JOINT TRAINING DIVISION ISSUES

1
JOINT TRAINING DIVISIONISSUES
CAPT JB Miller, USN Chief, Joint Training
Division Joint Staff J-7
2
Overview

• UJTL/Joint Task Article Process
• Joint Training Program Review
• Mission Training Requirements
• Training Trends
• Integrated Operations
• WJTSC 2007
• JTM Revision
• JTPG Revision

3
UJTL/JTA Processes

• Discussion
• JS J-7 proposes new process for developing and
  staffing UJTL changes and Joint Task Articles
  (JTAs) using the new UTDT tool, JSAP,
  telecon/VTC, and critical comment resolution at
  the WJTSC
• JTAs will be incorporated into the UJTL, either
  as data fields or hyperlinks.
• JTAs require formal staffing via JSAP JFCOM has
  agreed to discontinue the JTRAT process
• Issue(s)
• There are over 300 JTAs already developed that
  need to be staffed via JSAP
• There are technical issues regarding the various
  proposed methodologies for incorporating JTAs
  into the UJTL the JDEIS/UJTL Automation
  contractor will scope the effort(s)
• Eliminating full UJTL Working Parties will
  require additional electronic (UTDT, JSAP,
  telecon/VTC) staffing and WJTSC forum to resolve
  critical non-concurs
• Implementing the new process will require
  changes to the JTPG (CJCSI 3500.01)
• Impact
• Formalizes JTAs
• Reduces UJTL support travel requirements (twice
  annually)
• Desired Endstate
• Single, authoritative source for UJTL with JTAs
  (JDEIS)
• Streamlined development process

4
Proposed UJTL Development Process Concept
UJTL Task Development Tool (UTDT)

JTA Required?
N
Add to DRRS
Y
OPR
N
Perform Analysis/ Produce JTA
UJTL Coordinator Front End Analysis (L.O.W.,
Format, Verb usage, New Task, etc)
Y
UJSFCOM
JMETL Urgent Req?
Initial Staffing Via UTDT
SML/ SMO/ SME Analysis

N
Y
Y
UJTL Task Development
COLLABORATION
Fully Developed CR (Including JTA)
Submit to UJTL Task Development OPR for
inclusion With UJTL Task
N
OPR

OPOC/ DRRSsubmit Change Request (CR)
Y
Y
UJTL Staffing
OPOC-level Comments Resolved?
JS Telecon- Comments Resolved?
Fully Dev. CR/JTA Distributed To OPOCs via UTDT
UWP final Critical Cmt Resolution (At WJTSC)
N
N
J7
START
Note At any point in the process, a CR can be
returned to UC or OPOC for re-work or
non-concurrence
Note After this point, the task can be
changed by the process, but may still be used in
its original form in DRRS
Joint Staff Staffing
Fully Dev. CR/JTA To JS J-7 For JSAP/ Final
Comment Resolution
DJS Approve?
Update JDEIS
Y
Link to UJTL Task in JDEIS
N

5
UJTL/JTA Unresolved Issues

• Eliminate the UWP.
• a. Use the UTDT to Automate the UJTL Process.
• b. Resolve Critical UTJL/JTA Issues at the
  Semi-Annual WJTSC.
• c. Rewrite the CJCSM 3500 Series to Formalize
  the New Business Rules.
• 2. Incorporate JTAs into the UJTL.
• a. Eliminate the JTRAT Process.
• b. Develop JTAs simultaneously with Candidate
  Tasks.
• c. Naming of JTAs?? Remains JTA Enhanced
  UJTL Expanded UJTL.
• d. Develop UTDT to Include JTAs in the UJTL for
  AO Staffing.
• e. Formal JSAP for the Current 327 JTAs.
  Suspense of 6 Months.
• f. Subsequent JTAs will be JSAPed with Their
  Associated UJT.

