Title: RPC Progress for a DHCAL Lei Xia Argonne National Laboratory
1RPC Progress for a DHCALLei XiaArgonne
National Laboratory
- Digital readout system, multiplicity measurement
- RPC hit multiplicity and chamber configuration
study - Large size RPC test
2Multi-channel digital readout system
- We have already acquired expertise in RPC
construction and have very good understanding of
RPC signal and running condition - Our effort is now focused on multi-channel
digital readout of RPC signal, which is crucial
for a digital calorimeter - The digital readout system is built around a 6U
VME card - 64 channels per card
- Each channel convert input
- analog signal to a digital bit,
- according to a pre-set
- threshold
- The card collects a digital hit
- pattern of all channels and
- assembles them into an event
- A time stamp (100ns resolution)
- is attached to each event
Analog
Digital
3Digital readout system
Trigger area
Readout pads
- Use 8x8 pad array
- Each pad is 1x1 cm2, and has an on-board
amplifier (NEC video amp) - Cosmic ray signal is sent to one
- channel of the VME board,
- and is readout with pad
- signals
4Test with digital readout system AIR4
- AIR4 is a 1-gap RPC built with 1.1mm glass sheet
- 1.2mm gap size
- Resistive paint layer is about 1MO/?
- Running at 6.8 KV
- Avalanche signal 5pc
- Efficiency gt97
- Total RPC rate from 64 channels lt10 Hz
- Very low noise!
(On-board amplifiers)
Pad array
Mylar sheet
Resistive paint
1.1mm Glass sheet
1.2mm gas gap
GND
1.1mm Glass sheet
Resistive paint
-HV
Mylar sheet
Aluminum foil
5Test with digital readout system AIR4
- Changing the signal threshold, one can run AIR4
at specific efficiency, and measure the hit
multiplicity, thus measuring it as a function of
threshold/efficiency - Running at 6.8KV, good hit multiplicity achieved
- For eff95 1.6 1.7
- For eff90 1.4 1.5
- Running at 7.0KV, 7.2KV, similar hit multiplicity
achieved - Avalanche signal 8pc at 7.0KV
- Avalanche signal 11pc at 7.2KV
- Use result from AIR4 at 6.8KV as default. All
following results - will be compared to it!
6Hit multiplicity and RPC configuration
1-gap/2-gap, High R/ Low R
- AIR1 and AIR2 are 2-gap RPCs
- Each gap is 0.6mm, total gap size is about the
same as 1-gap chamber - AIR1 0.2MO/? on its resistive paint layer
- AIR2 1MO/? on its resistive paint layer
- Running both chambers at 8.4KV
- Avalanche signal 5pc
- Both AIR1 and AIR2 have low noise
(On-board amplifiers)
Pad array
Mylar sheet
Resistive paint
1.1mm Glass sheet
0.6 mm gas gap
GND
1.1mm Glass sheet
0.6 mm gas gap
1.1mm Glass sheet
Resistive paint
-HV
Mylar sheet
Aluminum foil
7Hit multiplicity and RPC configuration
1-gap/2-gap, High R/ Low R
- Both AIR1 and AIR2 have higher hit multiplicity
than AIR4 - Two gap design has higher hit multiplicity!
- AIR1 has higher hit multiplicity than AIR2
- Lower resistivity on the paint layer gives higher
hit multiplicity - This confirms results obtained with analog
readout system
8Hit multiplicity and RPC configuration thinner
glass
- AIR5 used thinner glass
- 0.85mm glass sheet (all others were built with
1.1mm glass sheet) - 1-gap of 1.2mm
- 1MO/? on paint layer, comparable to AIR4
- Accidentally tested two configurations
- Pads far from chamber ( 0.3 0.4mm additional
material) - Pads close to chamber
- Both configurations have low chamber noise
(On-board amplifiers)
Pad array
Plastic tape
Mylar sheet
Copper tape
Resistive paint
Copper tape
0.85mm Glass sheet
1.2mm gas gap
GND
0.85mm Glass sheet
Resistive paint
-HV
Mylar sheet
Aluminum foil
Pads far from chamber
(On-board amplifiers)
Pad array
Mylar sheet
Resistive paint
0.85mm Glass sheet
1.2mm gas gap
GND
0.85mm Glass sheet
Resistive paint
-HV
Mylar sheet
Aluminum foil
Pads close to chamber
9Hit multiplicity and RPC configuration thinner
glass
- Run AIR5 at 7.0KV
- Avalanche signal 5pc
- Compare the two configurations, the one with pads
close to chamber clearly gives lower hit
multiplicity - Signal pads should be as close as possible to the
avalanche signal!
