Of Men and Beaches - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 26
About This Presentation
Title:

Of Men and Beaches

Description:

Upham beach west central florida http://coastal.er.usgs.gov/wfla/video/vidphotos. ... Beach Restoration Study, chap 9. Other benefits associated with beach ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:118
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 27
Provided by: Ana2
Category:
Tags: beach | beaches | men

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Of Men and Beaches


1
Of Men and Beaches
  • How do we manage our shoreline?

2
Outline
  • How much money is at stake?
  • Who is deciding? How?
  • And the environment in all that?

3
How much money is at stake?
California Beach Restoration Study, chap 9.
4
Who is going to the beach?
California Beach Restoration Study, chap 9.
5
Who is going to the beach?
6
What are people thinking of when they think of
the beach?
7
Beach attendance evolution
California Beach Restoration Study, chap 9.
8
The Solution Beach nourishment
Before june 1995
After, june 1995
April 1997
Upham beach west central florida
http//coastal.er.usgs.gov/wfla/video/vidphotos.ht
ml
9
Estimated tax revenue with and without beach
maintenance could loose 42
California Beach Restoration Study, chap 9.
10
Other benefits associated with beach nourishment
according to
  • Keep the local species (snowy plower, grunion)
  • Numerous studies indicate that people who engage
    in outdoor activity are more likely to be
    sensitive to environmental issues, compared to
    people who do not recreate outdoors. (American
    Recreation coalition 1999)
  • Public safety benefits
  • limit bluff collapse, protects the coast in case
    of a storm.
  • Provide safer access to water for surfers and
    swimmers

California Beach Restoration Study, chap 3.5
11
Conclusion
  • People like large sandy beaches and spend a lot
    of money there.
  • The public agencies have interest in maintaining
    sandy beaches.
  • Who are the other voices in this issue?

12
Who has a word to say?
  • Property owners
  • Experts
  • Government regulators
  • Policy makers, and law makers

Mitigating shore erosion along sheltered coasts.
OSB. Chap 5
13
Property owners
  • Want to maximize their property value, and the
    use of their property.
  • Are informed by handbooks, consultants, gvt
    regulators, neighbors, flood zone map

Mitigating shore erosion along sheltered coasts.
OSB. Chap 5
14
Experts and consultants
  • Want to
  • satisfy their clients
  • Make a profit
  • Maintain their credibility
  • Are informed by
  • Litterature, experience, field work
  • Government agencies

Mitigating shore erosion along sheltered coasts.
OSB. Chap 5
15
Government regulators
  • Want to implement and enforce regulations
  • Are informed by reports of the NRC, consultants,
    legal counsels, professional networks,
    experience.
  • Example US Army Corps of Engineers.

Mitigating shore erosion along sheltered coasts.
OSB. Chap 5
16
Policy and law makers
  • Want
  • Re-election
  • Maintain the tax base
  • Quality of life, public health, safety and
    welfare
  • Are informed by
  • Press
  • Constituants
  • Staff(trusted experts in the field)
  • Gvt agencies and NGOs

Mitigating shore erosion along sheltered coasts.
OSB. Chap 5
17
Regulation The public Trust Doctrine
  • The waters of the state are a public resource
    owned by and available to all citizens equally
    for the purposes of navigation, conducting
    commerce, fishing, recreation and similar uses
    and that this trust is not invalidated by private
    ownership of the underlying land.
  • The doctrine limits public and private use of
    tidelands and other shorelands to protect the
    public's right to use the waters of the state.

18
How is the shore managed today
  • Regulatory incentive to build seawalls bulkheads
    and revetments.
  • Bias towards building landwards of the PTD.
  • Under-evaluation of environmental cost
  • Non - structural erosion control techniques are
    under used.
  • Lack of knowledge of options
  • Regulatory response is generally reactive rather
    than proactive. Most states have not developed
    plans for responding to and managing erosion in
    sheltered shorelines.

Mitigating shore erosion along sheltered coasts.
OSB. Chap 5
19
California Coastal management program
  • What has the Coastal Act accomplished? The most
    important achievements are the things one cannot
    see public access and recreation opportunities
    not lost, wetlands not filled, coastal views not
    lost, agricultural lands not paved, sprawling
    subdivisions not built. Highway One has been
    retained as a scenic two-lane road, attracting
    visitors from around the world.

California Coastal Commission brochure 2006
20
Impact of coastal management on the ecosystem
21
Beach ecosystem
  • Nutrient uptake
  • Beaches are usually nutrient limited, which
    allows a large variety of plant to compete.
  • Food production
  • Beaches support an extensive trophic structure
    many on the form of infaunia (animals who live
    inside the sediment) from bacteria to shore
    birds
  • Importing foreign sand will change the ecosystem


22
Beach ecosystem
  • Nourishment
  • Replaces the near shore benthic community with a
    supra-tidal beach and dune.
  • Breakwater
  • They can host barnacles and oysters, be the
    refugee for fish, and for sheltered coastline
    beach population.

23
Conclusion
  • Beach tourism industry has a lot of money and
    interests involved in it
  • Mitigation of the changes in our natural
    environment can have profound effects
  • Decision making needs to be better advised by
    scientists.

24
Of Scientists and Policy makers
Science Policy and the Coast. NRC chap 3
25
Excerpt from Science, Policy and the Coast
  • Human ego is a powerful thing and few things
    offend us and make us react in a negative way as
    much as the knowledge that another person does
    not value, respect, or understands what we are as
    individuals or was we do professionally. Whether
    it is an interaction between a fisherman and a
    biologist, an oil worker and an environmentalist
    , an scientist and a politician, if we interact
    with others with an attitude of superiority and
    contempt, conflict is likely. Understanding does
    not have to mean admiration or agreement, but
    simply an acceptance of the fact that the other
    party has legitimate status and ole in the human
    ecology of the policy making process and views
    that must be understood in the context of that
    status and role.

Science Policy and the Coast, Improving decision
making. NRC chap 3
26
Bibliography
  • California Beach Restoration Study,NRC chap 9.
  • http//www.nap.edu/catalog/4984.html
  • Mitigating shore erosion along sheltered coasts.
    OSB. Chap 5
  • http//fermat.nap.edu/books/0309103460/html
  • Science Policy and the Coast, Improving decision
    making. NRC chap 3 http//fermat.nap.edu/books/030
    9053390/html
  • http//www.ecy.wa.gov/programs/sea/sma/laws_rules/
    public_trust.html
  • http//www.csc.noaa.gov/beachnourishment/html/geo/
    shorelin.htm
  • http//coastal.er.usgs.gov/wfla/video/vidphotos.ht
    ml
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com