Safety Management Systems - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 34
About This Presentation
Title:

Safety Management Systems

Description:

Kenny So, Senior Airworthiness Officer, Civil Aviation Department, Hong Kong, China ... an aircraft that is maintained to the highest level of airworthiness. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:269
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 35
Provided by: fer134
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Safety Management Systems


1
Safety Management Systems
  • The Natural Successor to Error Management Systems
  • (from the Asian Culture Perspective)
  • Presented to Asia Pacific Airline Training
    Symposium 2008
  • Kenny So, Senior Airworthiness Officer,
  • Civil Aviation Department, Hong Kong, China
  • Date 16 September 2008

2
Can we have Safety Management without Error
Management?
  • YES but
  • It is a much harder objective to reach if you are
    starting Safety Management Systems (SMS) from
    scratch.
  • Maybe a better start point would be Human Factors
    training.
  • Why?
  • Because Human Factors introduces us to the
    concept of Error Management.

3
Error Management What is that?
  • It is a concept which accepts that errors will
    always occur at some point in any system which
    involves a Human-Machine interface.
  • A famous Greek philosopher coined the phrase
    Errare humanum est
  • To err is human (err make a mistake)

4
OK, but what is the difference between Error
Management and Safety Management?
  • The difference is reactive as opposed to
    proactive.
  • Reactive looks at events which have already
    happened, Proactive seeks to anticipate events
    which might happen and put in place defences
    against that event or mitigation strategies to
    minimize the effects of the event if it did
    happen.

5
Why did slide 1 include the phrase, the Asian
Cultures perspective?
  • Because it is very important that aviation safety
    practitioners (particular non-native) recognize
    the importance of CULTURE when seeking either to
    educate people about, or implementing concepts
    such as, Human Factors, Error Management and SMS.
  • What works in London/New York/Sydney will not
    necessarily work in Hong Kong/China.

6
Why not?
  • Because the people cultures are different.
  • European cultures tend to be individualistic
    where personal achievement and recognition are
    highly regarded and where mistakes are accepted
    as an integral part of the learning process.
  • Asian cultures tend to be more collectivist
    where people prefer not to stand out from the
    crowd either in a good or bad sense.

7
So what effect does this have on the
implementation of SMS?
  • There is no perfect culture with regard to
    Safety!
  • Let us first take a look at some of the basic
    cultural considerations here we will consider
    organisational culture.
  • For our SMS to be effective, the organisational
    culture must be.

8
An Informed Culture
  • People understand the hazards and risks involved
    in their operations.
  • Staff work continuously to identify and overcome
    threats to safety.

9
A Just Culture
  • Errors must be understood, but willful violations
    cannot be tolerated.
  • The workforce knows and agrees on what is
    acceptable and unacceptable.

10
A Reporting Culture
  • People are encouraged to report safety concerns.
  • When safety concerns are reported, they are
    analyzed and appropriate action is taken.

11
A Learning Culture
  • Staff are updated regularly on safety issues by
    management.
  • Safety information is fed back to staff so that
    everyone learns the lesson.
  • People are encouraged to develop and apply their
    own skills and knowledge to enhance
    organisational safety.

12
Idealistic Perhaps!?!
  • What about the realities?
  • What about the peoples culture and behaviour?
  • What about social norms?

13
Cultural Obstacles Social Patterns
  • Some typically observed comments
  • I wont report any safety issues because Ill be
    seen as a troublemaker.
  • I wont report mistakes that I make because that
    will mean a loss of face for me.
  • If I see safety issues involving colleagues I
    wont report these because that would mean a
    loss of face for them and our GuanXi
    friendship will be ruined.

14
Cultural Obstacles Social Patterns
  • More typically observed comments
  • I dont have anything of value to add to the
    enhancement of organisational safety Im only
    a small potato.
  • I cannot challenge what my boss wants me to do
    even if I think there are safety issues involved
    his post is higher and therefore his decisions
    must be respected.

15
Cultural Obstacles Social Patterns
  • Some typically observed behaviours
  • Deliberate covering up of mistakes by oneself and
    others.
  • Denial Refusal to accept responsibility for
    errors even in the face of damning evidence.
  • Belief that sorry sorry when found out will
    make everything alright but having no thoughts
    as to how or why the error occurred.

16
Not true?
  • Of course not, within our organisation those
    sorts of behaviour would not be tolerated
  • DENIAL.!

17
Social Norms
  • Lets have a look at some social norms
  • The love affair with the mobile phone.
  • The love affair with the I-Pod.
  • A perceived lack of situational awareness.
  • A perceived lack of concern for personal safety,
    either ones own or that of others.

18
Social Norms
  • Even though we do not necessarily realize it,
    these norms have a direct impact on how we go
    about our business and on the job we do.
  • They need to be recognized and personal
    strategies implemented to minimize the risks
    associated with them.

19
Too Simplistic and BIASSED!?!
  • Yes and No!!!
  • Yes, there is bias, interpretation of other
    peoples behaviour based on ones own cultural
    background, however
  • The comments and behaviour described are factual.

