Good Clinical Practices and FDA Inspections - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Good Clinical Practices and FDA Inspections

Description:

Good Clinical Practices and. FDA Inspections. Patricia Holobaugh. Chief, Bioresearch Monitoring ... Expanded to cell therapies, and then to all CBER IND/IDEs ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:460
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 35
Provided by: greghol8
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Good Clinical Practices and FDA Inspections


1
Good Clinical Practices andFDA Inspections
  • Patricia Holobaugh
  • Chief, Bioresearch Monitoring Branch
  • Division of Inspections and Surveillance
  • Office of Compliance and Biologics Quality

2
Agenda
  • Define Good Clinical Practices
  • Describe FDAs Bioresearch Monitoring Program for
    on-site inspections of clinical and animal
    studies
  • Explain when and how inspections are performed
  • Describe common deficiencies and what happens
    after the inspection

3
Good Clinical Practices
  • GCP is a standard for the design, conduct,
    performance monitoring auditing, recording,
    analysis, and reporting of clinical trials.
  • www.fda.gov/oc/gcp/

4
Regulations
  • Investigational Application
  • 21 CFR Part 312 IND drugs and biologics
  • 21 CFR Part 812 IDE
  • 21 CFR Part 809 IVD
  • Marketing Application
  • 21 CFR Part 601 BLA biologics
  • 21 CFR Part 314 NDA drugs
  • 21 CFR Part 814 PMA devices

5
Regulations
  • 21 CFR 50 Protection of Human Subjects
  • Informed Consent
  • Safeguards for Children
  • 21 CFR Part 56 Institutional Review Boards
  • 21 CFR Part 11 Electronic Records Electronic
  • Signatures

6
Examples of GCP Guidance Documents
  • Guideline for Monitoring Clinical Investigations
    (1998)
  • Information Sheets for IRBs and Clinical
    Investigators (1998)
  • ICH GCP Consolidated Guideline E6 (1997)

7
Regulations Guidance
8
FDAs Bioresearch Monitoring Program (BIMO)
  • Clinical Investigators
  • Sponsor/Monitor/Contract Research
  • Organizations
  • Institutional Review Boards
  • Nonclinical Laboratories

9
When are BIMO Inspections conducted?
  • Submission of BLA / PMA
  • Referrals from CBER staff
  • Referrals from other Centers/ORA
  • Complaints from sponsor, IRBs, and consumers
  • Routine surveillance of ongoing studies
  • target 50 pediatric sites this FY

10
Profile of CBER BIMO InspectionsFY04-05 (thru
3/9/05)
  • 189 Assignments issued
  • BLA 45 PMA 15
  • CI surveillance 102
  • IRB 22
  • GLP 12
  • Complaints 12

11
True or False???
  • Clinical investigator Im only doing phase 1
    and 2 studies Ill never be inspected by FDA.

12
True or False???
  • Clinical investigator Im only doing phase 1
    and 2 studies Ill never be inspected by FDA.
  • FALSE
  • Clinical investigators of studies in all phases
    may (and are) inspected by FDA....
  • And ALL GCP regulations apply.

13
CBER continues its program toinspect ongoing
studies under IND/IDEReal-time surveillance of
phases 1/2/3
  • For FY 2005, we issued assignments to inspect 50
    sites enrolling pediatric subjects
  • Cell therapies
  • Gene transfer
  • Vaccines
  • Blood products
  • Devices

14
History of CBER Surveillance Program
  • Started in 2000 following Gelsingers death in
    gene therapy study
  • Expanded to cell therapies, and then to all CBER
    IND/IDEs

15
Surveillance Cross-Section of Sponsors (FY00-05)
  • Individuals 64
  • NIH DOD 29
  • Hospitals
  • universities 11
  • Big companies 48
  • Small companies 84

16
Inspections for BLA / PMAHow Many Sites per
BLA/PMA?
  • Usually 3 to 5 study sites
  • ...but sometimes more
  • Will inspect foreign sites when needed
  • No US study or sites
  • Foreign data are critical

17
Inspections for BLA / PMAFactors in Site
Selection
  • Distribution of subjects
  • Distribution of subjects whose data are excluded
  • from SE analyses
  • Inspection history of investigators
  • Inconsistent data for one site
  • increased efficacy
  • decreased incidence of adverse events

18
Inspections for BLA / PMA Factors in Site
Selection
  • GCP problems reported by sponsor
  • Randomization cannot be reconstructed
  • Number of sub-investigators / sub-sites
  • Pending workloads in FDA Districts

19
FDA Inspection 101
  • Inspections are performed by ORA by
    specially-trained investigators
  • Center reviewers may participate
  • Most inspections are pre-announced
  • Interview who did what, and how
  • Review of records
  • Closing discussion issue Form FDA 483

20
Comparison of Data in BLA / PMA to Source Data
  • Data in
  • BLA/PMA
  • Sponsor

Source Data
CRF
21
Where is Source Data Defined?
  • NOT defined in 312 or 812
  • See GLP regs
  • 21 CFR 58.3(k) raw data
  • 21 CFR 58.130(e) describes how data are to be
    recorded, corrected, and describes automated
    systems.

