Ebusiness Second presentation - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 46
About This Presentation
Title:

Ebusiness Second presentation

Description:

E-commerce and e-business - relations to value chain integration ... who prosper by taking a 'cut' out of every transaction they organize within ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:70
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 47
Provided by: Kro84
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Ebusiness Second presentation


1
E-business Second presentation
  • E-business and value chain integration
  • Case
  • E-business in the automotive value chain
  • 11.9 2003
  • Anders Hellebust
  • Institutt for ledelse og organisasjon
  • BI

2
Agenda
  • E-commerce and e-business - relations to value
    chain integration
  • Main dimensions of e-business and core areas
  • Status and trends
  • It is in e-business and B2B the revolution will
    come and it is the development of e-business
    driven value chains that is most important
  • Transaction costs
  • The functions of market places hubs (value
    chain networks)
  • The development towards total e-business in value
    chains
  • Case studies
  • The Automotive industry
  • The oil and gas industry
  • Discussion

3
E-business and the value chain
  • E-business is the transformation of key business
    processes through the use of Internet
    technologies
  • E-business management is the planning and
    execution of front-end and back-end operations in
    a supply chain unsing the Internet
  • E-business will have a significant impact on
    supply chain integration we have only scratched
    the surface

4
E-business and impact on value chain integration
  • Information integration
  • Planning syncronization
  • Workflow coordination e-collaboration
  • New business models

5
E-Business and Supply Chain Integration H. Lee
and S. Whang, Stanford University
Table 1 Supply Chain Integration Dimensions
6
Ronald Coase and transaction costs
Ronald Coase first introduced the concept of
transaction costs in the late 1930s. He tried to
determine why some industries are organized into
only a few large firms, while others are
organized very differently He tried to find out
the boundaries of the firm
7
Ronald Coase today
  • Today, transaction cost economics is used largely
    to explain phenomena such as vertical
    integration, outsourcing, corporate governance
    and the boundaries of the firm
  • What is my companys core area, what can other
    companies to cheaper than my firm and could be
    outsourced, and what should be merged and
    integrated?
  • That means vertical integration or virtual
    integration

8
What are transaction costs?
  • There is often a large amount of effort that goes
    into choosing, organizing, negotiating and
    entering contracts. The costs associated to
    these efforts are called transaction costs, and
    are generally independent of the price of the
    contracted product or service itself.
  • Transaction costs are also to find the best
    companies to collaborate, outsource or merge with
  • On Internet, companies may get secure information
    about suppliers and partners in minutes. Lower
    transaction costs may therefore lead to rapid
    changes in alliances, outsourcing and merging
  • Transaction costs are enormous lower on internet
    and companies must evaluate what are their core
    area, what should they outsorce and what
    alliances should be preferred

9
Transaction costs in procurement and in the value
chain
  • Transaction costs are also costs to search and
    find products and services to buy (market
    communication) , to negotiate on prices and
    delivery conditions
  • There are also transaction costs in collaboration
    among companies in value chains on development of
    product design, product development, operation
    and maintainance

10
The Impact of the Internet on Transaction Costs
  • The most significant impact of the Internet on
    the business community is the reduction of
    transaction costs both for e-commerce and
    e-business
  • and it is precisely these cost reductions that
    have made the Internet such a perplexing medium
    in which to conduct business.
  • Paul Sholz What are Transaction Costs?
    http//www.firstmonday.dk/issues/issue6_5/sholtz/
    author

11
Transaction costs
  • Transaction costs are so firmly ingrained in the
    physical world that we largely take them for
    granted and naturally incorporate their effects
    into our business thinking when we move online.
  • In the physical world, most industries are
    arranged into long and complex value chains, the
    shapes of which are largely organized by
    transaction costs.
  • These value chains are populated with middlemen
    who prosper by taking a "cut" out of every
    transaction they organize within their sphere of
    influence.
  • Since the process of changing key suppliers and
    distributors in the physical world is so lengthy
    and involved, most buyers and sellers simply live
    with the "cut" imposed by middlemen rather than
    attempt to economize on transaction costs

12
Transaction costs on the Internet
  • On the Internet, the transaction costs associated
    with most forms of commerce largely disappear (or
    at least decrease by several orders of
    magnitude).
  • This does not necessarily imply that middlemen
    have no place on the Internet - there is ample
    evidence to suggest that many new types of
    intermediaries will prove quite successful
    online.
  • Online enterprises that attempt to artificially
    integrate and profit from transaction costs have
    had the most trouble staying in business
    recently. Business-to-business exchanges are
    perhaps the most visible example of this
    phenomenon.

