Title: The Economics of the Financial Crisis
1The Economics of the Financial Crisis
Elmer Sterken
2Unique event.
- This financial crisis is unprecedented
- Hopefully a once in a lifetime experience
- First serious economic problem in this part of
the world since 1979-1982 - We are right in the middle! And should be
interested! - So our Faculty of Economics and Business pays
attention to the Financial Crisis - Today is the first session, next week Professor
Harry Garretsen, our expert in financial crises,
will continue!
3Overview of today
- A Brief History of the financial crisis
- Main mechanisms the economics of the current
crisis - A view on the core of banking fragility
- Real impact transmission of financial
disturbances will the real economy suffer? And
how does it work? - Predictions, speculations, and policy advice
-
- I speak for about 45 minutes after that
everyone is free to go, but I will be happy to
discuss remaining items
4History of the 2006-2008 crisis
- The current financial crisis started with the
sub-prime crisis in the US. There is no precise
starting date, but it is around the end of
2005/beginning 2006 - The main cause is the risky mortgage market
structure (sub-prime loans and adjustable rate
mortgages) and decreasing US house prices - This sub-prime crisis triggered a larger crisis
of the banking/financial sector itself - First, lets look at the problems of sub-prime
lending and the US housing market
5Sub-prime lending
- Financial institutions providing credit to
borrowers that have a heightened perceived risk
of default (history of loan delinquency or
default, recorded bankruptcy, or limited debt
experience) - Sub-prime lending includes a variety of credit
types mortgages, auto loans, credit cards - But, in 2006 about 60 of all sub-prime borrowers
had credit scores high enough to qualify for
prime loans! - The value of US sub-prime mortgages was estimated
to be 1.3 trillion US as of March 2007 (7.5
million contracts) total US mortgage market is
about 12 trillion US in size
6Adjustable Rate Mortgages
- Mortgage loans where the interest rate is
periodically adjusted based on a variety of
indices (mostly the money market rate) - 16 of sub-prime loans where ARMs with 90-days
delinquent or foreclosure procedures. By May 2008
the delinquency rate was 25 - Especially in a downturn ARMs can enforce
negative dynamics - What causes the downturn decreasing housing
prices!
7Case-Shiller Housing price US
8Regional differences
9Initial impact on US financial institutions
- Drop in the value of assets like mortgage-backed
securities (MBSs) - MBS cash flow is backed by the principle and
interest payments on a set of mortgage loans. In
most cases packages of mortgage loans were
securitized in so-called special purpose
vehicles - Lot of banks (about 8400 in total in the US) had
speculated on an increasing house price. They
used financial leverage borrowing against a low
rate and invest the money in risky equity/other
assets - No real intensive supervision by the SEC/FDIC or
FED
10Expansion of the crisis
- Investors pulled back out of the mortgage loan
market and invested in e.g. oil contracts/other
raw materials/ speculative contracts - Banks became unwilling to lend to other banks
inter-bank money markets failed to work - Other assets, like Commercial Paper became
affected - International linkages between banks spread out
- Stock market indices decreased worldwide
- Trust in debt markets lowered and most in
particular trust in the banking sector decreased
dramatically
11Over-The-Counter derivatives BIS-data
(billions US dollars)
Steep increase after 2005
12Credit default swaps
- Two agents B and C transfer the credit risk of
agent A. How does this work? - Suppose company A issues a bond with a return of
10. Agent B owns this bond, but dislikes the
default risk of company A. - Agents B and C use a CDS B pays a fixed amount
of the principle of the bond, and C carries the
burden of default risk and repays B if default
occurs - This is a market that banks used to trade risks!
13OTC credit default swaps (BIS, billions US
dollars)
Enormous increase
No data available
14Seven Economic Insights we need
- Private nature of loans and opaque balance sheets
of banks - Trade-off between stability and efficiency
- The conquest of the capitalist system market-
versus bank-based economies and remuneration - Speculative bubbles
- Cheap money the build-up of world-wide liquidity
- Knut Wicksell overinvestment theory
- Trust
15First insight private nature of loans
- Private contract single supplier and unique
buyer. Could be a solution to market failures a
private contract is a typical banking product - Elements to contracts (1) interest rate, (2)
terms of maturity, (3) other repayment
obligations, (4) collateral (think of real estate
in mortgage contracts) - Private nature of the contract value of the
asset is opaque to other market participants - This is precisely one of the banking problems!
