School Improvement Planning: The Process and the Product PowerPoint PPT Presentation

presentation player overlay
1 / 57
About This Presentation
Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: School Improvement Planning: The Process and the Product


1
School Improvement Planning The Process and
the Product
Virginia Department of Education Office of School
Improvement February 27, 2008
2
Part I The ProcessSchool Improvement Planning
Coordinating School Plan Responsibilities
under NCLB and the SOA Why Not One Plan?
3
The Common Goal
Improved Student Achievement
Research
NCLB
SOA
4
From the Experts
  • What does research say about the bottom line
  • Delivering
  • Good Instruction?

5
The Language of The Research
  • Any school and school division involved in
    improvement should
  • Ensure that parents are kept informed and
    involved in the school improvement planning
    process.
  • Provide technical assistance to staff in the
    areas of
  • data analysis
  • curriculum alignment
  • time and scheduling
  • professional development
  • use of funds
  • organizational systems and procedures
  • selecting instructional methods
  • use of scientifically-based research and
  • school culture.

6
The Language of Virginias Standards of
Accreditation (SOA)
  • Plan Requirements for Schools Warned and Beyond
  • The school must include in its plan
  • A description of how the school will meet
    accreditation
  • Specific measures for achieving and documenting
    academic achievement
  • Amount of time in the school day devoted to
    instruction in core academic areas
  • Instructional practices designed to remediate
    students who have not been successful on
    Standards of Learning tests
  • Intervention strategies to prevent further
    decline in student performance
  • Staff development
  • Strategies to involve and assist parents
  • Description of the use of funding to support
    implementation and
  • Restructuring and reconstitution options when
    appropriate.

7
The Language of the No Child Left Behind Act of
2001 (NCLB)
  • Requirements for a Title I School
    Improvement Plan
  • The school must
  • Incorporate scientifically based strategies to
    strengthen the core academic subjects in the
    school
  • Directly addresses the academic achievement
    problem that caused the school to be identified
    for school improvement
  • Adopt policies/practices concerning the schools
    core academic subjects that have the greatest
    likelihood of ensuring that all students meet
    proficiency
  • Establish specific, annual, measurable objectives
    for continuous and substantial progress by each
    group of students in the legislation
  • Include strategies to promote effective parental
    involvement and
  • Identify implementation responsibilities of the
    school, the LEA, and the SEA.

8
The Language of NCLB (continued)
  • The local school division must
  • Ensure that parents are kept informed and
    involved in the school improvement planning
    process.
  • Provide technical assistance in the areas of
  • data analysis
  • professional development
  • use of funds
  • selecting instructional methods and
  • use of scientifically-based research.
  • Provide an opportunity for students to be
    transferred to other more successful schools.
  • Provide organized tutorial services.
  • Provide corrective action and restructuring
    options when appropriate

9
The Result Common School Improvement Themes
  • Data Analysis
  • Use of Time
  • Research-base Instructional Practices
  • Curriculum Alignment
  • Specific Instructional Interventions for at-risk
    subgroups
  • Professional Development
  • Parental Involvement
  • Use of Funds
  • Corrective Action or Restructuring Options

10
Common School Improvement Themes from the
Research, NCLB, and the SOA
  • Data Analysis
  • Use of Time
  • Research-base Instructional Practices
  • Curriculum Alignment
  • Specific Instructional Interventions for At-Risk
    Subgroups
  • Professional Development
  • Parental Involvement
  • Use of Funds
  • Corrective Action or
  • Restructuring Options

THEN WHY NOT ONE PLAN?
11
The SIP Requirements A Comparative Look
  • NCLB
  • Develop/Revise the
  • School Improvement Plan
  • Incorporate scientifically based strategies to
    strengthen the core academic subjects in the
    school
  • Directly addresses the academic achievement
    problem that caused the school to be identified
    for school improvement
  • Adopt policies/practices concerning the schools
    core academic subjects that have the greatest
    likelihood of ensuring student proficiency
  • Establish specific, annual, measurable objectives
    for continuous and substantial progress by each
    group of students in the legislation
  • Include strategies to promote effective parental
    involvement and
  • Identify implementation responsibilities of the
    school, the LEA, and the SEA.
  • Include corrective actions, restructuring and
    reconstitution options when appropriate
  • SOA
  • Develop/Revise the
  • School Improvement Plan
  • Incorporate scientifically based strategies to
    strengthen the core academic subjects
  • Describe how the school will meet accreditation
  • and include specific measures for
    achieving and documenting academic achievement
  • Examine amount of time in the school day devoted
    to instruction in core academic areas
  • Include instructional practices designed to
    remediate students who have not been successful
    and Intervention strategies to prevent further
    decline in student performance
  • Provide staff development
  • Include strategies to involve/assist parents

