College of Business Administration Institutional Effectiveness ReportPlan April 5, 2006

1
College of Business AdministrationInstitutional
Effectiveness Report/PlanApril 5, 2006
2
OVERALL ASSESSMENT RESULTS
3
Overall Assessment Results2003-04

• Goal 0 Meet internal and external (LBB)
  performance targets.
• Goal 1 Provide a positive educational
  experience.
• Goal 2 Maintain faculty performance
• Goal 3 Develop responsive programs

4
Overall Assessment Results2004-05

• Goal 1 Meet internal and external (LBB)
  performance targets.
• Goal 2 Provide a positive educational
  experience.
• Goal 3 Maintain faculty performance
• Goal 4 Develop responsive programs

5
Assessment Results By Goal
6
PERFORMANCEMEASURES
7
Summary of LBB Performance Measures
8
(No Transcript)
9
STUDENTLEARNINGOUTCOMES
10
Program Level Student Learner Outcomes
11
Average MFAT Score HistoryComparison of TAMUK to
National
12
Average MFAT Scores by MajorComparison of TAMUK
to National2003-04 Academic Year
13
Average MFAT Scores by MajorComparison of TAMUK
to National2004-05 Academic Year
14
Average MFAT Scores by MajorComparison of TAMUK
to NationalFall 2005
15
MFAT Assessment IndicatorsComparison of TAMUK to
National2003-04 Academic Year
16
MFAT Assessment IndicatorsComparison of TAMUK to
National2004-05 Academic Year
17
MFAT Assessment IndicatorsComparison of TAMUK to
NationalFall 2005
18
(No Transcript)
19
FACULTY
20
Faculty Complement
21
Average Class Sizes and SCH per Class
22
Faculty Publications
23
SYSTEM CENTER-SAN ANTONIO
24
SC-SA SCH of Total SCH by College
25
CBA Upper-Division SCH
26
SC-SA UD SCH of KV UD SCH for CBA
27
TTVN Utilization To/From SC-SA
28
TTVN Utilization To/From SC-SA(continued)
29
TTVN Utilization To/From SC-SA(continued)
30
ACCOMPLISHMENTSand GOALS
31
Accomplishments2004-05

• Improved graduation rate to an all-time high of
  32. Met LBB performance target for the first
  time.
• Hired four new tenure-track faculty
• George Gresham, MGMT MKTG, Ph.D., Old Dominion
  University
• Anthony Nikias, ACCT CISA, Ph.D., The Ohio
  State University
• Priti Verma, ECON FINC, Ph.D., Univ. of
  Texas-Pan American
• James Wollscheid, ECON FINC, Ph.D., Southern
  Methodist University
• Developed Student Learning Outcomes for most
  courses and incorporated the monitoring of the
  SLO assessment process into the faculty
  evaluation process.
• Continued to support System Center-San Antonio.
• Continued to support student participation in
  professional association meetings (IMA, AMA).

32
Accomplishments2005-06 (so far)

• M.B.A. students competed successfully in the
  TAMUS Pathways Research Symposium for the first
  time.
• Began development of graduate leveling courses to
  support KRIRM masters degree.
• Continued development of SLOs.
• Offering new scholarship for M.P.A. students.
• Resuming publication of College newsletter CBA
  Today.
• Began examination of degree programs for possible
  reduction in number of hours required.
• Began work on 2006-2011 strategic plan.
• Re-activated Delta Mu Delta honor society at both
  Kingsville and San Antonio.

33
Short-Term Goals2006-07

• Meet 10 headcount enrollment increase target.
• Complete development of 2006-2011 college
  strategic plan.
• Refine SLOs for all degree programs and utilize
  information gained to improve performance.
• Market M.B.A. and M.P.A. programs more widely.
• Support the Universitys capital campaign
  activities.
• Begin preparation for ACBSP accreditation
  reaffirmation.
• Complete restructuring of undergraduate degree
  programs.
• Continue to support System Center-San Antonio.

34
Transition to Implement Assurance of Learning(p.
65, AACSB Eligibility Procedures and
Accreditation Standards, 01/01/04)

• Visit year 2003-04. Development will have begun
  of conceptual and operational definitions of
  learning goals for each degree program.
• Visit year 2004-05. Beginning use will be made
  of some measures with monitoring and revision to
  refine definition
• Visit year 2005-06. An assurance of learning
  system will be in place with measures and record
  keeping for assessing program effectiveness.
• Visit year 2006-07 and beyond. Results from
  assurance of learning measures will guide
  continuing development of degree programs.
  Processes will evaluate and update the assurance
  of learning system.

35
RESOURCEREQUEST
36
Summary of Resource Request
37
Summary of Resource Request(continued)
38
T H E E N D