Colorado Clean Diesel Program - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 25
About This Presentation
Title:

Colorado Clean Diesel Program

Description:

Diesel Exhaust Emissions - Toxicity. Diesel exhaust is an EPA-listed mobile ... Both gasoline and diesel exhaust are comprised of many pollutants, including ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:52
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 26
Provided by: ljsi
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Colorado Clean Diesel Program


1
Colorado Clean Diesel Program
  • Lisa Silva, October 2008
  • Air Pollution Control Division
  • Colorado Department of Public Health
  • and Environment

2
Diesel Exhaust Emissions - Toxicity
  • Diesel exhaust is an EPA-listed mobile source air
    toxic and probable human carcinogen
  • Contains thousands of compounds, including 47
    listed air toxics, many of which are individually
    carcinogenic

3
Diesel Exhaust and Childrens Health
  • Developing lungs more susceptible to exposure to
    air pollutants Smaller surface area, higher
    inhalation rate markedly increased exposure.
  • Child respiratory rates are more rapid than
    adults
  • Early childhood 20-40 breaths/min.
  • Late childhood 15-25 breaths/min.
  • Adults 12-18 breaths/min.
  • Exposure is thus greater per child than adult

4
Gauderman Study (Lancet 2006, Vol 368)
  • Children (total n 3677, ages 10-18) living in
    proximity to major road or freeway (500 meters)
    in 12 southern California communities
    (socio-economically diverse) showed substantial,
    likely permanent, lung function deficits compared
    to children living gt 1500 meters from major road
    or freeway.
  • Both gasoline and diesel exhaust are comprised of
    many pollutants, including fine particulates (PM
    2.5) and numerous carcinogenic compounds.

5
Diesel Exhaust on the Bus
  • Diesel exhaust can aggravate or induce asthma and
    other pulmonary and cardiovascular disease
  • UCLA study (2004) found elevated levels of black
    carbon, particle-bound PAH and NO2 inside school
    buses
  • Crankcase emissions are an extremely strong
    source of of PM 2.5 in buses (CATF Three-City
    Study 03 -04)

6
Childrens Exposure to Diesel Exhaust
  • Exposures probably greatest inside school buses,
    but also at bus stops, other bus idling areas and
    in traffic (behind buses)
  • Many children exposed for extended periods twice
    a day
  • 20 days per month
  • 9 months/year
  • 10 to 12 years
  • 2 x 20 x 9 x 10 3600 exposures
  • 2 x 20 x 9 x 12 4320 exposures

7
Retrofit Goals
  • Reduce air toxics exposures to children, drivers,
    parents, teachers and general public from idling
    buses at neighborhood pickups, on school grounds,
    in traffic
  • Reduce fuel usage via engine preheat technology
    (idling not necessary saves fuel, thus reducing
    toxic emissions)

8
Pilot Project in Pueblo, Colorado
  • Partners Pueblo community, the (Denver) Regional
    Air Quality Council, EPA Region 8, Xcel Energy,
    Better Pueblo, CU-Boulder
  • 120 buses at 2 school districts, plus 10 Pueblo
    municipal buses used by school kids
  • University of Colorado tested buses on their
    routes before and after retrofits.

9
Cost-Effective Technologies
  • Engine pre-heaters save 1 gallon per bus per
    day of operation (cost 1,000 to 2,500 each)
  • Diesel oxidation catalysts (DOC) remove 20 of
    PM and 50 of HC (1,000 - 2,000 each)
  • Crankcase filtration (CCF) -- may reduce PM 2.5
    emissions from under hood by upwards of 95 (400
    - 700 each, plus replace filter at oil change
    50)
  • Ultra-low sulfur diesel fuel (ULSD) enables the
    new catalysts

10
Model year buses - Pueblo
  • Priority to retrofit MY 1988 2000 large route
    buses retrofitted a few newer buses
  • In Pueblo many were MY 1994 to 1999