12
A Reminder
The Common School Improvement Plan Requirements
Represent the CORE of School Improvement
Planning.
  • There may be other local requirements.

13
A Reminder
The Common School Improvement Plan Requirements
Represent the CORE of School Improvement
Planning.
  • There are other requirements for NCLB Years 3-6
  • schools and for those consecutively
  • warned under the SOA.

14
NCLB Year 3Selection of a Corrective Action
  • Continue to offer public school choice and
    supplemental educational services (SES)
  • Choose one of these Corrective Actions
  • Replace school staff deemed relevant to the
    failure to
  • make AYP or
  • Implement a new curriculum shown by research as
  • effective in raising achievement or
  • Decrease the authority of school-level
    management or
  • Appoint an outside expert to advise the school on
  • the plan implementation or
  • Extend the school year or school day or
  • Restructure the internal organization of the
    school.
  • (Teachers and parents must be promptly notified
    and given an opportunity to participate in the
    planning and comment on any action before taken.)

15
NCLB Year 4 and 5Preparation for or
Implementation of Alternative Governance
  • Continue to offer public school choice and SES
  • Choose one of these Alternative Governance
    Options
  • Reopen the school as a public charter school or
  • Replace all or most of the school staff (may
    include
  • principal and other staff) relevant to the
    schools failure or
  • Enter into a contract with an entity i.e., a
    private
  • management company with a demonstrated record
    of
  • effectiveness to operate the school or
  • Institute other significant governance and
    staffing changes
  • that will likely impact the problems that are
    causing the
  • school to remain in improvement.
  • (Teachers and parents must be promptly notified
    and given an opportunity to participate in the
    planning and comment on any action before taken.)

16
SOA School Divisions with Schools Warned Four
Consecutive Years Must
  • Enter into a Memorandum of Understanding with the
    Virginia Department of Education that will
    outline actions the school(s) will undertake.
  • The Memorandum of Understanding may include, but
    is not limited to
  • A Service/management review
  • Employment of a Turnaround Specialist
  • Reconstitution
  • May include restructuring governance,
    instructional program, staff, student body
  • Closing/combining schools
  • (Parents must be involved in the process.)

17
All in One Place Overview of School Plan
Requirements
SOA
NCLB
Accredited with Warning Years 1-3
Accreditation Denied
Year 4 in School
Improvement (for Implementation in Year 5)
Year 3 in School Improvement
18
The Task Include NCLB and SOA Requirements in
One Plan
Extras SOA Additional Accreditation
Denied Requirements
Common School Plan Requirements
Extras Example NCLB Additional Year 3, 4, or 5
Requirements Example Locally Directed
Requirements
19
Ensuring that Both Sets of Requirements Are In
the School Improvement PlanA Management
Tool
20
Checklist and Certification of SOA and NCLB
School Improvement Plan Requirements(http//www.d
oe.virginia.gov/VDOE/SchoolImprovement/SOAandNCLB-
SIPrequirements.doc)
21
Checklist and Certification of SOA and NCLB
School Improvement Plan Requirements (continued)
22
Checklist and Certification of SOA and NCLB
School Improvement Plan Requirements (continued)
23
Checklist and Certification of SOA and NCLB
School Improvement Plan Requirements (continued)
Then
Add and Discuss the Implementation of the Extras.

24
Goal Attained One Plan
  • Submit the
  • Checklist and Certification of SOA and NCLB
    School Improvement Plan Requirementsas a cover
    sheet
  • to the SOA required plan if the school is both
    warned and in
  • Title I School Improvement.