10Hit multiplicity and RPC configuration thinner
glass
- Compare to AIR4, AIR5 gives slightly lower hit
multiplicity - For eff 95, 1.6
- For eff 90, 1.4 - 1.5
- Again, pads closer to avalanche give lower hit
multiplicity
Trigger area
spacer
- 3 efficiency correction applied to AIR5 results
- A fishing line spacer passed through the center
of trigger area, causing 3-4 dead region
Readout pads
11Hit multiplicity and RPC configuration one paint
layer
- AIR7 was built with only one resistive paint
layer. The pads sit directly on the glass sheet - The resistivity of the paint layer is 1MO/?
- Compare to AIR4, AIR7 gives slightly lower hit
multiplicity - The noise rate of AIR7 is significantly higher
than AIR4 ( x5 higher) - To be understood
(On-board amplifiers)
Pad array
GND
1.1mm Glass sheet
1.2mm gas gap
1.1mm Glass sheet
Resistive paint
-HV
Mylar sheet
Aluminum foil
12Hit multiplicity and RPC configuration no paint
layer
- AIR8 was built with two bare glass sheets no
paint layer - HV applied through aluminum foil attached to one
glass sheet - Pads sit directly on the other glass sheet
- Compare to AIR4, AIR8 has a little higher hit
multiplicity - Resistive paint layer does help to reduce
avalanche size - RPC with this configuration might be able to run
at high event rate need test! - Noise rate is higher than AIR4, and is similar
to AIR7
(On-board amplifiers)
Pad array
1.1mm Glass sheet
1.2mm gas gap
1.1mm Glass sheet
Aluminum foil
-HV
Mylar sheet
13Hit multiplicity and RPC configuration one glass
sheet
- AIR9 was built with only one glass sheet, the
multi-pad PC board (with on-board amps) was built
into RPC as part of the detector - No resistive layer painted on the glass sheet
- HV applied through copper tape
- Signal pads directly face avalanche signal, which
is the closest possible position - RPC with this configuration might be able to run
at high event rate - Need to be tested!
(On-board amplifiers)
1.6mm PC board
Pad array
1.2mm gas gap
1.1mm Glass sheet
Copper tape
-HV
Mylar sheet
14RPC with only one glass sheet corrections
- Defects during PC board production
- One dead channel at the center of trigger area
- Two channels are connected, and always give hits
simultaneously - Corrections
- Made 6-8 corrections on efficiency, based on
trigger rates of surrounding pads - No correction made to hit multiplicity, due to
the dead channel should be a very small effect - No correction made to the connected channels hit
multiplicity is slightly over estimated - Will fix the problems and do the measurement again
Trigger area
Readout pads
Dead channel
Connected channels
15RPC with only one glass sheet preliminary result
- AIR9 has amazingly low hit multiplicity!
- 1.1 1.2 throughout measured region
- Noise rate higher than AIR4 ( x2-3)
- Total rate 20Hz, noise hit pattern is different
- Source need to be identified
- More study will be done
16RPC with only one glass sheet preliminary result
AIR4
AIR9
17Large size RPC towards test beam section
- AIR6 is the very first large size RPC we built
- 1 gas gap of 1.2mm
- Size of glass sheet 30.5cm x 91.5cm x 1.1mm
- Resistivity of paint layer 1MO/?
- Electrostatic force from HV compensated gas
pressure, as we expected - When HV is not on, deformation of glass sheet due
to gas flow pressure is quite significant - AIR6 was tested with single readout pad and
analog read out system - Readout pad has a size of 20cm x 20cm
AIR6
AIR5
18Large size RPC single readout pad
- AIR6 performs exactly the same as smaller size
RPCs, with the same gap configuration - Expect the same hit multiplicity as AIR4
19Conclusion
- Built 10 RPCs with different designs
- Built single and multiple channel analog readout
system for RPC test, result has been reported in
previous workshops - Built multi-channel digital readout system
- Extensively studied RPC digital signal and
explored different chamber configuration,
acquired excellent understanding of hit
multiplicity - Excellent hit multiplicity achieved
- Built large size RPC with excellent performance
- We have acquired all the expertise to build RPCs
for a 1 m3 Prototype Section to be tested in a
particle beam