Theyre Not All Nails: Choosing the Right Tools for eLearning - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 29
About This Presentation
Title:

Theyre Not All Nails: Choosing the Right Tools for eLearning

Description:

... to upload PowerPoint and image content and share it along with video content ... Desktop and document sharing. Application sharing. Annotation and drawing tools ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:43
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 30
Provided by: webCor
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Theyre Not All Nails: Choosing the Right Tools for eLearning


1
Theyre Not All Nails!Choosing the Right Tools
for eLearning
  • Blaine Victor Morrow
  • Director, CCC Confer and CCCSAT
  • Shufang Shi
  • Assistant Professor, SUNY-Cortland

2
Agenda
  • Why Online Instruction?
  • Webcasting Features
  • E-Conferencing Features
  • Which Tool for Which Job?
  • Lessons from Research
  • Q A

3
First, Why Go Online?
  • Cut Travel (and other) Costs
  • Increase Frequency of Communications / Access
  • Improve the Quality of Presentations
  • Standardize

4
The Webcast Option
  • Web-based (not television, not satellite-delivered
    )
  • Easy set-up is critical
  • Management must be simple
  • Uses streaming media
  • Registration and security may be an issue

5
The e-Conferencing Option
  • Collaborative Web-based tool
  • Designed for small groups
  • Extremely interactive, when used correctly
  • Can be catered for large groups where
    registration is important

6
Webcasting Features
  • Streaming media (video and audio)
  • Archiving capability (for future viewing)
  • Ability to upload PowerPoint and image content
    and share it along with video content
  • Ability to notify participants (audience) by
    e-mail and URLs

7
e-Conferencing Features
  • Desktop and document sharing
  • Application sharing
  • Annotation and drawing tools
  • PowerPoint / image Uploading
  • Telephone Audio Bridging
  • Polls and Surveys
  • Text Chat
  • Archiving

8
What Makes Webcasting Work?
  • Input Video and Audio
  • Streaming Server Output Stream
  • Audience PC Receives Buffers Stream
  • Audience Access View, Stop, Rewind, Fast Forward

9
What Makes e-Conferencing Work?
  • Browser-enabled programs (Popup Windows, Java,
    Flash, etc.)
  • Audio Bridge
  • Presenter Skills / Participant Perception
    Interaction

10
Choose to Webcast When
  • You want to broadcast an event
  • Your audience is large
  • Video (full-motion) is important
  • Interaction is not critical
  • Time-delay (seconds) can be endured

11
Choose to e-Conference When
  • Data must or should be shared
  • Audience size is relatively small
  • Interaction is important
  • Synchronous communication is requisite

12
Webcasting is a Tool for
  • One-to-many broadcasts
  • Large audiences
  • Video-centric presentations

13
e-Conferencing is a Tool for
  • Interactive presentations/meetings
  • Smaller groups
  • Content that comes from the PC, not the camera
  • Discussions, more than presentations

14
Decisions, Decisions
  • Think of Each Tool as a Communications Tool
  • Visualize the Subtle Effects
  • Picture the User(s)
  • What Problem(s) Does This Solve?
  • What Problem(s) Does This Create?

15
Research About What Works
  • MEET Research
  • Modeling Effective Educational Technology
  • Research Began in 2004

16
Purpose
  • To gather and evaluate strategies for Seven
    Principles of Good Practice in Undergraduate
    Education (using e-conferencing).
  • The resulting strategies will serve as guidelines
    for future instructors when teaching in the
    synchronous online environment.
  • This will lead to the development of good models
    of teaching and learning through CCCConfer and
    similar teaching and learning environments.

17
Research Questions
  • Are e-conferencing tools perceptibly valuable in
    supporting good instructional principles? Which
    tool for what instructional principle?
  • Whiteboard
  • Chat
  • Application Sharing
  • Polling Tools
  • Powerpoint Slide Pusher
  • Web Tool
  • Archiving and more!

18
Theoretical Framework
  • Chickering and Gamsons seven principles for good
    practice in undergraduate education

19
7 Principles
  • 1. Encouraging contact between students and
    faculty
  • 2. Developing reciprocity and cooperation among
    students
  • 3. Encouraging active learning
  • 4. Giving prompt feedback
  • 5. Emphasizing time on task
  • 6. Communicating high expectations, and
  • 7. Respecting diverse talents and ways of
    learning

20
The MEET Project
  • Modeling Effective Educational Technology (MEET)
  • CCCConfer 23 grant recipients (now 37)
  • MEET Project aimed to
  • Develop reusable educational content for use with
    CCC Confers e-conferencing technology
  • Field-test e-conferencing with faculty and
    students
  • Reward innovative approaches to online
    instruction and
  • Foster and nourish a community of instructors who
    use e-conferencing technology

21
Data
  • Three self reporting web-based questionnaires
  • First Q collected preliminary ideas regarding
    strategies for addressing Chickering and Gamsons
    seven principles
  • Final Q rating dominant ideas for each of the
    seven principles and asked participants to assess
    the merit of each idea by rating them on a scale
    of 1 to 7 based on their effectiveness in
    addressing the corresponding principle.

22
Results (1)
  • Responses demonstrated shared characteristics
    centered around common practices in the use of
    e-conferencing tools.
  • The subjects consistently and independently
    identified specific practices or techniques
    related to synchronous online learning tools
  • Conversely some of the Chickering-Gamson
    principles of good undergraduate education were
    not associated with tool-specific practices.

23
Results (cont.)
  • Principle 1 Contact between students and
    faculty.
  • Polling flexible scheduling (pedagogical)
  • Principle 2 Cooperation among students
  • Text chat or messaging
  • Principle 3 Active learning
  • Application sharing Polling
  • Principle 4 Prompt feedback
  • Chat and Polling
  • Principle 5 time on task
  • Not associated with any tool (universally
    pedagotical)
  • Principle 6 Communicating high expectations
  • Not associated with any tool (universally
    pedagotical)
  • Principle 7 Respect for learner diversity
  • Voice, text, graphics
  • Application sharing

24
Conclusion
  • The Responses (the teaching practices identified)
    were closely related and followed remarkably
    similar trends.
  • They also independently came to similar
    conclusions about the use of specific
    e-conferencing tools to accomplish distinct
    educational goals.
  • The results show an association between the use
    of discrete e-conferencing tools to reinforce
    particular principles of instructional practice.
  • Some of the Chickering and Gamson principles of
    good undergraduate education can be linked to
    effective practices using e-conferencing tools.
    Not all of the tools are associated with
    effective teaching practices, however, and no
    single tool can be associated with all of the
    principles.

25
Discussion which tool for what purpose?
  • Time on task high expectation
  • Text Chat heart hustle
  • White board art instructor

26
Limitations
  • Small Group of Subjects
  • Short-term (but ongoing)
  • Other framework (besides Chickering-Gamson)
  • Need for more research

27
Publication
  • Educause Quarterly, November 2006

28
Questions?
29
Contact Us
  • Blaine Morrow
  • bmorrow_at_palomar.edu
  • Shufang Shi
  • Shis_at_cortland.edu
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com