Evaluation of the Paris Declaration Phase 2 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Evaluation of the Paris Declaration Phase 2

Description:

Comparative in-depth case studies chosen to contain a good cross-section of ... Longitudinal studies: backward looking to track PD-like (longer established) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:30
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 13
Provided by: NielsDab5
Learn more at: https://www.oecd.org
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Evaluation of the Paris Declaration Phase 2


1
  • Evaluation of the Paris Declaration Phase 2
  • DAC Evaluation Network
  • 15 June 2009
  • Niels Dabelstein

2
Phase II Architecture
  • Again based on the principles of the Paris
  • Declaration a joint evaluation comprising
  • Country level evaluations assessing
    results/outcomes
  • Additional donor/agency HQ studies
  • Supplementary studies with focus on results
  • Synthesis report to be presented to 4th HLF

3
Phase II Evaluation Model
  • Two complementary foci
  • Implementation focus (expanded Phase I)
  • More diverse set of countries wider range of
    stakeholders
  • More attention to capacity building and assess
    donor support to analytic advisory activities
  • HQ level studies by donors not included in Phase
    I
  • Results focus
  • Identify PD influence on development
    effectiveness (outcomes results)

4
Methodological Issues
  • Challenges to evaluate the results
  • Brief time span since PD endorsed (March 2005)
  • External influences make attribution difficult
  • Demanding data requirements
  • Complementary methodologies required
  • To handle these challenges the evaluation should
  • Have a balanced sufficient sample of countries
  • Have sufficient coverage of sectors and themes
  • Produce information of good quality
  • Offer possibility of explanation and attribution

5
Methodological Issues
  • Therefore methods should include
  • Synthesis of existing evaluations, research and
    indicators
  • Comparative in-depth case studies chosen to
    contain a good cross-section of common
    themes/sectors
  • Longitudinal studies backward looking to track
    PD-like (longer established) policies and
    possibly forward looking (theory-based to map
    plausible directions of travel)
  • Targeted comparative studies to supplement
    country-based evaluations

6
Overseeing the evaluation
  • International Reference Group, co-chaired by Sri
    Lanka
  • and the Netherlands
  • Members of the DAC Network on Development
    Evaluation (who actively support)
  • Partner countries who conduct country-level
    evaluations
  • Multilaterals and CSOs
  • Tasks
  • Endorse overall Evaluation Framework and ToRs for
    component supplementary studies
  • Review draft reports for quality, credibility
    clarity

7
Participants in Int. Ref. Group
  • Afghanistan
  • Bangladesh
  • Benin
  • Bolivia
  • Cambodia
  • Cameroun
  • Columbia
  • DRC
  • Indonesia
  • Ghana
  • Kyrgyz Republic
  • Malawi
  • Mali
  • Mozambique
  • Papua New Guinea
  • Samoa
  • Senegal
  • South Africa
  • Sri Lanka
  • Australia
  • Austria
  • Belgium
  • Canada
  • Denmark
  • Finland
  • France
  • Germany
  • Global Fund/GAVI
  • Ireland
  • Japan
  • The Netherlands
  • New Zealand
  • Norway
  • Spain
  • Sweden
  • Switzerland
  • United Kingdom
  • USA

8
Managing the evaluation
  • Management Group responsible for
  • Developing the overall evaluation framework
    and ToR Core Evaluation Team
  • Coordinating and managing the evaluation
    process
  • Guiding the component studies
  • Developing and managing supplementary studies
    and synthesis of findings and recommendations.
  • Evaluation Secretariat at Danish Institute for
    International Studies

9
Managing the evaluation
  • National Reference Groups
  • Established in-country and with key government,
    development partners and NGO stakeholders
  • Approve detailed design of country study
  • Serve as resource for country evaluation teams
  • Review draft evaluation products for quality,
    credibility and clarity

10
BUDGET
11
Contributions
12
Schedule of Events 2009
  • 11 13 Feb. 1st Meeting of the Reference Group
    for PD Evaluation Phase 2 Kick-off
    workshop - 1st draft Approach paper.
  • 15 May Approach Paper and TOR for Core Team
    approved.
  • 3 June Tender process initiated w. three
    bidders. (one has withdrawn)
  • 5 August Team Selection
  • 7 September Core Team operational
  • 1 October Draft Report on Untying of Aid to IRG
    for comments (by 11
  • October)
  • 26 28 Oct. Asia Pacific Regional Workshop in
    Cambodia
  • 1 November Final Report on Untying of Aid
  • 3 5 Nov. Latin America Regional Workshop in
    Colombia
  • 10 12 Nov. Anglophone Africa Regional Workshop
    in Malawi
  • 18 20 Nov. Francophone Africa Regional Workshop
    in Benin
  • 20 November Untying of Aid Report discussed in
    DAC
  • 30 November 2nd Meeting of the Reference Group
    for PD Evaluation Phase 2.
  • 1 December Country Level TOR Work plan for 2010
  • 2 3 Dec. WP-EFF, presentation of progress
    report and Untying of Aid Study
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com