6
Joint Training Program Review (JTPR )

• Discussion (ref 06JS-04)
• SPG tasked development of recommendations to
  realign and consolidate joint training programs
  and apply resulting efficiencies against new
  mission areas and existing training gaps and
  shortfalls
• OSD (PR) developed the JTPR concept including a
  centrally managed Defense-Wide fund titled COCOM
  Exercise Engagement Training Transformation
  (CE2T2) with the CE2 piece initially totaling an
  estimated 130M contributing funds include
  JFCOM, JS, and OSD T-2 programs JTPR concept
  briefed through JIPT, SAG, ESG, and approved by
  the DAWG in Sep 06
• JS J-7 will manage the CE2 piece of the fund
  with OSD oversight and JFCOM support
• Fund takes effect in FY08
• Issues
• Development of business rules (strategy,
  planning, resourcing, execution)
• Definition of interfaces with existing and
  proposed requirements development/validation
  processes (e.g., JTRAAG, former JTRAP, JTFCB, T2
  forums, etc.)
• Development of Budget Documents in Fall 06 for
  FY08 PB submission
• Resourcing of necessary management positions
• Impact
• JTPR in place find efficiencies within and
  better meet needs of Joint Training community
• Desired Endstate
• Fully vetted business rules, fully staffed fund
  management ready to execute in FY08

7
Strawman Business Rules
For COCOM Exercise Engagement Training
Transformation (CE2T2) Central Transfer Account
Joint Training Community COCOMs CSAs Services Join
t Staff J-7 OSD Interagency

• 1. 4 Whos
• - Who approves PEP? JS/J-7 and DUSD(R)
• - Who attends? Joint Training Community
• - Who comments? Joint Training Community
• - Who votes? TBD
• 2. When see PPBE Cycle (next slide)
• 3. How are requirements prioritizedcollaborativel
  y each quarter at Spring/Fall WJTSC and
  Summer/Winter Joint Training Program
  Synchronization Meeting
• 4. How do we resolve conflicts? Planner level
  (T2 SAG or ESG, as required)
• 5. Who manages the fund? JS/J-7 with OSD
  Oversight

8
JTPR CTA Fund PPBE Cycle
POM Year
Release Draft to COCOMs and Services for Comment
Finalize POM Position
Submit Joint Training BES to USD(C)
Review POM Inputs from Services
POM Hearings w/ COCOMs
Submit Joint Training POM to PAE
Issue POM Program/Fiscal Guidance DOD Joint
Training Strategy
Develop BES Submission
Develop Joint Training POM
Budget Year
Respond to USD(C) requests for info about submit
PBD Review/Comment
Finalize Exec Year Plan/ Prepare 1st Release
FY07
Submit DOD Joint Training Presidents Budget to
Congress
Congressional Hearings/Briefings Support Approp
Auth Process Legislation
Submit Supplemental Request (if necessary)
Fund Startup initial build of Budget Docs
Execution Year
FUND ADJUSTMENTS MADE QUARTERLY VIA FM 1415
FY08 (First Year)
Release Execution Guidance
Release Mid-Year/UFR Call
Review/Determine Mid-Year Position
Send 1st 1415 to USD(C)
Support Supp Request on Hill (if required)
Send 2nd 1415 to USD(C)
Send Supp 1415 to USD(C) (if required)
Send 3rd 1415 to USD(C)
Send 4th 1415 (if required)
9
Program Funding
JEP COCOM Service Service
Exercise Funding OM Incremental OM
1 2 3
Obtain data thru approved JEP process
Obtain From COCOMs What was Submitted In POM To
EA(s)
Obtain data thru approved OSD(PR) process
(For Reference Only)
Need COCOM inputs to populate JTPR budget
database (spreadsheet)
10
Mission Training Requirements