25
  • The Difference in
  • Process and Product

26

Part II The Product An Improved School
Fully Accredited and Making AYP
27
Producing the Product
  • What are our schools needs?
  • How simple or difficult is it to determine our
    schools needs?
  • Is there a formal tool or process that can be
    used to determine the needs?
  • Could the needs fall in several different but
    equally important categories?
  • Can we tackle all of our needs at one time?

28
Is There Time?
  • Juggling Priorities
  • Principals Aim To
  • Improve the literacy and numeracy of their
  • student populations
  • Raise standards of achievement in general
  • Maximize the learning opportunities for pupils
    with special
  • needs
  • Improve poor attendance
  • Share good teaching practices of staff
  • Perfect performance monitoring.
  • When laid out in a list like this, it can seem
  • that the role of most school managers is
  • something akin to a highly skilled
  • juggling act.

  • Phil Neal, Capita Education Services

29
Is There Time To Examine
  • The Quality of Teaching
  • Effective teachers employ effective instructional
    strategies,
  • classroom management techniques, and classroom
  • curricular design in a fluent, seamless fashion.
  • Leinhardt and Greens Brooks and Hawke
  • The most important factor affecting
  • student learning is the teacher.
  • Robert J. Marzano

30
Is There Time To Examine
  • The Degree of Central Office Support
  • Effective school improvement involves building
  • the capacity for change and development. This
  • necessitates pressure and support from both
  • external and internal sources.
  • The need for 'change agentry' is well established
  • in the literature however, relatively little has
    been written
  • about the role of the LEA as an external agent of
    change.
  • School Leadership Management, Taylor Francis
    Group

31
Is There Time To Examine
  • The Order of
  • Priorities
  • The old way of thinking
  • was that parental
  • involvement was
  • all about parents.
  • The new way is that its
  • about student success.
  • Dr. Joyce Epstein, Center on School, Family
  • and Community Partnerships

Is Increased Parental Involvement a Top Priority
in Our School?
32
Is There Time To Examine
  • Fundamental
  • Student Beliefs
  • What matters most is that students
  • come to believe deeply in their own
  • capacity to master difficult academic
  • material through sustained,
  • thoughtful effort.
  • Every student is completing
  • homework, volunteering in class
  • Changing the Culture, D. Bruce Jackson

33
It Can Be Done.
  • Research Shows
  • "Any school in the United States can operate at
  • advanced levels of effectiveness--if it is
    willing to
  • implement what is known about effective
    schooling.
  • If we follow the guidance offered from 35 years
    of
  • research, we can enter an era of unprecedented
  • effectiveness for the public practice of
    education."
  • Robert J. Marzano

34
Will Your School Take the Time?
  • The Good
  • The Bad
  • The Ugly

Whats Really Behind Your School Doors ?
35
Workshop Time
15 minutes
  • In your teams, decide what are the top three
    Goods and the top three Bads and Uglies in
    your collective school.
  • Discuss the impact each of the six factors has on
    your school.
  • Prioritize the three positive factors and the
    three negative factors.

36
Behind Those Doors
  • The Good
  • Changing Behaviors
  • Assessing Students
  • Parent Conferencing
  • Articulation Among/Across Grade Levels
  • Thinking Big
  • On-going Development of Integrated, Sequential
    Curriculum
  • Team Building
  • Sharing Ideas, Materials, Resources
  • Creating a Supportive Risk- Taking, No-Fault
    Environment
  • The Bad and The Ugly
  • Inadequate Planning Time
  • Lack of Adequate Funding
  • Few Materials / Resources
  • Traditional Assessments
  • Lack of Parental Involvement
  • Community Apathy
  • Student Apathy and Poor Behavior
  • Fear of Job Security
  • Constant Change in Administrative Policy
  • Inadequate Teacher Compensation
  • Inconsistent Professional Development

37
Why Are the Good, the Bad, and the Ugly All Good?
  • For the lowest achieving students in the highest
    poverty schools to meet high standards of
    performance, the entire instructional program
    must be substantially improved and every facet of
    the school must be examined.
  • From The No Child Left Behind Act of 2001
  • Comprehensive School Reform
  • Administration, staff, parents, and community
  • must assess the good, the bad, and the ugly (of
    the whole
  • school) before there can be change.