11
Air Sampling in Buses
  • Pre- and post-retrofit
  • 3 buses run full routes 3 times each, before
    and after retrofits open/close doors each stop,
    etc. Each bus paired with a route/same pre- and
    post-retrofit
  • Fitted with
  • Small engine pre-heaters
  • Donaldson Series 6100 DOC
  • Racor 4500 crankcase filters

12
Air Sampling in Buses
  • PM 2.5 mass - PM 2.5 filter (Teflon) samplers,
    EPA Gravimetric method
  • P-PAH, EC, OC, Hopanes PM2.5 filter (quartz
    fiber)
  • Carbonyls DNPH-impregnated cartridges, EPA
    Method 11A
  • Used NIOSH 5040 method for EC and OC analysis
    solvent extraction followed by GCMS detection
    (Riddle et.al., 2007) for P-PAH and Hopanes
  • Particle number Continuous 2 Condensation
    Particle Counters Model 3007

13
Average in-cabin pollutant reductions
  • Particle numbers reduced by 30-41
  • PM 2.5 mass reduced by 56
  • Elemental carbon reduced by 85
  • Organic carbon reduced by 41
  • Formaldehyde reduced by 32
  • (A few carbonyls did not decrease Acetone
    increased likely a function of catalytic
    chemistry however, more toxins and the more
    potent toxins were reduced)

14
(No Transcript)
15
(No Transcript)
16
(No Transcript)
17
Calculated tailpipe emissions from pre- and
post-retrofitted buses (TPY)
Table 1A Annual Non-retrofitted Bus Emissions
vs. Retrofitted Emissions Reductions
18
Calculated annual tailpipe emissions reductions
(TPY) pre- and post- retrofit
19
Numerous Program Benefits
  • Direct benefit to childrens health
  • Direct benefit to community ambient air quality
  • Assists school districts that would not normally
    pursue this type of project
  • Reduced idling and petroleum usage (saving engine
    wear tear and cash)

20
Pueblo Pilot Program
  • Initial funding from Rocky Mountain Steel
    settlement funds (200K)
  • Subsequent 250K from agreement with Xcel Energy

21
Statewide Needs
  • Estimated 5,000 school buses at 150 school
    districts may be eligible for retrofits
  • CDPHE to receive 600,000 for this fiscal year
    will apply for DERA funds through 2012
  • Additional SEP funding 400,000, designated
    for Garfield and Rio Blanco counties
  • Exploring possibilities for sustained funding at
    the state level.

22
Statewide Expansion Logistics
  • Air Divisions Planning Policy and Mobile
    Sources programs partnering with EPA, CDE, school
    districts
  • Funds to be allocated according to criteria of
  • Air toxics/diesel emissions in area
  • Environmental Justice needs
  • Interest ( 15 districts have contacted us or
    EPA)
  • Special SEP designation of funds
  • Education, outreach to school districts and
    fleets

23
Colorado needs
  • Weve taken care of Pueblo SDs (120 buses)
  • Contacts with
  • Garfield and Rio Blanco Co. (150 buses) (SEP )
  • Weld Co SDs (250 buses) (DERA )
  • Huerfano/La Veta (37 buses)
  • Granada (McClave SD) (20 buses)
  • Limon SD (15 buses)
  • Southern Colorado
  • Colo. Spgs. SD 11 has 142 buses, but there are
    also, Fountain (63), Cheyenne Mountain (18),
    Manitou (16), Academy (114)..

24
More buses than funding this year
  • But we will get to you!
  • 400K SEP funds for Garfield and Rio Blanco
  • 600K funds about 140 school buses if retrofitted
    to the max (using all 3 technologies)
  • ANDwe are investigating funding sources in
    addition to SEPand DERA, which we anticipate
    receiving next year and in future.

25
Contact info.
  • Lisa Silva
  • Lisa.silva_at_state.co.us
  • (303) 692-3119
  • Garry Kaufman
  • Garry.kaufman_at_state.co.us
  • (303) 692-3269
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com