• Topic USJFCOM JTP Mission Training Requirements
• Discussion
• Current process is unsatisfactory in that it may
  not accurately reflect COCOMs true needs for the
  training of USJFCOM forces.
• Issue(s)
• Reliance on JMETLs alone is unsatisfactory in
  that they do not provide the level of fidelity
  needed to accurately convey training requirements
  to subordinate forces (e.g. what aspect of the
  task do we want to focus on during time
  constrained training events).
• COCOM JMETLs focused on ST and SN levels of war,
  USJFCOM training focused on OP and TA levels of
  war
• CJCSI 3500.01C, Joint Training Policy and
  Guidance, requirements for Master JMETL need to
  be modified
• Desired Endstate
• Top Down Process-COCOM input to USJFCOM JTP
• Focus on specific, critical, joint training gaps
  and seams for assigned forces
• Prioritized by COCOMS and approved by Joint
  Staff
• Agreement on the format for submission of
  commended training requirements to USJFCOM.
• Agreement on the level of fidelity/composition
  of commended training requirements.
• SUBMITTER JS J-7 JTD

11
Training Trends

• Discussion (ref 06JFCOM-06)
• JFCOM is tasked under JTPG (CJCSI 3500.01C Encl
  D 2.c(9)) to conduct and brief training trends at
  the Fall WJTSC and report results to CJCS as
  appropriate
• Issue(s)
• There is a perceived reluctance among the COCOMs
  to dedicate resources to provide inputs for this
  task
• COCOMs and subordinate organizations report few
  if any Training problems in DRRS (lt1)
• TPAs and MTAs are not routinely captured in
  JTIMS (lt2)
• TPAs are not yet feeding DRRS (crosswalk of
  taxonomy unresolved)
• JLLIS initial capability does not fully support
  as an input to trend analysis
• JNTC Support Team/OPFOR observations feedback
  mechanism not integrated with JTIMS
• Impact/Actions Required
• Encourage increased utilization of TPA/MTA
  reporting
• Enhance JTIMS and DRRS to facilitate input and
  collection/reporting of Training Trend data (see
  info briefing)
• Integrate Training Trends concepts into new IT
  platforms (e.g., JLLIS)
• Modify JTPG, as necessary, to reflect the
  end-state process
• Desired Endstate
• Timely, value-added Training Trends presented
  annually

EXPANDED BRIEFING TO BE PROVIDED DURING DETAILED
DISCUSSIONS
12
Integrated Operations

• Topic Draft DoD Directive 3000.dd, DoD
  Participation in Integrated Operations
  establishes policy and delineates
  responsibilities for DoD participation in
  integrated operations and provides overarching,
  capstone guidance to achieve U.S. national
  security goals
• Discussion Directive provides an umbrella for
  Stability, Security, Transition and
  Reconstruction (SSTR) operations, the Joint
  Interagency Coordination Group (JIACG), support
  to State and Local governments, and the
  international community
• Issue(s)
• Cultural differences between DoD and its federal
  agency partners
• Collaboration, communication, and synchronization
  of US Government responses to foreign and
  domestic consequence management operations (e.g.,
  Hurricane Katrina and the Pacific Tsunami)
• Integrated Operations is an emerging construct,
  particularly with respect to Joint Doctrine
• Funding to expand JIATS program to other Federal
  agencies
• Consider changing name from Joint Interagency
  Training Specialists (JIATS) to Joint Integrated
  Operations/Training Specialists (JIOTS) to
  reflect DoD emphasis on integrated operations
• Impact Current cross-agency processes adversely
  affect DoD and combatant commands ability to
  plan, coordinate, synchronize, support, and
  conduct integrated operations
• Desired Endstate
• Expand JIATS program to selected Federal
  Departments and Agencies (DOS (CRS/OFDA), USAID,
  DOJ/FBI, Treasury)

13
WJTSC 2007
WJTSC 07-2 Dates 17-20 Sep 07 (Proposed) Location
PEC Note will use JTIMS to schedule

• WJTSC 07-1
• Dates 5-9 Mar 07 (Locked in)
• Location PEC

WJTSC 07-2 MATRIX
NOTE intent is to use JTIMS for scheduling and
registration of 07-2 (requires additional
fields in registration module).

