Modes of Communication - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 27
About This Presentation
Title:

Modes of Communication

Description:

Point-to-Point and Broadcast Mechanisms ... Synopsis: The STARS client crashes when empty forms are submitted. Subsystem: User interface ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:640
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 28
Provided by: berndbr
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Modes of Communication


1
Modes of Communication
  • CS 6300
  • Fall, 2001

2
Classification of Communication
Last week
Today
3
Example Mechanisms for Project Communication
  • Synchronous and Asynchronous Communication
    Mechanisms
  • Synchronous Mechanisms
  • Meeting types and meeting roles
  • Example Mode/Mechanism Match Reviews as Meetings
  • Asynchronous Mechanisms
  • Point-to-Point and Broadcast Mechanisms
  • Example Mode/Mechanism Match Keeping Track of
    Changes with Forms Issue Bases
  • Asynchronous Hybrid Review Process

4
Example of Request for Clarification
  • From Alice
  • Newsgroups cs413.architecture.discuss
  • Subject SDD
  • Date Thu, 10 Oct 231248 -0400
  • Message-ID lt325DBB30.4380_at_andrew.cmu.edugt
  • MimeVersion 1.0
  • Content-Type text/plain charsetus-ascii
  • When exactly would you like the System Design
    Document? There is some confusion over the actual
    deadline the schedule claims it to be October
    22, while the template says we have until
    November 7.
  • Thanks,
  • Alice

5
Synchronous Communication Mechanisms
  • Hallway conversation (face-to-face)
  • Supports Unplanned conversations, Request for
    clarification, request for change
  • Pro Cheap and effective for resolving simple
    problems
  • Con Important information can be lost,
    misunderstandings can occur when conversation is
    relayed to others.
  • Meeting (face-to-face, telephone, video
    conference)
  • Supports Planned conversations, client review,
    project review, status review, brainstorming,
    issue resolution
  • Pro Effective mechanism for resolution of
    isssues, and building consensus
  • Con High cost (people, resources) difficulty of
    managing them and getting effective results

6
Meeting Roles
  • Primary facilitator
  • Responsible for organizing the meeting and
    guiding the execution.
  • Writes the agenda describing objective and scope
    of meeting.
  • Distribute the agenda to the meeting participants
  • Minute taker
  • Responsible for recording the meeting.
  • Identifies action items and issues
  • Release them to the participants
  • Time keeper
  • Responsible for keeping track of time

7
Structure of a Meeting Agenda
8
Reviews
  • Presentation of artifact for scrutiny by a team
    of reviewers
  • Artifact is not always code
  • Design specifications, project plan, test plan,
    etc.
  • Artifact may not be a document
  • User interface prototype demonstration
  • Types of review differ in formality and role
    differentiation
  • Goal
  • Review the artifact, not the author
  • "Egoless programming"
  • Raise issues, not solve problems or improve the
    design

9
Review Procedure
  • Preparation
  • Thorough preparation is essential
  • Artifact delivered 1-30 days in advance to review
    team
  • Longer lead time for larger, more significant
    artifacts
  • Presentation may be necessary in advance
  • Only necessary people should review, so everyone
    must review
  • Review meeting
  • Short meetings only (2 hours, max.)
  • Reporting
  • All team members are responsible for quality
  • Summarize findings
  • Report specific findings or raised issues

10
Review Output
  • Summary report
  • What exactly was reviewed
  • Who reviewed it
  • When
  • Summary appraisal
  • Issues list
  • Detailed issues or findings
  • NOT design solutions

11
Asynchronous Communication Mechanisms
  • E-Mail
  • Supports Release, change request, brainstorming
  • Pro Ideal for event-driven communication modes
    and announcements.
  • Con E-mail taken out of context can be easily
    misunderstood, sent to the wrong person, lost or
    not read by the receiver.
  • Newsgroups
  • Supports Release, change request, brainstorming
  • Pro Suited for notification and discussion among
    people who share a common interest cheap
    (shareware available)
  • Con Primitive access control (often, you are
    either in or out)
  • World Wide Web
  • Supports Release, change request, inspections
  • Pro Provide the user with a hypertext metaphor
    Documents contain links to other documents.
  • Con Does not easily support rapidly evolving
    documents

12
Asynchronous Communication Mechanisms
  • Lotus Notes
  • Each user sees the information space as a set of
    databases, containing documents composed of a set
    of fields. Users collaborate by crating, sharing
    and modifying documents
  • Supports Release, change request, brainstorming
  • Pro Provides excellent access control mechanisms
    and replication of databases.
  • Con Proprietary format, expensive

13
Example of a Change Request
  • Report number 1291
  • Date 5/3
  • Author Dave
  • Synopsis The STARS client crashes when empty
    forms are submitted.
  • Subsystem User interface
  • Version 3.4.1
  • Classification missing/incorrect functionality,
    convention violation, bug, documentation error
  • Severity severe, moderate, annoying
  • Description ltltDescription of the problemgtgt
  • Rationale ltltWhy the change should be donegtgt
  • Proposed solution ltltDescription of desired
    changegtgt

14
Example of Issue Base
15
Example Document Review with Lotus Notes
  • Use cases for review process
  • Fill out a review form
  • Attach document to be reviewed
  • Distribute the review form to reviewers
  • Wait for comments from reviewers
  • Review comments
  • Create action items from selected comments
  • Revise document and post the revised version
  • Iterate the review cycle

16
Review of Documents Database
17
(No Transcript)
18
Fill out the Review Form
  • Select reviewers
  • Select the document to be reviewed
  • Add comments to reviewers
  • Determine deadline

19
Reviewer Notification
  • Selected reviewers get e-mail

20
(No Transcript)
21
Reviewers add their Comments
22
Originator Notification
23
Final Recipient Notification
24
Review Tasks
  • Editor reviews comments
  • Editor selects reviewed comments
  • Web Master posts reviewed document and action
    items
  • Team members complete their action items
  • Editor integrates changes
  • Editor posts changed document on the review
    database for the next review cycle

25
Accepted Document w/ Action Items
26
SPMP Action Items
27
Summary
  • Communication Modes
  • Scheduled communication
  • Event-driven communication
  • Communication Mechanisms
  • Asynchronous communication mechanisms
  • Synchronous communication mechanisms
  • Important modes and mechanisms
  • Weekly meeting
  • Project reviews
  • Online communication (discussion forum, email,
    web)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com