20
BEHAVIOUR
  • People who work in aviation do not normally
    exhibit deviousness or deviant behaviour.
  • So how do we explain the behaviours outlined
    earlier?

21
CONFUCIUS
  • I have to turn to Confucius for an answer to this
    question.
  • Confucius "Master Kung," (551 BC
  • 479 BC) was a Chinese thinker and
  • social philosopher, whose teachings
  • and philosophy have deeply influenced
  • Chinese, Korean, Japanese, and Vietnamese
    thought and life. His philosophy emphasized
    personal and governmental morality, correctness
    of social relationships, justice and sincerity.

22
CONFUCIUS
  • Chinese culture and Confucian teaching emphasize
    the group or family over the individual.
    Confucianism also stresses obedience to
    elders/leaders as well as a need for harmony
    (either within the family or workplace). In fact
    the workplace can and does take on the identity
    of the Big Family.

23
CONFUCIUS
  • Not necessarily directly attributable to
    Confucius, but another feature of the
    collectivist culture which manifests itself
    both in Hong Kong and China, is the concept of
    collective responsibility/accountability.
  • When an incident or accident occurs, great effort
    is expended in the dilution of individual
    responsibility (spreading the blame) such that
    root cause, which may be individually rather than
    organisationally related, becomes almost
    impossible to identify thereby denying the
    opportunity for implementation of appropriate
    mitigating strategies.

24
LEADERSHIP
  • Accepting the principle of familial loyalty,
    a need to maintain a harmonious working
    environment, and Confucian traditions of
    hierarchical management style, it is my belief
    that for the successful implementation of an SMS
    in a Chinese context, indoctrination of top
    management from the outset is critical. Without
    this, in a traditional setting, the message
    will not reach the workforce.

25
ENGAGEMENT
  • ?With top management on-side, engaging staff in
    the System Improvement Process is the next
    crucial element.
  • ?Engagement-Definition Staff connected to their
    work in various ways - intellectually,
    emotionally, creatively and psychologically.

26
ENGAGEMENT
  • Intellectual Connection Staff are aware of
    safety efforts in progress. They understand why
    we do things the way we do. We want their ideas,
    and we want them to think about what is going on
    in our organisation. We want them intellectually
    connected to organisational safety performance.
  • Emotional Connection We want our staff to
    realise that what they think does matter. We
    want them to know that their contribution does
    make a difference.

27
ENGAGEMENT
  • Creative Connection We want their ideas, their
    suggestions, and their innovations. We want their
    creativity with respect to the work they are
    doing.
  • Psychological Connection We want our staff to
    feel that This is an organisation that cares
    about me it cares about me enough to improve the
    overall safety situation, and Im part of that.

28
What else?
  • Maintenance staff need the support and
    encouragement to do the job right.
  • What do we mean by the job?
  • Producing a safe (airworthy) aircraft.
  • We need to acknowledge their work, which is often
    hidden by access panels, and encourage them to
    take pride in doing the job correctly. Only this
    way we can produce an aircraft that is maintained
    to the highest level of airworthiness.

29
How do we achieve this?
  • We ensure that maintenance staff are trained and
    competent to perform the tasks which they are
    assigned.
  • We provide clear unambiguous guidelines on what
    we expect from our staff.
  • We put in place procedures which are easily
    understood.
  • We create a just culture where errors are
    understood but where everyone understands that
    deliberate deviation from procedures will not be
    tolerated.
  • We provide a safe working environment and
    encourage staff to highlight aspects of the
    working environment that they consider have a
    negative effect on safety, (either personal or
    with respect to the aircraft).

30
How do we achieve this?
  • We provide clear work instructions and procedures
    are available and must be complied with.
  • We provide a clean, uncluttered work environment
    and expect our staff to maintain it this way.
  • We ensure that all task specific tooling is
    available as and when required.
  • We provide and ensure that all maintenance data
    referenced in the work instructions is current
    (including SBs and ADs.)

31
What else?
  • We create an environment where open reporting of
    safety related issues is part of the fabric of
    our organisation, because without it we cannot
    hope to reduce risk to as low as reasonably
    practicable (ALARP).
  • We cannot do much more Attitude, Confidence and
    Discipline are personal attributes and the
    organisation has a responsibility to impress the
    imperatives of each of these on every member of
    the workforce.

32
Conclusions
  • To make the quantum leap from todays reactive
    safety environment to tomorrows proactive safety
    environment, the Big Potatoes need to be at the
    vanguard of the organisations Cultural
    Revolution demonstrating in the most visible way
    their commitment to the ideals espoused in the
    Safety Management requirements.

33
Conclusions
  • Utilising an SMS to manage safety can be the tool
    that bridges the differences to the safety
    performance in regard to the Asian Culture. It
    can move from a position of believing it is
    safe to one of knowing that safety is managed
    and as low as reasonably practicable.

34
Thank You !
  • Any Questions?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com