• 07 CONFERENCE
• FORMAT IDEAS
• Consider 2 days
• of Working Groups
• to allow better coverage
• Consider offering
• TIMS, JLLIS, DRRS
• familiarization for O-6
• during lunch/breaks,
• if desired.

14
Joint Training Manual

• The Joint Training Manual (JTM), CJCSM 3500.03A,
  is 4 years old and requires revision
• All JCS Pubs must be reissued or canceled after 5
  years
• Key events since JTM published
• CJCSI 3500.01C, Joint Training Policy and
  Guidance for the Armed Forces of the United
  States revised (Mar 06)
• T2 Implementation Plans published (Jun 03 Jun
  04 Feb 06)
• New T2 Strategic Plan (May 06)
• Transition of JKDDC to JFCOM (Jan 06)
• Enhanced JTIMS fielded through Spiral 4 (Sep/Oct
  06)
• Synchronization of US Government-wide exercise
  programs with the creation of the National
  Security Exercise Program (ongoing)
• Proposed Updates
• Update old/obsolete procedures and processes
• Focus on How To vs. programmatic issues
• Revision scheduled for Oct 06 Apr 07
• Collaboratively written (see detailed briefing
  for proposed Chapter assignments)
• Leverage Staff and COCOM pockets of expertise

CJCSI 5701.01B, Policy for Development of
Directives
EXPANDED BRIEFING TO BE PROVIDED DURING DETAILED
DISCUSSIONS
15
Joint Training Policy Guidance

• Joint Training Policy and Guidance (JTPG), CJCSI
  3500.01C, was published 15 Mar 06
• Key events since JTPG published
• New T2 Implementation Plan published (Feb 06)
• New T2 Strategic Plan (May 06)
• Numerous emerging/evolving initiatives (see
  below)
• Proposed Updates
• Incorporate Joint Task Article language and
  relationship with UJTL
• JETA integration process
• Training Trends requirements and responsibilities
• Redefine Joint Exercise and Training Program
  efficiency issue
• Document Joint Training Program Review decisions
• Define Joint Individual Knowledge management
  responsibilities
• Rename CCTIs as High Interest issues
• Revision scheduled for Oct 06 Apr 07
• Collaboratively written by JS J-7

Joint Experimentation, Test, and Evaluation,
and Advanced Concept Technology Demonstration
16
BACKUPS
17
Enhanced Specialist ContractCOCOM MIPRd End of
Year Funds

• Contract W74V8H-05-D-0018
• Provides JTS, JLL, and JIATS specialists
• JS, T-2, and COCOM/CSA/Service/J-Dir funded
• JS J-7, JS Comptroller, and JS Contracting Office
  (CCE) jumped thru hoops this year to execute all
  funds MIPRd by COCOMs before 30 Sep 06
• 6 Delivery Orders processed from 26 Aug 29 Sep
• To prevent a similar stampede in FY07, all
  funds for additional Specialist support must be
  received by the JS NLT 15 Aug 07

18
JOINT TRAINING PROGRAM REVIEWChange Proposal
Summary (JS J-7 Managed Portion) forCOCOM
Exercise Engagement Training Transformation
(CE2T2)

• FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11
  FY12 FY 13

• JWFC funding directly committed to supporting 2
  exercises per year for each regional COCOM
• Service Executive Agent directly committed to
  respective COCOMs for their training and exercise
  program
• T2 Management Efficiencies
• JFCOM JWFC/J7 PDM III JTF/FC HQ Cert
• JFCOM JWFC/J7 PDM III JTF/FC HQ Cert (proc)
• TC AoA Alternative 4 Acq Pilot Alt 5 (JTSS)
  funding
• Joint Training System / Interagency / Joint
  Lessons Learned Specialist funding JSJ7
• COCOM JNTC Sup Element Funding
• Joint Training Information Management System
  funding
• JFCOM Regional Security Cooperation Network
  funding
• Recover portion of the JS POM adjustment against
  JEP (tentative)