13
Internet and market places (hubs) reduces
inefficiencies and transaction costs
14
E-business will dramatically reduce the
transaction costs
  • Transaction costs stem from a wide variety of
    sources and are believed to represent over one
    third of all economic activity in the United
    States.(McKinsey)
  • Can be reduced to 1/5 by
  • Digitising and webitising of transaction
    processes
  • Building common technological platforms hubs (VC
    networks) and applications for collaboration
  • Standardisation and best practice

15
Different market places/ hubs and categories of
products
  • Hubs (market places)
  • Horizontal
  • Vertical
  • Products
  • Direct (strategic)
  • Indirect

16
Trends
Value Chain Network (Net Supply Chain)
S Supplyer B Buyer M Market place/ hub
Brochure-warepublicize on-line,
sell off-line Basic eCommerceone-to-one
selling from website
B2B eCommerceenabling commerce through
many-to-many commerce
S
B
B
S
S
B
B
S
M
M
S
B
M
M
B
S
EDI Networksexpensive, closed, non-scalable
S
B
S
B
B
B
S
M
S
S
B
B
S
B
S
B
S
S
B
B
S
K
S
B
B
Market efficiency
S
Real time integration among byers and sellers
systems SupplyChain Integration and
e-collaboration
S
S
Time 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001
Source Morgan Stanley Internet Research
17
Trends
Value Chain Network (Net Supply Chain)
S Supplyer B Buyer M Market place/ hub
Brochure-warepublicize on-line,
sell off-line Basic eCommerceone-to-one
selling from website
B2B eCommerceenabling commerce through
many-to-many commerce
S
B
B
S
S
B
B
S
M
M
S
B
M
M
B
S
EDI Networksexpensive, closed, non-scalable
S
B
S
B
B
B
S
M
S
S
B
B
S
B
S
B
"B2B is about much more than matching buyers and
sellers... it is about connecting the shared
business and information processes of the
extended trading networks, including multi-party
product design, manufacturing planning, strategic
sourcing, shipping and logistics, inventory
management and customer management, to name a
few.
S
S
B
B
S
K
S
B
B
Market efficiency
S
Real time integration among byers and sellers
systems SupplyChain Integration and
e-collaboration
S
S
Time 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001
Source Morgan Stanley Internet Research
18
Trends
Value Chain Network (Net Supply Chain)
S Supplyer B Buyer M Market place/ hub
Brochure-warepublicize on-line,
sell off-line Basic eCommerceone-to-one
selling from website
B2B eCommerceenabling commerce through
many-to-many commerce
S
B
B
S
S
B
B
S
M
M
S
B
M
M
B
S
EDI Networksexpensive, closed, non-scalable
S
B
S
B
B
B
S
M
S
S
B
B
S
B
S
B
S
S
B
B
S
K
S
The possibilty to share information with value
chain partner may give enourmous reductions of
transaction costs The problem today is
technological standards for communication and
information management. Suppliers and buyers use
different standards and have problems to see the
win win by collaboration.
B
B
Market efficiency
S
Real time integration among byers and sellers
systems SupplyChain Integration and
e-collaboration
S
S
Time 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001
Source Morgan Stanley Internet Research
19
What Companies are Asking For?
The Value of E-Marketplaces (hubs)
Source AMR Research
20
Buyer Benefits
  • Lower transaction costs
  • Greater negotiation power
  • Streamlined sourcing
  • Faster time to market
  • Real time access to market information
  • Collaboration

21
Seller Benefits
  • Increased exposure to new sales opportunities
  • Overcome inefficiencies in channel or
    manufacturing process
  • Reduce costs of excess and obsolete inventory
  • New partnership potential

22
  • The barriers to procuring online are
  • requires face-to-face interaction (34,6 )
  • suppliers do not sell online (32,6 )
  • concerns about data protection and security
    issues (30,6 )
  • technology is expensive (24,2 )
  • cost advantage is insignificant (20,6 )
  • suppliers technical systems are not
    compatible (11,9 )
  • and who benefits most from e-business?
  • 11,4 SME will benefit most
  • 38,4 Large enterprises will benefit most
  • 43,6 Will benefit equally
  • 2,1 No one will benefit

