Huntingtons Clash of Civilizations: - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 23
About This Presentation
Title:

Huntingtons Clash of Civilizations:

Description:

the fundamental source of conflict in this new world will not be primarily ... 'the Eastern boundary of Western Christianity in the year 1500 [...] cuts through ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:327
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 24
Provided by: FLORINN3
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Huntingtons Clash of Civilizations:


1
Huntingtons Clash of Civilizations
  • An empirical test?

2
Huntingtons thesis
  • the fundamental source of conflict in this
    new world will not be primarily ideological or
    primarily economic. The great divisions among
    humankind and the dominating source of conflict
    will be cultural the fault lines between
    civilizations will be the battle lines of the
    future (Huntington 1993, p. 22)

3
The Fault Line between Civilizations
  • More specifically, the Eastern boundary of
    Western Christianity in the year 1500 cuts
    through Belarus and Ukraine separating the more
    Catholic Western Ukraine from Orthodox Eastern
    Ukraine, swings Westwards separating Transylvania
    from the rest of Romania (Huntington 1993,
    p. 30)

4
(No Transcript)
5
Presidential Election, Romania 1996
6
Presidential Election, Ukraine 1994
7
So what?
  • End of story, right?
  • Wrong!
  • Proof of regional divisions within these
    countries many potential causes
  • E.g., economic development (poor vs. rich regions)

8
(No Transcript)
9
(No Transcript)
10
(No Transcript)
11
Ukrainian politics economics vs. nationalism
12
(No Transcript)
13
(No Transcript)
14
(No Transcript)
15
(No Transcript)
16
(No Transcript)
17
(No Transcript)
18
(No Transcript)
19
(No Transcript)
20
Conclusion?
  • The results are inconsistent with an economic
    conflict explanation
  • But they are consistent with a cultural conflict
    explanation
  • In both 1994 and 1999, Kuchmas opponent was to
    his left (economically)
  • However, Kuchmas relative position on the
    second, Ukrainian nationalist vs. Russophile
    dimension, changes

21
Kuchma 1994 vs. 1999
  • In 1994, he was relatively more pro-Russian than
    his opponent
  • In 1999, he had a relatively more nationalist
    (pro-Ukrainian) position
  • Thus, in 1994 he was the natural choice for
    voters from the Russian-speaking Eastern regions
  • In 1999, he became the natural choice for voters
    from the Ukrainian-speaking Western regions
  • Final piece of evidence?

22
(No Transcript)
23
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com