From
19
Mission Training Requirements Proposed Format
For COCOM Inputs
COCOM XXX JMET ST 1.6.3 Gain and Maintain
Maritime Superiority in Theater Commended UJTs
OP 1.4.4 Conduct Maritime Interception, TA 3.2.3
Conduct Interdiction Operations Commended
Conditions C1.2 Sea, Descriptor Littoral,
C1.2.6 Shipping Presence Descriptor
High Commended Standards M1 Number of vessels
boarded, M2 Number of vessels diverted due to
(suspected) contraband Commended Training
Objective Performance Train in and Analyze
performance of C/JTF (or C/JFMCC) and supporting
tactical forces planning and execution of
Coalition/Joint Maritime Interception Operations
focused on a CBRNE homeland defense threat.
Utilize JSOTF or Naval Component SOF to conduct
boarding operations in support of USCG LEA
Dets. Commended Training Audiences C/JTF and/or
C/JFMCC staffs, Supporting Coalition/Joint
Maritime and SOF Forces. Commended Training
Situations 1. C/JFMCC has established sea
control in the JOA 2. Intel indicates shipping
borne CBRNE threat 3. Instances of
uncooperative ships transiting sea control
lanes 4. USCG has requested USN forces to
intercept and USCG LEA Dets embarked on
supporting units Commended Levels of
Performance 1. MIO interceptions successfully
identify and contain threat vessel nuetralizing
CBRNE threat 2. Interception conducted within
ROE and Law of the Sea restrictions, and IAW
Proliferation Security Initiative procedures
20
Master JMETL

• Issue Development of a Master JMETL with
  baseline conditions and standards.
• Discussion
• CJCSI 3500.01C, Joint Training Policy and
  Guidance, requires development of a Master JMETL
  as follows
• COCOM/CSA requirements
• Provide JMETLs for training by headquarters
  staffs, JTF headquarters staffs, functional
  components, and allocated and apportioned forces
  to the Commander, USJFCOM. Address joint and
  interoperability tasks for Service components,
  CSAs, and National Guard Bureau (NGB) (tactical
  level in UJTL 5.0) deemed necessary to complete
  assigned missions in Tab H of JTP. (ENCL D
  2.b.(4) )
• Provide J/AMETL to USJFCOM for their
  determination of common tasks for apportioned
  forces. Review and assess readiness and
  inspection reports, provided by USJFCOM, on
  apportioned forces to determine gaps and
  deficiencies to focus the planning of events in
  the next command or agency JTP. (ENCL D 2.b.(11))
• Annually provide USJFCOM with commended
  training requirements by 30 March for
  USJFCOM-assigned forces. The submitted
  requirements should consist of a short statement
  of a specific and actionable training requirement
  (similar in fidelity to a training objective),
  based on a warfighting gap or seam, that can be
  mitigated through training. Each short statement
  should be linked to a relevant Universal Joint
  Task. (ENCL D 2.b.(18) )
• - JFCOM will Annually collect all COCOM JMETs,
  including tasks for allocated and apportioned
  forces. Develops a master JMETL with baseline
  conditions and standards validated by CJCS.
  Directs the training of assigned forces to the
  master JMETL IAW reference i. (ENCL D 2.c.(4) )
• Impact Lack of appropriate/current joint
  training requirements to focus efforts in Service
  component training
• Status USJFCOM JTP Tab H supports this
  requirement, but does not adequately scope/focus
  the requirements effectively. COCOM/CSA J/AMETLs
  are available in DRRS, but a process for further
  collaborative analysis of consolidated
  requirements is necessary to focus JFCOM Service
  component training.
• Recommendation JS J-7 work with JFCOM and other
  COCOMs to resolve way forward.

REPLACED WITH MASTER TRAINING REQUIREMENTS