16First insight banks balance sheets
Liabilities
Assets
Uncertain
Loans
Deposits
Opaque
Money/Capital market sensitive
Securities
Non-deposits
Risky
Stock market sensitive
Equity
17Second insight trade-off
- Important trade-off that we face in the banking
industry efficiency versus stability - We want banks to be competitive, looking for
large profits. But we also want banks to stable.
There is a clear trade-off - In the Anglo-Saxon market economy the emphasis is
on efficiency in countries with other
institutions, stability is more important
18Third insight conquest of capitalism and
market-based versus bank-based
- Since 1989 the capitalist system has no real
opponents liberalization and internationalization
are fully developed especially in finance - Market-based economies e.g. US and UK. Market
capitalization is high, private markets are
smaller, bank loans are less important,
short-term contracts dominant - Bank-based economies e.g. Japan, Germany. Market
capitalization low, large private markets,
long-term bank-relations (Hausbanks)
19Fourth insight speculative bubbles
- Suppose we have an asset a with a price p and
demandat ? (Etpt1 - pt). Et is an
expectations operator - Suppose there is a fixed supply process
at K, so independent of
time t - We assume rational expectations all market
participants know the information in the market.
The price solution has the form pt B (K/?) t - B can be anything! So multiple price processes
are consistent in case of agents with rational
expectations - If I believe that you believe that your brother
believes. The stock price can increase without
any fundamental cause
20Fifth insight cheap money
- Greenspan probably has increased liquidity too
much between 2003 and 2005 - Other economies had to follow this policy via
fixed exchange rates - Also the ECB has had a too large M3-growth rate
after 2002 - Conclusion liquidity growth has been too large
no real expenditures, but flight to assets
housing, equity, commodities
21US Federal Funds Rate Taylor rule
Taylor-rule implied rate above the actual rate
22Money growth in Europe
Excessive growth
Excessive growth
Target 4.5
23Sixth insight Wicksells overinvestment theory
Investment over the top Interest rate too low
GDP
Time
24Seventh insight trust
- Money is a product of trust
- Banks are products of trust
- Trust is asymmetric it takes a long time to get
it it can be lost at a high pace - Trust can be a substitute for financial
contracts. If I lend my friend 10 euro, I dont
need a contract (at least I hope so)
25The core of the banking problem
Trust in liquidity insurance
- Idea consumers are uncertain about the timing of
consumption and invest their funds at the bank in
a deposit as an insurance - Banks are a pool of liquidity they should
provide liquidity when needed - If households vary in risk profiles, banks do not
need to hold full cash (reserves) for deposits - But consumers face liquidity shocks
- This model is the Diamond-Dybvig-model
26How does Diamond-Dybvig work?
