Charmless Hadronic BPP decays in the context of SU3 symmetry - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 14
About This Presentation
Title:

Charmless Hadronic BPP decays in the context of SU3 symmetry

Description:

B factories have produced a lot of excitement, particularly in measuring ... CKM Fitter and UT Fit results. CKM Fitter, indirect: ?=(59 7-13)o. UT Fit, indirect: ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:39
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 15
Provided by: ds260
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Charmless Hadronic BPP decays in the context of SU3 symmetry


1
Charmless Hadronic B?PP decays in the context of
SU(3) symmetry
  • Denis Suprun
  • Brookhaven National Lab

2
Motivation
  • B factories have produced a lot of excitement,
    particularly in measuring indirect
    (mixing-induced) CPV in the B system
  • sin2ß0.6850.032
  • from B?yKS based upon BaBars and Belles data
    (LP05)
  • era of precision measurement
  • We also want to observe direct CPV in B system
    and to check whether it is consistent with SM
    expectation
  • BaBar and Belle announced first observation of
    direct CPV
  • ACP(p-K) -0.114 ? 0.018
  • Most branching ratios of charmless B ? PP and PV
    are currently measured with errors about 10,
  • i.e. 5 errors in amplitude

3
Charmless B decays
  • Relatively rare decays with branching ratios of
    the order 10-5
  • Wealth of new increasingly precise measurements
  • Many of them involve interference of a tree and a
    penguin amplitude with a weak phase ? between
    them
  • Nonzero (mod p) strong phases are required for CP
    Violation
  • Are well suited to
  • constrain ?
  • determine the magnitude of penguin contributions
  • get information on strong phases

4
CKM Matrix and Unitarity Triangle
5
CKM Matrix and B Physics
  • Many B decays involve the two CKM elements of
    interest to us and may reveal CP violating
    effects
  • The ultimate goal of studies in B physics is not
    only to achieve precision measurements of the
    above parameters, but to discover New Physics
  • One way to detect New Physics is to perform
    consistency checks for the sizes and phases of
    the CKM elements

6
CKM Fitter and UT Fit results
CKM Fitter, indirect ?(597-13)o
UT Fit, indirect ?(57.97.3)o
Direct measurements ?(6315-12)o
7
B ?PP decays
8
Dominant types of amplitudes
9
Assumptions
  • Neglect E, A, PA
  • SU(3) flavor symmetry
  • The only deviation from SU(3) is through decay
    constants in tree diagrams
  • SU(3) is implied when we assume
  • the same phases for T and T?
  • that QCD and EW penguins P? and P and
    color-suppressed amplitudes C? and C are related
    to each other as the ratio of the involved CKM
    parameters
  • that a penguin in which a gluon couples to
    has the same amplitude as those that couple to
    and

10
Approach
  • Take all available information on charmless B
    decays to a PP final state and fit it with a
    simple model of interference between appropriate
    tree and penguin diagrams
  • Extract magnitudes and relative phases of tree
    and penguin amplitudes
  • Predict branching ratios and CP asymmetries for
    observed and as-yet-unseen modes
  • Considerable sensitivity to ?.

11
Data, Parameters and Results of pp, KK, Kp Fit
  • 19 branching ratios and CP asymmetries in
  • strangeness-preserving pp, KK decays (?S0)
  • strangeness-changing Kp decays (?S1)
  • direct and mixing-induced asymmetries in pp- and
    p0KS decays
  • 8 fit parameters
  • weak phase ?
  • amplitudes T, C, P?, Ptu
  • strong phases dT , dC , dPtu
  • RESULTS
  • Fit ?215.5/11 ?(43122)o
  • Reasonable C/T0.450.130.01
  • Large dC-66o , indication of final state
    interactions

12
Data and Parameters and Results of the Full PP
Fit
  • 30 data points
  • branching ratios and CP asymmetries in
  • strangeness-preserving pp, KK, p?, p?? decays
    (?S0)
  • strangeness-changing Kp, K?, K?? decays (?S1)
  • direct and mixing-induced asymmetries in pp-,
    p0KS and ??KS decays
  • 12 fit parameters
  • weak phase ?
  • amplitudes T, C, P?, Ptu, S?, Stu
  • strong phases dT , dC , dPtu , dS , dStu
  • RESULTS
  • Fit ?226.2/18 ?(6092)o

13
Comments on SU(3) and other assumptions
  • In the last year new and more precise PP
    measurements shifted closer to our predictions.
  • Used to say
  • Despite smaller errors the quality of the fit
    improved from 32 to 41 to 51. Fit parameters
    remained stable.
  • We can not yet see significant SU(3) breaking
    effects or the presence of the E, A, or PA
    amplitudes in the current PP data.
  • Now
  • No longer true. SU(3) fit quality after LP05 is
    16.
  • Perhaps, our assumptions of SU(3) or negligible
    E,A,PA are close to being inadequate for the
    current precision of the experimental data.

14
Summary of SU(3) fits
  • Flavor symmetry is employed to analyze B decays
    into PP final states symmetry breaking effect is
    partially taken into account through the ratio of
    tree amplitudes.
  • Flavor SU(3) generally fits data well, with some
    exceptions. Predictions are made based upon
    current measurements.
  • Our preferred ?(6092)o fit in PP modes favors
    a weak phase g within the range 51o-69o at 1s
    level. It is also compatible with the indirect
    constraints on g 46olt?lt66o
  • Indications of substantial A, E, PA amplitudes
    or SU(3) breaking effects
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com