23
Three main trends for the company developments
towardstotal e-business suite
  • Companies integrate their applications,
    especially
  • ERP (Enterprice Resource planning)
  • CRM (Customer Relationship Management)
  • SCM (Supply Chain Management)
  • Webifisation (Internet) of these company
    internal applications
  • Webifisation and standardisation of proprietary
    product development and managing systems
  • CAD (Computor Aided Design) 3D-models
  • CAM (computor Aided Management)
  • CAE (Computor Aided Engineering)
  • Gives enormous possibilities for collaboration in
    a value chain within a common hub



24
Three main trends for the company developments
towardstotal e-business suite (cont.)
  • When all processes or transactions are digitised
    and webifised, companies may collaborate with
    other companies through market places
    (e-collaboration)
  • The market place develops to be an information
    hub (value chain network) for all business
    processes (transactions)
  • Supply chain management (SCM) better Demand
    chain management (DCM) is what all is about
    (pull not push)
  • Value Chain management

25
A market place is more than buying and selling
...
  • It is about e-collaboration to drastically ease
    the information process in the whole value chain
    to develop, produce and deliver products
  • It is the connection of the companies internal
    digital business processes (ERP, SCM, CRM, and
    the product development systems (CAD,CAM, CAE)
    with the hub and other companies corresponding
    processes, that gives the gains and may result in
    the transformation of the value chain
  • Remember e-business management is the planning
    and execution of front-end and back-end
    operations in a supply chain using the Internet

26
Problems Stem From
Need to integrate and optimize business
processes Organizations boundaries are no longer
fixed
27
Actually Want This
Sell Space
Business Processes
Customer Support Selling
Internal Space
Manufacturing Legal Finance Assembling
Online Systems
Buy Space
Integrated information and Access to that
information
Design Systems
Procuring
ERP/MRP Systems
Requirements Systems
Systems
Procurement Systems
28
But Have This
Sell Space
Business Processes
Customer Support Selling
Internal Space
Manufacturing Legal Finance Assembling
Online Systems
Buy Space
Silos of information and Limited single point
access to that information
Design Systems
Procuring
ERP/MRP Systems
Requirements Systems
Systems
Procurement Systems
29
Trends in the development of vertical hubs
experiences so far..
  • One three hubs will dominate within each
    industry sector (auto industry, oil- and gas
    industry, etc.) And they will be integrated with
    horisontal marketplaces
  • The hubs will be dominated and owned by heavy
    players within the industry sectors (buyers and
    main suppliers)
  • The development of overall and common solutions
    (end-to end-solutions) through strategic
    alliances among system integrators
  • The hubs will develop collaboration forms that
    will transform the value chains and the
    industries

30
The auto industrys Covisint
  • Joint venture among
  • Car producers Ford, GM, Daimler/Crysler,
    Nissan/Renault, PSA Pegeout Citroen og Mitsubishi
    Motor (in USA)
  • System integrators Commerce One and Oracle
  • Power battles among producers and suppliers
  • Covisint is model or best practice for other
    industry sectors Forrester Research Covisint
    will transform the auto industry

31
Covisint.com
Use Internet and common standards and
applications to receive transparency in the value
chain translate a linear model to a much more
productive and effective net work
model http//www.covisint.com
32
Why Covisint?
  • The main aim is through integration and
    e-collaboration to reduce costs and increased
    efficiency in the whole car industry
  • Concrete business aims
  • Reduce the production costs of cars with about
    Euro 3.000
  • Reduce the design process of new models to 12
    months
  • Develop customer relationship management (CRM)
    that makes it possible to deliver customised cars
    within few days

33
The importance of reverse bidding (RB) or
strategic sourcing
  • In the beginning the main emphasis was on
    procurement of indirect products, but today
    procurement of direct products are increasing
  • DaimlerCrysler with RB for 3 billion Euro om
    direct products, also complex products
  • Total procurement on Covisint in the 9 first
    months of 2001 was 17 bill Euro
  • RB has got enormous importance and may represent
    a shift of paradigm

34
Example of Reverse Bidding
35
A shift of paradigm?
Reverse bidding has proved that it is an
outstanding tool of procurement, also for more
complex orders. But the conditions are detailed
specifications of the products to
auction Covisint, 2001 Johannes Rudnitzy
Mercedes Benz
36
Supply Chain management before Covisint and the
Internet
  • A typical car is composed of more than 200.000
    components, delivered from about 200 different
    suppliers (vendors) that must deliverjust in
    time
  • Already from the seventies the car manufactorers
    used CAD, CAM og CAE tools for collaboration
    of design, management and engineering
  • These tools contributed to reduce the time to
    bring a new model to the market from five to
    three years
  • Business Week How the web is retooling
    Detroit 27.11 2000.