38
The Path to Producing the Product
  • Where are we now?
  • Where do we want to go?
  • How will we get there?
  • How will we know when we get there?
  • How will we sustain the focus and the momentum?
  • Asking the Right Questions Techniques for
    Collaboration and School Change
  • Edie Holcomb

39
Examining Data To Answer Where Are We
Now?Academic Data Sources
  • Achievement Tests Scores
  • Criterion-Referenced Tests
  • Norm-Referenced Tests
  • Diagnostic Tests
  • Benchmark Tests
  • Competency Tests
  • End-of-Chapter Tests
  • Other Performance Indicator Tools
  • Progress through Levels of Instruction
  • Teacher Grades (Report Card)
  • Grade-point Averages
  • Progress Checklists and Logs
  • Workbook Completions
  • Student Assignment Sheets

40
Even More Data School/Student Status Indicators
  • Percentages of
  • Students--
  • Continuing in, Formerly in, or New Identification
    for Special Programs
  • Retained
  • Dropping Out
  • Attending at or Near 100 percent and lower
  • Tardy Each Day
  • Referred, Suspended, Homebound, Expelled
  • Percentages of
  • Students--
  • On Honor Roll
  • Taking AP Courses
  • College Bound
  • Attending College Each Year
  • On, Below, Above Grade Level
  • Involved in Extra-Curricular Activities

41
Even More Data
  • Instructional Support Programs
  • Guidance/ School Health
  • Gifted and Talented
  • Title I /Other Federal Programs
  • Parent Resource Center
  • Instructional Materials
  • Technology
  • Before/After School Programs
  • Staff
  • Staff Credentials
  • Staff Attendance
  • Staff Morale
  • Use of Instructional Time
  • Teacher After-school Involvement with Students
  • Professional Development

42
...and More Data
  • In-School
  • School Climate
  • Parent / Teacher / Adm. Relationships
  • Teacher Satisfaction
  • Building / Equipment
  • Communication/
  • Accessibility to Adm.
  • Student Nutrition Program
  • Transportation
  • Community Relations
  • Confidence in School
  • Commitment to School
  • Volunteerism
  • Donations
  • Open Door Policy
  • Mentorships
  • Quality of Public Relations

43
Learning About Students from Parent and Teacher
Driven Data
  • Parent Input
  • Parent-noted Strengths/Deficiencies
  • Noted Adjustment Problems
  • Physical Handicaps or Health Problems
  • Degree of Commitment to Education in Home
  • Parent Requests for Certain Teachers
  • Teacher Input
  • Student Comfort in Classroom
  • Peer Influence
  • Student Appreciation of Academics
  • Student Respect for Teachers and Administration
  • Student Response to Rewards and Consequences

44
Where Do I Start?
45
Where Do You Want to Go? Begin With
the End in Mind.
  • The Language of the Research
  • Where are we now?
  • Where do we want to go?
  • How will we get there?
  • How will we know when we get there?
  • How will we sustain the focus and the momentum?
  • Asking the Right Questions Techniques for
  • Collaboration and School Change
  • Edie Holcomb

46
Isnt This Where You Want To Go?DestinationsF
rom the Virginia Department of Education
Academic Review Process
Improved Student Achievement Accurate Curriculum
Alignment Effective Use of Time and School
Scheduling Practices Effective Use of Data for
Making Instructional/Planning Decisions Aligned
Professional Development Effective School
Improvement Planning Effective Organizational
Systems and Processes Positive School Culture
47
Workshop Time
Do Your Good, Bad, and Uglies Fall Under These
Destinations?
Improved Student Achievement Accurate Curriculum
Alignment Effective Use of Time and School
Scheduling Practices Effective Use of Data for
Making Instructional/Planning Decisions Aligned
Professional Development Effective School
Improvement Planning Effective Organizational
Systems and Processes Positive School Culture
48
There May Be Other Categories of Destinations
from Research
  • This Is What You WantWhere You Want to Go.
  • Effective
  • Reform Activities for All Children
  • Scientific Based Methods and Strategies to
    Strengthen Core Academic Program
  • Strategies to Meet the Needs of Historically
    Underrepresented
  • Students
  • On-going Plan to Assess Implementation of
    Progress
  • Strategies to Increase Parent Involvement
  • Plan to Involve Teachers in Assessment Plan
  • Identification of and Intervention for Students
  • Experiencing Difficulty
  • Coordination of Local, State, Federal Funding