- We have two groups of consumers
- Group 1 is patient hands in deposits at time 0
and returns to the bank at date 2 - Group 2 is impatient they return at date 1
- As long as the bank knows how large group 1 and
group 2 are no problem - They hold cash for group 2 and invest in a
long-term, but risky, project, and payout a
higher interest to the patient group 1 (this is
the first equilibrium outcome it is a good
outcome IT OPITMIZES SOCIAL WELFARE)
27But there is a second, bad, equilibrium
- If all depositors believe that this solution
works no problem. The bank will function
normally - But, suppose that a patient consumer (group 2)
anticipates that all other patient consumers will
withdraw at date 1 (liquidity shocks). The bank
will be forced to liquidate the long-run
activities early - There will be no capital at date 2 and the
rational depositor will withdraw at date 1
28The causes of instability
- If the relative return of date 2 deposits is less
than an opportunity return, depositors will
withdraw early - There might also be mistrust in the capabilities
of the bank (or management of the bank) - There might be negative signals about the bank a
consumer sees this as a liquidity shock
29Solutions to instability 1 narrow banking hold
enough reserves
- A bank needs enough liquidity to guarantee
repayment to all depositors even in the case of a
bank run - A bank obtains enough liquidity after liquidation
of its long-run investment technology - A bank obtains enough liquidity after
securitization of its long-run technology - Anyhow, all these options are likely to be
unattractive, due to low profits
30Solution 2 suspension of convertibility
- Suspension of convertibility. If the proportion
of impatient consumers is known, the bank
announces that it will serve only the
pre-announced repayment at date 1. After this
threshold convertibility is suspended. This is
the initial ICESAVE-case
31Solution 3 Deposit insurance
- Banks create a deposit insurance company,
contribute the premium - The central bank can help in extreme cases
- Discussion on the maximum amount to be insured
- Main problem moral hazard. If banks know that
deposits are insured, they will go for riskier
investments
32Solution 4 equity
- A bank can try to attract more equity. If private
markets dont work, the government can supply
capital. This is the FORTIS case - A major drawback is that a nationalized bank
disturbs competition. Some people advocate full
nationalization to avoid a domino-effect - But, both investors and banks are dependent on
market beliefs
33Conclusion liquidity insurance
- We want banks to transform deposits into loans
this leads to optimal welfare. We also want
knowledge about the loans to be WITHIN THE BANK - This equilibrium is risky. Both the good and
bad solutions are rational - Regulation should help to keep the banking model
alive - Universal banking, or bankinsurance, or
investment banking activities, can blur the
liquidity insurance idea
34How can banking problems spread out in the real
economy? Main arguments
- If financial assets are imperfect substitutes
bonds and loans (or public and private contracts) - If internal wealth becomes low external
financing premium will increase. Especially the
interaction is nasty - If assets are used as productive assets and
collateral houses and land reuse of financial
assets as working capital - If financial leverage varies a lot between
agents some classes of firms and households are
affected more than average
35IS-LM lower income
Interest rate
Money market equilibrium
Monetary contraction
Real equilibrium
Income
36Bernanke modern versions of debt deflation models
- Internal wealth affects current spending
decisions - Lower internal wealth will increase the so-called
external financing premium (think of risk spreads
on private bonds) - The combination of a general cost increase,
higher leverage, and so higher EFP, will slow
down demand - Information problems cause this interaction
between costs and leverage
37 Bernanke IS-LM
38The empirics of the financial crisis part I
summer 2007-august 2008
- Main focus on the US estimates of the impact of
foreclosures and house price decreases on
expenditure - Two main channels (1) costs, (2) wealth effects
- The cost channel is relatively unimportant. The
user cost of capital elasticity of investment is
about -0.25, for consumption almost 0 - So it is the wealth effect
39Wealth effects so far in the US
- Mean wealth in houses in total private wealth is
about 30 median wealth about 70 median
loan-to-value is 80. So about 10-15 of total
private wealth is in housing - In March 2008 about 11 of the households had 0
equity in housing potentially about 30 could be
in this group. This implies that about 3 to 4.5
of total private US wealth could be lost - Given normal relationships between wealth and
consumption about 1 to 1.5-point consumption
growth could be lost this is the case in 2008!
40What can we expect? Part II August 2008-?
- US growth will at least slow down to about 0 in
2009 (see the World Economic Outlook 2009 of the
IMF). Note Iceland -3!. - Janet Yellen (San Francisco FED) predicts
negative growth rates in 2008.3-2009.1. The US
economy starts its recession right now. So it is
more likely that growth rates will turn negative
to about -1/-2 - Europe will follow contraction might even be
stronger due to higher rates of indebtedness and
lower flexibility of labor and goods markets
41Policies
- Return of trust (1) lower money market rates by
at least 100 basis points goal is to lower
costs, (2) through that increase liquidity
further by supporting inter-bank markets (the
current EU-initiative), (3) buy
equity/nationalize some banks (not all), - Future supervision should be improved (1) start
of a European/maybe worldwide bank supervisor,
(2) end of universal banking, (3) cope with moral
hazard issues, (4) end of market-based (fair
value!) accounting, (5) limit the use of
derivatives - Fiscal policies should support financial and
monetary policies. To avoid a recession taxes
should be lowered