37
Supply Chain management on Covisint and the
Internet
  • The next wave that takes place today is to
    connect all these internal and proprietary
    applications to the web start with design and
    end with the customer (car buyer)
  • When this works, team from different locations in
    the world can look at their PC displays (or
    handheld devices) and make changes and
    corrections that may be evaluated by all
    participants (E2E)
  • The supply chain develops to be a value chain
    where all, from the 3.tier- to the 2.tier to the
    main supplier (1.tier) and the car manufatorer,
    are connected directly in the development process
    - upstream
  • The car buyer may also be connected in the value
    chain (design, buying (problems with
    distributors) downstream
  • The competition is among value chains, using the
    same platform or hub (competition among the Ford,
    GM and DC value chain)

38
E-collaboration on design and product development
  • Covisint has developed common applications for
    e-collaboration on design, 3D models and product
    development etc and has selected MatrixOne (used
    already by big car manufactorers)
  • MatrixOne creates a virtual project workspace
    that supports
  • workflow and routing of documents,
  • strategic sourcing,
  • 3D visualization and design,
  • Engineering and product management
  • Workflow and product description
  • Possible to develop aut models 30 40 faster
    than earlier

39
The Engineering Process
Goal Quality, Time, Costs
Concept Development
Design
Quote
Industrial Engineering
Production
Quality Control and Project Management
40
E-collaboration in SCM
  • Common applications for SCM (SupplySolution
    Product)
  • Ford has connected its supply chain to Covisint
    with this tool (4200 suppliers)
  • GM and DaimlerCrysler are now doing the same
  • Delphi the worlds biggest auto main supplier
    are connecting its 5500 suppliers to Covisint -
    its cheaper to connect to the Covisint
    infrastructure, that already exists , than
    starting from scratch.
  • Johnson Controls Inc, that delivers components to
    23 million cars, are connecting its 86 factories,
    plus thousands of part suppliers to Covisint

41
Supply chain management (cont.)
  • The whole value chain from raw material
    suppliers, 3. 2 and 1tier (main) suppliers and
    the auto makers, are connected in a common hub
    (and later the car buyer?)
  • The auto producers inform the suppliers in real
    time about status of sales and give statistics
    so that the suppliers automatically may maintain
    their stores
  • Makes a platform for e-collaboration

42
Competition to make the best products from the
same platform not the best technological
solutions
  • You want to win the bigger game of running the
    best car and truck company, not the technology
    game of whom has the best solutions. There are
    certain things in this industry that will make
    the industry move faster if we standardize it."
  • A lack of standards could mean each auto company
    and its respective suppliers would spend millions
    of dollars on information technology to build
    separate pipelines to communicate with one
    another
  • Ralph Szygenda, GM and board member of Covisint

43
Covisint has reached critical mass
  • 11 global auto producers are members
  • One hundret millions transactions each month
    among 2000 suppliers and car producers
  • 30 of 40 main suppliers take part
  • Toyota and VolksWagen have different hubs, but
    may join Covisint or develop common standards and
    applications

44
Who benefits most from Covisint?
  • The auto producers Fords claims to have saved
    more money in efficiencis than they have plowed
    in the hub during the last year (2001) (for
    instance cost from 300 to 15 20 for an order)
  • What about the main suppliers (1.tier)
  • Earlier heavy resistance and
  • The main suppliers are now members of the board
    and have influence in the development of Covisint
  • What about the part suppliers?

45
What about the suppliers that do not use
Covisint?
  • Covisint expects that all main suppliers takes
    their part suppliers to the hub
  • 77 of the main suppliers expects that the
    number of part supplier will be reduced
    considerably next year
  • Only the suppliers who can do business
    Covisint-style will survive
  • AMR Research

46
Importance for Norwegian industry?
  • Large parts of Norwegian industry are affected
  • Raw material production Hydro Aluminium and
    Bjølvefossen
  • Main suppliers
  • Hydro Automotive Structure Raufoss (bumpers)
  • Kongsberg Automotive (Chassis)
  • And their part suppliers
  • Will they do e-business Covisint-style?
  • Will we have the same problems in other
    industries and for Norwegian companies in
    general?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com