49
So How Do We Get There?
  • The Language of the Research
  • Where are we now?
  • Where do we want to go?
  • How will we get there?
  • How will we know when we get there?
  • How will we sustain the focus and the momentum?
  • Asking the Right Questions Techniques for
  • Collaboration and School Change
  • Edie Holcomb
  • Improved Student Achievement
  • Accurate Curriculum Alignment
  • Effective Use of Time and School Scheduling
    Practices
  • Effective Use of Data for Making
    Instructional/Planning Decisions
  • Aligned Professional Development
  • Effective School Improvement Planning
  • Effective Organizational Systems and Processes
  • Positive School Culture

50
By Examining the Indicators of Effectiveness in
Each Area (Destination) and Where Your School
StandsWhat Are the Indicators of Effectiveness?
  • Destinations
  • Improved Student Achievement
  • Accurate Curriculum Alignment
  • Effective Use of Time and School Scheduling
    Practices
  • Effective Use of Data for Making
    Instructional/Planning Decisions
  • Aligned Professional Development
  • Effective School Improvement Planning
  • Effective Organizational Systems and Processes
  • Positive School Culture

51
From the AR Indicators
  • Area Professional Development
  • Is the school with division support
  • Designing an ongoing, school-based program of
    professional development that is based on the
    analyses of data and is aligned with the schools
    goals for improving student achievement?
  • Focusing the core of staff learning on
    research-based content and instructional
    practices that have been proven effective in
    improving student achievement?
  • Identifying essential learning outcomes from
    professional development activities that will be
    used to change practice?
  • Embedding professional growth and development
    into job performance expectations and the
    performance evaluation process?

52
From the AR Indicators (cont.)
  • Area Use of Data for Making Instructional /
    Planning Decisions
  • Is the school with division support
  • Using data/evidence from multiple sources to plan
    instruction that promotes the attainment of state
    standards and essential understandings,
    knowledge, and skills?
  • Collecting, compiling, and analyzing data related
    to instructional practices to determine the
    degree of alignment with state learning standards
    and to identify professional development needs?
  • Collecting and compiling individual student
    performance data to identify students needs,
    plan instruction, and monitor progress?
  • Disaggregating state and local student
    performance data by appropriate subgroups of
    students to identify needs and monitor student
    progress?

53
From the AR Indicators (cont.)
  • Area Use of Time and School Scheduling
    Practices
  • Is the school with division support
  • Basing decisions related to the pacing of the
    curriculum on state test blueprints and on
    student performance data?
  • Organizing instruction and structuring lessons to
    maximize student time on task?
  • Maintaining a high level of student engagement
    throughout the lesson?
  • Using classroom instructional time to provide
    enrichment opportunities and support services to
    individuals and small groups, based on students
    identified strengths and needs?

54
From the AR Indicators (cont.)
  • Area Taught Curriculum
  • Is the school with division support
  • Focusing instruction on specific learning
    objectives that promote the attainment of state
    learning standards and address essential
    understandings, knowledge, and skills?
  • Using available curriculum resources and
    supplementary materials appropriately to promote
    attainment of state learning standards?
  • Differentiating instruction to meet the
    identified needs of individual students and
    groups of students?
  • Assigning projects and tasks that require
    students to integrate and apply their learning in
    meaningful contexts and to reflect on what they
    have learned?

55
From the AR Indicators (cont.)
  • Area School Culture
  • Is the school with division support
  • Basing the mission of the school on the shared
    beliefs and common vision of the members of the
    school community?
  • Clearly communicating expectations for student
    performance to students and parents?
  • Implementing instructional and organizational
    practices that reflect high expectations for all
    students and consideration of the culture and
    needs of the school community?
  • Assigning teachers by matching the needs of
    students with the endorsements and demonstrated
    strengths of teachers?

56
Practicing Planning
Workshop
A School Improvement Team Planning Tool
57
Contact Information
  • Brenda A. Spencer
  • School Improvement Coordinator
  • Virginia Department of Education
  • Office of School Improvement
  • Brenda.Spencer_at_doe.virginia.gov
  • (804) 371-6201
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com