22
Elements of Data Quality ALCOA
  • Attributable
  • Legible/readable
  • Contemporaneous
  • Original
  • Accurate

23
After the Inspection
  • Inspected party may respond in a letter - send to
    address on the Form FDA-483.
  • May also ask the FDA investigator for the HQ
    Center address
  • The inspection report is written by the FDA
    investigator and sent to the Center.

24
After the Inspection (2)
  • The Center evaluates the report, and determines
    the corrective action.
  • Classifications
  • NAI No Action Indicated
  • VAI Voluntary Action Indicated
  • OAI Official Action Indicated
  • We write a letter following most inspections

25
Most Common CI Violations
  • Failure to follow the protocol
  • example Required testing is incomplete
  • Recordkeeping errors
  • Informed consent problems

26
Most Significant Violations
  • Enrollment of ineligible subjects
  • Violation of protocol affecting safety
  • Extensive data corrections and questionable
    changes
  • Inadequate oversight of study personnel
  • Inappropriate delegation of authority
  • Poor oversight of satellite sites
  • No Informed consent
  • Failure to communicate with IRB

27
Significance of Violations
  • Do the violations
  • ...affect rights, safety, or welfare of subjects?
  • ...directly impact integrity of data set?
  • ...indicate systemic problems within the
    study? sponsor problems?
  • Did the sponsor report the problems to FDA?
  • ...indicate that other studies at that site might
    be impacted? investigator problems

28
Inappropriate delegation to subinvestigators
  • Investigator individual who actually conducts
    an investigation (i.e., under whose immediate
    direction the drug is administered or dispensed
    to subjects.
  • How many miles (or states!) away ????
  • Sponsor should assure that the CI controls the
    study

29
Possible Administrative Actions
  • Warning Letter
  • Determine if the data are reliable
  • Complete and accurate?
  • Delay approval of BLA/PMA
  • Clinical hold
  • Disapproval of IDE
  • Initiate termination of IND
  • Initiate disqualification of investigator
  • Initiate Application Integrity Policy
  • Refer to Office of Criminal Investigations

30
Your Questions for CBER
  • Can case report forms be source documents?
  • Yes protocol should specify how data are to
    be captured and records are to be maintained.
  • Are diaries, questionnaires, photos subject to
    inspection?
  • Yes these need to be maintained by CI per 21
    CFR 312.62(c)

31
Your Questions for CBER
  • What data points should be captured on case
    report forms?
  • What data should be entered into a database for
    analysis?
  • Data critical to determining safety and efficacy
    endpoints. Protocol is roadmap for required
    tests. Consult FDA review team.

32
Your Questions for CBER
  • Does FDA audit systems databases to ensure they
    are validated?
  • FDA does not audit computerized systems for
    clinical trials.
  • Sponsor is responsible for QA of computerized
    systems used by the sponsor, and for determining
    whether systems used by investigator sites are
    suitable for their study.
  • See FDA Guidance Computerized Systems Used in
    Clinical Trials
  • http//www.fda.gov/ora/compliance_ref/bimo/ffinalc
    ct.htm

33
Your Questions for CBER
  • For clinics without medical records system in
    place, how
  • should study records and source documents be
  • maintained when subjects participate in one or
    more
  • studies?
  • Do you recommend that subject source records and
  • health information be maintained in a central
    file, with
  • study-specific CRFs maintained separately?
  • No regulation for this. Records should be
    retrievable
  • and meet 312.62(c) retention requirements.
    Records
  • must be maintained at site if clinical
    investigator
  • departs. Recommend SOPS explaining how an
    alternate
  • record system is utilized.

34
If You have GCP Questions......
  • Contact CBERs Bioresearch Monitoring Branch --
  • Pat Holobaugh 301-827-6347
  • holobaugh_at_cber.fda.gov
  • OR
  • Contact your IND/IDE reviewer
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com