events
  • Should run 1,000,000 events for better error
    analysis

15
PROBLEM!!
16
Problem
  • After running 1,000,000 events, discovered no
    correlations again.
  • Further analysis revealed an improperly
    configured option in the macro for the simulator.
  • Simulator was set to merge events shorter than
    1ms. This guarantees no correlations in the 1
    to 100?s window.

17
Simulations and analysis
  • Simulated 500,000 events with correctly
    configured macro at two different rock
    thicknesses.

18
Results
  • 400.0mm rock thickness
  • Target 108 statistical error
  • Gamma-Catcher 306
  • Buffer 1445
  • Inner Veto 6196
  • 5.14 of deposition events occurred within the
    target and gamma-catcher volumes.
  • 9 correlation events
  • Eliminated all but 2 in final analysis due to
    multi-neutron events

19
Results
20
Results
  • 4000.0mm rock thickness
  • Target 32 statistical error
  • Gamma-Catcher 63
  • Buffer 271
  • Inner Veto 1287
  • 5.75 of deposition events occurred within the
    target and gamma-catcher volumes, similar to
    other thickness
  • 2 correlation events
  • Eliminated both in final analysis due to
    multi-neutron events
  • 79.48 less events with a rock thickness 10 times
    greater.

21
Results
22
Conclusion
  • Detector geometry (steel shield) and surrounding
    rocks are effective in blocking most high-energy
    neutrons.
  • Neutron events rarely correlate to neutrino
    events. However, this must still be accounted
    for, considering neutrino events themselves are
    rare.
  • Two to three per day, on average

23
KamLAND
  • Kamioka Liquid-scintillator Anti-Neutrino
    Detector
  • Kamioka Mine in northwestern Japan (main island)
  • Spherical geometry
  • Duties involve monitoring equipment and ensuring
    everything is operating at peak efficiency.
  • Hourly check

24
Final Remarks
  • Learned a great deal about programming,
    neutrinos, detectors, real-world experience.
  • I made the right choice in choosing a career path
    involving high-energy physics.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com